A place were I can write...

My simple blog of pictures of travel, friends, activities and the Universe we live in as we go slowly around the Sun.



February 03, 2026

Cut their dicks off.....

There are many famous names in the Epstein files

By Zachary B. Wolf, Michael Williams, Austin Culpepper

The major headlines from the latest dump of files related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein focus on President Donald Trump, former President Bill Clinton, Bill Gates, Elon Musk and the former Prince Andrew, among others. And rightly so. Those names are sprinkled throughout the documents.

Epstein’s alleged victims, meanwhile, were horrified that the Department of Justice posted unredacted nude images before taking them down, according to reporting that first appeared in The New York Times.

The overdue saga of releasing files related to the convicted child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein will continue. Millions of files have now been released; more are expected.

There are many boldface names sprinkled throughout the millions of documents released so far. Some mentions seem to contradict previous statements, such as Elon Musk’s apparent desire in an email to attend a “wild” party on Epstein’s island. Musk denies ever going to the island or attending such a party.

There are countless awkward revelations in the files, including Martha Stewart trying to get Epstein’s cell phone number and Katie Couric commending a “ROCKIN” lasagna she had at his party. The crown princess of Norway offered some strange comments about infidelity. The celebrity doctor Peter Attia made crass jokes. New York Giants co-owner Steve Tisch was apparently in pursuit of women.

These are some of the glimpses of the rarefied air in which Epstein traveled, even after the controversial 2008 plea deal in which he was convicted on charges related to the solicitation of a minor.

The inclusion of a person’s name in the file release does not indicate they participated in or were aware of Epstein’s crimes, although most of the exchanges below occurred after his initial conviction.

Bill Gates is the subject of salacious draft messages

The long relationship between Gates and Epstein is well documented. The latest document release only raises new questions. It’s not clear who wrote what look to be draft messages from 2013 saved in Epstein’s email account. But they appear to document, in stream-of-consciousness style, feelings of betrayal aimed at the Microsoft co-founder. The drafts mention marital discord between Gates and his then-wife Melinda. There is discussion of business deals, the idea of Gates having concerns about a sexually transmitted disease, and soured business ventures. The draft message expresses concern that a public divorce between Bill and Melinda Gates would hurt their foundation. Later, that divorce would be a yearslong process.

“These claims — from a proven, disgruntled liar — are absolutely absurd and completely false. The only thing these documents demonstrate is Epstein’s frustration that he did not have an ongoing relationship with Gates and the lengths he would go to entrap and defame,” a Gates representative told the New York Times.

Musk, rather than ‘REFUSE’ an invite, tried to coordinate trip to Epstein’s island

Elon Musk has previously said he rebuffed Epstein’s attempts to invite the Tesla and SpaceX billionaire to his private island. But in released documents, it is Musk who appears to be involved in trying to set up a visit.

In a 2012 email, Epstein asked Musk how many people will need a helicopter ride to the island. Musk wrote back that it would be only him and his then-wife Talulah Riley, and wondered what night would yield the “wildest party.”

The detailed emails between the two men run counter to Musk’s claim last year that he’d “REFUSED” to attend a party on Epstein’s island.

After Friday’s files release, Musk said this on X:

I have never been to any Epstein parties ever and have many times call for the prosecution of those who have committed crimes with Epstein. The acid test for justice is not the release of the files, but rather the prosecution of those who committed heinous crimes with Epstein.

Lutnick wanted coordinates for his boat captain to find Epstein’s private island

In December 2012, Trump’s now-secretary of commerce was trying to get coordinates for his boat captain in order to link up with Epstein, presumably at Epstein’s private Caribbean island, for dinner. Lutnick was on his boat with his wife, another couple, and each family’s four children. They later discussed meeting for lunch. Lutnick sent a message to an unidentified recipient with directions:

Below from Jeffrey: come sat or sunday lunch? little st jamcs on the map, behind christmans cove

Years later, in 2015, Lutnick tried to invite Epstein to a political fundraiser for Hillary Clinton.

“Secretary Lutnick had limited interactions with Mr. Epstein in the presence of his wife and has never been accused of wrongdoing,” a Commerce Department spokesperson told CNN.

Richard Branson: Told Epstein to ‘bring your harem’

The Virgin Group founder was a known Epstein acquaintance before the release of documents. In one 2013 email released by the Department of Justice, Branson told Epstein he’d be happy to meet any time the two are in the same area “as long as you bring your harem!”

Branson also counseled Epstein to get Bill Gates to vouch for him after Epstein was required to register as a sex offender.

A Virgin Group spokesperson said the phrase “harem” referred to three adult women from Epstein’s team and that Branson was repeating the term back after it was originally used in an email by Epstein. Further, the spokesperson said Branson made the comment about Gates in response to Epstein’s request for advice after Epstein mentioned his own prison sentence and said he was an adviser to Gates.

The Virgin spokesperson said Epstein framed his legal troubles as having stemmed from a consensual relationship with someone who was nearly 18. If he had known the full facts, the spokesperson said, Branson would never have become involved with Epstein.

“Any contact Richard and Joan Branson had with Epstein took place on only a few occasions more than twelve years ago, and was limited to group or business settings,” the Virgin Group spokesperson said in a statement. “Richard believes that Epstein’s actions were abhorrent and supports the right to justice for his many victims.”

Hosting the former leader of Norway. Talking to the crown princess…

Separately in that email exchange with Branson, Epstein referred to the head of the committee that awards the Nobel Peace Prize, former Norwegian Prime Minister Thorbjørn Jagland, staying at his New York house.

Jagland exchanged many emails with Epstein; so too, separately, did Norway’s Crown Princess Mette-Marit. Both have said they showed poor judgment in their relationship with Epstein

Steve Tisch asked Epstein to connect him with a woman

The New York Giants co-owner is a new face in the documents. He emailed Epstein asking about a woman he met at Epstein’s house and wondered if she was a professional or a “civilian.” In another exchange, Epstein said he would have a “present” for Tisch. Days later, Epstein described a woman he would introduce Tisch to as “tahitian speaks mostly french, exotic.”

Tisch asked if she was a “working girl.” Epstein said “Nwver.”

In a statement to CNN, Tisch said this:

“We had a brief association where we exchanged emails about adult women, and in addition, we discussed movies, philanthropy and investments. I did not take him up on any of his invitations and never went to his island. As we all know now, he was a terrible person and someone I deeply regret associating with.”

The NFL said Monday it will look into Tisch’s association with Epstein.

Larry Summers gossiped about Trump

The former Harvard president, treasury secretary and economic adviser to former Presidents Bill Clinton and Barack Obama has long been known as an acquaintance of Epstein’s. After a first tranche of Epstein files was released, Summers left the board of the firm OpenAI and stopped teaching at Harvard. In newly released emails from 2017, Summers and Epstein gossiped about President Donald Trump during his first term and insulted Trump’s intelligence.

“Your world does not understand how dumb he really is,” Epstein told Summers in one email.

Summers was also, as previously reported, named as executor in an early version of Epstein’s will.

“Mr. Summers had absolutely no knowledge that he was included in an early version of Epstein’s will and had no involvement in his financial matters or the administration of his estate,” a Summers spokesperson told CNN back in December.

Summers had previously said he is “deeply ashamed” and takes “full responsibility for my misguided decision to continue communicating with Mr. Epstein.”

Peter Attia made crass jokes

The viral anti-aging influencer had a chummy relationship with Epstein. The men exchanged hundreds of emails. Attia acknowledged that being friends with Epstein was not something he could share publicly. They discussed a 2018 Miami Herald story that identified Epstein victims.

Attia also made jokes about sex acts and the female anatomy.

Attia said in a statement that while he was not involved in any criminal activity, “I apologize and regret putting myself in a position where emails, some of them embarrassing, tasteless, and indefensible, are now public.”

Katie Couric enjoyed Epstein’s ‘ROCKIN’ lasagna

The TV host and journalist Katie Couric emailed about stopping by Epstein’s house in 2010 and thanked him for dinner and what was apparently a tasty lasagna, for an “eclectic crowd” that included her and someone she refers to as “Brooks.” Couric at the time was dating Brooks Perlin.

At one point, when Couric declined an invitation for tea, Epstein said he and someone named Andrew were disappointed they wouldn’t see her.

In 2011, Couric emailed the publicist Peggy Siegal perhaps ironically thanking her for an Epstein invite. Couric wrote:

Oy, thanks for the Jeffrey Epstein invite… it’s brought me a world of trouble!

Siegal forwarded the message to Epstein as evidence of a “witch hunt” against him and Andrew and offered her services to help.

Couric recounted the dinner, alongside other celebrities and Andrew, in her 2021 memoir. She described the atmosphere at Epstein’s home as “creepy” and conceded she “should have done a little more research” into Epstein. Reached by text on Monday, she declined further comment.

Martha Stewart wanted Epstein’s number, was invited to dinner with Woody Allen

Epstein’s assistant Lesley Groff asked Epstein if it was okay to give his cell number to Stewart’s assistant in 2013. Groff also included Stewart’s cell number in the email and said Stewart would be on St. Croix starting December 23 that year.

On December 26, a calendar entry for “martha stewart st. croix” blocks off an hour on the morning of December 26.

A few years later, Groff emailed a “Martha Stewart” contact in her address book to invite Stewart to a dinner with Epstein, Woody Allen and Allen’s wife Soon Yi. Groff included Epstein’s New York address and said the party would start at 7 or 7:30, but she was still working on the time. It’s unclear whether she accepted the invitation.

A spokesperson for Stewart did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Lots of dinners with Allen

In 2016, Epstein emailed a contact for Deepak Chopra wondering if “l=o dicaprio would want to have dinner with Woody.”

“I can certainly ask him if he is around,” Chopra replied.

It’s not clear what, if anything, came of the idea.

In 2017, there are emails inviting the TV personality Dick Cavett and his wife Martha to another dinner with Woody Allen and Soon Yi. Cavett was unable to attend.

A powerful lawyer, Brad Karp, contacted Epstein about getting his son, then a Cornell student, work on an Allen film.

“i will ask, of course,” Epstein responded.

Other exchanges with Chopra

Epstein corresponded frequently with Chopra. They exchanged news articles and set up meetings. Chopra was unable to make one 2017 dinner with Epstein, Allen and Slovakian then- Foreign Minister Miroslav Lajčák, due to being delayed in Washington, DC.

In a 2016 exchange, Chopra asks Epstein if he knows Marla Maples, Trump’s former wife and the mother of Tiffany Trump. Epstein says that when Trump found out Maples was pregnant, Epstein lost a $10,000 bet, which he said he paid to Trump with a truck full of baby food.

Lajčák was, at the time of the planned dinner with Chopra, Epstein and Allen, President of the UN General Assembly. He resigned from his position as an adviser to the current Slovakian government after the latest Epstein release, according to Reuters.

Josh Harris had fun at breakfast

Josh Harris, the billionaire co-owner of the NFL’s Washington Commanders, NBA’s Philadelphia 76ers, and NHL’s New Jersey Devils, also appears several times in the files.

The files released in September revealed that Epstein invited Harris to an “intimate” breakfast at his estate in New York in 2014, where “Bill Gates will be in attendance.”

While it was previously unclear whether Harris accepted the invitation, Friday’s new files indicate Harris did meet with Epstein. Epstein asked Harris about a week after the intended meeting date “did you hve fun at breakfast,” to which Harris responded, “Yes very much. Thank you for inviting me.”

In a statement to WJLA-TV, a spokesperson for Harris said, “Josh Harris never had an independent relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. Harris sought to prevent Epstein’s attempts to develop a corporate relationship with Apollo. As these emails indicate, Harris sought to avoid meeting with Epstein, canceling meetings and having others return his calls.”

‘Melania’ filmmaker appears in a photo on a couch

The newly released files include photos of Bret Ratner, the director of Melania Trump’s new Amazon film, lying on a sofa with Epstein as they both embrace young women. The release by the Justice Department came one day after Ratner appeared on the red carpet for his film Melania, for which Amazon paid $40 million in rights and another $35 million in marketing.

Ratner was accused of sexual impropriety by six women in 2017. He has denied any wrongdoing. Ratner told Fox News he did not have a personal relationship with Epstein and that he was engaged to one of the women pictured on the sofa at the time the photo was taken.

Steve Bannon bragged about his influence over Trump

New text messages reveal the depth of the relationship between Epstein and Steve Bannon, the populist strategist and one of Trump’s closest advisers in his first term.

Epstein and Bannon frequently messaged about Trump, including poking fun at the president and Bannon’s influence over him

In reference to an Axios post about the president’s schedule, Bannon wrote: “Brother is out of gas.” Bannon also referred to Trump sarcastically as a “‘Stable Genius’ bringing himself down.”

In reference to Bannon’s efforts to start building a private border wall outside El Paso, Texas, Bannon wrote to Epstein “I can’t seem like I’m running trump’s nose in his own incompetence.” This border wall construction led to Bannon facing federal charges for defrauding donors of more than a million dollars, for which Trump pardoned him in the final hours of his first administration

In another message, Bannon wrote “Dude: I just got him to pull the trigger on $400 billion in tariffs on china.”

Among the newly released files is nearly two hours of video of an interview between Bannon and Epstein, including discussion of Epstein’s classification as a sex offender. Bannon asks Epstein what class of predator he is, to which Epstein responds, “Tier one,” or “the lowest.”

Bannon did not immediately respond to CNN’s request for comment.

Sergey Brin tried to make time for a visit

Sergey Brin, the billionaire co-founder of Google, appears multiple times in the files. Brin exchanged multiple messages with Ghislaine Maxwell, including offering to bring along Google’s then-CEO, Eric Schmidt, to a dinner at Epstein’s residence in New York. That exchange occurred in 2003, long before Epstein’s conviction as a sex offender. Maxwell told Brin, “Dinners at Jeffrey’s are always happily casual and relaxed.”

Epstein accuser Sarah Ransome had previously claimed in court documents in 2024 that she met Brin and his then-fiancée, Anne Wojcicki, on Epstein’s private island.

Brin did not immediately respond to a request for comment sent to Google.

A remake movie about a cheep whore fucking a stupid fat orange fucker, to get a green card for family....

The Melania Movie Is an American Obscenity

The vapid, corruption-soaked film, which celebrates the myth of the “good immigrant,” is more revelatory than it seems.

Inae Oh

Even in the Trumpian corner of New Jersey, where I chose to witness Melania, the $75 million Amazon-produced film about the first lady, I predicted that I would be watching alone. This is, after all, a historically bad time for theatrical releases, and initial forecasts for Melania‘s opening weekend had been dismal. Yet there they were, at least a dozen attendees at a 10 a.m. screening on a frigid Saturday morning. I appeared to be the only one who required breakfast wine for what was about to unfold.

What flashed across the screen over the next hour and 48 minutes can best be described as an interminable slog of airbrushed nothingness. After all, only so much entertainment can be wrung out of footage of a woman in snakeskin Louboutins traveling from Mar-a-Lago to New York and back again in the lead-up to the inauguration. And yet, for nearly two hours, the film turns on the premise that its subject is some kind of fashion genius, resulting in some of the most stultifying scenes I have ever seen committed to film. What other way is there to describe extended, drawn-out shows of Melania getting fitted for her inauguration wardrobe, only to be followed by scenes of her walking across gilded ballrooms in that very wardrobe? A few other pre-inauguration scenes follow, including a meeting between Melania and Brigitte Macron over Zoom. But they all appear brief, choreographed, and wooden. Throughout, Melania claims to have a leading role in the preparations for her husband’s inauguration, but there is scant evidence of actual decision-making by the first lady.

But Melania is more revelatory in its world-historical vapidness than it might seem. Consider that Melania appears to go out of her way to foreground her journey from Slovenian immigrant to American first lady, a story she says serves as “a reminder of why I respect this nation so deeply.” Similarly, the film gives rare space to the immigrants in Melania’s inner circle, including her chief interior designer, Tham Kannalikham, who opens up about her journey from Laos to now decorating the White House, as well as Melania’s father, who is seen beaming with pride in his American daughter. Absent in Viktor Knavs’ film debut is the context of the “chain migration” pathway through which he and his late wife became US citizens, the very same policy targeted by their son-in-law.

“Everyone should do what they can to protect our individual rights,” Melania says at one point. “Never take them for granted, because in the end, no matter where we come from, we are bound by the same humanity.”

What an obscenity to hear this woman employ the language of shared humanity, as the Trump administration kills Americans and systematically kidnaps immigrants and their children. But as galling as they were, the remarks were instructive of both how Melania views her American story and the same anti-immigrant sentiments with which some, in order to prove that they belong here, yank the ladder up from newcomers seeking the same opportunities. Such immigrants, like Melania, cast themselves as the “good immigrant” who came here the “right way.” But the first lady appears to do this despite reports, including our own, that she may have initially been working here without a visa. In other words, she may have violated immigration law. Meanwhile, the immigrants Melania now surrounds herself with, like Tham, are props for that very narrative—with zero mention of her husband’s endless cruelty. But why would there be in a piece of abject propaganda—backed by one of the richest men in the world as he prepares to gut the Washington Post—that many crew members asked not to be credited on?

As a purely cinematic experience, Melania, a ghastly parade of fun-house mirror herstory, will certainly be relegated to the footnotes of her family’s deeper atrocities. I would have asked what my fellow attendees thought, but not even a plastic cup of wine could help wash down the film in its entirety. I left 15 minutes before the credits rolled in, incomplete as they were.

Bulldozing its past...........

Trump’s War on History

As America’s 250th anniversary approaches, the president wants to control the country’s future by bulldozing its past.

Dan Friedman and Amanda Moore

On a June afternoon in Washington, swarms of mosquitoes were feasting on thousands of Americans as they watched a military parade roll past the National Mall. It was the US Army’s 250th birthday, which also happened to be President Donald Trump’s 79th, and the MAGA-heavy crowd watched the procession trudge down Constitution Avenue, largely silent but for the squeaking of armored personnel carriers. Groups of soldiers marched by at seemingly random intervals, as if to foreshadow the actual military occupation Trump would unleash on the city two months later.

It was overcast and muggy, and spectators had lined up for hours to get inside the security perimeter. Uniformed troops were handing out free bottles of Phorm Energy—a beverage launched nationally the month before by Anheuser-Busch and Dana White, a vocal Trump supporter who runs the Ultimate Fighting Championship. Phorm, which bills itself as the “ultimate energy drink,” is an official sponsor of America250, a government-funded nonprofit organizing a series of celebrations for the country’s 250th birthday, culminating on July 4 this year. When asked, a soldier explained he had been ordered to hand out the samples—despite Defense Department rules that bar the military from endorsing “a particular company, product, service, or website.” The Pentagon didn’t answer questions about this apparent violation.

So it goes with the Trump administration’s approach to the country’s semiquincentennial. Congress is expected to allocate some $150 million for the festivities, but that’s not enough to fulfill Trump’s vision. So corporations with links to the president or his inner circle—UFC, Palantir, Oracle, Amazon, Coinbase—have signed on as sponsors, pouring in millions of dollars alongside companies like Chrysler, Coca-­Cola, and General Mills.

The promise of all that cash and spectacle helped America250 lure a flock of political operatives with Trump ties. Chris LaCivita, who helped steer Trump’s 2024 campaign, joined as a strategic adviser. Campaign Nucleus, founded in 2021 by former Trump campaign honcho Brad Parscale, helped organize America250 events. So did Event ­Strategies, which staged Trump campaign gatherings in 2020 and 2024, as well as the January 6, 2021, rally near the White House that preceded the attack on the US Capitol. America250 said in January that it’s no longer working with these contractors but hasn’t disclosed how much they were paid.

America250 and the White House insist they are planning nonpartisan festivities for all Americans, rather than creating a slush fund to throw the president militarized birthday parties and advance hard-right ideology. But in reality, American history is being subordinated to Trump’s cult of personality. The president’s face is suddenly ­everywhere—next to George Washington on America250-themed National Parks passes; alongside Abraham Lincoln and Teddy Roosevelt on giant banners hanging from federal buildings; on a $1 coin under consideration by the US Treasury.

Faced with sporadic pushback from a congressional commission overseeing America250 and from career officials at various agencies, Trump is now seeking to evade even these modest constraints. In December, he launched a new organization, Freedom 250, that could implement his most outlandish anniversary events without the inconvenience of legislative oversight or mandatory bipartisanship. For the president’s 80th birthday this year, Freedom 250 will help organize a UFC fight on the White House lawn.

The semiquincentennial is just one part of the commander in chief’s broader campaign to harness the mechanisms of the federal government to enforce his preferred version of the nation’s history and culture—a Trumpified presentation of America’s past and present. On the fifth anniversary of the January 6 insurrection, the administration even rolled out a taxpayer-funded webpage seeking to recast the day’s events as a patriotic effort to protest “the fraudulent election.” Three weeks later, Trump’s FBI seized hundreds of thousands of 2020 ballots and other election material from Georgia’s largest county. “TRUMP WON BIG,” the president declared the next morning. “Crooked Election!”

Since his inauguration last year, Trump has taken personal control of the Kennedy Center—reshaping its artistic programming, installing a MAGA-dominated board that claims to have renamed it in his honor, and then closing it for renovations. He’s railed against “OUT OF CONTROL” museums that he insists are too focused on “how bad Slavery was.” He has successfully pressured the Smithsonian Institution to review displays to ensure “unbiased content” and has extracted significant ­concessions over what top universities teach students. At his direction, the National Park Service has altered or removed scores of exhibits at parks and historic sites on topics including slavery, Native Americans, climate change, and even fossils. Trump acolytes are also leveraging federal dollars to stop local librarians and educators from sharing content they dislike.

Under the pretense of stamping out “woke” ideas and promoting patriotism, the White House is attempting to ­mandate uncritical acceptance of its own take on the American story, one that celebrates the martial feats of mostly white men and an imagined religious and ideological conformity that minimizes the fights, tribulations, and dissenters who have defined the country. It’s an effort that flies in the face of American ideals—and reality.

“In a pluralist democracy, there are invariably conflicts of values,” says Alexander Karn, a Colgate University historian who has written about the 250th anniversary. “To deny that messiness by seeking to erase the perspectives that don’t flatter a dominant group or help create a triumphal history is anti-egalitarian and, therefore, anti-democratic.”

Instead, Karn argues, “the road to a ‘more perfect Union,’ which is enshrined in the Constitution, runs through the past, and it depends on our willingness to confront our history in an honest and ­thoroughgoing way.”

Which is not the road we’re on.

Inside the Eisenhower Executive Office Building—a historic gray structure that Trump has, to the dismay of preservationists, promised to paint white—John Adams has a message. “Facts do not care about our feelings,” an AI-generated version of America’s second president intones, paraphrasing not John Locke or Thomas Paine, but conservative influencer Ben Shapiro.

The exhibit, dubbed the Founders Museum, features computer-generated portraits of all 56 signers of the Declaration of Independence. Though some of the material is also available online, you need access to the White House complex to see it in pesrson. Nevertheless, according to the Daily Signal, a right-wing outlet invited to cover the opening, Education Secretary Linda McMahon described it as “a place where every American can connect with the courage and conviction that built our nation.” The White House did not respond to Mother Jones’ request to visit the museum.

The project is a collaboration between a Trump administration committee called Task Force 250 and PragerU, a conservative nonprofit that makes right-leaning educational materials. The task force has also partnered with Hillsdale College—a conservative Christian school known for incubating plans to push US education rightward—to create another series of videos, dubbed “The Story of America.” In the first installment, Hillsdale President Larry Arnn alludes to Trump’s Make America Great Again slogan. Trump’s use of the word “again,” Arnn asserts, shows the president’s interest in the country’s history. This, Arnn says, “places him somewhere near the politics of Abraham Lincoln.”

Task Force 250, created by Trump shortly after taking office in January 2025, has been a nerve center for the president’s whole-of-government effort to assert dominance over the country’s anniversary proceedings. It’s led by White House official Vince Haley, a Trump loyalist who in late 2020 played a key role in efforts to overturn the election using fake electors.

But in the byzantine politics of semiquincentennial commemoration, Task Force 250 is far from alone. There’s Freedom 250, Trump’s newly unveiled public-private fundraising vehicle that has recently taken the lead in implementing his highest-profile and most extravagant projects. And there’s America250, a theoretically nonpartisan organization established by a 2016 statute. America250 is overseen by the US Semiquincentennial Commission, a bipartisan group whose members are appointed by Congress and that furnishes America250 with staff, offices, and congressionally appropriated funds. The president has the power to choose the commission’s chairperson, who in turn can hire and fire staff—meaning that in practice, Trump has substantial authority over how America250 operates.

This authority has not gone ­unnoticed. MAGA acolytes like Sen. Eric Schmitt (R-Mo.) have called on Trump to remove commission Chair Rosie Rios, a Democrat who was appointed by President Joe Biden in 2022. So far, Rios has survived in the role, partly by publicly courting Trump. Last year, she­ installed Ariel Abergel, a 25-year-old former Fox News producer and Melania Trump aide, as America250’s executive director. Rios has said she “welcomes” Trump’s interest in the celebration and has credited him with enabling the commission to accomplish more than it did under Biden. It might also help that Rios serves on the board of Ripple, a crypto company that gave $4.9 million to Trump’s inaugural committee. That ­donation, Rios has said, was unrelated to her work for America250.

Last year, America250 brought on MAGA-­aligned staffers like Trump campaign fundraiser Meredith O’Rourke and Monica Crowley, a former Fox News ­pundit who serves as the chief of protocol in Marco Rubio’s State Department. The organization also dismissed its liaison in charge of coordinating with federally recognized tribes. Numerous advisory councils—each dedicated to making the anniversary events resonate with different groups of Americans—were removed from America250’s website.

The YWCA, previously listed as a partner, disappeared from the group’s website in June. So did Advancing American Freedom, a conservative advocacy center founded by Mike Pence, the erstwhile VP who, according to the White House’s new January 6 page, perpetrated a “betrayal of the president” when he declined to help steal the 2020 election. A representative told us Advancing American Freedom had not realized it had been removed.

Other partners have chosen to sever ties. America250’s programming had become “heavy on spectacle and with no clear lasting public benefit,” the American Association for State and Local History said in a July letter explaining why it was ending its relationship with the organization. As John Dichtl, the association’s president, told us, “America250 became sharply partisan, and increasingly less helpful to the many state 250 planning commissions.”

Anniversary events have indeed been heavy on jingoistic, MAGA-style celebration of far-right values. In September, speaking at the Museum of the Bible, a ­private institution in Washington, Trump announced a new 250th-themed initiative, America Prays, which urges citizens to gather each week to “pray for America.” Participants include the conservative powerhouse Focus on the Family, the Palantir-aligned prayer app Pray.com, and Pizzagate peddler Jack Posobiec. Another participant: Let Us Worship, an ­organization run by Christian nationalist Sean Feucht.

Feucht also appeared at an event on the National Mall that America250 co-hosted with the Department of Housing and Urban Development. “We are gonna be lifting our hands in praise, dancing here on this dance floor, and just glorifying the name of Jesus over our nation’s capital,” said Feucht, who noted he’d previously participated in similar private events. “But here’s the thing: This year, we are doing it in partnership with the US government.”

Even produce stands can turn into agitprop. The Great American Farmers Market in downtown DC got a partisan makeover last summer after partnering with America250. The market—held since 1995 by the Agriculture Department to showcase local bakers, farmers, and small businesses—instead offered “MAHA Monday” and a “star-studded lineup” of prominent Trumpers like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. During one such event, a country music singer told a sparse audience: “Thank God Donald J. Trump is the president of the United States…Can you even imagine if you had to listen to Kamala Harris every single day on the news? My God. But we don’t have to, because our man won, and they lost.” Three days later, children who showed up for Smokey Bear’s birthday were treated to remarks from a quartet of Cabinet officials and music by country duo LoCash, a Trumpworld favorite.

A fight for control over America250 burst into public view in September when Abergel used an official Instagram account to post about the murder of Charlie Kirk. “America is in mourning,” he wrote. “God bless Charlie Kirk.” Members of the Semiquincentennial Commission had already spent months discussing how to oust Abergel, a person familiar with those discussions told us, faulting him for attempting to remove some of their members “by misrepresenting himself as acting on behalf of congressional leadership.” They made their move after his Kirk post, asserting that he had violated past orders not to commandeer the group’s ­social media. (Abergel, who has previously disputed the commission’s allegations, didn’t respond to a request for comment.)

Abergel didn’t go quietly. He told Fox News that he was fired because the organization’s leaders “hate President Trump more than they love America.”

Asked about concerns over America250’s right-wing bent, a spokesperson said the bipartisan Semiquincentennial Commission would run some programs, while the White House task force and the president’s new Freedom 250 entity would take the lead on others. “America250’s vision is to create the largest, most inspiring, and unifying commemoration and celebration in the nation’s history, bringing Americans together to reflect on our shared heritage,” the commission said in a statement. The commission added that Freedom 250—rather than America250—would now be “responsible for leading the President’s major national initiatives and signature events.”

By January, Freedom 250—which Trump’s team controls—seemed to have taken charge of the most visible anniversary celebrations, including a series of events promoted by the Interior Department. In memos sent out that month, the National Park Service told its employees to replace “America250” references and logos displayed online and in public with Freedom 250 insignias. “Freedom 250 is the Administration’s primary branding for all federal agencies participating in 250th activities,” states one of the documents. Another memo encourages employees to add Freedom 250 logos to their email signatures—displacing the America250 logos that once resided there.

“American250 is out,” said one NPS official. “Now it’s all Freedom250.”

Freedom 250 kicked off 2026 by turning the Washington Monument into “the world’s tallest birthday candle,” with projections depicting the nation’s “discovery, expansion, independence, and future.” Accompanying audio lauded figures like Christopher Columbus and Henry Ford and highlighted space exploration and AI. Left unmentioned: immigration, slavery, Native Americans, civil rights, and any notable woman at all.

There will be July 4 festivities in all 50 states, including the first-ever non–New Year’s ball drop in Times Square. The president has touted a “Great American State Fair” across the country and on the Mall, where anniversary events now have priority over all other potential gatherings—­including any protests.

The highest-profile initiatives will be unmistakably Trumpian. Those include the massive triumphal arch the president hopes to build, as well as the White House UFC extravaganza that will, according to Trump, feature the “greatest champion fighters in the world.” Trump claimed last week that his administration is planning to construct a stadium that will hold 100,000 attendees for the fight. And he signed an order that calls for an IndyCar race, dubbed the “Freedom 250 Grand Prix,” through the streets of Washington. “It’s going to be very, very important,” Trump said.

There’s also the “Patriot Games,” a nationally televised Freedom 250 competition for high school athletes—one girl and one boy from each state—that the White House says will be overseen by RFK Jr. The Hunger Games echoes are hard to miss, though the competitors presumably won’t be battling to the death, and, in any case, Trump has assured Americans that “there will be no men playing in women’s sports.” And of course, he’s promised even more religion: “We will host a major prayer event on the National Mall to rededicate our country as one nation under God. We’re not changing that—there are a lot of people who would like to see it; it will never happen.”

Whatever the 250th celebrations have lost in pluralism, they seem to have replaced with newfound crypto connections. Last year, America250 co-hosted the “Code + Country” day of a major bitcoin conference in Las Vegas, where Rios thanked the audience for “what you have done to put this president in office”—though she noted the anniversary celebrations were legally “mandated to be bipartisan.” Joining her on the panel was LaCivita, who also serves on Coinbase’s global advisory council.

That night, women in cow onesies danced to Bone Thugs-N-Harmony at an America250 party sponsored in part by Tron, a company owned by crypto mogul Justin Sun. In 2023, Sun was accused of fraud in a federal complaint filed by the US Securities and Exchange Commission. ­Beginning in late 2024, however, Sun became a major financier of the Trump ­family’s own crypto ventures. After Trump took office, the SEC agreed to pause its case while negotiating a final resolution.

Americans have always fought over the meaning of our history. In 1835, Democrats loyal to the late Thomas Jefferson objected to the placement of a statue of his rival ­Alexander Hamilton outside the New York Stock Exchange. During the 20th century, segregationists erected hundreds of monuments to Confederate soldiers—often in opposition to the civil rights movement. In 1995, the director of the Smithsonian’s National Air and Space Museum was forced to resign amid an outcry over a planned exhibition that some lawmakers and veterans’ groups complained was too critical of the decision to drop atomic bombs on Japan.

Since his first term, Trump has reveled in such battles—but not because he cares about the details of the country’s past. This is a guy whose record includes installing a bogus historical marker commemorating a made-up Civil War battle at his Virginia golf course. The presentation of American history matters to Trump because it offers a medium through which he can wage the all-encompassing cultural, political, and legal battles animating his administration.

For Trump, “the enemies that matter are in the present: us, history professors, journalists, and any others who represent ‘wokeness,’” says Johann Neem, a historian at Western Washington University. In Neem’s view, Trump is weaponizing the backlash against genuine excesses in progressive scholarship as part of a “larger project to shut down independent sources of knowledge and authority.” Even as the administration purports to celebrate the American Revolution, it is waging “a cultural counterrevolution that has authorized them to feel comfortable violating the political principles of that revolution.”

Trump is especially into statues. His infamous statement that some attendees at the 2017 Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, were “very fine people” occurred as he defended their opposition to the removal of a monument to Confederate General Robert E. Lee.

But Trump’s approach to the nation’s birthday appears to have been particularly influenced by the culture wars of 2020. When millions took to the streets that year to protest the murder of George Floyd, the president’s current crusade against public acknowledgments of racism began taking shape. He became fixated on a series of incidents in which activists removed or vandalized statues of Confederates, slaveholders, and various other historical figures ranging from Spanish missionaries to Abraham Lincoln. He issued an executive order directing federal law enforcement to prosecute to the “fullest extent” anyone defacing monuments or government property—an order that served as purported justification when he dispatched militarized federal agents to Portland, Oregon, and other cities that year.

“Angry mobs are trying to tear down statues of our founders, deface our most sacred memorials, and unleash a wave of violent crime in our cities,” he said in a July 4, 2020, speech at Mount Rushmore—a monument on which Trump wants to add his own visage. At the same event, he announced plans to construct a vast ­“National Garden of American Heroes,” featuring “statues of the greatest Americans to ever live.”

Two months later, speaking at the ­National Archives Museum, Trump framed this Manichaean struggle as one rooted in education and scholarship. “The left-wing rioting and mayhem are the direct result of decades of left-wing indoctrination in our schools,” he declared. “The left has warped, distorted, and defiled the American story with deceptions, falsehoods, and lies.” He took particular aim at the “totally discredited 1619 Project,” the landmark New York Times package that, a year earlier, had sought to “reframe the country’s history” around the central role of slavery in the development of the nation.

The 1619 Project, whatever one thinks of it, was not a government work. But the response Trump proposed that day certainly was: a 1776 Commission that would “encourage our educators to teach our children about the miracle of American history and make plans to honor the 250th anniversary of our founding.”

Trump stacked his new commission with conservative luminaries, led by Hillsdale College’s Arnn. In a report issued days after the January 6 attack, the group laid a framework for the president’s reactionary brand of history. The authors attacked the “untrue” and “devastating” charge that slave-owning founders “were hypocrites who didn’t believe in their stated principles” and the “illusion that slavery was somehow a uniquely American evil.”

Their report painted vast swaths of ­historical inquiry and education as fundamentally anti-American and dangerous. Such “deliberately destructive scholarship,” they warned, “is the intellectual force behind so much of the violence in our cities, suppression of free speech in our universities, and defamation of our treasured national statues and symbols.”

Biden disbanded the 1776 Commission. Trump immediately reestablished it at the start of his second term and tasked it with creating a “patriotic” lecture series about the country’s founding, to be broadcast nationally throughout 2026—though where those lectures will appear remains unspecified. The panel is also advising the White House’s Task Force 250.

The 1776 Commission’s version of history is reflected in Trump’s statue garden, which remains a key part of his anniversary vision. The National Endowment for the Humanities, which was gutted by DOGE last April but remains nominally in charge of the project, claimed until recently that the garden was “set to open in July 2026.” The White House, however, has quietly conceded that date is unlikely, stating the goal is to complete the project before Trump leaves office.

Regardless, the planned collection of 250 statues of past Americans in a yet-to-be-determined location is backed by $40 million in funding that Congress approved last year. Ronald Reagan, Humphrey ­Bogart, Medgar Evers, Milton Friedman, Jackie Robinson, and Whitney Houston are among the group Trump has supposedly personally approved.

No one has said how the garden will seek to reconcile the importance of figures like Evers, the murdered civil rights leader, with Trump’s hostility to public discussion of such matters.

The facade of a neoclassical building with large columns, featuring two tall banners hanging between them: one of Donald Trump on the left and one of Abraham Lincoln on the right. In the foreground, a person in athletic gear is jogging along the street past a chain-link fence and green shrubbery.
Banners hanging from the Department of Agriculture in Washington, DCChip Somodevilla/Getty
“This country cannot be WOKE, because WOKE IS BROKE,” Trump posted on Truth Social last summer, opening yet another front in his all-encompassing campaign to reshape the American narrative. “We have the ‘HOTTEST’ Country in the World, and we want people to talk about it, including in our Museums.”

The president said he was dispatching “my attorneys” to the Smithsonian Institution—the country’s flagship network of museums devoted to history, art, and science, as well as the National Zoo—to clamp down on overly negative depictions of the United States. Among other issues, he said, museums focus too much on the evils of slavery. Instead, Trump explained, they should emphasize “Success,” “Brightness,” and the “Future.”

The 21 Smithsonian facilities, which are federally funded and free to the public, draw more than 15 million visitors per year—a massive cultural footprint that Trump was eager to control. In March 2025, he issued an executive order aimed at purging federal museums of “improper ideology” ahead of the 250th anniversary. In August, Trump lawyer Lindsey ­Halligan and other White House officials wrote to the Smithsonian, emphasizing the need to “celebrate American exceptionalism, ­remove divisive or partisan narratives, and restore confidence in our shared cultural institutions.”

The letter came after the Smithsonian’s board of regents had already agreed to review exhibits to “make any needed changes to ensure unbiased content,” including “personnel changes.” Smithsonian Secretary Lonnie Bunch insisted the institution maintains independent authority over “our programming and content,” but he also noted that the ongoing review was designed “to ensure our programming is nonpartisan.”

The Smithsonian’s National Museum of American History removed references to Trump’s two impeachments from a display, while leaving content related to other impeached presidents. The institution claimed it did so because the material “did not meet the museum’s standards in appearance, location, timeline and overall presentation” and “blocked the view of the objects inside its case.” Following criticism, it reinstalled revised language about Trump. But months later, a different Smithsonian museum, the National Portrait Gallery, removed its own description of Trump’s impeachments.

Citing the same executive order that Trump used to target the Smithsonian, the Interior Department has told the National Park Service not to disseminate information that “inappropriately disparages Americans” or says anything about nature beyond celebrating the “beauty, abundance and grandeur of the American landscape.” To comply, Park Service officials have altered or removed signs and exhibits at sites around the country. The ongoing changes, which likely total in the hundreds, include exhibits about slavery yanked from Independence Hall in Philadelphia, climate change signs disappeared from Fort Sumter in South Carolina, and placards discussing geology and fossil formation removed from Big Bend National Park in Texas.

Trump has also seized control of other institutions tasked with shaping the nation’s cultural and historical memory, ousting the leaders of the National Archives and the Library of Congress. Keith Sonderling, the new head of the Institute of Museum and Library Services, said he intended to “revitalize” that agency—which supports local institutions—“and restore focus on patriotism, ensuring we preserve our country’s core values, promote American exceptionalism and cultivate love of country in future generations.” Sonderling has pressured librarians to implement the president’s various anti-DEI orders, while also quizzing them about how they were planning to celebrate the 250th anniversary.

Then there’s the Kennedy Center, DC’s iconic performing arts institution that was established by Congress to serve as a “living memorial” to the assassinated 35th president. Last February, Trump purged board members appointed by Biden and named his volatile adviser Ric Grenell president of the center—and himself board chair. “We’re going to bring it to a higher level than it ever hit,” he said in August. “We’re going to use the Kennedy Center as a big focus of…the 250th anniversary celebration.”

By December, over the objections of Kennedy family members, Trump’s loyalists had added his name to the center, and the president had immersed himself in ostentatious renovations. “Potential Marble armrests for the seating at The Trump Kennedy Center,” he wrote on Truth Social. “Unlike anything ever done or seen before!”

Trump also put his stamp on the center’s programming. “NO MORE DRAG SHOWS, OR OTHER ANTI-AMERICAN PROPAGANDA,” he posted in February 2025. “ONLY THE BEST.” During his first term, Trump boycotted the Kennedy Center Honors after recipients of the prestigious awards criticized him. This time around, he personally announced the honorees, whom, he said, he was “98 percent” involved in picking. Those included country singer George Strait, disco singer Gloria Gaynor, and actor ­Sylvester Stallone, who in 2024 called Trump “the second George Washington.” In December, Trump hosted the ceremony.

Trump’s takeover has led a number of artists to cancel their planned performances. When drummer Chuck Redd pulled out of a Christmas Eve concert shortly after the renaming, Grenell threatened legal action against the jazz musician. Meanwhile, ticket sales at the institution have plunged. Amid the growing turmoil, Trump abruptly announced that he would shutter the center for two years—beginning on July 4—for “Construction, Revitalization, and Complete Rebuilding.”

Not even the White House itself is exempt from corporate-funded transformation. America250 sponsors Coinbase and Palantir are among the companies financing the demolition of the East Wing and the construction of Trump’s new ballroom. Beyond simply plastering the Oval Office in tacky gold, Trump has boasted about adding marble walls to a White House bathroom and paving over the Rose Garden lawn to build a Mar-a-Lago-style club. He’s installed a “Presidential Walk of Fame” with plaques deriding his recent predecessors and praising Andrew Jackson, who was “treated unfairly by the Press, but not as viciously and unfairly as President Abraham Lincoln and President Donald J. Trump.”

Trump’s own White House plaque leans even further into his grievances—and idiosyncratic capitalization—asserting that he overcame the “unprecedented Weaponization of Law Enforcement against him” to win a second term. To that end, in September, he rewarded his Smithsonian attack dog with a critical new assignment. In a Truth Social post that may have been intended as a private message to ­Attorney General Pam Bondi, he indicated that ­Halligan should be given control of the US attorney’s office for the Eastern District of Virginia and that she should attempt to indict two of the president’s longtime legal tormentors: former FBI ­Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James.

For the administration, the incident ­offered yet another lesson in the value of historical narrative. Taking to X, White House aide Mark Paoletta—a close friend of Justice Clarence Thomas—insisted that Trump’s directive to prosecute his enemies was “perfectly appropriate” and followed “in the tradition of our greatest Presidents/Founders, such as George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, Theodore Roosevelt, and Ronald Reagan.” A federal judge soon ruled that Halligan’s appointment and the indictments were invalid.

“It’s a beautiful sight to be with you in a place called Fort Bragg,” Trump said in June 2025, emphasizing the massive Army base’s name as soldiers holding American flags cheered. He continued: “Can you ­believe they changed that name in the last administration for a little bit?” Some of the troops booed loudly.

Fort Bragg, originally named for Confederate General Braxton Bragg, had been redubbed Fort Liberty during the Biden administration. After retaking office, Trump restored its old name, taking advantage of a loophole in a 2020 law barring military bases from honoring Confederate leaders. Officially, the fort’s name now refers to Private First Class Roland L. Bragg, a World War II Silver Star recipient, whom Trump never mentioned during his speech that day.

“We are also going to be restoring the names to Fort Pickett, Fort Hood, Fort Gordon, Fort Rucker, Fort Polk, Fort A.P. Hill, and Fort Robert E. Lee,” Trump added to applause.

The Fort Bragg speech—an official America250 event that had been billed as patriotic and bipartisan—took place days after Trump had ordered the military to crack down on anti-ICE demonstrations in Los Angeles. From the beginning, it looked a lot like a political rally. It was promoted by Never Surrender Inc., formerly the principal campaign committee for Trump’s 2024 run. “You’ve been invited to Fort Bragg by President Trump!” blared the subject line of an email that exhorted readers to “Make America Great Again!” MAGA merchandise was for sale at the event, and the troops in the audience had been handpicked “based on political leanings and physical appearance,” the news outlet Military.com later reported.

The screening effort apparently worked. Uniformed soldiers cheered Trump administration policies and booed when the president attacked “incompetent” Democrats like California Gov. Gavin Newsom and LA Mayor Karen Bass. “Los Angeles has gone from being one of the cleanest, safest, and most beautiful cities on Earth to being a trash heap with entire neighborhoods under the control of transnational gangs and criminal networks,” Trump insisted. “We will liberate Los Angeles and make it free, clean, and safe again.”

But Trump’s vision for “freeing” America’s second-largest city went beyond using the military to control occasionally violent protests—he also declared his intention to curtail basic constitutional liberties. The demonstrators, he complained, “don’t carry the American flag; they only burn it.” Flag burners “should go to jail for one year,” he said. “And we’ll see if we can get that done.”

More cheers.

Rallies that celebrate a simplified, sanctified historical narrative have long been a favorite tool of autocrats. “Dictators brook no opposition, and this extends to the past,” says Karn, the Colgate historian. “When a dictator is intent on creating or sustaining a hierarchical social order, he will see to it that history abides.”

The military parade through Washington four days later proved to be a clumsy prelude for Trump’s very real efforts to deploy troops, along with heavily armed federal agents, on the streets of even more cities—often against the wishes of local officials. To justify sending the National Guard to Portland, the president made false claims about widespread violence, perhaps because Fox News repeatedly re-aired violent footage from 2020 as though it were part of the 2025 anti-ICE protests.

Since August, the Labor Department’s DC headquarters has displayed an America250-branded banner with a Mao-­style image of Trump above the words “American Workers First.” The spectacle drew attention when National Guard members deployed by Trump were photographed beneath it—an image that captures the ­authoritarian ethos of his second term.

The troops, supposedly dispatched to Washington to fight crime, are now staying on in connection with the semiquincentennial. In an October court filing, the DC attorney general revealed that Guard leaders were planning for a prolonged deployment. “We know that America250 occurs this summer, and that will be a factor in determining the future of the mission,” a Guard commanding general wrote in an email included in the filing. In January, Trump officially extended the DC operation through the end of 2026, even as he bowed to court rulings blocking him from unleashing the armed forces on other parts of the country.

That Trump’s enthusiasm for the domestic use of troops is merging with America’s 250th festivities is almost too easy a metaphor. To celebrate the anniversary of a war sparked in part by the quartering of soldiers in US cities, the administration is lengthening a military occupation vehemently opposed by the local population.

A quarter-millennium later, amid “No Kings” protests and an unprecedented executive power grab, the arguments against tyranny that inspired American independence are alive and pressing. It seems worth asking whether America250 will celebrate the ideals of the country’s founders—or those of the monarch they rebelled against.

Pathetic Monsters

The Power of Mocking Trump’s Pathetic Monsters

It’s impossible to ignore the administration’s blend of violent repression and overwhelming cringe.

Anna Merlan

Over a few weeks this January, two Minneapolis sisters repeatedly left their homes and headed out to mock, insult, and record Border Patrol Commander Greg Bovino, who until recently was leading the disastrous and violent anti-immigrant operation in the city. The first time they heard him speak, the women, who uploaded their street surveillance of Bovino to TikTok, howled with laughter: Bovino’s voice is somewhat high and surprisingly nasal. “Wait, your voice is not what I expected,” one of the women hollered through a megaphone, sounding near tears with hilarity. “Speak again! Talk again!” 

The first time they had seen Bovino, things went differently. The two women, who are both in their 20s and asked that they not be named or have their videos linked, were standing on a public sidewalk after spotting ICE vehicles nearby, when Bovino walked out of a local TV-affiliate’s building flanked by masked men.

“I had my megaphone,” one sister told me. “And I just screamed at him with all the rage in my body from across the street.” While righteously venting was, she says, “cathartic,” she noticed that Bovino also seemed to enjoy it. “He was energized by it. It was so gross.”

With their anger seeming to backfire, the sisters “realized we need to strategize,” she says. After some research, “we chose mockery as a deliberate tactic,” she says, a way to try to respond to and puncture the image that Bovino has carefully crafted. “His social media presence, his news appearances—everything he does—leans into these theatrics,” she says. “He posts what I call thirst traps to his Instagram, these edited videos of him walking around and detaining people. It was so clear that it was the attention that he wanted.”

Luck was on their side; the next time they saw Bovino, he looked at the sisters and chirped, “All right! Title 8 immigration enforcement!”

Her laughing response of borderline hysteria worked, she says: “You can see in his body language that it just shuts him down.” The video went viral, and prompted the sisters to create a series of riotously funny and often uncomfortable videos based on their continued birddogging of Bovino and the agents accompanying him.

“I wanted to put a video out there so other people could see him and make sure they could recognize him in public and make sure he didn’t have peace,” the Minnesota woman explains. “I wanted to alter public perception of him. He works so visibly hard to portray a powerful image. When I realized that I had eyeballs on these videos, I had some power myself to alter that perception.”

Before his apparent demotion and unceremonious return to the arid confines of El Centro, California, Bovino had come to stand in for the proudly amoral, violent, lie-riddled way that ICE has conducted operations in Minnesota and elsewhere. He’s also an excellent representation of how monumentally cheesy these guys are. The Border Patrol commander, who is, as many protesters have pointed out, quite diminutive in stature, likes to stride around in a long military-style green coat and a questionably useful leather cross-body strap, both of which clearly resemble outfits donned by Nazi SS commanders. “Get your Hitler coat off, you little bitch,” one of the Minneapolis women recommended during one of their on-camera interactions. (In a sympathetic interview with the outlet News Nation, Bovino claimed that the coat is “Border Patrol issued,” adding, “I’ve had it for over 25 years.”) 

More broadly, the clothes that ICE and CBP agents wear are a fine example of the powerful blend of menace, deadly incompetence, and total lack of drip they constantly display. Having made anonymity a hallmark, they virtually always appear masked, sometimes sporting neck gaiters with skulls on them, when they’re not wearing what GQ has called “Dropshipped Normcore,” “a kind of algorithmically-influenced, masculine mish-mash of the kind of high-crowned baseball hats, tight graphic T-shirts, open plaid button-ups, slim stretch denim jeans or cargo pants, and anonymous walking sneakers or trail shoes.” The author and illustrator Molly Crabapple has called them a “Temu death squad.” It’s no surprise that masked ICE agents slipping on (real) ice have provoked such intense hilarity that Homeland Security officials apparently instructed FEMA workers to avoid using the term “ice” in recent winter storm warnings, to avoid having their posts “being turned into internet fodder.” 

It is, of course, not just ICE and CBP who look and sound like tremendous dorks while doing real and frightening damage. The Trump administration has adopted a cruel, gross, and weird way of communicating, blending moldy internet memes with overt white supremacy. The way they perform impunity when they are caught doing that is also a blend of chilling and deeply uncool. After Nekima Levy Armstrong, a Twin Cities activist, was arrested after allegedly disrupting a church service, the White House was caught circulating a manipulated image showing her in tears. (Actual photos of the arrest show her looking calm and serious as she’s led away.) After The Guardian broke that story, the White House responded with what they clearly considered to be an epic clapback. As deputy communications director Kaelan Dorr posted, “Enforcement of the law will continue. The memes will continue. Thank you for your attention to this matter.” 

“The memes will continue” is incredibly weak: it sounds like something Elon Musk would tweet in his frenzied and thus far unsuccessful efforts to be funny online. The White House’s memes about taking over Greenland last month also had an unpleasantly Musk-like aroma: an AI-generated image of Donald Trump walking hand-in-hand with a penguin that is holding an American flag, for instance, along with the words “Embrace the penguin.” (There are no penguins in Greenland, or really anywhere in the northern hemisphere.)

These attempts at meme-based relevance go hand-in-hand with all the unsuccessful pivots and impersonations that people in the Trump orbit have tried to look cool, culturally relevant or even, God help us, badass: Katie Miller’s excruciatingly dull fascist wine mom podcast, say, or Pete Hegseth’s American flag-lined suit, camo ties, and ongoing impression of Slim Pickens‘ atomic bomb-riding cowboy character in Dr. Strangelove. There’s also JD Vance pretending he enjoys the Internet jokes about him having sex with a couch. All of these gambits try—and fail—to serve the same purpose: to make these people look cool, funny, or with it while they advance a profoundly unpopular agenda.

Not surprisingly, the response from a large sector of the American public has been to continue making fun of this administration, from our increasingly exasperated and radicalized late night hosts—minus the always gutless Jimmy Fallon—to Minnesota protesters braving subzero temperatures to throw snowballs at ICE vehicles, pour a little freezing water on the ground, and let Greg Bovino know his coat looks stupid. Even world leaders openly mock Trump, as in a viral video from earlier this year of the leaders of France, Azerbaijan, and Albania joking about Trump’s inability to keep Armenia and Albania straight, or who might be at war with whom.  

Trump’s opponents have tried this before: the former-reality TV star was treated like a joke almost right until the moment he won the 2016 election. It was hard not to, what with his surreal Baked Alaska hair, his ridiculous braggadocio, his weird grudge against windmills, and other endless things about him to mock—physically, financially, and spiritually. Recall, if you will, that the Huffington Post classified Donald Trump under “entertainment” news until, at the end of 2015, they had to stop doing that. Personally, in the time I worked at the feminist website Jezebel, we came up with dozens of creative nicknames to describe the then-candidate, including ones like “future leader of the free world” that I imagine were somewhat funny at the time.

Srdja Popovic, a self-described “revolution consultant” whose activism helped overthrow Slobodan Milosevic, calls mocking the powerful “laughtivism”—using humor and creativity to effect profound social change. The Minnesota woman says that in their video-recorded beclowning of Greg Bovino, she and her sister happened on a central principle of mocking a powerful public figure, one that Popovic also understood: forcing the target into a situation where he would wind up looking silly no matter what. Popovic calls it a “dilemma action.”

“We put him in a lose-lose situation,” the Minnesota woman says. “He could’ve kept talking and we would make fun of his voice, or he shuts up and we looked like we shut him down.”

Dictators and despots understand the dangers of humor: early in his rule, Vladimir Putin was reportedly enraged by a depiction of him as an ugly, weird-looking puppet on “Kukly,” a show put out by the then-independent TV channel NTV. He demanded his puppet avatar never appear again and the show, as the New Yorker has written, cheekily obliged: a subsequent episode showed Putin as various weird manifestations of God, like “as a burning bush and a storm cloud.”

In Nazi Germany, people also mocked Reich officials for being unpopular, incompetent, sweaty losers; so-called “whisper jokes” proliferated as a way to express discontent. Germans did this even when the stakes were deadly: in 1943, a woman named Marianne K cracked a joke about Hitler standing atop a radio tower with with Goering, trying to come up with something that would cheer up Berliners. “Why don’t you jump?” Goering suggests. After someone ratted her out, Marianne was soon executed.

In an echo that might sound familiar today, Hitler and other Reich officials also took their own stabs at humor to make themselves more popular: a New York Times article from 1940, with the unfortunate headline “Hitler’s Fun,” says that a recent speech by the dictator was full of “merry quips,” adding, “He was very jovial about the thousands and thousands of bombs he promised to drop on England nightly for every hundred the British raiders scatter over Germany.”  

By 1944, mockery was firmly entrenched in Germany as a form of dissent, the Times reported, including widespread parodies of popular Nazi songs. “None of the joking is very brilliant humor,” the paper sniffed, “some descending to gutter level, but showing, nevertheless, the general discontent with the Nazi regime on the part of vast numbers who have been deprived of other means of registering their disapproval.” 

The danger with merely making jokes, then as now, is that they serve as a way to let off steam without effecting actual change. The Nazis, for instance, tried to at first stem the tide of parody songs, as the Times reported, before eventually thinking the better of it: “Goebbels evidently has decided on second thought that this sort of activity was a safety valve that would be dangerous to remove.” Similarly, JD Vance has not only pretended to love being called a couch-fucker, but, on Halloween, dressed as one of the memes of himself that has circulated online. By clumsily attempting to get in on the joke, the people in charge try to defuse the power those jokes have against them.

These days, it feels borderline delusional to think it will do any good to mock Trump or the various maladaptive, malevolent dorks around him. Every joke that could be made has been, and all of them have bounced off him like a million arrows against the carapace of an armadillo streaked with cheap self-tanner. (See, I couldn’t resist one more, and look where it’s gotten us: nowhere.) Most credit for how Minnesota is prevailing against ICE should go to serious, effective, broad-scale activism, resistance, and community solidarity—and not just jokes about Greg Bovino.

Yet the two things aren’t mutually exclusive. And in a way, jokes about Trump, ICE, and all the rest of them are a way of reasserting and insisting upon observable reality: what’s taking place is shocking, reprehensible—and also powerfully wack. When then-vice presidential candidate and Minnesota Governor Tim Walz called Trump and his gang “weird,” it went over remarkably well, a rare example of a politician simply saying what so much of the public was thinking.

Humor alone will not save us. But perhaps it allows us to continue the painful task of looking at what’s really happening here, and, in the words of the artist Barbara Kruger, “the ridiculous clusterfuck of totally uncool jokers” who are doing it to us.  

The day that we spoke, the Minneapolis woman was digesting Bovino’s departure, and Tom Homan’s installation. “I’m going to keep doing what I’m doing and learn about the new guy,” she told me. If ICE ever actually leaves her city, she adds, “I think sharing what we as a community have learned with the other cities that they’re going to go to will be huge. I think we’re going to be a model for the resistance of the occupation. I hope my videos showed one way of doing that, but there are so many more.”

ICE detention facilities

Judge says Trump administration must let lawmakers make unannounced visits to ICE detention facilities

The Department of Homeland Security had implemented a one-week notice for lawmakers’ visits.

By Kyle Cheney and Josh Gerstein

A federal judge ruled Monday that the Department of Homeland Security likely broke the law when it barred members of Congress from visiting immigrant detention facilities without a week’s notice.

U.S. District Judge Jia Cobb found that in crafting and enforcing the one-week-notice policy, the department relied on funds that Congress specifically forbade from being used to deny lawmakers access to those facilities.

The ruling applies to 13 Democratic members of Congress who have joined a lawsuit filed last year, challenging limits on their ability to visit locations where Immigration and Customs Enforcement detains people facing deportation proceedings.

The judge’s action comes several weeks after three Democratic lawmakers were blocked from visiting the Bishop Henry Whipple Federal Building in Minneapolis to survey conditions amid the Trump administration’s mass deportation surge in the Twin Cities.

In December, Cobb blocked an earlier version of the DHS policy, concluding that it ran afoul of a longstanding appropriations rider — dubbed “Section 527” — that effectively requires DHS to give lawmakers unimpeded access to detention facilities. She emphasized that the policy was intended to ensure that lawmakers could make timely visits to facilities whose populations often spike and decline with little notice.

However, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem issued a directive last month reimposing the advance-notice policy and claiming that it would be enforced solely with funding from the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act,” passed in July, which lacks the same requirements for unfettered access.

However, Rep. Joe Neguse (D-Colo.) and a dozen House Democratic colleagues argued that it would be virtually impossible for DHS to segregate funds that way — and that in fact DHS officials had not done a proper accounting to show that it could be done. Cobb agreed.

“The Court notes that it finds compelling Plaintiffs’ argument — one not presently disputed by Defendants — that at least some of these resources that either have been or will be used to promulgate and enforce the notice policy have already been funded and paid for with Section 527-restricted annual appropriations funds, including pursuant to contracts or agreements that predate the” Big Beautiful Bill law, wrote Cobb, a Biden appointee.

Although DHS’ annual appropriations lapsed on Saturday and Democrats are insisting on new limits to ICE enforcement before agreeing to more funds, Cobb said her ruling would remain in effect because it is predicated on funds DHS appears to have already spent to develop the policy.

Spokespeople for DHS did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Neguse and lawyers representing the House members welcomed Cobb’s decision and condemned the administration’s policy as an attempt to obscure the harsh detention conditions for immigrants swept up in the ongoing crackdown.

“The Court’s decision today to grant a temporary restraining order against ICE’s unlawful effort to obstruct congressional oversight is a victory for the American people. We will keep fighting to ensure the rule of law prevails,” Neguse said.

Now the mess begins? Always been there.........

3 Florida House Republicans are exiting Congress. Now the mess begins.

The Sunshine State is expecting to see three open House seats heading into the 2026 cycle.

By Kimberly Leonard

At least three House Republicans in Florida are moving on from Congress next year, creating an aggressive, crowded collection of hopefuls clamoring to fill the midterm openings — including a pardoned former felon, at least five Republicans who ran for office in other states and top party officials.

The massive potential field could add to the Florida delegation’s already colorful cast of characters, could be completely scrambled by mid-cycle redistricting while generating millions of dollars in political spending and create intra-party divisions. And, of course, there’s a chance the races will affect the tight House majority margin.

“We are not in the fourth quarter — we are in the first round of the fight here,” said GOP consultant Anthony Pedicini, who predicted “crazy crowded” fields leading up to the August primaries. “There’s a lot to go around, a lot to be fleshed out yet.”

The seats are opening up due to the retirements of GOP Reps. Vern Buchanan, 74, and Neal Dunn, 72, while Rep. Byron Donalds, 47, is the frontrunner to become the next governor of Florida.

All three are currently in safe Republican districts. But adding to the frenzy already underway: Exact boundaries of these seats could shift, as Florida prepares to take on mid-decade redistricting.

That means candidates are rushing into the 2026 election without knowing precisely what the makeup of the districts will be. It’s a dynamic expected to continue for months, given that Gov. Ron DeSantis doesn’t want the Republican-led Legislature to pass new maps until late April — and has moved to extend candidate qualifying to June.

“I would be lying if I said I didn’t think about it,” Republican Austin Rogers, a former staffer for Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.), said of redistricting. Rogers recently announced his bid for Florida’s 2nd Congressional District, in the northern part of the Panhandle. “But, from my perspective, I just have to pound the pavement working in the district that I know.”

Despite the uncertainty, he and other candidates are lining up for a shot at joining Florida’s 28-member delegation; if they wait, they may not see another vacancy for decades.

Contenders for CD-2 include big names in Florida politics, including state GOP Chair Evan Power, who — like Rogers — is running to replace Dunn. Power is continuing to helm the state party heading into the midterms. Weighing a run against him on the Democratic side is another political heavyweight: former Rep. Gwen Graham, the daughter of the late senator and Gov. Bob Graham.

The seat has also attracted Keith Gross, an attorney who ran an unsuccessful bid for Senate against Scott in 2024 and previously ran as a Democrat in Georgia’s state House, as well as Kingdom Insurance owner Nick Lewis. Those officially in the race on the Democratic side got in before Dunn announced his retirement, including foreign aid professional Amanda Marie Green, tech entrepreneur Nic Zateslo and Yen Bailey, an attorney who launched an unsuccessful bid in 2024.

“A lot of national eyes will be cast upon this area. That’s why we are seeing so much stimulation on both sides,” said Ryan Ray, who chairs the Leon County Democratic Party and worked on Graham’s successful 2014 House campaign.

He added that he thought the seat, which includes Tallahassee, was “up for grabs” given “the absolute collapse of MAGA” and accusations that President Donald Trump’s popularity is diminishing, as well as infighting in Florida’s GOP supermajority that left the party with “too many mouths to feed.” For Democrats, a win there would feel especially gratifying, he said, given that DeSantis pushed maps through that upended former Democratic Rep. Al Lawson’s seat.

Power, who met with the White House about his candidacy, said it was crucial for the president to have “reinforcements” in Washington to ensure Trump was “a four-year president” and prevent a Democratic majority from trying to “stall” the administration in Congress.

“It’s not the time for people who have been absent from the fights of our lifetime,” he said. “I am a battle tested leader and I’m ready to lead this race.”

Down in Florida’s 16th District, the retirement announcement from Buchanan came last week, marking the end of his 20-year career in Congress and his powerful perch as vice-chair of the Ways and Means Committee.

Buchanan, a successful businessperson before entering Congress, was also a prodigious fundraiser who helped launch the political careers of several key figures in Florida, including Republican National Committee Chair Joe Gruters.

Some in Florida political circles have discussed Gruters for the seat. Though RNC spokesperson Zach Parkinson said the chair isn’t running, another person familiar with Gruters’ thinking said he hasn’t ruled it out. The person also said Gruter’s wife, New College of Florida Foundation executive director Sydney Gruters, is being seriously floated to run for the seat if her husband doesn’t launch his own bid.

Combat veteran and U.S. Army Reserve chief warrant officer Jon Harris, who’s worked in cybersecurity, has already made an official bid for the seat. But other possible candidates in the mix include state Rep. Fiona McFarland and former state Rep. Tommy Gregory. Kristen Truong, a state House candidate who’s married to a Manatee County commissioner, has also been approached by donors and supporters about a run but has said she would defer to Gruters.

Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin, in an interview, likened the latest wave of retirements across the country for Republicans, which are so far more numerous than that of Democrats, as “rats fleeing off a sinking ship.” The 2024 election cycle in Florida saw only then-Rep. Bill Posey abruptly retire right before the qualifying deadline, which kept challengers to his handpicked successor at bay.

By 2025, two special elections were triggered due to the departures of Mike Waltz, who became U.N. ambassador, and Matt Gaetz, who initially resigned to become Trump’s attorney general but — following internal backlash about the nomination due to sexual misconduct allegations that he denied — withdrew his name from consideration and landed his own show at One America News Network.

Over in Donalds’ district, more than a dozen candidates have lined up to try to replace him, though it’s possible a big name could yet enter to clear the field.

At least five of the Republicans running have previously run for office in other states. With almost $3 million cash on hand — nearly all self-funded and the highest among the GOP contenders for the seat — is Jim Oberweis, a former Illinois state senator who’s run for higher office multiple times and had a dairy business that declared bankruptcy.

Some come to the race with a good deal of baggage from their time in elected office in other states. The most recent candidate to make his campaign official is Chris Collins, who resigned from his New York seat in Congress after pleading guilty to insider trading and was later pardoned by Trump. Collins was the first member of Congress to endorse Trump in 2016 — and he’s launching a flashy bid for Congress in Trump’s home state by buying over $10,000 in ads for the Super Bowl and Olympics, according to the tracking firm AdImpact.

Madison Cawthorn, who represented North Carolina in the House for a term but lost reelection after high-profile controversies and inflammatory comments about his GOP colleagues, is also running. In his bid to represent Florida, he loaned his campaign half a million dollars but raised just over $18,000 during the final quarter of 2025 after launching in October. Lee County Sheriff Carmine Marceno, who Pedicini works with, is also considering a run.

As if that all weren’t enough, political insiders have already been gossiping among each other about whether more House members in Florida are devising an exit. And GOP leaders have predicted that redistricting could give Florida Republicans three to five additional seats before the midterms, potentially attracting even more candidates to the mix.

“It’s Florida politics,” Pedicini said. “Anything and everything can — and does — happen. Just when you think Florida is done giving you surprises, she gives you another one.”

Cunt

Gabbard defends presence at elections raid

In a letter sent Monday, the director of national intelligence acknowledged facilitating a phone call between Trump and FBI agents in Atlanta — but denied any wrongdoing.

By John Sakellariadis

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard told lawmakers Monday that President Donald Trump personally asked her to be on site as FBI agents executed a politically sensitive search warrant at an Atlanta-area elections office, according to a copy of a letter sent by Gabbard and obtained by POLITICO.

Gabbard also confirmed news reports earlier Monday that she facilitated a call the next day between Trump and some of the FBI field agents who participated in the raid in Fulton County, Georgia — but denied that she or Trump pressured them.

“While visiting the FBI Field Office in Atlanta, I thanked the FBI agents for their professionalism and great work, and facilitated a brief phone call for the President to thank the agents personally for their work. He did not ask any questions, nor did he or l issue any directives,” Gabbard wrote in a letter sent to Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.) and Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.).

Gabbard’s Monday missive came in response to a letter last Thursday from Warner and Himes — the top Democrats on the Senate and House intelligence panels — about the scope, legality and justification for her involvement in last Wednesday’s FBI raid. Lawmakers first learned she was on the scene via a photograph that circulated online.

It also followed the New York Times reporting earlier Monday that Gabbard arranged a call last Thursday between Trump and members of the FBI field office in Atlanta, which led the operation. The Justice Department is supposed to operate free from political interference, and it is highly unusual for a sitting president to have direct communication with frontline law enforcement personnel handling a sensitive case.

Trump continues to claim the 2020 election was rigged in favor of Joe Biden, and Georgia has long been at the center of his unproven claims of widespread fraud.

Even before news emerged about the call, Gabbard’s presence at the raid alarmed Democrats and current and former state election officials because the director of national intelligence is traditionally focused on foreign intelligence matters and rarely if ever plays a direct or highly visible role in domestic criminal investigations.

Gabbard said in the letter that her presence came at the explicit direction of the president and was well within her legal authority: “My presence was requested by the President and executed under my broad statutory authority to coordinate, integrate, and analyze intelligence related to election security, including counterintelligence (CI), foreign and other malign influence and cybersecurity,” she wrote.

She said she accompanied FBI Deputy Director Andrew Bailey and Atlanta acting Special Agent in Charge Pete Ellis only for “a brief period of time” to oversee FBI personnel executing the search warrant.

To justify her presence, Gabbard cited three statutes, one executive order and one presidential policy directive that broadly outline her office’s role in coordinating or overseeing intelligence on foreign election interference efforts and foreign threats to U.S. critical infrastructure, including election systems.

She also wrote that the ODNI’s general counsel’s office had “found my actions to be consistent and well within my statutory authorities.”

The White House did not respond to a request for comment on Gabbard’s letter.

In a statement, Rachel Cohen, a spokesperson for Warner, said Gabbard’s letter only “raises more questions than it answers.” She added: “Senator Warner plans to continue pressing for accountability.”

On a podcast Monday, Trump repeated his claim that the 2020 election was stolen, and urged Republicans to nationalize the election process. Presidential elections are largely run at the state and local level.

Escalates feud

Trump escalates feud with Ilhan Omar, appears to suggest she is linked to ISIS

The president has previously called for Omar, the first Somali American elected to Congress, to be deported.

By Cheyanne M. Daniels

President Donald Trump on Tuesday escalated his ongoing feud with progressive Rep. Ilhan Omar, appearing to suggest baselessly the Minnesota Democrat is aligned with ISIS leaders in her birth country of Somalia.

In a post to Truth Social, Trump linked to a news report about U.S. forces striking ISIS-Somalia leaders in Somalian caves. He captioned the post, “Was Ilhan Omar there to protect her corrupt ‘homeland?’”

Omar, 43, is a Somalian-born Muslim and the first Somali American elected to Congress. She and her family fled the country when she was 8 years old and, after spending four years in a Kenyan refugee camp, the family moved to America. She became a U.S. citizen in 2000.

The progressive legislator has drawn the president’s ire for years.

Trump has repeatedly accused Omar of profiting off of a widespread fraud investigation in her home state without providing any evidence; called her “garbage”; and insisted she be jailed and deported back to Somalia. He has previously mocked her hijab and recently announced the Justice Department will be investigating the congresswoman after Omar’s net worth skyrocketed.

A spokesperson for Omar previously told POLITICO she has not received anything from the DOJ about an investigation. Her office did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Tuesday, though Omar had previously said Trump is “obsessed” with her.

A White House spokesperson pointed back to the president’s social media post when asked for comment.

Tensions between Trump and Omar have only increased as the White House’s immigration crackdown has escalated in Minnesota.

Omar has repeatedly issued calls to abolish Immigration and Customs Enforcement. She has also called Trump and his administration “liars” for calling Renee Good “a domestic terrorist” after she was fatally shot by an ICE agent in Minneapolis last month.

Then, after a man charged at Omar and sprayed her with what was later identified as water and apple cider vinegar during a town hall, she accused Trump of spewing “reprehensible rhetoric” that allows “right-wing grifters” to “terrorize our community.” Trump later said Omar “probably had herself sprayed.” The man was arrested and ultimately charged with assaulting or impeding a federal employee.

The U.S. military has launched a series of strikes targeting ISIS facilities in Somalia, according to the United States Africa Command. The latest strike occurred near the Golis Mountains.

Millionaire's tax

Washington state lawmakers join other states in proposing a millionaire's tax

Legislators have tried to pass a tax on high earners in the past, but polling this year shows the public is behind it.

By Natalie Fertig

Democratic lawmakers in Washington state introduced a proposal Tuesday to impose a tax on residents whose annual incomes exceed $1 million, becoming the latest state to weigh a millionaire’s tax.

While legislators in Washington have introduced similar legislation in the past, Democrats claim the outlook for passage has never been this good. A recent poll showed that 61 percent of all Washingtonians — and 54 percent of Republicans — support an income tax on high earners. The proposed legislation would place a tax of nearly 10 percent on residents with annual incomes exceeding $1 million.

Democratic Washington House Majority Leader Joe Fitzgibbon says his caucus’ optimism comes in part because the Trump administration’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act added more tax breaks for wealthy people who have non-standard income. Washington remains one of the few states without an income tax.

“The magnitude of the tax cuts, both on individuals and on businesses that the federal government … really stokes the fires of people’s anger at both the federal administration and [at] wealthy people that they don’t think are paying their fair share,” Fitzgibbon told POLITICO ahead of the bill introduction.

First-term Democratic Gov. Bob Ferguson endorsed the legislation last December and championed it in his State of the State address in January. And Democrats, who control the state Legislature and governor’s office, are promoting the education and health care services the tax could fund, as well as possible tax reductions for lower- and middle-income earners they believe they could provide with the additional revenue.

Republicans are attacking the bill for failing to solve the state’s current $2 billion budget deficit — returns from the millionaire’s tax would not be seen for a few years — and for taking more resources to enact.

Washington Senate Republican Leader Sen. John Braun, who is challenging Democratic Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez in Washington’s 3rd District this November, said it may be hard for Democrats to get a complex tax bill through the Legislature in a short session, even with the majority.

Washington is not alone in considering a tax on high earners or a wealth tax this year: California and Rhode Island are also considering such legislation, and there are pushes in other states like Illinois to get similar bills introduced. Massachusetts and Minnesota enacted their own income taxes on high earners in recent years.

Each proposed state millionaire’s tax is slightly different in whom it taxes and how much, but legislators in all these states cite Trump’s tax cuts for millionaires and the administration’s cuts to services like Medicaid as motivating factors for legislators and for voters.

In Rhode Island, for example, legislators last year introduced a tax on earners making over $625,000, and Democratic Gov. Dan McKee’s proposed budget this year included a 3 percent surtax on income over $1 million. While Rhode Island legislators have tried to pass this in the past, proponents say the federal funding cuts out of Washington, D.C., have changed the outlook.

“What I believe that it makes [the outlook this year] different is the Trump cuts — they’re already starting to hurt us,” said Rhode Island state Rep. Karen Alzate, explaining that her state depends heavily on federal money. “We don’t have the financial means to do this ourselves, to fund [the gaps] ourselves.”

State Democrats introducing similar bills shoot down concerns that high-income earners will leave with new or additional taxes. Alzate said Rhode Island is already losing companies to states with higher taxes and more services nearby, while Fitzgibbon said that cutting education and health care at the state level could drive away companies that pick Washington because of the quality of life for their employees.

Meanwhile in California, billionaires are already threatening to leave the state, and Gov. Gavin Newsom is staunchly against the proposal, which may appear on the November ballot.

If the bill passes out of Washington’s Legislature this year, it will likely go before voters before becoming law. A ballot measure to repeal the tax law is expected to be proposed, and voters will have the ultimate say in November — another reason why strong polling was so important.

“We just want to be sure that the public is on board with this approach,” Fitzgibbon said. “It looks like, from what we’ve seen so far, that they are.”