A place were I can write...

My simple blog of pictures of travel, friends, activities and the Universe we live in as we go slowly around the Sun.



February 20, 2026

Dude!!!!! Is this real.... Epstein Epstein Epstein Epstein all the time...

Steve Bannon pushed hard for the release of the Epstein files. Then he was in them

By Steve Contorno, Kristen Holmes, Austin Culpepper

Earlier this month, as the latest disclosures in the Epstein files rippled through right-wing media, the conservative morning television show “American Sunrise” devoted several segments to calls for harsher consequences and sustained attention on the scandal.

“We need to make an example of all of this,” co-host Emily Finn said during the February 9 broadcast on the pro-Trump cable channel Real America’s Voice. “And not just let this go and let this slip under the radar.”

Moments later, the program handed off to the conservative network’s marquee show, “War Room,” hosted by Steve Bannon, President Donald Trump’s former chief strategist. Over the next two hours, Bannon ticked through topics animating his audience — from Bad Bunny’s Super Bowl performance to a contentious Republican Senate primary in Texas.

He did not mention Jeffrey Epstein.

Silence has largely defined Bannon’s public posture toward Epstein since the Justice Department released records on January 30 detailing a close personal relationship between the two men. In the weeks that followed, Bannon has not broached the release of the files or the frequency with which his own name appears in the newly public records, a CNN review of dozens of hours of programming found.

Even when Bannon showered praise on Attorney General Pam Bondi for her combative Capitol Hill appearance earlier this month, he didn’t explicitly mention the Epstein files, the subject of many of her heated clashes with lawmakers.

It’s similar to an approach Bannon once suggested for Epstein as allegations about the financier’s sex crimes resurfaced. In February 2019, Epstein said in a text message he would like “true facts out.” Bannon replied, “you should just want this to go away.”

As Epstein contemplated responding to some of the coverage, Bannon was blunt. “Have you lost your f**king mind,” he wrote, “the moment you say ANYTHING this is global story #1!!!!!”

Bannon did not respond to CNN’s request for comment. In a statement to The New York Times, Bannon said he was working on a documentary film about Epstein and “that’s the only lens through which these private communications should be viewed.” Bannon told the newspaper he captured 50 hours of footage of Epstein, and that the film would expose Epstein and “destroy the very myths he created.” Last month, the Department of Justice released two hours of Bannon interviewing Epstein.

As a leading voice in the GOP’s conspiratorial flank, Bannon has long trained his audience to distrust convenient explanations. Since its inception in 2019, his podcast has served as a platform for guests to push unproven theories about election fraud and other topics. Until recently, a placard bearing one of his favorite sayings sat over his shoulder during broadcasts: “There are NO conspiracies but there are NO coincidences.”

Mixed reactions from MAGA

Now, some longtime allies are pressing him for answers.

Laura Loomer, a Trump loyalist with a large online following, told CNN that Bannon should be “100% forthcoming” about his ties to Epstein. Trump’s former national security adviser Michael Flynn, another far-right figure, wrote on X that an explanation was overdue, a remark that came in response to the release of a 2018 text to Epstein in which Bannon suggested that the 25th Amendment could be invoked against Trump to remove him from office.

Former Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, once a regular guest on “War Room,” wrote on X that her concerns extended beyond Bannon’s discussions with Epstein about Trump.

“There is no excuse for having such a friendly relationship with Epstein, post conviction,” she wrote, referring to Epstein’s 2008 guilty plea to two state prostitution charges, one involving a minor. “None.”

But while the MAGA movement has spent years fixated on exposing Epstein’s network, there are so far few signs one of its most influential voices faces significant fallout. Bannon’s show has continued on Real America’s Voice without interruption, and high-profile guests have appeared even after his communications with Epstein were released, including Alabama Sen. Tommy Tuberville, White House trade adviser Peter Navarro, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and the chairman of the Virginia GOP, among many others.

One Trump administration official told CNN that Bannon’s audience was so big, he would likely survive.

‘Epstein is a key that picks the lock’

The absence of Epstein discussion on “War Room” marks a stark programming shift from last year, when it served as a recurring source of intrigue for Bannon and his guests. Dozens of these clips were posted to the War Room X account.

“Democrats know Epstein’s black book is a ticking time bomb. That’s why they’ve switched their focus to affordability,” said one July War Room post with a video of Bannon viewed 1.4 million times.

His podcast regularly amplified calls to release investigative records related to Epstein, who was arrested in July 2019 on charges he sex trafficked minors, and helped fuel a pressure campaign that culminated in Trump signing legislation to make additional files public.

“Epstein is a key that picks the lock on so many things,” Bannon told a July gathering of young conservatives hosted by Turning Point USA. “Not just individuals, but also institutions, intelligence institutions, foreign governments.”

Turning Point USA spokesman Andrew Kolvet declined to comment when asked if Bannon would be invited to the organization’s future events, but he notably appeared on “War Room” earlier this month.

What Bannon didn’t disclose in that July speech or others was his own conversations with Epstein — which included private discussions about reshaping global politics. In their exchanges, Bannon described plans to “take down” Pope Francis and sought Epstein’s help in advancing populist movements in Europe.

Epstein at one point warns Bannon about potential headwinds he faces sidestepping federal rules about representing foreign governments and later suggests a media platform would avoid the scrutiny a nonprofit or new political party might receive. The next year, Bannon launched his podcast.

Loomer called it “a bit hypocritical” for Bannon to bang the drum for releasing the Epstein files without mentioning their shared history. Comedian Tim Dillon, who previously interviewed Bannon on his own popular podcast, recently said he would’ve asked about Epstein had he known about their relationship.

“That’s uncomfortable,” Dillon said on “The Young Turks,” a progressive web show. “I guess for whatever reason, Bannon thought there was value in a relationship with a guy like Jeffrey Epstein, and that’s something he’s going to have to answer.”

Bannon, though, has so far offered little public explanation of how he first came to know Epstein or why he shared sensitive information with the disgraced felon in hundreds of text messages and emails.

Their exchanges include shared grievances about Trump — who dismissed Bannon as White House senior adviser in 2017 and once counted Epstein among his friends before a falling out in the mid-2000s. In August 2018, the two discussed the need for an intervention for Trump and the potential liabilities the president faced in his mounting legal entanglements. Bannon once shared an article titled, “How close is Donald Trump to a psychiatric breakdown,” which Epstein then circulated to other close confidantes. In an exchange with Epstein, Bannon referred to Trump and his inner circle as “transitory figures” while suggesting he was the “center of gravity of this movement.”

When Bannon launched a fundraising campaign to raise money for a wall at the US southern border, he told Epstein he needed to tread carefully. “can’t seem like I’m running (sic) trumps nose in his own incompetence,” he wrote. Federal prosecutors would later charge Bannon with defrauding donors, but the case against him disappeared when Trump pardoned him before leaving office in 2021.

These messages have fueled private speculation within the president’s orbit about Bannon’s future in MAGA and his relationship with Trump. White House officials have often sought to keep Bannon at arm’s length and out of the president’s ear, but the two have managed to maintain a relationship.

“He has a lot to answer for,” a Trump ally told CNN.

Another Trump adviser expected the controversy to follow Bannon as he navigates his role in the MAGA movement beyond 2028. While Bannon has led calls for Trump to run for a third term, his own political aspirations — including long-rumored presidential ambitions — remain a source of intrigue in Washington.

“He has zero chance now,” the adviser said. “It’s so sketchy.”

‘We need to push back on the lies’

In 2019, texts between the two men turn toward an emerging issue for Epstein: an intensifying national focus on allegations that he had trafficked girls resurfaced in a Miami Herald series. In dozens of messages, Bannon advises Epstein on how to navigate the fallout, writing in April 2019: “first we need to push back on the lies; then crush the pedo/trafficking narrative ; then rebuild your image as philanthropist.”

When federal prosecutors rejected a push by Epstein’s alleged victims to throw out his 2008 plea deal, Bannon appeared elated at the news.

“Dude!!!!! Is this real,” he texted Epstein. “Tell me this is real.”

Bannon has not publicly addressed these messages, but he told the Times he was “a documentary filmmaker working, over a period of time, to secure 50 hours of interviews from a reclusive subject.” Their final correspondences include ongoing efforts to carve out time for Bannon and his crew to film Epstein.

Tom Fitton, the head of the conservative group Judicial Watch, said he was unaware of Bannon’s extensive history with Epstein when he appeared on the “War Room” podcast last year to share updates on his legal fight to force the release of the Epstein Files.

Fitton told CNN he watched footage of Bannon’s interview with Epstein and was left wondering why any public figure would seek out his company.

“Epstein seemed like a sociopath to me,” said Fitton. “I don’t know how Bannon was able to keep on communications with him even for the reasons he says he was doing that.”

On “American Sunrise,” though, anticipation for an Epstein film from Bannon is already building.

“War Room will be up next,” co-host Gina Loudon said at the end of Tuesday’s show. “How about when that Bannon documentary on Epstein comes out? That should be interesting.”

Bannon did not mention it during his broadcast.

Getting prepared.......

The US could strike Iran. Here’s how Tehran is getting prepared

By Mostafa Salem, Farida Elsebai, Gianluca Mezzofiore

As the United States continues a significant military buildup in the Middle East, Iran has taken steps to signal its readiness for war, including fortifying its nuclear sites and rebuilding missile production facilities.

Iranian and US negotiators held indirect talks in Geneva for three-and-a-half hours on Tuesday, but it ended with no clear resolution. Iran’s top diplomat Abbas Araghchi said both sides agreed on a set of “guiding principles,” but US Vice President JD Vance said the Iranians had not acknowledged “red lines” set by US President Donald Trump.

Despite ongoing talks, the White House has been briefed that the US military could be ready for an attack by the weekend, after a buildup in recent days of air and naval assets in the Middle East, sources familiar with the matter told CNN.

Amid the threat of war, Iran has spent recent months repairing key missile facilities and heavily damaged air bases while further concealing its nuclear program. It has appointed war veterans to its national security structures, conducted maritime wargames in the Persian Gulf and launched an intense crackdown on domestic dissent.

Repairs

In June last year, Israel launched a surprise attack on Iran that destroyed parts of its nuclear program, severely damaged missile production sites and killed key military commanders. Over the ensuing 12-day conflict, Iran retaliated by launching hundreds of missiles and drones at Israeli cities, while the US struck three Iranian nuclear sites – with US President Donald Trump claiming they had been “totally obliterated.”

Western nations have consistently failed to persuade Iran to curb its missile program, which Tehran regards as a central pillar of its military strength and a right to its self-defense.

Despite suffering heavy losses in the war with Israel, satellite imagery analysis reveals that Iran has rebuilt damaged missile facilities.

Satellite imagery of the Imam Ali Missile Base in Khorramabad, captured on January 5, shows that of the dozen structures destroyed by Israel, three have been rebuilt, one has been repaired while three others are currently under construction. The facility houses silo launch sites critical for firing ballistic missiles with earthwork and construction around them.

Two other military bases have also undergone extensive repairs. At the northwestern Tabriz air base linked to Iran’s medium-range ballistic missiles, taxiways and runways have been restored. In another a missile base in the north of the city, extensive work has been conducted after the war. All the entrances were reopened after being bombed shut, the support area by the entrance was mostly rebuilt and some tunnels are now open, according to a CNN analysis and Sam Lair, a research associate at the James Martin Center for Non-proliferation Studies (CNS).

At Hamadan Airbase in western Iran, craters created by bombs on the runway have been filled and aircraft shelters repaired, according to a CNN analysis and Lair.

Iran has also swiftly rebuilt its largest and newest solid-propellant missile production facility in Shahrud, a technology that allows for the rapid deployment of longer-range missiles.

“I think the most important site is Shahrud. The damage there was repaired very quickly,” Lair said. “There was also a new production line under construction there during the war which was not damaged and is now likely operational, which means counterintuitively solid propellant missile motor production might be greater now than before the war, at least at that site.”

Fortifying nuclear facilities

Despite expressing flexibility in limiting its nuclear program, Iran is rapidly fortifying several of its nuclear facilities, using concrete and large amounts of soil to bury key sites, according to new satellite imagery and analysis from the Institute for Science and International Security (ISIS).

High-resolution satellite imagery from February 10, 2026, analyzed by ISIS, shows Iran continuing to harden tunnel entrances at the underground complex carved into Pickaxe Mountain near Natanz. Fresh concrete is visible at both the western and eastern entrances, increasing protection that could help shield the facility from potential airstrikes, alongside trucks and other construction equipment at the site.

At a nuclear facility known as ‘Taleghan 2’ at the Parchin military complex southeast of Tehran, satellite images published this week show that Iran has completed a concrete sarcophagus around the site and is now covering it with soil, according to the Washington-based institute that focuses on nuclear nonproliferation.

“The facility may soon become a fully unrecognizable bunker, providing significant protection from aerial strikes,” ISIS president David Albright warned in a post on X.

At the 7th of Tir Industrial Complex near Isfahan in central Iran, which is linked to producing centrifuge parts for uranium enrichment, damaged structures have been rebuilt, according to CNN-reviewed image analysis. The complex was sanctioned by the UN in October 2025.

“I think Iran is reconstituting its nuclear and missile programs, probably faster than Israel claimed it could during (Operation) Rising Lion,” Jeffrey Lewis, Distinguished Scholar of Global Security at Middlebury College, told CNN referring to the Israeli strikes in June.

“The reconstruction of the buildings, as well as some other information, suggests that Iran was either able to replace that equipment or move it to safe places underground before the strikes,” he added.

Reshaping governance

Last year’s conflict with Israel laid bare weaknesses in Iran’s command structures under pressure, with Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei reportedly becoming increasingly hard to reach and authority devolving to provincial governors.

Tehran has since strengthened the Supreme National Security Council headed by Khamenei confidant Ali Larijani and formed a new authority – the Defense Council – to govern in times of war.

War veteran and a former Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) commander Ali Shamkhani, who survived an Israeli attempt on his life during last year’s war, was appointed this month as the secretary of the Defense Council, with the aim of “comprehensively strengthening defense preparations” and developing “mechanisms to counter emerging threats,” an outlet affiliated with Iran’s security apparatus, Nour News, said.

Hamidreza Azizi, a visiting fellow at the German Institute for International and Security Affairs, said Shamkhani’s appointment signals that Iran is preparing for the possibility of a US decapitation strike – potentially targeting the Supreme Leader himself.

“It’s becoming a … more immediate question, the issue of post-Khamenei succession, and they are getting prepared for that … whether or not that’s going to be the case, it depends on many factors, like the scale of a potential US attack or a campaign. But this is at least what I can see happening from within the system,” he told CNN’s Becky Anderson.

Crackdown on dissent

Israel’s strikes on Iran in June were preceded by a sophisticated infiltration by Israel’s Mossad spy agency, a tactic that heightened the already paranoid state of the Iranian regime.

Iran has intensified its crackdown on dissent amid concerns war could trigger regime change. Last month, security forces brutally suppressed nationwide protests, killing thousands and arresting many more in the deadliest suppression of demonstrations in the history of the Islamic Republic.

The regime accused protesters of being Israeli spies and deployed the brutal local paramilitary Basij force to suppress demonstrations which were sparked by poor economic conditions but transformed into calls for regime change.

And the regime’s deepening paranoia has even turned inward. Last week, four prominent reformists who campaigned for President Masoud Pezeshkian were detained by Iranian security forces and accused of incitement against “the internal atmosphere” and working “to destroy national cohesion by … spreading untrue positions against the country,”

War games

As Iranian negotiators engaged with the US in Geneva, Iran launched naval drills in the Persian Gulf to demonstrate its disruptive capabilities to Washington’s regional allies.

In a first, the IRGC closed parts of the Strait of Hormuz for a few hours as it conducted naval exercises, according to Iranian media. The critical chokepoint is located between the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman, through which one-fifth of daily oil global production flow every day.

Iranian officials have previously threatened to close the strait in the face of tensions with the West, a scenario that could cause upheaval in the global energy market.

Iran’s navy also held a joint exercise with Russia in the Gulf of Oman and northern Indian Ocean, where the two sides carried out a drill to “retake a mock hijacked ship,” according to Iranian state media.

This month, the US deployed two aircraft carriers to the region, and one of them shot down an Iranian drone that as it aggressively approached it in the Arabian Sea. And earlier, two gunboats operated by the IRGC approached a US-flagged tanker in the Strait of Hormuz and threatened to board and seize the ship, according to a US military spokesman.

Amid the US military buildup and Iran’s wartime preparations, experts say Iranian officials are trying to send a message to the US.

“The Iranian tactic is trying to convince the United States that war is going to be costly,” said Vali Nasr, a professor at Johns Hopkins University said. “This is not like June. This is not going to be like Venezuela, that the United States will have to face certain costs and it has to calculate those costs before it actually strikes Iran,” he said.

Look America, see how it's done.......

A former prince is arrested in the UK with accountability in question in the US

Analysis by Stephen Collinson

Police officers who came for Britain’s fallen prince on his 66th birthday punctured the defining perception of the Jeffrey Epstein scandal: that wealthy elites are shielded from scrutiny because of who they are.

In America, accountability still seems elusive.

It doesn’t get much more elite than being the brother of King Charles III or the favorite son — according to insiders — of late Queen Elizabeth II. But blue blood did not spare Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor from arrest in an investigation following the release of the Jeffrey Epstein files.

The spectacle of the former Prince Andrew being taken on Thursday from his new, downsized quarters in the British countryside to the grubby indignity of a police station escalated the gravest controversy to rock the royal family in generations.

Mountbatten-Windsor was questioned over suspicion of misconduct in public office. Police have not disclosed what led to Andrew’s arrest but previously said they were assessing whether he shared confidential information with Epstein during his decade as a UK trade envoy. Mountbatten-Windsor denied all prior wrongdoing but has not commented on the latest claims.

But his diminished reality was laid bare in the spare legalese of a police statement Thursday that said “a man in his sixties from Norfolk” had “been released under investigation.”

The principle that no one — not even the former Duke of York — is immune to the principle of equality before the law was reaffirmed in a statement by the King, notable for its icy distancing of the monarch from his brother.

“Let me state clearly: the law must take its course,” it said.

The first arrest of a British royal in nearly 400 years posed this question: If legal authorities in Britain and elsewhere in Europe can act independently and breach the protected circle around Epstein’s former network, why is there not a similar faith in the justice system in the US?

“Great Britain is holding its powerful and privileged to account. The United States of America should do the same,” Democratic Rep. Jake Auchincloss of Massachusetts told CNN’s Kate Bolduan.

In the United Kingdom, the machinery of public investigation appears to be functioning as intended. It’s harder to make that claim with confidence in the US given the politicization of a justice system that has prosecuted President Donald Trump’s opponents and a president who pardoned hundreds of people convicted of crimes linked to the January 6, 2021, riot.

The Trump DOJ had to be forced into every act of disclosure. And the only person offered legal relief so far is Ghislaine Maxwell, who gave testimony absolving the president of wrongdoing in his dealings with her former companion — and was moved to a more lenient prison to serve her sex crimes sentence.

Amid an escalating campaign for justice by victims of Epstein, Trump has branded their trauma a “hoax.” He’s said it’s time for the country to move on. The performative outrage of Attorney General Pam Bondi, who last week refused to address Epstein survivors in a congressional hearing, epitomized the attitude of an administration only forced into releasing the Epstein files by a new law passed late last year amid a Republican revolt.

The core issue at the heart of the Epstein scandal

There is no evidence of wrongdoing by the president in connection with his past friendship with Epstein. Yet Trump’s desire to move on from the Epstein files — despite years of promising to release them — followed by his DOJ’s chaotic, opaque handling of the matter has repeatedly fueled doubt about his motives.

He’s hardly alone among prominent Americans — including former President Bill Clinton, Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick — in facing questions about what they knew of Epstein’s behavior. On Wednesday, billionaire businessman Les Wexner, who helped facilitate Epstein’s luxurious lifestyle, gave a deposition to a congressional committee investigating the alleged sex trafficking ring.

Like Trump, none of these men have been accused by law enforcement of criminal wrongdoing. But past associations with Epstein have now begun to cost prominent Americans in business, big law and the business end of the entertainment industry. Some have lost their jobs. Others are defending their reputation.

The DOJ may be justified in insisting that there is insufficient evidence of wrongdoing to charge anyone with crimes over their ties to Epstein.

This does not, however, address the core issues in the scandal. Even if prosecutions aren’t possible, what about an accounting for scores of women allegedly abused by Epstein? If there was a sex trafficking ring operating in the United States, shouldn’t the government be investigating it, if only to ensure it never happens again? And isn’t the country owed answers about the circle of rich and influential people who continued to associate with Epstein even after his 2008 conviction for soliciting prostitution from a minor.

These questions do not concern the Trump administration alone. There is no public evidence that the Biden administration pursued active inquiries into Epstein or his former orbit after his death.

A recurring lesson of the Epstein saga is that each effort Trump makes to close it down only seems to give it new political life.

But the disclosure of the material unleashed accountability. The British investigation into Mountbatten-Windsor, for example, followed the document dump. So did a separate criminal probe into former British ambassador to the US Peter Mandelson. The onetime cabinet minister is being investigated over claims he passed sensitive information to Epstein that would have been valuable on Wall Street. Mandelson in January said: “I want to say loudly and clearly that I was wrong to believe (Epstein) following his conviction and to continue my association with him afterwards. I apologize unequivocally for doing so to the women and girls who suffered.”

The Epstein files have also led to investigations in Norway and Poland.

This all represents vindication for lawmakers who pushed for their release and for Epstein victims who stepped up their campaign last year.

Some Epstein survivors hope that Thursday’s stunning developments will fuel more disclosure in the US.

“It’s amazing. And it’s really, really something that all the survivors have been looking forward and working towards,” Marina Lacerda told CNN’s John Berman. “I just look at it, it’s insane how everyone’s taking action. And we are doing nothing in the United States.”

Lacerda’s story does not intersect with Mountbatten-Windsor’s, but she is a prominent voice in the victims’ movement.

In a coincidence of timing, the DOJ unveils a big move

While the British investigation into Mountbatten-Windsor is predicated on concerns about his role as a trade envoy, it could open windows into other areas of his life. Most tantalizingly, it could lean into what was known about his alleged activities inside the government and his family.

Since everything about the royals is huge news, every development in the case will refocus attention on the Epstein matter — and new contrasts with the way it’s being handled by the Trump administration.

Spencer Kuvin, a lawyer who represents nine Epstein victims, told “CNN News Central” that the most important breakthrough Thursday was “at least on behalf of the victims is that regardless of title, institution, social standing or power, that these men will be held to account.”

Thursday also offered some consolation to the family of the late Virginia Giuffre, to whom Mountbatten-Windsor reportedly paid millions of dollars in 2022 to settle a case in which she alleged sexual assault. “Today, our broken hearts have been lifted at the news that no one is above the law, not even royalty,” her family said in a statement. Mountbatten-Windsor said he had no recollection of ever meeting Giuffre and settled her lawsuit without admitting responsibility or wrongdoing.

Yet hopes that investigations elsewhere could open a dam of accountability in the United States could only be dashed by Trump’s first comments about Mountbatten-Windsor’s arrest.

“It’s really interesting, because nobody used to speak about Epstein when he was alive, but now they speak. But I’m the one that can talk about it, because I’ve been totally exonerated,” Trump said. “I did nothing. In fact, the opposite — he was against me, he was fighting me in the election, which I just found out throughout the last 3 million pages of documents.”

While the president regards the Epstein affair as a plot against him, women seeking recognition for wrongs they suffered as young girls are likely to be disappointed.

And the idea that the US justice system, like its British counterpart, could operate independently of the head of state — even if it causes him great embarrassment — is no longer credible.

As if to confirm this stark new American reality, the DOJ on Thursday unfurled a massive banner between two iconic columns on its Washington headquarters.

Staring out was a massive picture of Trump’s face.

Emergency loan

Gov. Newsom authorizes emergency loan for public transit

By Bay City News Service

Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a bill at the Colma BART Station on Thursday that will allow public transportation agencies in the Bay Area to receive millions of dollars through an emergency loan aimed at keeping their operations afloat.

"This agreement will help protect transit service for more than three million monthly riders," Newsom said in a statement. "I'm proud of the progress the Bay Area transit service and operators are making on ridership recovery, and this loan will continue to build on that success as the region works together on long-term funding solutions."

Newsom signed AB 117, allowing the California State Transportation Agency to loan $590 million to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, the body responsible for planning and financing the Bay Area's public transit system.

The loan will help prevent potential service cuts as many public transit agencies in the Bay Area face dire financial constraints primarily due to struggling ridership.

He signed the bill alongside numerous public transit leaders and state politicians including state Sen. Scott Wiener, D-San Francisco, state Sen. Josh Becker, D-Menlo Park, state Assemblymember Lori Wilson, D-Suisun City, and state Assemblymember Liz Ortega, D-Hayward.

"This bill provides flexibility while local leaders consider long term solutions and engage stakeholders and constituencies," Wilson said in a speech. "Today's signing reflects our commitment to protecting essential services and strengthening regional partnerships."

Many public transit agencies in the Bay Area have fallen into deep financial woes in the post-COVID-19-pandemic era, and ridership has not fully bounced back as less people work in the office.

BART is facing immediate and long-term budget shortfalls of hundreds of millions of dollars and is developing a contingency plan in response that includes eliminating service and closing several stations. The San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency, or SFMTA, is looking at a fiscal cliff that could grow to more than $400 million by 2030.

"We have an operating funding problem," Wiener said. "If we don't do anything, if we just let inertia set in, we're going to lose our public transportation systems. We're going to lose BART."

The loan will be paid back over a period of 12 years in quarterly installments, interest free for the first two years. Interest rates will then be tied to the state's surplus fund so that general fund will not be short-changed.

Another stipulation is that the California Transportation Commission will oversee the spending of the funds.

"We all need to step up our game," Newsom said. "We can't continue to do what we've done because we will be right back here in a few years."

Copyright © 2026 Bay City News, Inc. All rights reserved. Republication, rebroadcast or redistribution without the express written consent of Bay City News, Inc. is prohibited. Bay City News is a 24/7 news service covering the greater Bay Area.

It's Nazi Idaho.....

“Who the Fuck Are These Men?”

How extremists reconquered Idaho—and how some locals are fighting back.

Michael Edison Hayden

By nightfall, people all over America had seen the footage. It was barely a month into President Donald Trump’s second term, and a team of black-clad private security officers was violently dragging a woman out of a Republican town hall meeting in Idaho. One agent mumbled that things would get “a hundred times better” if she would cooperate.

“That’s what they say to rape victims, you fucking piece of shit!” she shouted back.

The woman, a ginger-haired 41-year-old named Teresa Borrenpohl, had worn beige pumps to the event. Her left shoe popped off as the agents hauled her away.

Megan Kunz, a friend of Borrenpohl’s wearing a “Destroy American Fascism” hoodie, tried to help. But an older man in a blue flannel blocked Kunz’s path, towering over her like a self-deputized sheriff.

“You’re not my dad!” Kunz snapped.

“And you aren’t my wife!” he replied.

The town hall, hosted at a high school by the Kootenai County Republican Central Committee (KCRCC), had been contentious from the start. Borrenpohl and others interrupted speakers; conservative attendees shouted back. Emcee Ed Bejarana, an audiobook voice actor with a folksy baritone, called Borrenpohl a “little girl” and went on an extended diatribe about the “crazy” audience members who were “just popping off with stupid remarks.”

“Is this a town hall or a lecture?” ­Borrenpohl repeatedly shouted at ­Bejarana.

That’s when Bob Norris, the county sheriff, ordered Borrenpohl to leave, before directing a security team to remove her. “Who the fuck are these men?” Borrenpohl said as the guards grabbed her. In the struggle, she kicked and bit one of them, according to court documents. People lurched from their seats and shouted. Gregg ­Johnson, who’d never met Borrenpohl before, yelled, “Hey, leave her alone!” at the men in black. Within minutes, Norris and a security guard had detained Johnson, zip-tying his hands behind his back.

It took Kunz about 10 minutes to locate Borrenpohl in the lobby and return the missing shoe. When she finally found her, Kunz started to cry.

Footage of the chaotic town hall zipped across phone screens, a flashing red warning of the Trumpian illiberalism that unfolded in the year that followed. In places like Kootenai County, where white Christian Republicans hold a supermajority, local politics is mutating into something undeniably extreme. North Idaho offers a particularly stark example. A decade after Trump took over the GOP, the Coeur d’Alene region finds itself beset by a ­vexing mix of far-right activists and white nationalists who are trying to drive moderate voices out of political life.

North Idaho came up a lot during my time at the Southern Poverty Law Center, the storied civil rights watchdog where I worked from 2018 through 2023. The region seemed to have an uncanny ability to attract bigots from elsewhere in the country. But Leigh McOmber, a 57-year-old resident I met last summer at Coeur d’Alene’s annual Pride celebration, recalled a time when the area felt far more tolerant.

“When I hear people who have just moved here in the last few years talk about Idaho values being these horrific, anti-LGBTQ, racist, awful opinions, this is not what Idaho…was,” she said, reflecting on the decades she’s lived in the region. “It was never like that.”

By the 1970s, though, neo-Nazis were arriving.

Richard Butler, founder of the Aryan ­Nations, moved from California to Hayden Lake—a few miles outside Coeur d’Alene—around 1973 and built a compound there. In the 1980s, a related terrorist group called The Order committed bombings, robberies, and other violent attacks throughout the American West, including the murder of Jewish radio host Alan Berg in Denver.

Then in 1991, an Aryan Nations associate named Randy Weaver failed to appear in court on a firearms charge. US marshals began surveilling his property the following year, and when they approached his residence in the Ruby Ridge area of North Idaho, they came into conflict with the Weaver family, ultimately killing Weaver’s teenage son and Weaver’s wife, who was carrying the couple’s baby in her arms when she was shot. A friend of Weaver’s shot and killed a marshal in the chaos; a jury acquitted him of murder.

The Ruby Ridge disaster galvanized the radical right in America, especially in North Idaho. Longtime residents of Coeur d’Alene remember seeing Aryan Nations supporters standing on street corners, waving swastika flags. Members marched down Sherman Avenue, the city’s main drag.

In 1998, Aryan Nations security personnel fired on a family driving near their compound, mistakenly believing themselves to be under attack. The SPLC sued on behalf of the family, resulting in a judgment of more than $6 million. The suit decimated the Aryan Nations, and for a time, residents felt like things had calmed down—until Trump’s first term.

“Things got weird in Coeur d’Alene after the 2016 election,” Kunz told me. “But then after the Covid-19 pandemic, shit went completely off the rails.”

In 2019, the KCRCC—the same entity that would go on to sponsor the shambolic February 2025 town hall—passed a resolution urging the federal government to reinstate the travel privileges of Martin Sellner, an Austrian “Identitarian” whose movement aims to “preserve and secure a future for ethno-cultural identity in Europe.” Sellner had sought to enter the country to marry Brittany Pettibone, a local social media influencer who in 2016 helped mainstream the far-right Pizzagate conspiracy theory about a nonexistent pedophile dungeon below a Washington, DC, pizzeria. It’s unclear why the US government had revoked Sellner’s travel authorization, though the move came following revelations that he’d exchanged emails with Brenton Tarrant the year before Tarrant murdered 51 people in two New Zealand mosques. (There is no evidence Sellner was involved in Tarrant’s crimes.)

Around that time, a new slew of right-wing radicals moved to the area. There’s Lana Lokteff and Henrik Palmgren of Red Ice, a “Pro-European/Pro-White” outlet that publishes video episodes with titles like “The Wrath of the Awakened Saxon” and “AI Zionism: No One Understands How Bad This Is.” Owen Benjamin—a fringe comedian who has made comments defending Adolf Hitler, like saying the führer merely wanted to “clean [Germany] of the parasites”—tried to build a compound in the region, which locals feared might lead to another Ruby Ridge. Matt Colligan, a participant in the infamous Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, moved to the area from Massachusetts.

And unlike the neo-Nazi terrorists of decades past, some of the new extremists quickly began making inroads in the local GOP power structure. A Republican group called the North Idaho Pachyderm Club, which is promoted on the official Kootenai County GOP website, has invited far-right activists Vincent James Foxx and Dave Reilly to speak in recent years. Reilly, who has a history of antisemitic commentary, even secured a KCRCC endorsement for his failed 2021 school board campaign.

More moderate Republicans became targets. Jennifer Drake, who owns an ­English-style pub called the Crown and Thistle, says others in her party first lashed out at her in 2020 for participating in a charity drive to provide sanitary pads to needy women. The event was sponsored by a chapter of the Satanic Temple, which promotes secularism and satirizes conservative Christians while also playing with the idea of devil worship in a tongue-in-cheek way. Drake allowed the group to put a “Menstruatin’ with Satan” donation bin outside her restroom. Once word reached Facebook, some religious conservatives took the idea of devil worship at face value, and conspiracy theories spread. Extremists have harassed Drake ever since.

In June 2020, armed individuals patrolled the city’s streets in an event called “Gun d’Alene”—part of the backlash to the Black Lives Matter movement. Two years after that, dozens of masked members of Patriot Front, a neofascist collective, were caught packed in a U-Haul, preparing to storm a Pride parade. Police arrested 31 men associated with Patriot Front from at least 10 states, and the images of handcuffed figures in matching blue shirts and khakis tore across the internet. (Several members were convicted, while some of the cases were dismissed.) Coeur d’Alene’s police chief told reporters that the department subsequently received more than 100 threatening phone calls from as far away as Norway.

Then in March 2024, the University of Utah women’s basketball team, which was staying in Coeur d’Alene during the NCAA tournament, said they’d been subjected to racial harassment so frightening that they fled town. Law enforcement concluded that “five credible eyewitness statements confirmed that someone shouted the N-word” at a member of the group as they walked to dinner and that two hours later, a white 18-year-old was recorded yelling, “I hate [N-word]s, but I’ll fuck your butt!”

It was “incredibly upsetting for all of us,” Utah coach Lynne Roberts told the Associated Press.

Local prosecutor Ryan Hunter expressed outrage at the “abhorrently racist and misogynistic” behavior but said there was insufficient evidence that any crime had been committed. In the court of public opinion, though, the verdict was damning. The story made headlines everywhere from the Salt Lake Tribune to ESPN. Even the governor felt compelled to weigh in. “There is no place for racism, hate, or bigotry in the great State of Idaho,” tweeted Republican Brad Little. “We condemn bullies who seek to harass and silence others.”

Then came the town hall.

For politically engaged residents, the detainment of Teresa Borrenpohl was both a local story about familiar gadflies and an example of how menacing Idaho politics had become.

Everyone knew the fiery Borrenpohl. She’d run three long-shot campaigns for the Idaho legislature as a Democrat and spent much of the previous few years opposing efforts by the KCRCC to dominate the board of North Idaho College, where she once worked.

The NIC fights ranged from disputes over governance to culture war issues like pandemic masking and abortion. At one point, the board’s KCRCC-backed chair wrote that he was “battling the NIC ‘deep state’” and lamented that the “liberal progressives are quite deeply entrenched” at the college, according to reports and email records released by NIC. The situation got so bad in 2023 that the Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities threatened to revoke NIC’s accreditation, alleging that “ongoing actions” by the community college’s board “continue to place the institution at risk for viability.”

“What happened at North Idaho College prefigured what is happening to higher education throughout the country,” said Kate Bitz, an organizer with the Western States Center, a civil rights group. “The far right figured out here that it’s a game changer in terms of who is in charge of a community or a community’s future.”

Things came to a head in the fall of 2024, when moderate board candidates backed by the “Save NIC” campaign faced off against a KCRCC slate running under a “Make NIC Great Again” banner. “Liberal factions, real estate interests, and unelected officials are conspiring to seize our college and convert it into a hub for their woke agenda,” the KCRCC warned voters. “But we can thwart their plans!”

On Election Day, even as Trump captured 75 percent of the vote in Kootenai County, Save NIC candidates swept to victory, taking control of the board. But the bad blood persisted. The KCRCC arranged for a private security company, Lear Asset Management, to patrol the February 2025 town hall, citing both a bomb threat that had been made against one of the participants and the fact that Borrenpohl and her Save NIC compatriots were encouraging allies to attend the event. KCRCC Chair Brent Regan later told investigators that Lear’s leadership was “known to the committee” and offered to do the work for free.

At the start of the town hall, Regan issued a stern warning to the audience: “If there’s any disturbances or people can’t maintain decorum, we have security here, and you’ll be escorted out of the building.” If that message was intended for Borrenpohl, police records later indicated that she arrived too late to hear it. (Borrenpohl’s attorney did not respond to requests for comment.)

In the investigation that followed, the city’s cops also pointed out that Borrenpohl and her allies were far from alone in disrupting the event. Detective Dan Haley counted 13 “comments/cheers/jeers” from audience members opposing the KCRCC speakers and 11 from KCRCC supporters. But the Coeur d’Alene police weren’t the ones calling the shots during the meeting. That was Bob Norris, the Kootenai County sheriff. An elected Republican who’s waged a high-profile campaign against “harmful” materials in public libraries, Norris has a contentious relationship with some locals.

Borrenpohl can be heard warning ­Norris not to forcibly remove her—“Bob, you know this is a bad idea”—at which point he backed away and, in the words of state investigators, “pointed her out to two” security guards. The Lear guards then “physically removed Borrenpohl from the event” as Norris “attempted to oversee the matter.” Civil claims filed by Gregg Johnson and Borrenpohl assert that the Lear security guards failed to adequately identify themselves, an allegation that Lear and the KCRCC dispute. Local law enforcement initially cited Borrenpohl for battery, but city prosecutors dropped the charge soon after. Instead, they charged Lear owner Paul Trouette and three of his employees with battery and false imprisonment, both misdemeanors.

The Lear agents pleaded not guilty, arguing that they were acting under lawful orders from Norris. The sheriff “can command any citizen to assist him in the accomplishment of his duties,” the KCRCC’s Regan argued on Newsmax last April. “And that should be a get-out-of-jail-free card.”

Idaho’s attorney general declined to charge Norris, concluding that he’d acted properly in response to the disruptions, and prosecutors eventually dropped the charges against all of Trouette’s employees. But in December, Trouette himself was found guilty of battery against Johnson and another town hall attendee and of two additional misdemeanors. He was acquitted on four other counts, including false imprisonment and the allegations related to Borrenpohl.

“Justice was done,” Ryan Hunter, the local prosecutor, told reporters.

Over a pint at the Crown and Thistle, Christa Hazel recounted how Idaho Republican politics has changed in recent years. “I remember a time when the local Republican Party celebrated when a Democrat would leave their affiliation and join the Republican Party,” she said. “But now…Chairman Brent Regan…will accuse other Republicans of being fake or Democrats in disguise.” (“I am not accusing anyone of anything,” Regan countered. “I am simply pointing out when some people who claim to be Republicans act like Democrats.”)


Hazel moved to Coeur d’Alene from Alabama in 1984, when she was still a girl. She watched as her FBI agent father spent the 1990s investigating the Aryan Nations and The Order. She was hardly a liberal. As student body president at North Idaho College in 1994, she backed an effort to block the formation of a Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Alliance. (NIC’s board overruled the student senate and recognized the club.) Hazel told me recently that she didn’t support the club on grounds that they were “asking for special treatment” under the college’s rules, but she added that she was, and remains, supportive of the LGBTQ community.

Hazel first encountered Regan at a tea party gathering in 2010, and their political paths have crossed many times since. In 2012, Regan was appointed to the local school board, becoming part of an aggressive right-wing majority. He sparked an outcry when, during a discussion about gun control, he recounted a conversation he claimed to have had with his wife: “I said, ‘They can’t figure out what an assault weapon is—it’s just black and it looks scary.’ And she looks at me and says, ‘Well, so is Obama.’” He apologized, but four months later, Hazel—running as a “common sense conservative”—defeated him in his bid for a full term.

In 2016, Regan bested a more moderate candidate to become chair of the KCRCC, the powerful committee that runs the county Republican Party. Hazel resigned as a member of the committee the following year, telling the Coeur d’Alene Press that it had been “taken over by far-right conservatives.”

Since then, the mustachioed Regan has cast an intimidating shadow over local GOP politics. Dan Gookin, a Republican city council member who was running an upstart campaign for mayor when I spoke with him last year, called Regan a “tyrant” and a “dictator.”

Regan chairs the influential Idaho Freedom Foundation, an activist organization that indexes the votes of local legislators. Republican lawmakers have complained that the group is pushing them further to the right by rating them negatively if they fail to pursue a hardline agenda—like an effort to block a state sex-ed program on grounds that it promotes “porn literacy.”

His rhetoric can still be extreme. ­“Kamala Harris is not a Natural Born ­Citizen. Kamala Harris does not meet the requirements to be President,” Regan tweeted in 2024. “It’s just common sense.”


Hazel, meanwhile, has devoted herself to putting the party on a more mainstream path. She co-founded the Save NIC campaign and joined the moderate North Idaho Republicans group that challenges Regan’s faction. She and Gookin are particularly bothered by the local GOP’s embrace of figures like Dave Reilly.

Reilly is a relative newcomer to North Idaho. He was living in northeastern Pennsylvania in 2017 when he traveled to Charlottesville for the Unite the Right rally. When local news outlets reported on his presence at the deadly event, he moved away from the Keystone State—and sued for defamation. He claimed he was not a “participant” in the rally and was simply there to film it as a member of the media, but judges threw out nearly all his claims.

In a 2019 essay, Reilly criticized the ­Charlottesville violence, which he said had fulfilled “the wishes” of political elites who sought to turn the white nationalist rioters into villains. An ardent Catholic, Reilly argued that “white identity” was a false ­concept promoted by “Jewish sociologists” and that youth should embrace conservative religious identity instead. “Although it’s true that the Catholic Church has been infiltrated by homosexuals, Jews, and bad leadership,” he wrote, “the Catholic faith is too old and too deeply internalized and too minutely codified to be co-opted by the evil intentions of social engineers.”

He arrived in Kootenai County around 2020, and his online commentary continued. “There’s a ‘Center for Jewish Ethics’?” he tweeted in March 2021. “Is that where you go to learn how to shoot Palestinian kids, run child sex-trafficking operations, blackmail governments to get your way, oppress the poor and defraud laborers of a just wage?”

He often took aim at other figures on the right. In November 2020, he complained on Twitter that a prominent GOP influencer “wants Republicans to cater to ‘dreamers’, homosexuals and J*ws, while COMPLETELY NEGLECTING Christian, white, working-class Americans.” And he blasted conservative activist Chris Rufo for being “an employee of Paul Singer; a radical Jewish Zionist, a Vulture Capitalist, and manager of Elliot Management.” When he gave a talk on critical race ­theory to the North Idaho Pachyderm Club in the summer of 2021, Reilly pulled out a copy of The Culture of Critique—which promotes antisemitic conspiracy theories—and praised it.

None of that stopped the KCRCC from endorsing Reilly for a seat on the school board of Post Falls, a 45,000-person city in Kootenai County, in 2021. “We have all seen the headlines about transgender child grooming, the implementation of Critical Race Theory, and the adoption of a race-based ‘equity framework’ in Coeur d’Alene,” he wrote on a candidate questionnaire published on the KCRCC’s website. Reilly pledged to keep “divisive, destructive and, frankly, delusional” curricula out of Post Falls’ schools.

Regan has repeatedly said the KCRCC wasn’t aware of Reilly’s online rhetoric when it endorsed him. “Years ago there was an individual that the committee recommended for office who we later [found] out had made some controversial posts on social media,” Regan told me in an email. “After that we initiated our Vetting Committee to better investigate potential candidates. He is not a member or affiliated with the KCRCC.”

But when media outlets exposed Reilly’s antisemitism a month before the election, the KCRCC didn’t pull its endorsement, instead calling him “highly rated.” And Regan personally defended his character. “Have you bothered to meet Dave Reilly and spend a few moments talking to him before you formed your opinion?” Regan wrote on Facebook in response to a complaint about the endorsement. “If you bothered to get all the source information, as I have, you would find Dave Reilly’s true story inspirational.”

Reilly lost, but he hasn’t disappeared from local politics—including his apparent connections to a far-right website called the Idaho Tribune. As my SPLC colleagues and I pointed out in 2022, the outlet often promotes Reilly’s favored causes and denigrates people like Borrenpohl, Jennifer Drake, and Dan Gookin. When I asked Reilly whether he ran the Idaho Tribune, he texted back: “I’m behind *everything* in North Idaho, depending on who you talk to.”

In June 2022, Reilly sent a tweet alerting Libs of TikTok—the online handle of anti-LGBTQ influencer Chaya Raichik—to Coeur d’Alene’s upcoming Pride in the Park event. Four days later, the Idaho ­Tribune breathlessly warned that the event would feature a “drag queen show for Idaho children” and that members of the Satanic Temple were planning to attend. “They are grooming your children,” the website announced.

Raichik heard the call. “We are living in hell,” she wrote, before tweeting an image of a Pride in the Park flyer with the date, time, and location. Four days after that, the Patriot Front members rolled up in a U-Haul.

In 2023, InvestigateWest reported that the Idaho Freedom Foundation, the activist group Regan chairs, contracted with Reilly to help shape its messaging. (According to the IFF, the part-time gig lasted less than three months.) In October 2024, Reilly again appeared at the Pachyderm Club, giving what he described as a talk on “the hidden connections between the liberal” NIC candidates and the Biden Justice Department. The Pachyderm Club did not respond to a request for comment.

The Pachyderms have also hosted Vincent James Foxx, whose website has called for the “regulation of morality” in response to queer people and has raised alarms about Jewish influence in Hollywood. A California transplant, Foxx has been described by ProPublica as the onetime “unofficial propagandist” of the Rise Above Movement, which, according to federal prosecutors, held itself out to be a white supremacist, “combat-ready, militant” group. On a 2022 livestream, Foxx boasted about attending one of the contentious NIC board meetings and hurling slurs.

“I was able to call a couple of guys ‘faggot,’” he bragged. “This one kid, I guess he was like a college student…He walks up to me, he hands me this flyer…[It says] ‘Look at how racist these guys are, look how dangerous these [KCRCC-backed] board members are.’ And I don’t say anything, I just take the flyer from him…[Later], he’s like, ‘Oh wow, you’re, like, a literal Nazi, aren’t you?’ And I was like, ‘Oh, you’re, like, a literal faggot, aren’t you?’”

Hazel said it’s all part of a disturbing pattern: “When you bring antisemites into the tent, what happens?” she asked. “If you point this out, Regan…will attack the messenger for being woke.”

Regan told me that his critics are wrong. “You won’t find any direct evidence supporting those claims,” he wrote. “What you will find is a resolution passed by the full KCRCC committee by unanimous vote rejecting supremacy in all forms. You will find I offered a reward for the arrest and conviction of the person(s) responsible for the reported racist hate incident involving the Utah Women’s Basketball Team.”

Bitz, of the Western States Center, found that response notable.

“It’s interesting to see Regan on his back foot like this,” she said. “Because looking at the KCRCC, this is one of the local Republican Party organs in our country that is most comfortable rubbing shoulders” with extremists.

Once sustained by lumber and mining, Coeur d’Alene now runs on tourism. It’s a captivating place: Imagine the woodsy landscape of Twin Peaks with a shimmering, picturesque lake at its center.

Blair Williams, who owns the Art Spirit Gallery, told me that a quiet but growing group of people in Coeur d’Alene have become fed up with being seen as a hub of hate. They see it as an existential threat not only to their values, but also their livelihoods.

That’s why, after Patriot Front stormed Pride in the Park, concerned residents convened quietly to vent about what was happening to their city. “We didn’t want others to be aware so that we wouldn’t be targeted because we know darn well this is the community we live in,” she said.

In March 2025, Williams sent an email to then-Mayor Woody McEvers warning that all of this was bad for business. She alerted him that Get Lit!—a literature festival sponsored by Eastern Washington University—had opted against housing authors in Coeur d’Alene because of its reputation for political extremism. A spokesperson from Get Lit! confirmed this, noting that an Indigenous writer had grown concerned after seeing video of men dragging Borrenpohl out of the town hall.

McEvers never replied to her. Williams handed me a different statement she’d written that read like a cry for help: “Without addressing the roots of racial hostility and fostering genuine inclusivity, Coeur d’Alene risks further economic decline, continued cultural isolation, and a tarnished reputation that no amount of natural beauty or community pride can easily erase.”

In the meantime, locals are doing what they can to persevere. At the 2025 Pride in the Park, Sarah Lynch told me that the LGBTQ community refuses to let Reilly, Libs of TikTok, or Patriot Front win. Lynch, a former Air Force pilot who now serves as executive director of the North Idaho Pride Alliance, pointed out that the event broke attendance records.

The next day, a Sunday, I visited Candlelight Christian Fellowship, a church housed in an old cineplex that locals told me was another source of political extremism. Inside, the stage was flanked by two enormous flags, one American and one Israeli. After some robust singing, a speaker announced a group of four people for whom we should pray. The last one was Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito. They projected his face onto a big screen.

Then Pastor Paul Van Noy, balding and with a salt-and-pepper beard, emerged wearing a loose-fitting tropical shirt. He criticized Pride in the Park, which he claimed he’d just happened to stumble upon while taking a Saturday stroll with his wife. “By the way, I didn’t want to go, and I didn’t want anyone else to go,” he said. “Don’t let them count the numbers. Coeur d’Alene Press said there were 3,000 people. That is a total fabrication.”

“We love the gay community just like we love drunkards, just like we love drug addicts,” Van Noy explained. “But we do not love what harms people.” He added that “the only reason I’m bringing this up” was that “the people that are there, who are being advocated for, are also mutilating children.” (Gender surgeries on transgender youth are extremely rare, and in 2023, Idaho entirely outlawed gender-affirming medical care for minors.)

At the end of the service, a man handed out sacks of locally grown potatoes.

That night, I met Dave Reilly at Whispers, an outdoor lounge at the Coeur d’Alene Resort. I walked through a winding lobby with a giant fish tank as speakers played Heart’s 1985 power ballad “These Dreams.” The room gave way to a sprawling patio overlooking Coeur d’Alene Lake. There was a giant stone fireplace.

Reilly was wearing a crucifix the size of a softball around his neck and a keffiyeh, the scarf associated with the Palestinian freedom movement. An outspoken defender of white nationalist Nick Fuentes, Reilly is also vehemently anti-Israel. The genocide in Gaza has opened new opportunities for him to try to win converts to his cause.

Reilly was accompanied by Rebecca Hargraves, a striking woman with blond hair and excellent posture who co-hosted a podcast with him. Hargraves moved to Idaho from Seattle “because I was sick of having to deal with minorities,” she wrote on X in 2024. She has urged “white people that don’t feel safe” to join her in the state and “fortify the hell out of it” and has called for a return to “voluntary” segregation.

Also with them was Casey Whalen, a citizen journalist who occasionally writes for the Idaho Tribune. And there was a nervous, skinny man who wore a red Bass Pro Shops ballcap and didn’t want to be identified. He seemed to subscribe to Reilly’s worldview, though Reilly told me that he was Jewish.

“There was an exodus in California in the early ’70s, another one in the early ’80s, another one because of Rodney King in the early ’90s, and then because of Covid,” Reilly said, sipping his beer. “So, I mean, this is the fifth or sixth wave of mass migration to Idaho.”

I asked whether he meant a migration of white nationalists. The man in the red hat corrected me to say they preferred to use the word “separatists.”

Reilly denied that he wanted to build a white ethnostate and insisted his focus was on his Catholicism. Richard Spencer—who gained infamy for his own participation in Unite the Right—later told me that he thought Reilly, while sincere in his faith, had shifted to emphasizing Catholic themes because the ethnostate conversation “hit a brick wall” with the average American.

Reilly said Idaho is already “great the way that it is” and noted that celebrities like the Kardashians, Mark Wahlberg, and Justin Bieber have vacationed here.

“But why do they come up here?” ­Hargraves interjected.

“Because it’s nice,” Reilly answered.

“Why is it nice?” Hargraves continued. “It’s, what, 90 percent white? Okay, let’s go to anywhere in the world that’s 89 percent Black. And you can tell me it’s going to be some sort of vacation destination?”

The conversation at one point turned to the Candlelight church. Van Noy is a self-professed Christian Zionist, which puts him directly at odds with Reilly. “Why do they have such a boner for you?” Hargraves asked Reilly. “I don’t get it.”

“They tanked my school board campaign in 2021,” Reilly said. Van Noy later told me over email that while he personally didn’t support Reilly, it was a “local Jewish man (who is a believer in Jesus as Messiah—and often attends Candlelight)” who “led the charge” to defeat him; the church itself didn’t get involved.

More recently, Reilly has been pointing to allegations made by Van Noy’s adult daughter, who stated publicly in November that Van Noy had failed to protect her from past sexual abuse by others. Van Noy maintains he did nothing wrong and told me that there are “many false accusations circulating.” Candlelight, he said, “has a zero-tolerance, one strike policy, for all sexual crimes.”

As we sat on the Whispers patio, Reilly talked about how he’d started out as an artist and became addicted to opioids, then got clean through the church. After Unite the Right, he lived in Kansas, where he immersed himself in religion before moving to North Idaho.

“A lot of my life, I just view as—‘this is my art,’” Reilly said. “And if my art is Nazism, well, then fine, whatever. You can call it whatever you want.”

Reilly laughed for a moment and then asked me not to print that part.

“Strike that,” he said.

The next day, I met Russell Mann, a Republican in his mid-40s who runs the local Bombastic Brewing, over coffee. He said Reilly and his crew bring back bad memories of Idaho’s extremist past, and he blames the KCRCC and the Republican Party for helping undo the progress that had been made since Aryan Nations was driven out. “The difference between then and now is that political power is behind this,” Mann told me.

“I would say that anywhere I go, or anyone I talk to, and I mention Idaho, they instantly think, ‘That’s a racist place’ or ‘That’s a terrible place,’” he said. “I thought 20 years ago that by now, I wouldn’t have to explain anytime I say I’m from Idaho that I’m not racist. But it came back.”

Mann noted that Reilly had warmly greeted Frank DeSilva during an online chat that took place on the night of the 2025 Pride in the Park. DeSilva served more than a decade in prison for his affiliation with The Order and once admitted in court that he had organized a 1983 cross burning. When I asked Reilly about this, he told me that DeSilva had “requested to speak” and that if he had known DeSilva “was so long-winded,” he would have passed.

In late June, news broke of a man near Coeur d’Alene murdering two firefighters with a shotgun and severely wounding another before taking his own life. The killer, 20-year-old Wess Roley, who’d aspired to be a firefighter himself, had baited the victims into a death trap by starting a blaze. The crime didn’t seem politically motivated, but it sparked another flurry of social media posts about Kootenai County and messages from pretty much everyone I’d been interviewing—even Reilly.

“I get people that hate cops, but firefighters?” he texted me.

In November, Gookin, the moderate Republican, overcame intense KCRCC opposition to win Coeur d’Alene’s mayoral election by a few hundred votes. His victory came on a night in which ideologically diverse candidates, ranging from center-right to socialist, defeated MAGA-­backed politicians across the country. And just last week, North Idaho College received official confirmation that it had been removed from probation and would keep its accreditation.

One theme I heard repeatedly about Coeur d’Alene was that it is a bellwether for radicalization. Meaning that if you see something like authoritarians ­shutting down speech at a town hall there—or maybe even a maniac ambushing firefighters—you should take it seriously, because it could be coming to your city next.

Perhaps that’s even true for the modest successes of folks like Borrenpohl, Hazel, and Gookin as they look to reclaim power from the extremist right. As Kate Bitz of the Western States Center said, “If it happens in North Idaho now, no one should be surprised when it happens nationally a few years later.”

Should be 18....

Newsom backs social media restrictions for teens under 16

The California governor joins a growing chorus of politicians calling for social media age limits.

By Tyler Katzenberger and Christine Mui

California Gov. Gavin Newsom stepped into the fight over age limits on social media Thursday, saying he wants state legislation that would restrict access to the powerful online platforms for teens under 16.

In a policy position shared first with POLITICO, Newsom spokesperson Tara Gallegos said that the Democratic governor supports passing age-gating rules inspired by those Australia began enforcing last year, which bar teens under 16 from having social media accounts. Her comments came minutes after Newsom told reporters that “we have to address this issue” of teenagers’ chronic use of social media.

“We need help. I think it’s long overdue that we’re having the debate,” Newsom said, when asked about age-gating during a press conference near San Francisco. “It is something that I’m very grateful that we are debating and pursuing at the state level.”

With his remarks, the governor moved a step ahead of a bipartisan group of state lawmakers who this month introduced legislation that calls for “a minimum age requirement to open or maintain a social media account.” His comments mark a notable break from the governor’s typical reluctance to weigh in on pending legislation before it reaches his desk.

Lawmakers are debating the age limit to include in the legislation. The bill’s lead author, Long Beach Democrat Josh Lowenthal, previously said he’s leaning toward setting the cutoff at 16.

In staking out his position, Newsom joins a growing group of high-profile politicians arguing for the need to restrict access to Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok and other social media platforms that draw billions of daily users and have upended how people interact. The call for age limits has gained momentum since Australia put its ban in place, citing a growing body of research that the platforms can be addictive and harmful to teens’ mental health.

When asked whether the governor would specifically support an outright ban on social media accounts for teens under 16 — as Australia has done — Gallegos said that was still in flux.

Newsom’s comments Thursday follow recent overseas trips he made to the World Economic Forum in Switzerland and the Munich Security Conference. The governor said he directly discussed social media age limits in meetings with world leaders, including Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez.

Spain and Malaysia are exploring Australia-style bans, while officials in France, Denmark and Italy are mulling a ban for kids under 15. On Wednesday, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz signaled he may back a proposal to restrict access for kids under 14 — an idea that’s gained steam back in the U.S., where bipartisan members of Congress are pushing a 13-and-under ban.

Newsom previously touched on the issue during his State of the State address in January, in which he called on state lawmakers to explore stronger youth social media controls. During the speech, he questioned if California could “do more” following Australia’s social media ban.

Even with the governor’s support, proposals to legally cut off teens’ access to social media are likely to spark fierce pushback from tech giants. Google, TikTok and Meta, which owns Facebook, are currently suing to block a 2024 state law that requires parental consent before minors view personalized content feeds, arguing it infringes on free speech.

Tech industry group NetChoice, which lists Meta, Google and TikTok as members, has also indicated it may challenge two California social media laws passed last year: one requiring platforms to show minors health warning labels, and another requiring device-makers like Apple and Google to collect user ages.

The same group of state lawmakers behind California’s age-gating bill also recently introduced legislation that would create an independent “eSafety Commission” to enforce digital platform regulations, modeled on a similarly named Australian agency. Newsom has not said whether he supports the measure.

Not Funny












 

A Nazi by any other name.........

French far right looks for Charlie Kirk moment after activist’s killing

Ahead of local elections that serve as a bellwether for next year’s presidential campaign, the National Rally says it is the victim of an increasingly radical left wing.

By Marion Solletty and Victor Goury-Laffont

France’s far right is framing the death of an activist associated with far-right groups as a moment akin to the murder of Charlie Kirk in the United States.

The National Rally has in recent days started pointing to the killing of 23-year-old Quentin Deranque in Lyon as proof the poll-topping populist party is the victim of an increasingly radical political left, much as the MAGA movement in the United States did following Kirk’s assassination last year.

With key municipal elections next month serving as a bellwether of the National Rally’s electability heading into the 2027 presidential race, the incident has deepened the fissures in France’s polarized politics and fueled fears of further violence.

“What happened to Quentin, it feels like it could have happened dozens of times to our supporters in recent years,” said National Rally MEP Pierre-Romain Thionnet.

“Of course, those are not the same circumstances,” Thionnet said of the Kirk comparison. “But there are similarities in the way it resonates.”

Deranque was, unlike Kirk, unknown to the general public before he died Saturday after taking several blows to the head during a fight that broke out near a university where MEP Rima Hassan was attending an event.

The events leading up to the fight that cost Deranque his life remain unclear. The far-right feminist group Collectif Nemesis said Deranque was providing security for them at their protest against Hassan and her anticapitalist party, France Unbowed.

France Unbowed and its firebrand leader Jean-Luc Mélenchon have been the focus of most of the fury following revelations that police are investigating whether members of the now-disbanded antifascist group Young Guard, cofounded by France Unbowed lawmaker Raphaël Arnault, was involved in the fight.

A judge on Thursday placed two people under formal investigation for voluntary homicide, while one of Arnault’s parliamentary assistants was put under formal investigation for aiding and abetting a crime.

Lyon’s chief prosecutor told reporters earlier Thursday that he had requested seven people, including the assistant, be put under formal investigation for voluntary homicide. The prosecutor said three of the suspects told investigators that they were or had been affiliated with “ultra-left” groups. Some acknowledged that they took part in a fight but all denied their intent was to kill Deranque, the prosecutor said.

Right-wing shock

National Rally President Jordan Bardella likened the incident to terrorism at a press conference Wednesday, as U.S. President Donald Trump had done after Kirk’s death.  

“When an organization uses terror to impose its ideology, it must be fought with the same force as terrorist groups,” Bardella said.  

France Unbowed and its firebrand leader Jean-Luc Mélenchon have been the focus of most of the fury following revelations that police are investigating whether members of the now-disbanded antifascist group Young Guard was involved in the fight. | Sameer Al-Doumy/AFP via Getty Images
Marion Maréchal, Marine Le Pen’s niece and an MEP with Giorgia Meloni’s European Conservatives and Reformists, is asking the European Parliament to hold a debate “on the violence of the far left in Europe that threatens our democracies.” 

Meloni herself weighed in, expressing her “shock” on X before blaming “left-wing extremism” and “a climate of ideological hatred that is sweeping across several nations” — sparking yet another feud with French President Emmanuel Macron.

Macron and his prime minister, Sébastien Lecornu, said France Unbowed must “clean house.”

France Unbowed is invoking Kirk’s killing as well, but as a cautionary tale, concerned about a Trump-like crackdown on universities. 

French Education Minister Philippe Baptiste announced Tuesday he would seek to prevent political conferences at universities whenever authorities believed they could lead to confrontation. Hassan, the MEP who had been taking part in a conference in Lyon during the deadly confrontation, said she feared the government would respond with “censorship” at universities.  

And French media reported Thursday that Lyon Mayor Grégory Doucet was opposed to holding a march Saturday to honor Deranque over fears it could lead to more violence.

Historical violence

While the political climate in France appears to have turned more aggressive, historically most violence has been committed by extreme right-wing groups.

A 2021 study found that of the 43 homicides with ideological motives that occurred between 1986 and 2014, just four were committed by far-left militants.

The sociologist who oversaw that work, Isabelle Sommier, told French newspaper Le Monde in an interview published Thursday that the number of politically motivated assaults has doubled since 2017, most of them carried out by ultra-right extremists. She said if authorities determine that Deranque was killed by an antifascist group because of his political views, he’d be the first victim of extreme-left violence since the 1980s.

France Unbowed, for its part, has condemned the violent attack and said they played no role in it, stressing that the party’s call for a “civic revolution” is nonviolent. Arnault, the MP whose assistant is being investigated, expressed “horror and disgust” at the news of Deranque’s death and said he was working with parliamentary services to terminate the contract of an aide who reportedly took part in the fight. 

The tragedy isn’t expected to affect France Unbowed’s prospects in the race to lead Lyon, France’s third-largest city. The party was not expected to win there and polling obtained exclusively by POLITICO following Deranque’s death shows no significant change in France Unbowed’s prospects.   

The bigger test will be whether the incident affects the outlook for mayoral races where France Unbowed candidates are expected to be competitive.

Just more fucking stupid shit for the stupid people to waste their time on..........

Trump says he will declassify reports on UFOs

The president’s announcement came after he criticized former President Barack Obama for suggesting aliens are real.

By Aaron Pellish

President Donald Trump says he’s directing the government to release classified files about UFOs and extraterrestrial life in response to a spike in interest in the subject caused by one of his predecessors in the White House.

Trump announced on social media Thursday that he would direct the Department of Defense and other agencies to release the material days after former President Barack Obama suggested in an interview that aliens are “real” though he hadn’t seen any.

“Based on the tremendous interest shown, I will be directing the Secretary of War, and other relevant Departments and Agencies, to begin the process of identifying and releasing Government files related to alien and extraterrestrial life, unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP), and unidentified flying objects (UFOs), and any and all other information connected to these highly complex, but extremely interesting and important, matters,” Trump said in the social media post.

Asked in an interview published Saturday about the existence of extraterrestrial life, Obama said aliens are “real but I haven’t seen them” and debunked conspiracy theories about a government facility in Nevada housing an extraterrestrial life form.

“They’re not being kept in Area 51. There’s no underground facility unless there’s this enormous conspiracy and they hid it from the president of the United States,” Obama told podcast host Brian Tyler Cohen.

Obama later clarified in a social media post that he meant to suggest that “the universe is so vast that the odds are good there’s life out there” and reiterated that “I saw no evidence during my presidency that extraterrestrials have made contact with us.”

Trump criticized Obama’s comments Thursday afternoon, telling reporters he believes Obama wrongly revealed classified information.

Often the subject of government conspiracy theories, questions around U.S. contact with UFOs broke into the mainstream following a 2021 report from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence detailing dozens of instances of U.S. Navy pilots encountering unexplained aerial phenomena dating back to 2004.

That report became the central focus of a 2022 House Intelligence hearing that featured declassified videos and descriptions of those encounters.

Trump backs pesticide

MAHA unleashes on White House after Trump backs pesticide

MAHA advocates promptly denounced the move and said it would threaten Republicans’ chances in the midterms.

By Marcia Brown and Cheyenne Haslett

President Donald Trump’s Wednesday night executive order promoting production of a widely used herbicide is threatening to blow up a coalition that played a key role in his 2024 election victory.

Make America Healthy Again activists brought into the Republican fold by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. are furious over Trump’s move to ensure adequate supplies of the herbicide glyphosate, a prime target of their efforts to crack down on toxic chemicals that they argue are killing Americans.

“I’m witnessing the bottom falling out on MAHA,” MAHA influencer Kelly Ryerson, who goes by the moniker “Glyphosate Girl” online, said of watching the reaction on X. “People came along on MAHA because of pesticides and foods. It wasn’t because of vaccines.”

The controversy encapsulates the president’s tightrope walk as he struggles to maintain grassroots support while he courts traditional Republican farm and business allies.

Just last month, the White House, GOP lawmakers and Republican strategists coalesced around a midterm election strategy that centered on popular food policies of the MAHA agenda to help hold onto tight majorities in Congress. Now Trump appears to be doubling down on his position to protect pesticide use.

His administration already sided with the maker of the glyphosate-based Roundup in the company’s Supreme Court case and Republican lawmakers are pushing for legislation to make it more difficult to sue pesticide manufacturers. Wednesday’s executive order put a heavy focus on glyphosate’s role in keeping food affordable and farmers afloat, both potential weak points for the president in the midterms.

Some Democrats have already seized on the issue, using it to question the Trump administration’s dedication to food and health.

“Trump’s executive order is nothing more than an attempt to protect one of the biggest producers of a toxic pesticide from legal liabilities,” said Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) in a statement. “The message from this Administration is clear: chemical company profits are more important than your health.”

Responding to the backlash from MAHA advocates, the White House sought to frame the order as “not an endorsement of glyphosate,” but a recognition of the “reality” that increasing domestic production of phosphorus, a key ingredient in glyphosate that’s also used in weapons and semiconductor production, is necessary for national security as well as crop production.

More necessary, in this case, than MAHA priorities, a White House official said.

“There’s plenty to be done on the MAHA front, but we also can’t compromise our security, or our general food supply, either. It’s not very MAHA for there to be mass famines because we don’t grow enough food to feed our population,” said the official, who was granted anonymity to describe the White House’s thinking.

“I mean, are people happy about it? No, but there’s a logic here that’s pretty undeniable,” the official said.

Food safety and environmental groups such as the Center for Biological Diversity and the Center for Food Safety pushed back against the notion of a national security threat, noting that there’s no imminent, new risk to glyphosate supply.

The official maintained that MAHA would remain a priority for the midterms and pointed to a $700 million pilot program through USDA for regenerative farming, which doesn’t rely on chemical inputs.

The executive order also comes at a moment of crisis for Bayer, the parent company of Monsanto, which makes the glyphosate-based weedkiller Roundup. On Tuesday, the company announced a proposed $7.25 billion settlement of thousands of lawsuits alleging its product causes cancer. And in December, a key study that regulators leaned on to demonstrate glyphosate’s safety was retracted.

“President Trump’s Executive Order reinforces the critical need for U.S. farmers to have access to essential, domestically produced crop protection tools such as glyphosate,” Bayer spokesperson Brian Leake said in a statement attributed to Monsanto. “We will comply with this order to produce glyphosate and elemental phosphorus.”

Zen Honeycutt, executive director of the grassroots group Moms Across America, said the electoral consequences will be real.

“To put toxic farming and businesses before the health and safety of our children is a betrayal of every voter who voted for him to [Make America Healthy Again],” she said in a statement to POLITICO. “The repercussions are not going to just affect the midterms, but the health of millions of Americans for generations to come.”

While pesticides have historically elicited opposition from environmentally conscious Democrats, the MAHA movement’s focus on the issue has made it bipartisan. Wednesday’s executive order prompted some GOP candidates running on the MAHA agenda to try to distance themselves from the president’s position.

“There is no pending ban or shortage of glyphosate. There is only pending lawsuits for a foreign company that is causing harm to Americans. And now they have immunity — this must be reversed,” wrote Zach Lahn on X. Lahn is a Republican candidate for Iowa governor.

Alex Zdan, a New Jersey Republican running to oppose Booker, said it is possible to achieve both the president’s goal of national security and Kennedy’s goal of safe farming practices.

“These two tracks can be ongoing at the same time. They complement each other — not conflict. MAHA is not a light switch that can be turned on or off, it’s a long-term commitment to promoting freedom and responsibility,” Zdan told POLITICO in a statement.

The issue is especially complicated for Kennedy, who has called glyphosate “one of the likely culprits” behind high rates of chronic disease in the U.S. and, as an attorney, helped win a major lawsuit against Monsanto contending that Roundup causes cancer.

As health secretary, Kennedy lacks the authority to limit pesticide exposure, which is the purview of the Environmental Protection Agency. He has also run up against the economic realities of farmers’ reliance on glyphosate. On a recent podcast with comedian Theo Vonn, Kennedy said HHS’s mission was to find alternatives to “transition off of [glyphosate] without putting farmers out of business.”

MAHA advocates have hammered EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin over what they see as his status quo approach to pesticide regulations, even launching a petition calling for his removal. But it’s not just Zeldin; despite pressure from advocates to target glyphosate, the White House’s splashy MAHA cross-agency strategy released last year, led by Kennedy, ultimately left the industry alone.

Asked if the executive order reflects a change of heart from the Health secretary, a spokesperson provided a statement from Kennedy backing the president.

“Donald Trump’s Executive Order puts America first where it matters most — our defense readiness and our food supply,” Kennedy said in a statement. “We must safeguard America’s national security first, because all of our priorities depend on it. When hostile actors control critical inputs, they weaken our security. By expanding domestic production, we close that gap and protect American families.”