A place were I can write...

My simple blog of pictures of travel, friends, activities and the Universe we live in as we go slowly around the Sun.



February 06, 2026

Cassiopeia A


Massive stars in our Milky Way Galaxy live spectacular lives. Collapsing from vast cosmic clouds, their nuclear furnaces ignite and create heavy elements in their cores. After only a few million years for the most massive stars, the enriched material is blasted back into interstellar space where star formation can begin anew. The expanding debris cloud known as Cassiopeia A is an example of this final phase of the stellar life cycle. Light from the supernova explosion that created this remnant would have been first seen in planet Earth's sky about 350 years ago, although it took that light 11,000 years to reach us. This sharp NIRCam image from the James Webb Space Telescope shows the still-hot filaments and knots in the supernova remnant. The whitish, smoke-like outer shell of the expanding blast wave is about 20 light-years across. A series of light echoes from the massive star's cataclysmic explosion are also identified in Webb's detailed images of the surrounding interstellar medium.

Shaping the race to replace her

Marjorie Taylor Greene’s feud with Donald Trump is shaping the race to replace her

By Kathryn Squyres

Among the people running to fill the seat vacated by former GOP Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene is one of her former staffers, Jim Tully. Introducing himself on a local conservative radio show in January, he didn’t mention his connection to Greene until asked by the host.

Tully said Greene’s departure left “a glaring loss in the district,” adding that he announced his campaign almost immediately after Greene’s November announcement of her resignation to give voters a chance to “start over.”

“I couldn’t leave families wondering what was next,” he said. “I had to give them some hope.”

Other candidates are more pointed about their former congresswoman.

James Marty Brown, a former firefighter and paramedic, says Greene “divided a lot of people” with her approach to politics.

“She’s the cat chasing that little dangling feather, a little shiny object, instead of sitting back and looking to see what the big picture of what’s going on is,” he told CNN recently.

There’s a clear pattern in how the Republicans running to replace Greene address her resignation and her split with President Donald Trump. Those who are better known due to their prior involvement with local GOP politics strike a balance between showing loyalty to Trump and respect to Greene, while newcomers have less hesitation about taking shots at her.

CNN spoke with or reviewed the public comments of 12 of the 16 Republicans who launched campaigns to replace Greene in a March 10 primary likely to lead to an April runoff.

Almost all are claiming that they will be Trump’s best local ally. More than half said they regularly hear from voters about Greene, including from people who say they felt confused and betrayed by her resignation in the middle of her third term.

David Guldenschuh, an attorney in Rome, Georgia, who hosts a weekly conservative talk show on WLAQ-AM, notes that Georgia’s 14th District is one of the most pro-Trump districts in the country, particularly in its northern counties on the Tennessee and Alabama borders well away from the Atlanta suburbs.

“President Trump is extremely popular here, so of course you’re going to see the candidates try to, as I said, out-Trump each other,” said Guldenschuh, who is also the past chair of the Floyd County Republican Party.

Trump this week endorsed Clay Fuller, who resigned his role as a local district attorney to run in the special election. Fuller said recently that he would ultimately back the president even when the administration disagreed with him.

“If they say, ‘This is what we’re going with,’ they have a very strong perspective on what’s best for the American people,” he said on Guldenschuh’s show. “So I’d be willing to listen … and assist them with it because when I’m up there, I’m going to have the president’s back.”

Greene wrote on X in November that she would not be endorsing a successor.

A balancing act for some candidates

As a senior district representative for Greene, Tully said that he worked as Greene’s “eyes and ears” in the district, relaying local sentiments to her office.

Still, he spent most of a recent interview on Guldenschuh’s show pitching listeners on his connection to the district.

“When we found ourselves so enamored with Congresswoman Greene at points, and all of the sudden, here we are just disillusioned at some points, sometimes very mad, folks needed to know that there was somebody there that cared enough to say, ‘Wait a minute, I’m not gonna let that happen,’” he said.

Brian Stover, a former county commissioner and businessman from the southern part of the district, told Fox News Digital in December that he had a different approach.

“I respect everything she’s done,” Stover said. “She’s worked for the district, but I have a different tactic. I go in, and I like to negotiate through just sitting down, having good, great conversations and … not being so loud, like she is.”

Stover also told Fox News that he’d handle any disagreements with the president privately.

“You don’t get stuff from just going in and trying to be the bull in the china shop,” he said. “I can sit down with President Trump, and I guarantee you we can work things out for the best of my district.”

And former state Sen. Colton Moore, who also resigned to run, said in a statement to CNN that Greene’s “departure opens the door for a new chapter focused on unity behind Trump.”

“I think the Republican Party absolutely has problems, especially when it comes to weak leadership and broken promises,” Moore said in the statement. “Donald Trump remains the most important political figure in our movement and the clear leader of the America First base. Congresswoman Greene raised important concerns to hold people accountable, and I appreciate her fighting for the district.”

Moore also has his own history of clashes with Republicans. He was expelled from the state senate’s GOP caucus and later arrested for attempting to force his way onto the House floor for a joint address after he had been banned from the chamber. He said in his statement he’s “not running to be anyone’s clone.”

The political newcomers take more shots at Greene

While none of the newcomers are centering their opinions of Greene in their campaigns, several of them were quick to criticize her in interviews with CNN.

Star Black, a retired Federal Emergency Management Agency employee, had already been running to challenge Greene in the primary if she had run again. She said talking to voters since her campaign announcement in June showed how “polarizing” Greene had been.

“(Greene) never had a plan of how she was going to fix anything, but she certainly was able to grab a headline to complain about it,” Black told CNN.

Meg Strickland, who’s running on a platform to “return to normal” and is the only Republican CNN spoke with who openly criticized Trump, agreed.

Where she’s been campaigning at the southeastern area of the district around the Atlanta suburbs, she said people have been ready to move on from Greene since before her feud with Trump.

“She was in it for herself and not actually serving the people, so she didn’t accomplish anything,” Strickland said. “If you’re gonna be that divisive and belligerent all the time, then you’re never going to have open discussions to create common solutions for people.”

Jared Craig, an attorney in Newnan and the vice president of Veterans for America First, said that fiery approach to politics was more effective when the GOP was in the minority.

“Her brand was well suited for being the underdog,” he said. “But once you get to the point of winning, I don’t think that she had a real sense of what to do at that point.”

Other candidates criticized Greene for her abrupt departure from Congress.

Though both said they were grateful for the attention Greene brought the district, Beau Brown, who works in risk management, said her resignation “left a bad taste in everyone’s mouth,” and Jenna Turnipseed, a farmer and an Army veteran, said she “didn’t see a lot of reasoning for Greene’s “immediate political shifts on things like (Affordable Care Act) subsidies.”

Nicky Lama, who resigned his Dalton City Council seat to run, said, “Everybody, including myself, just wants to know what changed, what happened?” And Reagan Box, who ended her Senate campaign to run for the seat, said a lot of voters felt “shafted” because they had supported her.

Black and Box also worried about the cost of putting on a special election, and Strickland said she had “zero respect for someone who promised her constituency a term and then left.”

“We kind of feel sad for her,” Craig said. “That’s kind of the real tone. Because she had opportunity and it’s just sad where she chose to take it.”

Guldenschuh, the host of the weekly conservative talk show, doesn’t think denouncing Greene will benefit the field. Many voters in the district still “love” Greene, he said, and wish she and Trump could’ve worked out their disagreements.

“I think (the candidates) should be very proud and honored that we had somebody like Marjorie representing us for as long as she did,” he added.

Show

One Protest After Another

Rian Dundon

Since June 2025, the Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility in Portland, Oregon, has seen daily protests against the government’s immigration policies. Though relatively small in numbers, activists’ strategy of simply blocking the building’s driveway is an effective way to disrupt operations, and demonstrators are often met with force from federal police, who’ve arrested scores of people and routinely use rubber bullets and tear gas to disperse crowds. 

When President Trump threatened to send the National Guard to Portland in September, the scenes outside ICE detention centers and other facilitiescame under increased scrutiny from media and politicians. Only by then the protesters weren’t just left-wing activists. Some were pro-ICE counter demonstrators emboldened by Trump’s posturing, who’d come to flag-wave and film the proceedings, using their cameras to provoke skirmishes with protesters while spinning a story of liberal lawlessness run amok. Several were even allowed to embed with federal agents, and their footage used to identify and pursue demonstrators. By the end of October, Portland’s ICE protests had become a content farm for the parallel battle online. 

So far, Trump’s attempts to deploy the military to Portland have been successfully repelled by the courts. But as the fight against ICE becomes a nationwide imperative, the spirit of resistance in the city George H.W. Bush dubbed “Little Beirut” should not be underestimated. Since the January 2026 killings of activists RenĂ©e Good and Alex Pretti in Minneapolis, efforts outside Portland’s ICE facility have again intensified.

On January 31, a coalition of more than 30 labor unions organized a rally and protest march from a nearby park. The event was attended by several thousand sign-waving supporters, including many families with young children and elderly people, who after listening to speeches from union leaders, walked unsuspectingly toward the ICE building.

As they approached, federal agents abruptly inundated the neighborhood with tear gas and flash-bang grenades, causing panic in the crowd and prompting paramedics with the Portland Fire Bureau to treat people at the scene. DHS would later dismiss the incident and City Hall’s condemnation of the attack, stating that Mayor Keith Wilson “should be grateful to our brave law enforcement officers for cleaning up the streets of Portland.”

“He thinks our people are idiots.” You said it........ They are so stupid, they shouldn't vote, even if they do...

Trump Has Betrayed the People of Coal Country. They Love Him Anyway.

“He thinks our people are idiots.”

Stephanie Mencimer

Christy Ratliff is sitting in a folding chair in a public school gym in Grundy, Virginia, waiting for her number to be called. She arrived at 4 a.m. on this October Saturday to secure her position in line to have eight teeth pulled. Genetic gum disease, she explains, has left most of them rotten or broken. She hooks a finger to pull down her lip and show me gruesome damage—the kind most dentists see only in textbooks.

Grundy, the seat of Buchanan County, sits deep in the Appalachian Mountains of Southwest Virginia. This weekend, it’s hosting a free clinic courtesy of Remote Area Medical, a nonprofit like Doctors Without Borders, but for places in the United States where the health ­outcomes are as grim as those in many developing countries. RAM founder Stan Brock once suggested that because Grundy is so inaccessible, his volunteers should literally parachute into town, as he once did while working in rural Africa.

Buchanan County borders West ­Virginia and Kentucky. The nearest (tiny) airport is in Bristol, Tennessee, about two hours south. Nothing around Grundy is flat. The roads can be perilous and slow going. But the topography doesn’t deter hundreds of people from traveling to the RAM clinic from all over the region. Ratliff’s friend drove her about 30 minutes from her home in Haysi, population 537, in neighboring Dickenson County. Grundy, an ­isolated coal country outpost, has only one or two dentists, and even if Ratliff could get in to see them, she can’t afford to. A mother of two small children, with her ex-husband in prison, she earns $13.47 an hour working part time at Food City. Along with about a quarter of the residents of Buchanan and Dickenson counties, Ratliff is covered by Medicaid, but she hasn’t been able to find a dentist to go to. That’s why she’s here in this gym, where RAM offers free dental work.

Inside the gym are rows of clear plastic tents full of patients in dental chairs undergoing cleanings, fillings, and extractions. The providers are dental students, including at least a dozen Kuwaitis who attend Virginia Commonwealth University and volunteer dentists from as far away as Buffalo, New York. Under the basketball hoops, patients sit in plastic chairs, waiting their turn or recovering from various procedures, cheeks stuffed with gauze and lips stained with blood.

This operation is a well-oiled machine, but the dentists can do only so much in one weekend. Ratliff aims to come back for dentures when the clinic returns next year. Until then, she tells me, she’s “just gonna chew on my gums.”

Ratliff is 29 years old.

When I call a few weeks later to see how it went, she gives me an update: She called it quits after just two teeth. The dentist “just kept prising and prising,” she said. “I couldn’t do no more.” But she plans to get the rest out eventually. Her situation is not unusual in these parts. Roughly 20 percent of Buchanan County residents have no teeth at all. “That’s not something you see even in dental school,” says Dr. Kevin D’Angelo, a University of Buffalo dentistry professor who’s been overseeing the local RAM dental clinic for decades. “You just don’t get that.”

Rotting teeth may be part of an Appalachian stereotype, but they are also a visible marker of extreme poverty and a health risk in their own right. “Infected teeth cause cardiovascular disease, diabetes,” D’Angelo explains, diseases rampant in Buchanan County, nearly a quarter of whose 19,000 or so residents live below the federal poverty line. In 2015, the Atlantic dubbed Grundy “the sickest town in America.” Now it is famous for another reason: One of America’s sickest, poorest places is also one of its Trumpiest.

In 2016, Buchanan County gave ­Donald Trump his single biggest win of the national Republican primaries. He got 70 percent of the local votes, double his statewide share. He fared even better here in the 2024 general election, winning 85 percent. Ratliff has never voted, she says, but “I’m glad Trump got it back.”

Despite all the faith these locals have put in Trump, his second term is threatening their precarious existence. Few places in America are as reliant on the federal government. According to a recent study, 45 percent of the personal income of ­Buchanan County residents comes from Social Security, Medicaid, and Medicare, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), and government disability programs. Federal dollars also account for about 15 percent of the county budget, subsidizing nearly every aspect of local life—education, economic development, disaster recovery, housing, sewer infrastructure. And Trump has succeeded in jeopardizing or eliminating nearly all of it.

“The role of the federal government in that part of America is just so core and ­fundamental,” says former Rep. Rick Boucher, a Democrat who represented Buchanan County for nearly 30 years before he was ousted in the 2010 tea party wave. “To reduce it substantially is going to create real hardship and pain.”

At 5:45 a.m. on the first day of the clinic, rows of idling cars are stuffed with people bundled against the autumn chill, eating gas station snacks and sipping coffee from thermoses. Many have been here all night. Someone is even rumored to have dropped off an Amish guy who spent the night in an adjacent field with nothing but a sleeping bag.

RAM’s free services are first-come, first-served, and latecomers risk losing out. Volunteers with clipboards wander among the cars, assigning people places in line for when the clinic opens at 6.

Mistaking me for a volunteer, a man behind the wheel of a pickup truck asks how much longer the wait will be. He and his friend have been here since 3:30 a.m. They are 60th and 63rd in line. The driver, a thin 42-year-old with a clipped beard, hails from nearby Bradshaw, West Virginia, population 207. Bradshaw is part of McDowell County, where the life expectancy is 66 years, about the same as in Sudan.

“We live in a remote part of the world,” the driver says, declining to give his name. He’s here for denture work because ­Bradshaw has no dentist. He grew up in a holler, and like generations of his people, worked in the coal industry, including once for a company owned by Sen. Jim Justice (R-W.Va.)—until his paychecks bounced, a chronic problem at Justice’s mines. Now he works in logging. He has no health insurance, he says. Like 80 percent of McDowell County’s voters, he cast his ballot for Trump: “He’s kicking ass and taking names. He’s cleaning up the gangs. He’s doing awesome with the immigrants, too.”

I ask him whether there are many immigrants around here. “Very few,” he concedes. He’s also pleased the president cut taxes on overtime, though none of the companies he’s worked for gave him enough hours to qualify for overtime. But mostly, he likes that Trump is a cheerleader for the coal industry.

Trump has been promising Appalachia he’d end the “war on coal” ever since his first campaign, then kicked off his second term with three executive orders slashing regulations and rolling back environmental protections to boost mine production. Coal companies laid off more than 300 people in Buchanan County in 2025. By the end of November, the county’s unemployment rate had shot up by 63 percent since the last month of the Biden administration.

Though Trump’s pro-coal rhetoric may win him votes, none of his incentives are likely to bring jobs back, especially given the local effects of his trade and foreign policies. The type of rare coal found in this part of Appalachia is used not for power plants but to produce steel, particularly in China. But Trump’s trade war with the People’s Republic “has resulted in the imposition of an additional 15 percent duty on US coal imported into China,” explains Andrew Blumenfeld, a coal market expert with McCloskey, a mining data analytics firm. “This resulted in almost no US coal exports to China [in 2025], with Buchanan being swept up in this dispute.”

The Russia–Ukraine war that Trump promised to end “on day one” is another factor. The parent company of Wellmore, one of the companies shedding jobs locally, is owned by the Ukrainian billionaire Rinat Akhmetov. Buchanan County coal was helping Ukraine produce steel. But thanks to the war, Ukraine is not producing much steel and has cut back on purchases of Wellmore’s pricier coal. Christy Ratliff tells me that Wellmore recently laid off her “Pawpaw.” The company is now for sale, and with no offers on the table, it may close down for good.

Buchanan County has been trying for decades to diversify its economy. Among its largest employers is a state prison that opened in 1990. But the biggest economic threat is population loss. The county now has about half as many people as it did in 1980. A recent University of Virginia study pro­jects that it will lose another 50 percent in the next quarter century. An ongoing opioid epidemic culls the county’s young—those who haven’t already left for better opportunities. The people left behind tend to be a graying and unhealthy bunch, median age 47—nearly a decade older than statewide. A whopping 35 percent of Buchanan County residents are disabled.

The Trump administration has been trying to make matters a lot worse. Last spring, for instance, the administration attempted to lay off almost all of the employees at the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), including the people running a program that administers benefits for miners stricken by black lung disease. The miners sued, and a judge ordered the administration to restore some of those jobs, but many employees haven’t returned. After intense lobbying by unions and unhappy members of Congress, the administration revoked all of the NIOSH layoff notices on January 13.

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s proposed budget for 2026 would have slashed NIOSH funding by 80 percent this year, but in late January, Congress rejected the proposal and increased the budget by about $4 million. Trump’s Labor Department also has attempted to roll back safety rules that reduce the risk of mine collapses and other disasters.

The only meaningful benefits to mining communities had been coming, ironically enough, from the Biden administration, which in 2024 finally managed to enact a rule limiting miners’ exposure to the silica dust that causes the most severe forms of black lung, a variant that has become especially acute in younger miners. Because the most accessible coal seams are long gone, Appalachia’s miners must now bore through miles of stone, creating extremely dangerous fine particles that lodge in the lungs. But the Biden silica rule was put on hold last April after industry groups sued to block it, and the Trump administration has not defended it.

“My dad died from black lung,” says Brandi Hurley, a local lawyer and Grundy native who struggles to understand her community’s support for both coal and Trump. “I wish I could explain it in a way that made sense.”

She likes to remind Trump supporters, including family members, what he said about coal miners back in 1990: “The coal miner gets black-lung disease, his son gets it, then his son,” Trump told Playboy magazine. “If I had been the son of a coal miner, I would have left the damn mines. But most people don’t have the imagination—or whatever—to leave their mine. They don’t have it.”

In short, Hurley says, “He thinks our people are idiots.”

Back at the clinic, I take a break from watching tooth extractions to eat lunch on a sunny picnic bench near the parking area. A couple of young women approach with a clipboard: Do I have a number?

They are first-year students from Appalachian School of Law (ASL), a tiny local institution that requires students to perform community service. They clearly don’t hail from these parts. One is from New York City, the other from California by way of West Virginia, where she’d been employed as a social worker. Neither is white.

The students, who asked not to be named, are part of an underappreciated economic engine that’s helping keep ­Buchanan County afloat, but that also is imperiled by the Trump administration. Founded in the 1990s, ASL was funded in part by the Appalachian Regional Commission, a federal economic development agency that Trump has attempted to eliminate. The law school has a full-time enrollment of 182 students. Roughly a third are people of color, and many are the first in their families to have attended college.

One of the students mentions that she lives in an apartment owned by a coal ­industry worker. Renting to students is a much-needed source of income for many families, just one way the school helps the local economy.

The law school’s dean, David Western, is a retired Air Force colonel, former judge advocate general, and pastor at two local churches. He sees ASL as a major force for good in the region, with graduates going on to work as local defense lawyers and prosecutors and assume other important legal roles that are historically hard to fill. “Our real mission is to fill those legal deserts in the Appalachian region,” he told me.

Western figures his students spend about $2.4 million locally each year. “Anytime a student goes to Walmart,” he says, “they’re funding the local economy.” That figure doesn’t include the value of their volunteer work—about $50,000 a semester, he estimates­—or the local taxes paid by the school’s 47 employees.

The Trump administration is now undermining one of Buchanan County’s few bright lights. For one, the president’s so-called One Big Beautiful Bill limits the amount ASL’s students can borrow directly from the government’s low-interest loan program. It capped student loans for professional schools at $50,000 a year, with a lifetime cap of $200,000. The estimated cost of attendance (tuition plus expenses) at ASL is $82,800 a year. Some 75 percent of students rely on federal loans, Western says.

Trump claimed the cap was put in to protect students from burdensome debt, but critics counter that it is a giveaway to private lenders, who lost billions of dollars when President Barack Obama ­allowed the government to loan directly to students back in 2010, making borrowing more affordable while cutting out the middlemen—the big banks.

The new loan cap will likely force law students to turn to private—and ­potentially predatory—lenders, who enjoy minimal scrutiny now that Trump has neutered the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights. “I’ve been trying to figure out what we’re going to do,” Western says. “Most deans across the country are panicking.”

Trump’s megabill, Western says, also has an “accountability” provision that ties a school’s eligibility for the direct loan program to its students’ postgraduate earnings. The salaries of ASL grads, who often end up working in low-income Appalachia, may be paltry next to those of University of Virginia and Virginia Tech graduates who are more likely to secure higher-paying jobs in engineering or tech. The administration can now penalize programs with “low earnings outcomes” such that students at schools like ASL, he says, “won’t be able to take out any federal loans.”

Western is now frantically trying to raise money through grants, big donors, and even “boozy bingo” scholarship fund events. “This is so Appalachian to share this,” he says sheepishly. “People here love bingo.” The first event lost money, but “it should raise more next time.”

Clearly, boozy bingo won’t make up for the millions of dollars the school could lose in financial aid under the Trump regime. “To be honest with you,” Western confesses, “we’re a little terrified.”

Given its dire financial straits, the law school is considering a merger with ­Roanoke College—a move opposed by county officials. But to survive in Grundy, ASL desperately needs to increase enrollment, a near-impossible task if its students can’t borrow enough affordably. “If the school has to close,” Western says, “it will likely be the Big Beautiful Bill that puts the nail in the coffin.”

People originally came to Buchanan County for “moonshine,” says homegrown lawyer Hurley, who grew up on land her family has owned for 150 years and got her law degree from ASL. For its first 100 years, she says, it was the realm of outlaws. “You moved to Buchanan if you were okay gutting a federal officer who tried to take your still. Those were my people,” she tells me with a laugh. “Even the Native Americans weren’t in Buchanan County. It’s an inhospitable area.”

The topography that makes Grundy ­inaccessible also makes it stunningly beautiful. Ancient rock cliffs rise from the Levisa river, which 20 years ago ran black with coal dust. Driving in, I saw dense forests ablaze with fall color. Houses with precariously steep driveways clinging to hillsides. Trailer homes parked end to end on a narrow strip of flatland along the riverbank.

However beautiful the landscape, this can be a deadly place. The narrow spits between the river and the rock face act as ­funnels, creating catastrophic floods. In 1977, a community upstream of Grundy got 16 inches of rain in a single day. The Levisa sent 6 feet of water rushing through town, leaving three people dead and inundating Main Street.

After the flood, town elders came up with a radical plan. With nearly $200 million from the US Army Corps of Engineers and the state, Grundy packed up and moved to higher ground. Main Street was mostly demolished and floodwalls were installed. The engineers even blew up a mountain, carting away 2.3 million cubic yards of rubble, to create a 13-acre plateau, home to what is now arguably Grundy’s beating heart: a three-story Walmart that opened in 2011. “Grundy may be one of the only towns in the United States,” Grundy native Lee Smith wrote in her memoir, Dimestore, “that has ever actually invited Walmart into its downtown area, instead of organizing against it.”

The project mitigated some of the flood risk but didn’t eliminate it. One day in February 2025, Buchanan County was deluged with 7 inches of rain. Flash flooding killed a person in neighboring Bland County. Mudslides washed out roads, destroyed 17 homes, and left hundreds more damaged—others were left without power and clean water. The sheriff’s office reported that 280 people were rescued. It was the fifth major flooding event since 2021.

The law school, too, was inundated. Scores of students lost most or all of their possessions. Dean Western recalls he personally “lost everything” in his basement.

Glenn Youngkin, Virginia’s Republican governor, asked the Trump administration for an expedited major disaster declaration that would enable locals and the state to seek federal assistance. Such declarations are at a president’s sole discretion. When Hurricane Helene came through in 2024, President Joe Biden approved an emergency declaration three days after the storm first made landfall in Florida. But Trump sat on Youngkin’s request for nearly two months. Even then, the administration did not approve assistance for individuals.

Last April, Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.) held a town hall meeting in Grundy ­focused on flood recovery. “I’m just more confused because I thought we were going to get some individual help and as of right now, I don’t know that we are,” local resident Patricia Cooper told him. Warner replied that he, too, was frustrated.

“A lot of businesses have not recovered,” notes Garrett Jackson, public affairs director for People Inc., a nonprofit that provides affordable housing and a host of critical services in Buchanan County. Many areas are still “just devastated,” he says. “This area did not get a lot of the FEMA attention that it should have.”

The Federal Emergency Management Agency is charged with coordinating every facet of disaster response, from search and recovery to housing assistance to debris removal—services county residents desperately need now that climate change has exacerbated their flooding problem. But Trump is determined to dismantle FEMA, which he says is “very bureaucratic and it’s very slow.” As Grundy was getting swamped, Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency was busy carving a trail of destruction through the agency, where about 2,000 workers were laid off or bought out by last summer. FEMA didn’t have a permanent director between Inauguration Day and December, when Trump appointed an election conspiracy theorist with no disaster management experience to run its Office of Response and Recovery. In early January, the Washington Post reported that the Department of Homeland Security was planning further cuts that could reduce FEMA’s disaster response workforce by thousands more.

At Warner’s town hall, Grundy officials said they needed help paying for projects to mitigate future flooding. The Biden administration had aimed to do just that via the Inflation Reduction Act. Five days before Trump took office, Sen. Warner and fellow Virginia Democrat Sen. Tim Kaine announced that the Environmental Protection Agency had awarded the University of Virginia nearly $20 million to fund climate resilience projects in Southwest Virginia. About $5 million was slated for Buchanan County to build housing outside the flood plain. But EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin canceled the grant. “The objectives of the award are no longer consistent with EPA funding priorities,” the termination letter read.

It’s “the perfect example of where the Biden administration did something for a very rural Appalachian area, but it wasn’t pushed by the press in this area,” says ­Jackson of People Inc. “People don’t see truly who’s trying to help them.”

In the school parking lot, I strike up a conversation with number 82 in line, who is leaning against a car chatting with friends through the window. She declines to reveal her name but says she lives in Grundy and works for the state. She’d arrived at 5:30 a.m. for a filling. In 2024, she had two teeth pulled. “I’ve got insurance,” she assures me, “but the co-pays are ridiculous.” In 2014, she says, a RAM dentist had pulled all her husband’s teeth. During Covid, she’d come in for free eyeglasses.

Her father was a coal miner and she supports Trump, she says, because Democrats are too “focused on the environment.” She is also unhappy about “how we’re giving money to the wrong people.”

“I would love to see jobs come back to this country,” she says. “I want to buy American.”

Nikki Hardin, the car’s driver, is number 54, having arrived here at 3:30 a.m. with her cousin. I ask them if they follow politics. “Only when I vote for Trump!” Hardin volunteers, prompting laughter from her companions. They’d all voted for him. Hardin informs me that the president “is a very successful businessman” who is “helping the poor people.”

We chat about life in Buchanan County, and the women bemoan the dearth of local amenities and entertainment options. They insist, like most everyone I spoke with, that the only good sit-down restaurant in town is Grundy’s Mexican joint, El Sombrero.

Too tired to venture out that night, I opt for the Italian place next to the town’s single hotel. The restaurant walls are decorated with big posters of the region’s high school sports mascots, including the ­Hurley Rebels with their Confederate flag. Near the register is a framed USA Today clipping about that school’s fealty to its racist symbol; its front doors create a giant flag.

The next day, for lunch, I try El Sombrero, which is in a little mall attached to the Walmart. Pickup trucks with “Don’t Tread on Me” plates are parked outside. Inside, it feels like a little slice of Jalisco—the state in western Mexico famous for ­tequilas and mariachi music. The spacious restaurant has a full bar and a big menu. High-backed chairs are brightly painted with Mexican pueblo scenes. A card commemorating Saint Toribio—a Jalisco priest executed for defying anti-clerical laws in the 1920s—hangs near the register.

I order carnitas served on cheerful fiesta ware and watch as the place fills up, almost entirely with white people coming from church. My server is quick and friendly and speaks very little English. With my rudimentary Spanish, I gather that he is from Mexico, like El Sombrero’s owners. Until today, I’d seen almost no immigrants in the county other than RAM volunteers. El Sombrero is the go-to destination for kids going to prom or college students looking for a night out. I wondered how it could survive in a place where people had voted overwhelmingly for a president they hoped would ship out all the immigrants.

I later learned that Buchanan County Sheriff Allen Boyd, a regular customer, ate dinner here about two weeks before my visit, and then assisted ICE in setting up a late-night checkpoint that nabbed two El Sombrero employees. One was known as Little Lupe. The other was Alejandro Martinez, a waiter who’d been a fixture in Grundy for more than 15 years. Lupe was released, but Martinez was quickly deported to Mexico.

The deportation sparked a flurry of ­social media posts expressing shock that a law-abiding waiter would be taken by an administration that claimed it would only target “the worst of the worst.” “Mr. Allen Boyd and his masked thugs waited for them to leave and head home,” the owner’s daughter-in-law wrote on Facebook. “That’s when they were pulled over, pulled them out of the vehicle and shoved them to ICE…Our men do not deserve this in any way, shape or form.”

One Facebook poster wrote, “They can get the one illegal immigrant in Buchanan County, but the 4000 meth-heads are fine. ok.” Another chimed in: “Did I vote for TRUMP??? YES, I DID but that didn’t mean my friend had to be done this way.”

Martinez himself was a Trump supporter, as were the restaurant’s owners. “I’m pretty sure they had a Trump flag in there at one time,” a person close to ­Martinez told me, adding that locals had convinced Martinez and the owners that “if Trump didn’t get into office, coal would die, and the town would die.”

After news of the deportation spread, residents speculated that ICE was paying off snitches and worried that El Sombrero would close because of ongoing ICE harassment. Because of the uproar and furious rumors, Boyd was forced to issue a statement acknowledging that money was a factor in the immigration operation. He’d signed a lucrative agreement to cooperate with an ICE task force that netted his department $100,000 for vehicles, $15,000 for equipment, and more money for the salaries of cops who worked the task force.

Boyd referred all requests for comment to an ICE spokesperson, who never answered any of my questions. He seemed to concede in his press release that the county had bigger problems than a few Mexican waiters, but “when a federal agency requests assistance from our Sheriff’s Office to help enforce federal law, we have a duty—under the oath we swore—to respond and support that effort.”

“Narcan training starts in 5 minutes!” This announcement blares over the school loudspeaker as I walk down a hall lined with tables hosted by social service agencies on hand to assist RAM patients. At one table sits ­Celeste Barrett, who oversees eligibility for federal safety net programs in Buchanan County, including food stamps. She’s been doing this about 25 years and knows the county’s demographics intimately.

Of its roughly 19,000 county residents, she informs me, about 11,000 get some form of federal aid, including Medicaid, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, and energy assistance. About a quarter receive SNAP benefits. This helps explain why Trump’s second term could exact such a huge local toll.

Trump’s big budget bill includes the biggest cut to SNAP in the program’s history, about $187 billion over 10 years, which translates to a direct loss of about $2.3 million a year in Buchanan County, according to the nonprofit Voices for Virginia’s Children. The legislation requires recipients to work 80 hours a month and creates new burdensome recertification requirements. The state already had a SNAP work requirement, Barrett told me, but given the high rate of local unemployment, Buchanan County was always exempt. That exemption is over. After six months, Barrett notes, if an applicant fails to satisfy the work requirement—and correctly submit all of the required paperwork—“they will be disqualified for 30 months.”

The bill also killed exceptions for veterans, unhoused people, and youth in foster care. Under the old law, people with children under 18 were exempt, too, but Trump’s bill lowered the age limit to 14. Voices for Virginia’s Children estimates that about a third of the county’s households will lose some or all of their benefits. “I don’t know how you prepare for something like that,” Barrett says.

Buchanan County has four food banks, but their services are strictly limited. I happened to be visiting the one day per month when one of them, Feeding My Sheep, was distributing food, so I decided to check it out. Located about 10 miles from Grundy, Feeding My Sheep works out of a nondescript blue warehouse on a narrow slip of land between the road and a sheer rock cliff that leaves almost no room for parking. Getting there involves a harrowing drive on a steep, winding road through sparsely populated mountains. I nearly miss the food bank coming around a turn.

Inside, I find a handful of elderly volunteers who direct me to Reva Fields. A deeply religious woman with a no-nonsense ­manner,­ Fields took over the operation in 2013 with help from her husband, Jerry, who used to work in the mines. Now his knees are shot, and he has a pinched nerve in his back, so he needs a walker to get around.

With a budget of about $65,000 a year, which comes from county and coal company foundation grants, and food donations from Walmart and Food City, Feeding My Sheep distributes staples to roughly 500 families. People line up early at a parking lot on the Southern Gap, a flat, 3,000-acre expanse created when the mountaintop was strip-mined.

Fields shows me around a warehouse with pallets of canned corn and other sundries stacked to the ceilings. A walk-in refrigerator holds fresh produce from ­Appalachian Harvest, a nonprofit rural food hub. In March 2025, the US Department of Agriculture paused $500 million in food bank–related programs and whacked $1 billion from a program that lets schools and food banks buy directly from local farms. “We are getting less food from USDA,” Fields says. She consults a notebook.

In the first three quarters of 2024, Feeding My Sheep received about 414,760 pounds of food. For the same period in 2025, it got roughly 65,000 pounds less—a 16 percent shortfall­—which could have fed about 1,000 families, she notes. Appalachian Harvest used to provide more fresh food from farms, Fields says, but that’s declined, too. (Sylvia Crum, development director for a group called Appalachian Sustainable Development, later told me that Trump’s clawback of USDA grants cost her organization $1.5 million for its program purchasing food from local farmers to donate to food banks like Feeding My Sheep.)

As Fields and I chat, a gaunt older man wearing a faded Han Solo T-shirt pulls up to the warehouse on a bike. He dismounts and walks unsteadily up the ramp to the office using a small, upside-down garden hoe as a cane.

Fields fetches an old cane she had in the office. He accepts this gift, along with a box of food the volunteers packed just for him: jars of peanut butter and pickles, hot dog buns, canned corn, cheddar puffs, cereal, and raisin packets. A woman brings him some Gatorade. He inspects a box of Devil Dogs snack cakes and tries to figure out how to make it fit in his backpack.

Given the steep, twisty roads, I’m impressed he made it here on a bike. He used to ride everywhere, he says, until he got hit by a car in 2024. He was paralyzed from the waist down for a while until he was able to have back surgery. Eying his overflowing pack skeptically, Fields asks if her husband can drive him home. “If it ain’t too much trouble,” the man says quietly. They throw his bike in the back of a truck and the two drive away.

One of the volunteers mentions that SNAP benefits were due to be cut on ­November 1 because of the government shutdown. “That’s going to be terrible,” Fields says with alarm. “If they cut out food stamps, we’re going to be swamped. In this area, they’ve already laid off a bunch of people from Wellmore. They need help.”

The prediction proved prescient. In a Facebook post at the end of November, a month after the new SNAP rules took effect, Feeding My Sheep announced, “Our shelves are currently depleted. We typically maintain a three-month supply of food. This past month, we distributed 32 percent more food than usual. Notably, we served a record 630 families.”

Did Fields know that Trump’s budget cuts were the reason she was getting less food from USDA, and why SNAP was getting cut? Her response reflected the restraint I had come to recognize in the women here, especially when dealing with outsiders. “He may not realize what’s happening,” she ­finally responds. “I’m praying that he will take care of America. I’m hoping he gets food to the needy.”

After making my way back to Grundy, I stop in at St. Joseph’s Catholic Church for Mass. The modest brick church is perched high on a ledge of stone carved out of a mountain. The small parking lot is unfenced, and I have a little panic attack as I realize how easy it would be to accidentally drive off the cliff.

With only 15 or so members, the church relies on a traveling priest from the Philippines who conducts Saturday afternoon Mass in Grundy before visiting other parishes. A Nigerian student from the local pharmacy school assists with communion. As we pray for the RAM volunteers and patients, I think about how, despite the myriad ways Trump’s policies will harm locals, very few of the people I’ve met seem to hold him responsible. Nor can they articulate why they are standing by him. No one has mentioned abortion—or even inflation. They tend to fall back on immigration as Trump’s signature selling point. ­Hurley’s theory is that “people want to believe the best of him because they’ve been with him for so long,” and alternate viewpoints are in short supply, because “the only people they’re hearing from are Republicans.” Hurley has served as Democratic Party vice chair in neighboring Russell County, where her chapter lacks enough active ­participants even to give out hot dogs on July 4. “It’s me and another guy against 1,000 angry [Republicans],” she says.

A handful of locals have admitted to her they regret voting for Trump, she says, but that’s only translated so far into seven new members for her group. “It’s a hive mindset,” she says. Sure, the people here ­overwhelmingly support Trump, but “when they were Dems, they were 80 percent Dems. There was never a split.”

On Sunday morning, I find Frannie Minton, a force of nature with a pixie haircut who is almost single-handedly responsible for bringing RAM to Grundy. From her command center in the middle school’s main office, she answers phones, makes loudspeaker announcements, dispatches runners, and fields all manner of requests. She refers a woman who needs a wheelchair ramp for her house and maybe hearing aids to a group that will help with both. She dispenses mammogram referrals and advises a student volunteer on medical school applications.

A nurse for 45 years whose father was the town doctor for decades, Minton knows everyone in Grundy. She also runs the local chapter of Daughters of the American Revolution, which makes sandwiches for patients at the dental clinic. She’s active in the town’s tiny Catholic church—she’d like Pope Leo to make RAM founder Stan Brock a saint. And somehow, she still finds time to run a primary care clinic out of the local Food City.

Minton brought RAM to town in the early 2000s, after witnessing its work in Kentucky. “It’s an honor to be here,” she tells me. “Everybody is helping their fellow people. It’s like the beatitudes. It’s my warm fuzzy.” She’s well aware of the county’s dire health care situation, but says she’s seen some improvements. A 2018 report noted that for the entirety of 2015 and 2016, nearly 40 percent of adults under 138 percent of the poverty line were uninsured. A year later, the state finally expanded ­Medicaid through the Affordable Care Act, and by 2023, that figure had fallen to just over 12 percent of county residents.

With more people insured, demand for RAM’s services has ebbed. In 2017, the clinic saw 744 patients in a single weekend. The weekend I visited, there were 313, who came mostly for free glasses and dental work. But Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill may reverse those figures. Buchanan County is slated to lose more than $40 million in Medicaid funding by 2034. More than 22,000 people in Virginia’s 9th Congressional District, which includes Buchanan County, are ­expected to lose coverage, as are nearly 15,000 more who get their insurance through the Affordable Care Act.

These cuts imperil the county’s lone hospital and other, bigger ones in Southwest Virginia. Because Medicaid and Medicare payments don’t cover the true cost of care, private payers must make up the difference. In Buchanan and other poor rural counties, nearly 75 percent of hospital patients have Medicaid or Medicare, explains Julian Walker, VP of communications at the Virginia Hospital & Healthcare Association. This leaves many rural hospitals in the red. Last summer, a group of Democratic senators released a list of rural hospitals at risk of closing because of Trump’s bill—two are here in the 9th District.

Drug treatment facilities that rely on Medicaid are also endangered in Buchanan County, where opioid overdose deaths and ER visits are vastly higher than in the rest of the nation. “I am worried about our local hospital,” Minton says. “I’m worried about health care in general. The people are so poor.” She voted for Trump in 2016, believing the country “needed a clean sweep.” But “this wasn’t a real broom.”

I think about the conversation I had after Mass with Doug Vance, a parishioner wearing an American flag lanyard and using a walker. Vance is a former teacher of students with disabilities in Grundy schools who lives over the border in West Virginia. He also volunteers at the RAM clinic. He told me Appalachia is inhabited by “cracks people”—as in people who fall through them. He pointed to the three people killed in his county during the February 2025 floods. They barely made the news.

I sensed he might be a Democrat. And like many from around here, he says he was—once. But when I asked him about the funding Trump has rescinded from social programs and how that might hurt his neighbors, he replied angrily, “Some of it needs to be rescinded.” The deficit needs reining in, he argued, and plenty of people were getting benefits they didn’t really need.

That’s a sentiment often expressed by another Vance, far more famous, to whom Doug thinks he may be distantly related.

Trump is “doing great!” this Vance ­insisted. He loved that the deal-making president got donors to pay for a new White House ballroom rather than making taxpayers foot the bill. “What has been happening in Israel has been tremendous,” he added. After listening to him tick off Trump’s accomplishments, I finally asked him about the president’s core economic policy: the tariffs.

“I’ve been affected by it,” Vance admitted after a long pause. He has a Subaru that was damaged and needed repairs. The first quote was $3,000. But by the time he went to get the work done, the price had doubled because of tariffs on auto parts. “That’s the price you have to pay,” he lamented.

“For what?” I replied with bewilderment.

Inflation in auto parts, he informed me, was a necessary trade-off for the strong economy that was surely coming. “Sometimes,” he said, “we have to sacrifice.”

Not funny












 

Steal the election..

Florida push for mid-decade redistricting draws its first lawsuit

Florida has been seen as a key piece of the national push by Republicans to overhaul congressional districts ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.

By Gary Fineout

Florida’s bid to reshape its congressional map — which still hasn’t happened yet — drew its first lawsuit Thursday with the help of a group aligned with Democrats.

Two Floridians, with backing from the National Redistricting Foundation, filed a lawsuit Thursday that contends Gov. Ron DeSantis and Secretary of State Cord Byrd lacked the legal authority to alter election laws after the governor called an April special session on mid-decade redistricting.

Byrd, relying on the special session proclamation issued by DeSantis, issued a directive that moved the dates of congressional qualifying from April to June. That directive cited a state election law that allows a change in qualifying procedures during a year when redistricting occurs. Florida’s constitution requires redistricting two years after the U.S. Census is taken but is silent on mid-decade redistricting.

Florida has been seen as a key piece of the national push by Republicans to overhaul congressional districts ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. The GOP already has a 20-8 edge in the Sunshine State, but some Republicans have predicted that they could gain three to five additional seats if they redraw the lines in Florida.

The lawsuit filed with the Florida Supreme Court concedes that DeSantis can call a special session. But lawyers argue that until the Legislature passes a map, the directives from Byrd “are not binding and enforceable” and that DeSantis cannot unilaterally declare that redistricting will occur.

“Gov. DeSantis exceeded his constitutional authority by usurping a core legislative responsibility in service of his desire to enact a mid-decade gerrymander,” said Marina Jenkins, executive director of the National Redistricting Foundation. “The Florida constitution is clear, the Legislature is the branch of government that is responsible for redistricting.”

Democrats have slammed the GOP for moving ahead. Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin told POLITICO last week that “we’re going to fight them every step of the way on this.”

DeSantis started advocating for mid-decade redistricting last summer after other states such as Texas and California began moving on new maps in response to a push from the White House. The governor last month set the special session on redistricting for April 20-24 — the same week that qualifying for federal elections had been scheduled to take place.

The lawsuit contends those “actions have already disrupted Florida’s impending elections by casting significant uncertainty on the future of Florida’s congressional map and the relevant candidate filing deadlines. These consequences demand swift resolution by this court.”

DeSantis has said legislators will need to redraw congressional districts if the U.S. Supreme Court rules as expected in a Louisiana case and bars states from considering the racial makeup of voting populations when drawing new districts.

He argued such a ruling would create the need to alter seats in South Florida that currently have a Black and Hispanic voting majority.

“I have a very high degree of confidence that at least one or two of those districts on our current map are going to be implicated by this Supreme Court decision,” DeSantis said last month.

The Florida House last year created a select committee on redistricting and even held meetings in December. But that chamber has not done any work on redistricting during its regular 60-day session that began in January. Initially, House Speaker Daniel Perez said it would be “irresponsible” to wait until later in the spring.

What a fucking shit... How brain damaged can he be???

Trump wanted Dulles Airport and Penn Station named after him as condition of releasing rail tunnel funds

Funding for the Gateway Project has been held up since October.

By Chris Marquette, Mia McCarthy, Meredith Lee Hill, Ry Rivard and Jordain Carney

Trump administration officials made it known to Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer that the president would release federal funds for a massive rail tunnel project connecting New York and New Jersey on the condition that two major travel hubs be renamed in his honor, according to three people with knowledge of the request.

The three people, granted anonymity to discuss a sensitive negotiation, said President Donald Trump would agree to release the funding for the Gateway project, which has been held up since October — but that his ask was that both Washington-Dulles International Airport outside Washington, and Pennsylvania Station in New York City, be renamed for the president.

Schumer declined the offer, according to two people with knowledge of the request. “There was nothing to trade,” said a person close to Schumer. “The president stopped the funding and he can restart the funding with a snap of his fingers.”

The White House did not respond to a request for comment.

The Trump administration has withheld billions in federal funding for the $16 billion project, arguing it is conducting a review into whether diversity, equity and inclusion practices had played a factor in awarding contracts for the job. Since that decision, Transportation Secretary Duffy and Trump have given conflicting public statements on the status of Gateway.

When completed, the project would expand the number of rail tunnels between New York City and New Jersey under the Hudson River.

The end of the Gateway tunnel project could put roughly 1,000 workers out of a job. A judge is expected to hear an emergency order to restart the federal funding Friday.

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), in a statement Thursday evening, called Trump’s ask “ridiculous.”

“These naming rights aren’t tradable as part of any negotiations, and neither is the dignity of New Yorkers,” she said. “At a time when New Yorkers are already being crushed by high costs under the Trump tariffs, the president continues to put his own narcissism over the good-paying union jobs this project provides and the extraordinary economic impact the Gateway tunnel will bring.”

Punchbowl News first reported the news.

Democrats propose sweeping pause on data center

New York Democrats propose sweeping pause on data center construction

Lawmakers have introduced a bill to prohibit new data centers until regulations can be crafted to address potential environmental and energy cost impacts.

By Marie J. French

Key Democratic state lawmakers alarmed by the surge in demand for power by the tech industry want to pull the plug on new data centers in New York.

New legislation in Albany would freeze state and local approvals for data centers for three years — a sweeping moratorium that has not previously been reported. The pause would continue until new regulations are in place.

The move would put New York on the front lines of a national reckoning over whether states can absorb the energy demands of the AI boom without driving up electricity costs or destabilizing already strained power grids.

“Massive data centers are gunning for New York, and right now we are completely unprepared,” said Democratic Sen. Liz Krueger, one of the bill’s sponsors and chair of the state Senate’s powerful Finance Committee. “It’s time to hit the pause button, give ourselves some breathing room to adopt strong policies on data centers, and avoid getting caught in a bubble that will burst and leave New York utility customers footing a huge bill.”

Politicians across the country are grappling with the thirst for power driven by AI. In neighboring Pennsylvania, Democratic Gov. Josh Shapiro has pivoted from being an outspoken advocate for attracting the industry to proposing new requirements to protect residents from higher energy costs. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, a Republican, has also floated restrictions and liberal firebrand Sen. Bernie Sanders has called for a national moratorium.

In New York, Gov. Kathy Hochul has backed requirements for data centers to bring their own power or pay more to ensure costs don’t rise for residents. She’s also embraced the potential benefits of AI and funded a university-based AI research initiative that includes a new data center.

Lawmakers in Albany have an appetite to tackle the data center issue this session — but it remains to be seen if a moratorium can overcome almost certain opposition from labor unions, which are particularly influential with state assemblymembers.

While the state hasn’t seen a significant buildout of large-scale data centers like in Virginia or Texas, there are thousands of megawatts of these projects looking to hook up to New York’s grid.

That crush of requests has led to concerns about the reliability of the state’s electric grid in the coming years and sparked worries about spiking energy prices.

The New York moratorium bill would halt new data centers over 20 megawatts for three years. It would require the state Department of Environmental Conservation to complete an environmental review and issue regulations to address any impacts identified. The state’s utility regulator would also have to issue regulations to prevent higher energy costs for residential ratepayers from new data centers.

New York is the largest state where lawmakers have proposed a moratorium on data centers. But concerns about the growing issue are bipartisan, with Republicans and Democrats backing moratoriums in various states.

Similar measures have been introduced in Maryland, Georgia, Oklahoma, Virginia and Vermont. A Republican legislator in Michigan — where dozens of local governments have already passed moratoriums — has said she’ll introduce a statewide measure there, as well. In Wisconsin, a Democratic gubernatorial candidate has also called for a moratorium.

The New York measure has backing from Food and Water Watch, an environmental organization that’s also spearheaded calls for a national moratorium. Environmentalists see data centers driving fossil fuel use and new gas plants across the country.

“It’s an issue that legislators feel strongly about, and they feel strongly about it because they get that this is the hottest environmental thing there is at the moment,” said Alex Beauchamp, Northeast director at the organization.

There’s also major concern that the added demand from data centers could undermine New York’s moribund efforts to decarbonize its electric grid. More power demand without added supply also likely means higher electricity prices for consumers.

The projects bring few permanent jobs to offset these concerns. Other Democratic lawmakers in New York have also offered proposals to put tighter guardrails around data centers.

“In a session where everyone is talking about affordability, it’s frankly, hard to think about something that would have a bigger impact on utility rates than addressing data centers,” Beauchamp said.

Assemblymember Anna Kelles, a Democrat from the Ithaca area, is the lead sponsor of the bill in that chamber. Kelles has opposed a data center project in her district.

“This is the time to take a pause and set up strong regulations that ensure protections for New Yorkers from carrying the economic burden of the high energy demands of data centers and minimize environmental harms of water, noise, light, and air pollution,” she said.

Kelles also championed a moratorium on gas-powered cryptocurrency mining operations that Hochul signed in 2022. There are several parallels between that battle in Albany and the data center issue.

Cryptocurrency mining was a relatively novel issue when that moratorium was passed. Labor unions whose members build data center projects are likely to oppose a moratorium, as they did on the cryptocurrency issue.

“These are really good projects for our members overall,” said Daniel Ortega, head of community affairs for Engineers Labor-Employer Cooperative (ELEC 825) and executive director of New Yorkers for Affordable Energy.

Ortega said the group would oppose a moratorium and also objected to Hochul’s proposal to have data centers pay more.

Beauchamp likened the data center fight to a different environmental battle: the successful effort to ban fracking in New York more than a decade ago.

“Most things in politics, people have really, really solid views that have been developed for years or decades. Something like data centers isn’t like that, because nobody thought about them five years ago,” he said. “I’m hopeful there’s a similar political moment here where you can very quickly make positive change.”

Blocks IRS from sharing taxpayer information

Second judge blocks IRS from sharing taxpayer information with ICE

U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani cited concerns including violations of privacy laws and the possible arrest of misidentified U.S. citizens.

By Danny Nguyen and Toby Eckert

The Trump administration was dealt another setback Thursday in its effort to use taxpayer information to track down undocumented immigrants, as a second federal judge ordered the IRS to stop sharing residential addresses with Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani said the information sharing potentially violated taxpayer privacy rights. She blocked the agencies from sharing the data until the court can review the case further and barred ICE from using information already provided by the IRS.

Talwani, a Boston-based appointee of President Barack Obama, raised numerous concerns about the controversial information-sharing agreement made last year by the Treasury Department and the Department of Homeland Security, the respective parent agencies of the IRS and ICE.

Beyond the possible violation of taxpayer privacy laws, Talwani cited the chilling effect the data sharing may have on tax filing by immigrants and the risk that people will be wrongfully arrested due to mistaken identity.

She pointed to the highly publicized arrest of a naturalized U.S. citizen in St. Paul, Minn., who was dragged from his house barely clothed after ICE agents mistook him for a sex offender they were looking for at the address.

The immigrant rights groups that sued to halt the information sharing “have demonstrated that a significant portion of immigrant communities not only share common last names … but also live in shared homes or in the same apartment complexes,” Talwani wrote in her opinion.

Talwani is the second federal judge to temporarily block the IRS-ICE information sharing deal. In November, U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, a Washington-based Clinton appointee, said the agreement violated a taxpayer confidentiality law, in a suit filed by an advocacy group called the Center for Taxpayer Rights.

Kollar-Kotelly also blocked Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent — who is the IRS’s acting commissioner — from disclosing taxpayer information to the Department of Homeland Security unless the official who receives the data is working on a non-tax criminal investigation.

Taxpayer data is usually concealed; the primary exception is during non-tax criminal investigations.

The federal government appealed Kollar-Kotelly’s ruling though that has not impacted her order.

Both cases stem from ICE’s effort to mine taxpayer information for immigration enforcement just weeks into the second Trump administration. The move caused shockwaves at the IRS, prompting concern from officials that the effort could violate taxpayer privacy laws.

Bessent and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem subsequently entered into a formal information sharing agreement, and last August the IRS disclosed the addresses of about 47,000 taxpayers to ICE.

The immigration enforcement agency says it has not used any of the information for deportations.

Attempting to destroy America, and turn it over to the rich......

Elections overhaul takes center stage in House as hard-right pressure mounts

The SAVE America Act, up for a vote next week in the House, has been a rare rallying point for a divided GOP.

By Meredith Lee Hill and Mia McCarthy

The House is set to vote next week on a once-obscure elections bill that has now become a household name among hard-right activists and a major rallying point for an otherwise divided GOP.

The SAVE America Act, aimed at tightening voter registration standards, has a difficult path to enactment despite a no-holds-barred pressure campaign from the likes of President Donald Trump and tech mogul Elon Musk. Democrats are certain to filibuster the bill in the Senate, and it’s unlikely the GOP is ready to take extraordinary steps to overcome that hurdle.

But amid growing fears that their party is not doing enough to address Americans’ key concerns — rising prices chief among them — House GOP leaders and key senators have chosen to put the election security push at the center of their agenda.

The issue almost tanked a massive government funding package this week and threatened to extend a four-day partial government shutdown — until Trump intervened and ordered House Republicans to pass the bill without attaching the elections legislation.

But the issue is not going away. Besides the House action next week — the chamber’s second vote on a version of the legislation in less than a year — there is a mounting campaign on GOP senators to find ways around Democratic opposition and get the bill to Trump’s desk.

Trump is personally involved in the effort. Majority Leader Steve Scalise spoke with the president about the bill at a Jan. 29 White House meeting, and GOP Sens. Mike Lee of Utah, Rick Scott of Florida and Ron Johnson of Wisconsin met with Trump to discuss it Thursday afternoon.

Scalise said in an interview that Trump “wants to find the best place to get it passed so it can get signed into law” and Republican leaders are “in the process of working with the president to get the best path forward.”

The legislation would trigger major changes to how Americans vote, including requiring would-be voters to present proof of citizenship to register, eliminating mail-only registrations, and requiring photo ID in every state for the first time. It would also require states to take new steps to remove noncitizens from existing voter rolls.

The push for the bill has taken flight among GOP hard-liners, who won a private promise from Speaker Mike Johnson to schedule the upcoming vote, according to four people granted anonymity to describe the conversations, in lieu of attaching the election bill to the larger spending package and threatening its ability to clear the Senate.

White House deputy chief of staff James Blair this week also wrangled House GOP holdouts upset over the lack of action on the elections bill. The top Trump political aide worked to salvage the funding package in a series of phone calls in the final minutes before it was ultimately passed, according to three people with direct knowledge of the conversations.

Democrats and voting-access advocates have attacked the legislation as likely to disenfranchise huge swaths of legitimate voters in a misguided effort to address an alleged epidemic of noncitizen voting that they say does not exist.

“If you’re one of the tens of millions of U.S. citizens who does not have access to your birth certificate, or if you’re one of the 50 percent of Americans who don’t have a passport, the SAVE Act could make it impossible for you to participate in elections,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said this week.

But the bill is in keeping with Trump’s longstanding belief, unsupported by evidence, that elections in many states are “rigged” in favor of Democrats and that strong federal action is needed to rectify it. He said in an interview this week that Republicans should seek to “nationalize” elections.

Addressing House Republicans at a policy retreat last month, Trump told them they “ought to pass” the SAVE America Act, formerly known as the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act.

“Our elections are crooked as hell, and you can win — not only win elections over that and not only win future elections, but you’ll win every debate because the public is really angry about it,” he said.

He reiterated the message in a Truth Social post Thursday, published after his meeting with the three senators: “We are either going to fix [America’s elections], or we won’t have a Country any longer.”

The House is expected to vote on a procedural measure Tuesday paving the final floor action later in the week. What happens in the Senate after that is less clear.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune has pledged to call the bill up for a vote at some point in the coming months, but under normal circumstances Democrats could block it from proceeding.

Yet rank-and-file House Republicans and some GOP senators are pushing for a breakthrough, urging Thune to require a “talking filibuster” or “standing filibuster” that would eventually, they believe, force Democrats to relent. The change would force senators to be present and speaking on the Senate floor to block legislation, as opposed to the current practice of requiring 60 votes to end debate and move to the final passage of most bills.

But Thune has treaded carefully around any suggestion that the 60-vote rule should be diluted. Many Republican senators want to see the supermajority threshold start in place, and Thune dismissed claims from some House Republicans this week that he had agreed to pursue the talking filibuster route. He said he would only agree to discuss the matter with his conference.

With the Senate still working through how to pass long-term Department of Homeland Security funding, that internal conversation has yet to take place. Some senators are privately and publicly warning the push could tie up the Senate floor for weeks or months, blocking other GOP priorities.

Some hard-line Republicans are floating a trial run, using the talking filibuster to try to pass a DHS funding stopgap, according to three people granted anonymity to describe the private discussions.

“I would just remind people that the coin of the realm in the Senate is floor time, and we have a lot of things we have to do,” Thune told reporters. “Triggering a talking filibuster has implications and ramifications that I think everybody needs to be aware of. So we will have those discussions.”

In a sign that Republicans are looking at this as more than a political messaging exercise, the bill’s proponents say they are addressing some of the criticisms of the bill — including that it could effectively bar members of the U.S. military stationed abroad from voting.

Co-author Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) said there are exceptions in the bill that would address the military and other concerns but allow only “true absentee ballots.” He said he was otherwise focused on pushing the other chamber to sidestep Democrats and send the bill to Trump.

“They get on the Senate floor, they can call the question, if there are people willing to speak … there’ll be drama, and then we’ll see what happens,” Roy said. “We’ll see who wins, but that’s what we’re supposed to do.”