There isn't a socioeconomic
litmus test they could take that would result in them being in a class result
other than elite.
And yet Justice Clarence Thomas,
when asked during an interview at the Duquesne University School of Law in April
whether he thought he would see a black president in his lifetime, made it seem
as if he's on the outside looking in. He
said he knew "it would have to be a black president who was approved by the
elites and the media, because anybody that they didn't agree with, they would
take apart."
Thomas saying "the elites" in
that context is like Honey Boo Boo complaining about "the trash on TV." People
are asked to rise when he goes into the office, and he frames himself as some
sort of powerless commoner? He was appointed by President George H.W. Bush and
confirmed by the Senate, two symbols of America's elite.
No, Thomas is part of the elite
class that, in his words, "approved" the selection of Barack Obama as the first
black president. He can make a distinction between political leanings of those
within the class, but that in no way impacts his socioeconomic status.
Thomas' remarks are an extension
of the anti-elite rhetoric that has always been a part of the fabric of American
politics but because of the proliferation of new media seems to have been amped
up to a preposterous level. For the better part of three general elections, we
have seen well-educated, well-funded, well-connected politicians bend over
backwards trying not to appear to be well-educated, well-funded or
well-connected.
Despite the charade, a study by the Center for Responsive Politics found that the
average net worth of last year's incoming freshman in Congress was more than $1
million. The average American household? Less than $67,000.
Everyone wants to be seen as a
Regular Joe, but no one wants to admit Regular Joes don't get to be
president.
Or Supreme Court justice.
That's not un-American. In fact,
if you look at our history, in some ways, that point couldn't be more
American.
President James Madison, who is
sometimes called "Father of the Constitution," came from wealth and attended
what is now known as Princeton University. Thomas Jefferson, the author of the
Declaration of Independence, attended the College of William and Mary, rode
horses for fun and played the violin. John Jay, another one of our Founding
Fathers, was from a wealthy family in New York.
What's more stereotypically
elite than a rich guy from New York?
This country's political
dialogue would benefit greatly if we acknowledged that part of history and
stopped treating the word "elite" like a hot potato. "Elites" exist in all 50
states, regardless of whether they're red or blue.
"Elites" exists in all effective
lobbying groups; that's why they're effective.
And "elites" exist in national
media, regardless of the call letters.
Fox News has comfortably been on
top of the ratings food chain for a number of years now, and yet it continues to
brand itself as an outsider, as if it's a weekly alternative newspaper and not a
significant part of mainstream media.
At one point, Sarah Palin was
making as much as $100,000 per speaking engagement and still tried to paint
herself as disenfranchised. Last year, Rick Santorum famously misrepresented
President Obama's education policy and deemed him a snob for pushing higher education -- while
failing to mention his three degrees.
But the reason why elites play
this branding shell game is because people on both sides of the aisle fall for
it.
President Obama plays golf with
Tiger Woods.
Rush Limbaugh pays Elton John $1 million to sing at his
wedding.
And if you listen to them
closely, it's the other guy who's elite.
Um, OK.
"I think the president is an
elitist, and he thinks he knows what's best for everyone," Eric Maynard, a
pastor from Flushing, Michigan, told the Washington Post after a Santorum event in February
2012. "In Michigan, we have a large blue-collar population, and what Sen.
Santorum said is right. Not everybody can go to college."
Maynard is right; everybody
can't go to college.
But what kind of Jedi mind trick
has been used on the country when that very idea is offensive?
LZ Granderson
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.