A place were I can write...

My simple blog of pictures of travel, friends, activities and the Universe we live in as we go slowly around the Sun.



August 13, 2026

Who do you believe????

Trump keeps saying the US controls the Strait of Hormuz. Does it?

By Jessie Yeung

Nearly half a year into the US-Iran war, global oil stockpiles are rapidly diminishing as traffic through the Strait of Hormuz remains effectively stalled and the two powers at the center of the hostilities argue about who controls the critical waterway.

US President Donald Trump has repeatedly insisted that the strait – through which oil flows from countries like Saudi Arabia and Iraq to the rest of the world – is under US control.

“They don’t have control. We have total control. We own it, and at some point, maybe they’ll do something, and then they get blown away,” Trump told reporters on Wednesday. “Right now, we’re in a very good position.” And earlier Wednesday, he claimed the US Navy had swept the strait for mines.

But Iran says it won’t reopen the strait fully until the US meets its conditions.

The reality is far more complicated than Trump’s proclamation of control, experts say – with ships fearing for their safety amid attacks on vessels in the strait, and the ever-looming threat of US-Iran strikes resuming.

Is the strait open, or closed?

The US naval blockade of Iran is still in effect, barring ships from going to or from any Iranian port either inside or outside the strait. This has strangled Iran’s cashflow and closed the strait to Iranian maritime trade.

There is still some traffic going through the Persian Gulf, headed to non-Iranian destinations. But that traffic is still just a fraction of pre-war levels. For instance, only 14 vessels crossed the strait on Tuesday – compared with the roughly 120 ships that used to cross daily before the war.

That’s largely because “few merchant shipping companies and their ships are confident that the US can ensure their safe transit of the strait,” said Carl Schuster, former director of the US Pacific Command’s Joint Intelligence Center.

Those fears are hardly unfounded. At least four vessels belonging to the Abu Dhabi National Oil Company were attacked by drones and missiles in the strait last week alone, the company said. And these attacks drive up insurance costs – further deterring shipping companies while the war rages on.

Besides outright attacks, Iran can also harass ships by flying drones overhead and doing “targeted surveillance of merchant shipping,” said the United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) in a recent advisory.

Since the war began, there have been 54 reports of damage to vessels in the strait, or the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman which sit either side of it, according to UKMTO, a Royal Navy-affiliated body that monitors maritime security and shipping in the region.

There have also been three confirmed total losses of vessels, it said, and 13 near misses.

“Until you can ensure safe use of the strait, you do not have total control,” Schuster said.

CNN military analyst and retired Air Force Col. Cedric Leighton agreed that neither side has full control right now. “What you’re really dealing with is a standoff here,” he said.

“Because of the proximity of US forces, because of the blockade, and because of Iran’s ability and willingness to at least threaten the use of mines and the use of small boats to harass vessels … neither side is really able to exercise full control over the strait.”

Who has the upper hand?

Both the US and Iran have tools in their arsenal to apply pressure on the other and to harness some control over the strait, which normally carries 20% of the world’s oil, and an even higher proportion of the natural gas that some nations are critically reliant on.

Iran, lying right on the strait, has the advantage of proximity. It also has a “psychological and political upper hand,” Schuster said, since the disrupted maritime traffic offers them a political and strategic boost.

The strait’s closure has wreaked havoc on global economies and the energy sector, piling pressure on the US to find a solution or guarantee safe passage through the waterway. This pressure could influence the upcoming US midterm elections in November – another thing that could play to Iran’s favor if the new Congress forces Trump to end the war on terms advantageous to Tehran, Schuster said.

And Iran is prepared to bide its time, it seems, with a top adviser to its Revolutionary Guards saying Tuesday that it could “prolong” the war until Trump is out of office.

“We have to attain deterrence so that the enemy never dares to attack us, so we can live with security,” Mohammad Reza Naqdi told PBS.

The US still has a clear military and economic advantage, with heavy sanctions on Iranian oil as well as Iranian assets frozen overseas, say experts.

But the US’ military forces in the region “are basically stretched pretty thin, and they’ve been there for quite some time,” said Leighton. That means the US needs to replenish its forces – by, for instance, rotating a new carrier battle group into the region – to increase its leverage in any negotiations with Iran over the strait.

And, he added, “the US leverage is limited by its staying power.” If the US backs off for any reason or loosens its grip on the blockade, it loses negotiating power and could have less say over the future of the strait, including which parties will govern it and what new rules are imposed for shipping.

That leaves Trump in a tough spot – at risk of losing leverage and having to make concessions if he pulls out, but under pressure to end the war and bring cost-of-living relief to his constituents ahead of crucial legislative votes, according to analysts.

They lie... Then run away like cowards...

ICE agent points gun at Virginia woman who shouted at them in video that conflicts with government’s narrative

By Emma Tucker, Jillian Sykes and Martin Goillandeau

A confrontation captured on video between a woman who shouted insults at Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents conducting immigration enforcement action in Northern Virginia escalated when one of the officers pointed a gun at her on Monday.

A Department of Homeland Security spokesperson described the woman in a statement as “an anti-ICE agitator” who drove her car “in circles around our ICE officers and then attempted to harm officers by weaponizing her vehicle against them—all in an attempt to help illegal aliens get away.”

The office of Fairfax County Commonwealth’s Attorney Steve Descano is reviewing the video, an office spokesperson told CNN Thursday.

“We have heard from community members who are concerned about this situation,” the spokesperson said. “We are aware of the incident and are reviewing it.”

The woman, Carolina Molina, is a licensed mental health therapist who was visiting immigration lawyers in Bailey’s Crossroads for her work when she saw ICE agents taking people into custody, she said at a news conference Wednesday.

Two Latino men were being handcuffed and escorted to an unmarked vehicle by the ICE agents, she told CNN affiliate WUSA in an interview. The encounter is not visible on camera.

“So, I rolled down my window and was like, ‘you guys are messed up,’” Molina told WUSA.

Molina said that she saw more agents as she continued to the attorney’s office.

Video from her dashboard camera shows she yelled, “You’re a hoe” and “you’re fucked up” to the agents.

Molina said she turned her car around to avoid drawing attention to the attorney’s office “where possibly immigrants could be,” according to an Instagram post in which she shared the dashcam footage.

“I decided to pull into a parking spot, pull out, and just go on my merry way when I got blocked in by one of the ICE agents,” she said at the Wednesday news conference.

Masked federal agents pulled up in a gray SUV in front of her and jumped out, with one shouting “are you following us?” and saying she “almost ran us over,” according to the dashcam footage and video Molina shot on her phone.

One of the agents threatened to arrest Molina and pointed a gun in her direction. The gun was out for much of the encounter, according to the video footage.

“I’m a legal citizen,” Molina responded, adding, “Run you over when? I got recording! I got dashcam! I got dashcam! That’s a lie … I never tried to run you over.”

Molina said Wednesday she felt “the situation changed” once she started recording on her cell phone, and the agent claimed she was trying to run them over.

“That is not the case. I was actually trying to leave,” Molina said during the news conference.

The agents eventually returned to their vehicles and drove away.

“I think it’s messed up. I don’t think it’s fair that they can sit there and block somebody in and point a gun at your head … I think they should be investigated,” Molina said, adding any body camera footage should be released.

DHS said in the statement to CNN that the agents were conducting an “operation targeting criminal illegal aliens, whose crimes included a hit and run and drug trafficking, and illegal aliens with final orders of removal.”

The agency also said the woman was trying “to help illegal aliens get away” and “could face criminal prosecution as a result of her actions.”

“Our officers are experiencing a more than 1,300% increase in assaults against them, a 3,300% increase in vehicular attacks, and an 8,000% increase in death threats. When faced with dangerous circumstances, DHS law enforcement used their training to protect themselves, their fellow officers, and the public,” the DHS spokesperson said in the statement.

The confrontation is the latest incident in recent months in which DHS has made claims that were later called into question by video, other evidence, local police and/or judges. Its legal cases against people it accused of targeting federal agents have repeatedly fallen apart.

Molina denied DHS’ account of the incident.

“One thing I’m not is a liar,” she wrote in the caption of an Instagram post sharing her dashcam video.

CNN reached out to Molina again Thursday for comment.

Democratic Rep. Don Beyer of Virginia, whose district includes Bailey’s Crossroads, just outside Arlington, said he has been in touch with Molina, whom he described as “a North Virginia native and a mother,” in a post on X.

He called for answers and accountability about the incident.

“While I am relieved that she is safe, the habitual dishonesty and dangerous and unjustified escalation seen in this video matches what we have seen from ICE agents across the country. This kind of misconduct and threat of force against members of our communities cannot be tolerated,” Beyer said on X.

Molina said she couldn’t believe the interaction escalated to that point and it reminded her of Renee Good, a 37-year-old US citizen who was killed when an ICE agent shot into her vehicle during an encounter in Minneapolis earlier this year.

“I think my life was in danger at that point,” Molina said when asked by CNN what she thought would have happened had she not been filming the encounter. “It wasn’t until after I was like, ‘This is the whole Renee Good situation again.’”

You think!!!! Extraordinary, corrupt, and unconstitutional..................

Trump sued over service selling faster access to Truth Social posts

Bobby Allyn

Two media organizations sued President Trump on Wednesday over his social media platform Truth Social's new service offering faster access to his often market-moving posts, calling it "extraordinary, corrupt, and unconstitutional."

The Intercept and the nonprofit Freedom of the Press Foundation alleged that the Truth Social offering runs afoul of the First Amendment's guarantee of equal public access to the president's statements and also violates the Fifth Amendment by granting preferential access for "unreasonable sums." The suit asks a federal court in New York to block the president from posting official government information exclusively on Truth Social.

The service, called Truth API, charges up to $100,000 a month for faster access to Truth Social posts from the president and other high-profile users of the platform. In the world of high-frequency Wall Street trading, even a few milliseconds edge could mean a difference of millions of dollars.

It drew immediate blowback from critics of the president, who say Trump has mixed his private businesses with government affairs. The lawyers who filed the lawsuit on Wednesday underscored that argument.

"The president here is using the power of the office to vastly enrich himself, and I think it's unprecedented in American history," Brendan Ballou, who runs the Public Integrity Project and is representing the media groups in the suit, said in an interview. "In some ways, Trump is the Picasso of corruption. He comes up with schemes that just wouldn't occur to you or I, and the Truth Social one is an example of that."

In addition to Trump, the suit also names as defendants the president's executive assistant Natalie Harp and White House deputy chief of staff Dan Scavino, two aides who have access to Trump's Truth Social account, according to the suit. The Executive Office of the President and the White House Office are also defendants.

A spokesperson for the Trump Media & Technology Group, which owns Truth Social, said monetizing social media platform data is commonplace among tech companies and that the president's social media posts are spread across the internet by many platforms and news outlets.

The president founded the social media service as "an uncancellable haven for free speech," the Trump Media statement said.

The White House did not respond to requests for comment.

The controversial service is being promoted at a time of acute financial distress for the president's media company.

On Monday, Trump Media reported a $238 million loss for the second quarter tied mostly to cryptocurrency assets. Given the mounting red ink, executives told investors on a conference call that they are making "the disciplined choice" to focus energy on Truth Social.

To that end, the company reported that more than 10 customers have signed up for the faster-access feed. Trump Media officials said they were "primarily high-frequency trading firms" but did not name them.

Congressional Democrats, legal experts and even some Wall Street executives told NPR that selling a premium product giving paid customers quicker access to the president's announcements about economic policy, the war in Iran and other topics raises market integrity questions and could potentially violate laws against insider trading.

The lawyers who filed the suit say the service also puts journalists covering the White House who do not pay for the president's posts at a disadvantage.

"It will be harder for them to do their job if they don't have the fastest access to this information," said Ballou of the Public Integrity Project. "It's just as much about the accuracy of information as it is the speed."

Financial disclosures released in June show that the president took in at least $2 billion last year.

While Trump's media company is hemorrhaging money, critics say the Truth Social subscription service is just the latest instance of Trump turning the office of the president into an opportunity for profits.

The president is the largest shareholder of his media company, which his son, Donald Trump Jr., oversees. Trump Media's ambitions are far-reaching and, at times, have boggled analysts, like when it announced a merger with a nuclear fusion company.

In the company's earnings call on Monday, executives said that merger was still pending. Company officials also said they are abandoning a plan to launch Truth Predict, the president's proposed entry into the booming prediction market sector. Instead, executives told investors, Truth Social will promote Crypto.com's prediction market services to the social media platform's users.

Horrific act of terror... Has been going on for decades....

U.S. ambassador calls settler siege of Palestinian homes a 'horrific act of terror'

By The Associated Press

The U.S. Ambassador to Israel condemned the actions of Jewish settlers who are besieging the home of an American Palestinian family in the Israeli-occupied West Bank.

U.S. Ambassador Mike Huckabee called the siege a "horrific act of terror."

Since Sunday, according to local officials and family members, settlers have gathered near the home in the village of Qusra and harassed those inside, defying efforts by the Israeli military to defuse the situation.

A group that has included up to dozens of men has thrown stones, attempted to bring down a stone wall nearby, and prevented the occupants from leaving despite dwindling supplies.

Speaking to The Associated Press by phone from his home in Ohio, the home's owner Lou Ridi said his 48-year-old brother and nephew, who have been holed up in the home to defend it, had been unable to leave the house and did not have access to food or water for several days.

On Thursday morning, the owner's brother Qusai Abu Rida said that he and his teenage son had been evacuated by Israel's military. It was unclear what would happen to the property and at least one other that has been targeted.

Israeli troops intervened in recent days to try to restore order. The military said that overnight Thursday its troops had dismantled "two illegal outposts" on the outskirts of Qusra and a nearby village, and detained one Israeli. It added that additional soldiers had surged to the area, which is about 16 kilometers (10 miles) of the Palestinian city of Nablus, to "carry out defensive missions and patrols."

Journalists on the outskirts of Qusra said roads into the village were closed. Israeli police did not immediately respond to questions about whether any Israeli civilians had been arrested.

Palestinians and the Israeli opposition accuse Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's hardline government of turning a blind eye to attacks by settlers against Palestinians as clashes have surged in the last few years.

Huckabee's post on X was an unusually sharp rebuke from a U.S. official, even as he defended the Israeli military's response. Huckabee is a longtime ally of Israel's settler movement and in the past has expressed support for Israeli control over the occupied West Bank while condemning settler violence.

Home security footage from Thursday morning appeared to show a few settlers still hiding by a damaged stone wall near the house.

Ridi said that settlers have been harassing his home for months before the situation escalated in recent days, saying they had cut off the water and electricity to his house and thrown stones, causing damage to the property as well as at least one more house in the area.

"We are prisoners in our own house, hostages in our own house," he said.

Last month, a mosque in Qusra was set on fire in another apparent settler attack. That followed the killing of an Israeli settler, which triggered violence that left two Israeli soldiers and four Palestinian villagers dead.

Settlers have been building more outposts in an effort condemned by many in the international community as aimed at dismantling any remaining hopes of establishing a Palestinian state in the occupied West Bank.

The Palestinians seek the West Bank, captured by Israel in the 1967 war, as part of a future state. Many settlers and their supporters say the entire area should belong to Israel for historical, religious and security reasons.

Destroy more of america...

Businesses brace for impact as Trump's 50% tariff on Canada draws closer

by Richard Haller

The scent of white pine sawdust, diesel fumes and cedar sap hangs in the air at a lumber yard in Rensselaer Falls, NY, fifteen miles south of the Canadian border. 

Two men in their 20s, Matthew Morse and Austin Kennedy, are loading narrow white pine boards onto the forks of a small Cat loading machine and slipping thin strips of wood between the boards to create air gaps that prevent warping and mold, a process called stickering.

JP Building Supply stores and sells all types of building materials and lumber and gets "about a third" of its supply from Canada. That includes sheathing like plywood, which is threatened with a tariff that could double the import cost. 

On July 20, President Donald Trump imposed 50% tariffs on many Canadian goods, from dairy and alcohol to motor vehicles to building materials like plywood, kitchen cabinets, and cement. They’ll take effect Aug. 19 unless the countries strike a deal before that date. 

As he straps down a bundle of white pine with a ratchet strap, Morse said he's "not concerned about the tariffs himself." 

"It allows for more commerce in the country and not outsourcing to other countries," said Morse. "You know what I'm saying? It's time to give our own companies business."

This sentiment is one of President Donald Trump's arguments for imposing these tariffs: that they'll drive more local business within the U.S.

But JP Building Supply owner James Putman said that if these tariffs really do move forward, they're "in trouble." 

"That’s going to affect us tremendously. If things bump up 50%, we have to add on 50% because we’ve got to put it onto the customer. And that’s just going to push everything else up."

That's despite his business growing and doing well, said Putman. 

Tariff impacts

For the past year and a half, the Trump Administration has aggressively targeted Canada with tariffs, arguing that the country has treated trade with the U.S. unfairly. But the Supreme Court ruled in February that Trump didn’t have the authority to impose certain tariffs by executive order; the government has refunded around $100 billion in tariff earnings so far. Now, it’s imposing new tariffs under Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Trump is the first U.S. president to invoke this provision.

According to CBC, Canadian officials are mapping out a trade deal to pitch to the Trump Administration early next week to try and avoid these new tariffs. 

Across the border in Canada, Hank Vedder is a reclaimed lumber sales manager at a lumber business in Ottawa called WoodSource that ships 60% of its product to the U.S. He said the threat of these tariffs alone is already impacting U.S. customers like home builders and contractors.    

"They say, 'Hey, if that 50% is coming in, I need to do one of two things. I'm going to either order today before the tariffs kick in, or then I'm going to wait until there's relief in those tariffs.'" 

Vedder said these tariffs are causing a domino effect—raising import costs on specific items, which then pushes companies to raise all their prices.

"So then that affects the contractor because he's trying to get this house built on time for his customer. And then that affects the supply chain because if the contractor is not ordering the material, then the supply chain is weakened."

Vedder said he's lost substantial U.S. customers, and that "the tariffs are making or breaking it." He said that if the 50% tariffs go into effect, regular consumers will pay the price.

"So when that price comes through, because it is a consumer-driven economy, it's the consumer that pays the tariff," said Vedder. "So, regardless of where you live in the world, you're the one who's going to be swallowing the tariffs. Businesses will maybe try to absorb some of it, but at the end of the day, they just can't."

In central New York, dairy farmer A.J. Wormuth owns Half Full Dairy and also chairs the Northeast Dairy Producers Association. He said he hopes the new 50% tariffs apply enough pressure to help both sides reach a better deal to restore the United States-Mexico-Canada-Agreement (USMCA). But he said existing tariffs—like on steel and aluminum—stacked with the uncertainty of whether these new tariffs will happen, have already "created economic pressure."

Insider trading

Democrats in Congress are investigating Energy Fuels for alleged insider trading

By Chris Clements

Congressional Democrats opened an investigation on Aug. 10 into the uranium mining company Energy Fuels Resources for potential insider trading.

The investigation centers on whether two of the company’s top leaders received nonpublic information about President Donald Trump’s planned slashing of Bears Ears National Monument in southern Utah before the news became public, and if they used that information to purchase stock in their own business. The company denies the claims.

According to a letter sent to Energy Fuels by U.S. Reps. Jared Huffman (D-California) and Maxine Dexter (D-Oregon), the stock trade by CEO Ross Bhappu was the largest in the company's history. Chairman of the Board Bruce Hansen also purchased stock a day after Bhappu.

Huffman and Dexter say the trades occurred days before Trump met with Utah’s congressional leadership in the Oval Office to announce he was cutting Bears Ears by more than 90%.

Trump also slashed Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, also in Utah, by about 90%.

The San Juan Basin in Bears Ears has significant uranium deposits, but its designation as a national monument banned most new mining claims. Energy Fuels owns the Pinyon Plain uranium mine near the Grand Canyon’s South Rim and the White Mesa Mill near the Ute Mountain Ute Reservation, the only conventional uranium processing mill in the U.S.

In an emailed statement provided to KNAU, Energy Fuels said it was “unaware of any evidence supporting claims of wrongdoing in the referenced letter” and that it “strongly rejects any suggestion that the Company or its executives engaged in any improper conduct.”

“The White Mesa Mill has never been located in the Bears Ears National Monument, Energy Fuels holds no properties, mining claims or economic interests in the monument, and we have not actively advocated for any changes to the monument with the current Administration,” the statement continues.

But Huffman and Dexter argue in their letter that Energy Fuels stood to benefit from the slashing of Bears Ears due to the company’s role in uranium production.

As evidence of the company’s interest in changing the boundaries of Bears Ears, the congresspeople cited a Washington Post story from 2017, during Trump’s first attempt at reducing the size of the monument.

According to that story, Energy Fuels’ then-Chief Operating Officer Mark Chalmers wrote to the Interior Department at the time, saying, “There are … many other known uranium and vanadium deposits located within the [Bears Ears’ boundaries] that could provide valuable energy and mineral resources in the future.”

The congressional letter also references a July announcement from Energy Fuels that it had begun construction to expand the White Mesa Mill using part of a $725 million loan from the U.S. Department of Defense.

“Beyond your DOD loan, your company appears to have close connections with the Trump administration and has specifically identified strong government support as a selling point for your investors in expansion plans,” the letter states. “This demonstrates close coordination and communication with the Trump administration, which may have enabled you to receive privileged information about when the Bears Ears announcement would occur.”

Though the lawmakers noted it appears company CEO Bhappu and Chairman Hansen haven’t “profited much from the [stock] purchase yet,” they asked the company to send communications between it and the U.S Department of the Interior around the time Bears Ears was slashed, as well as both executives’ calendars.

Bhappu bought 74,000 shares of stock on July 7, Hansen bought 4,000 on July 8, and Trump announced the Bears Ears reduction on July 13.

Ukraine's drone strikes challenge Russia

By sky and sea, Ukraine's drone strikes challenge Russia's grip on Crimea

Greg Myre

The Black Sea peninsula of Crimea is normally packed in the summer with families enjoying beach vacations. But not this year, as Ukraine's relentless drone strikes make life increasingly miserable.

"Transportation is completely at a standstill. No gasoline, no fuel, no power. The stores are closed. The banks are closed. Nothing works at all. There's no water either," a Russian woman said on social media.

No one expected this.

Crimea was the first place Russian leader Vladimir Putin seized when he initially invaded Ukraine in 2014. An estimated 1 million Russian troops and civilians have poured into the territory to make it more Russian and less Ukrainian. With the Russian influx, and the departure of many Ukrainians, Crimea's population is now estimated at around 2.5 million.

Ukraine has vowed to get Crimea back and carried out periodic drone strikes in recent years, with limited effect. But the campaign has ramped up dramatically in the past couple months.

Russian military facilities have been hit hard, especially in the northern part of Crimea. For civilians, a critical shortage of basic services keeps getting worse in a place that relies heavily on imports.

"Putin's got a problem here," said Mark Montgomery, a retired U.S. Navy rear admiral who comes to Ukraine regularly to help train the military. He's been keeping a close watch on Crimea.

"You cannot keep that many people in a place with limited water, no fuel, limited foodstuffs. I mean, they're going to have to leave," he said.

A coveted territory

Crimea juts out into both the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov, and this location, along with its mild climate, has made it a prize for centuries. Russian Empress Catherine the Great first brought the territory into the Russian Empire in 1783.

For Russia's military, Crimea is a vital warm-water naval port to the south. On the civilian side, tourists come every summer for the beaches and the picturesque views of the sea and the mountains.

Hanna Shelest, the head of security programs at the Ukrainian Prism think tank, said Russians eagerly moved to Crimea a decade ago.

"Some of the Russian military were coming together with their families, buying property and dreaming about staying there."

They often took over homes vacated by Ukrainians who had fled. Russian security forces still maintain tight control over Ukrainians who have remained.

"You are arrested if you speak Ukrainian, if you have a Ukrainian [computer] keyboard, if you have Ukrainian music. Any demonstration of you being Ukrainian, and you are arrested," said Shelest, who's based in the southern Ukrainian port city of Odessa.

Tourists sunbathe on a beach near a telescope of the Crimean Astrophysical Laboratory in Simeiz, Crimea. The Black Sea peninsula is normally packed with visitors in the summer. But Ukraine's drone attacks, and the disruption of daily services, has kept many tourists away this year.
Tourists sunbathe on a beach near a telescope of the Crimean Astrophysical Laboratory in Simeiz, Crimea. The Black Sea peninsula is normally packed with visitors in the summer. But Ukraine's drone attacks, and the disruption of daily services, has kept many tourists away this year.

Russian control challenged

Ukraine's recent drone campaign has included strikes that cut electricity, cell phone service and water for extended periods. The daily attacks have also targeted Russian ships and ferries that deliver food, fuel, and other essential supplies from Russia.

Ukraine's military says in the past month it's hit more than 130 Russian vessels in the Sea of Azov and more than 80 in the Black Sea.

"Russia overestimated its own naval power and didn't expect these measures from us," said Dmytro Pletenchuk, the spokesman for Ukraine's Navy. "Now they're trying to catch up with our technology. But it takes them six months and we keep improving. Russia is now at a logistics dead end."

Russia still controls the entire coastline of the Sea of Azov, which is an inland sea. Yet Russia has effectively lost control of the water — losing it to a country that doesn't currently have traditional naval ships or sailors at sea.

Mark Montgomery says the Ukrainian Navy has been overachieving throughout the war.

"The Ukraine Navy is the most successful navy in the world without having a ship get underway for a day," said Montgomery.

Russia wiped out most of Ukraine's Navy in the initial 2014 incursion. When Russia launched its full-scale invasion in 2022, Ukraine intentionally sank its last major ship rather than accept an inevitable takeover by Russia's large Black Sea fleet.

Yet Ukraine still managed to fight back, damaging or sinking more than two dozen Russian ships and submarines, mostly by firing missiles from the Ukrainian mainland.

Russia then retreated, pulling back most of its warships to Russian ports on the eastern side of the Black Sea.

But Ukraine has gone on the offensive again, becoming the first country in the world to develop and deploy powerful sea drones that operate both on the water's surface and underwater.

"This is the advent of unmanned undersea vessels, unmanned surface vessels," said Mark Montgomery. "They're very small, very hard to track. [Russia] can control the whole coastline and not have visibility to what's going on in the middle of the inland sea."

Russia attacks international cargo ships

Russian forces still control all of Crimea, though some Russian civilians appear to be leaving. And while the Russians are suffering tough blows, they're also delivering some of their own.

The Russian Navy is striking international cargo ships that go to pick up Ukrainian corn, wheat, and sunflower oil in and around the port of Odessa.

Ten sailors were killed in one recent attack, and now most international ships have been scared away, says Hanna Shelest.

"These ships are not even Ukrainian. [They're] only guilty of coming to Ukraine," she said.

Ukraine, which depends heavily on agriculture, is now at the peak of its harvest season and has lost its main export route, she said. Ukraine is now looking to export by land, though this is a far less efficient alternative, and Ukraine's beleaguered economy is expected to suffer another hit.

Meanwhile, military analysts say Ukraine's forces are in no position to launch an offensive to retake Crimea. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy recently told Fox News that Ukraine isn't trying to recapture Crimea — at least for now.

"The land is very important. It's our territory. It's our history. It's about our houses. But the most important [thing is] not to lose people," Zelenskyy said.

Russia's Putin called Crimea "an inseparable part of Russia" when he seized it 12 years ago. Today, he's conspicuously silent about the troubles there.

Not dismissing socialist candidates

These swing voters in Nevada say they are not dismissing socialist candidates

Ashley Lopez

Supporters of Wisconsin Democratic gubernatorial candidate Francesca Hong cheer at her election night party on Tuesday in Madison. They are standing as a group, and two are holding up campaign signs.
Supporters of Wisconsin Democratic gubernatorial candidate Francesca Hong cheer at her election night party on Tuesday in Madison. Hong, a self-described democratic socialist, narrowly lost the primary.

Some swing voters might not be quick to reject socialist political candidates.

NPR observed two online focus groups of Nevada voters on Tuesday night, and 10 of the 12 participants said they wouldn't automatically think negatively of a politician who identifies with the left-wing ideology. The voters, who supported Joe Biden in 2020 and then cast ballots for Donald Trump in 2024, had a mix of political affiliations — six self-described independents, four Republicans and two Democrats.

"I don't just take one thing and then label or judge somebody just for that," said Jasmine, a 33-year-old independent voter. (The participants agreed to take part in the focus groups on the condition that their last names would not be used.) "I need to just get to know them completely before I make a judgment or a decision on who I'm going to vote for."

Melody, a 37-year-old independent, added: "I wouldn't immediately think bad of someone. I would want to talk a little bit more about it with them because … to me, they're at least trying to think of a solution where everybody has rights and everybody has food, everybody has a house, everybody has a job. They're at least looking for something like that for everyone."

The focus group participants offered their opinions on Tuesday, during the Wisconsin Democratic gubernatorial primary, which a self-described democratic socialist narrowly lost. There's a debate in the Democratic Party about whether recent wins by democratic socialist candidates will spell trouble with more centrist voters come November.

A recent Pew Research Center survey found that about a third of Democratic voters view democratic socialist leaders positively and that a plurality of all Americans neither like nor dislike democratic socialist politicians.

Focus groups are not scientifically significant like polls, but they do provide insight into what voters are thinking and feeling about certain issues. These focus groups were held by messaging firm Engagious and marketing research group Nelson Recruiting. NPR partners with them each month as part of the Swing Voter Project.

Rich Thau, the president of Engagious, moderated both focus groups Tuesday. He said he was surprised that so many of these swing voters, who he said "tend to be attracted to more centrist political positions," said they would not automatically think negatively about a candidate who identified as a socialist.

"I was struck by the receptivity that they had toward democratic socialism as a concept, that they weren't willing to automatically dismiss it," he said. "And I thought generally that they were way more open to socialism than any swing voter otherwise would be."

The voters were also asked to weigh in on the difference they observe between garden-variety Democrats and democratic socialists.

Marianne, a 57-year-old independent voter, said she thinks traditional Democrats are "more centrist" and cater to more corporate interests.

"But they also care about the people as well, the working people," she said. "Whereas socialist Democrats are more about community."

Some voters struggled with the definition of socialism or said they didn't know enough to explain the difference between Democrats and democratic socialists. But Justin, a 39-year-old independent, echoed Marianne, saying his gut reaction is that Democrats are more in line with business interests.

"Democrat socialists will actually look at the people," he said, "[and] where they can give back to the programs and the people and actually break them off a piece of that revenue."

Freddy, a 34-year-old independent, was one of the two voters who said they view socialists negatively, but he offered that they were more likely than Democrats to "aggressively target the wealthy for more money for the good of all." Overall, though, he said socialists hold radical positions.

"Anything that far left, it's not for me," he said. "It's too extreme."

Economic anxiety may drive an openness to socialism
The 12 voters were roughly split on approving of Trump's job performance, yet 10 of the 12 participants said they feel more economically anxious now than when Trump took office last year. And seven reported carrying a higher debt load now than they were a year ago.

Katrina, a 53-year-old independent voter, said it was hard to put into words why she's so anxious, but she knows she is.

"I feel anxious that nothing has really changed," she said. "I mean, Trump talks about this 'Big, Beautiful Bill,' but, it's like, I don't see any difference. In my life, I don't."

Thau connected the openness to socialism with this growing economic anxiety.

"It's sort of the economic version of any port in a storm," he said. "In other words, these people are struggling economically. … So they need help. And they think that socialism apparently is going to offer them the help that they're looking for."

Marianne was among those who said she is carrying more consumer debt lately.

"I used to pay cash for groceries," she said. "Sometimes I put it on credit cards because the price has just gone up so much in certain areas. And also my son lives with me. My son has worked on the [Las Vegas Strip] for 22 years and he can't make ends meet, so I have to make the ends meet for him."

Corrina, a 51-year-old Republican, said she's stressed because of rising home insurance costs.

"That's why I'm having more debt," she said. "So it's changing my mortgage payment because taxes have gone up and insurance has gone up."

"We're living paycheck to paycheck," Jasmine added, "yet inflation is going up, things are going up."

While focus group participants were open-minded about socialism, they drew a line on communism.

"I'm giving contempt prior to investigation with communism. You got me there," Justin said. "It's just ingrained from childhood. Living in the '90s, communism, it's very ingrained that it is negative."

Trump often uses the term "communist" to describe his political opponents, rather than "socialist."

It makes you want to bring back the guillotine... But that would be too quick.. A slow guillotine...

Elon Musk’s DOGE Promised Savings, But It’s Cost Us a Fortune

A new report from the Government Accountability Office misses the point entirely.

Michael Mechanic

The US government doesn’t have many watchdogs left. Donald Trump fired a whole bunch of them shortly after returning to power, and many others have been pushed out since. We do still have a Government Accountability Office (GAO), for what it’s worth, and one week ago, that office published a report detailing the remarkable lack of transparency in how Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency conducted its affairs and how the savings DOGE reported fell far short of its claims.

But here’s the thing: a) We knew that from the start, and b) the GAO entirely misses the point.

DOGE saved us nothing. In fact, Musk’s little project has cost America dearly. In countless ways, we are much worse off than we were on the day Trump took back the Oval Office and invited the richest man on Earth to come in and break things.

Here’s just a partial accounting of what their nonsense has cost us.

A ton of money: Before he was tapped to run the IRS under President Barack Obama, John Koskinen spent decades as a turnaround man, helping large, failing organizations get back on track. And “the last thing I ever thought,” he told me, reflecting on how DOGE was gutting the tax agency, “was, ‘Well, let’s starve the revenue arm.”

But starving the government’s revenue arm is precisely what DOGE and Trump have done, with the gleeful complicity of Republican leaders long hostile to tax enforcement yet who are always eager to enact obscene tax breaks for the wealthy at the expense of the poor.

During Trump’s first year back, through the firings and deferred resignations that DOGE spearheaded, the IRS lost 28 percent of its workforce. The first to go were probationary employees, Joe Biden hires who had been on the job less for than two years. “A lot of them came with very sophisticated backgrounds and experience in technology and tax law management,” Koskinen said. “They weren’t 25-year-olds. They were filling important positions.”

Cheered by Republicans, these firings crippled the IRS’s capacity to collect unpaid taxes and investigate sophisticated tax cheatsrich individuals and companies, including firms that, as we speak, are routing their substantial profits through offshore tax havens without consequences.

The IRS’s inability to conduct complex audits encourages law-breaking by the uber-rich, the richest of whom invariably avoid punishment. (Commoners who defy the rules are easy to catch.) An April report from the Yale Budget Lab estimates that the 2025 IRS layoffs will cost the nation $600 billion in lost revenues over 10 years—and the IRS budget cuts in the One Big Beautiful Bill will add another $263 billion to the deficit. The combined losses total about what you’d need to restore the Medicaid funding that congressional Republicans, in passing that bill, took from America’s most desperate people.

On Joe Biden’s watch, the IRS was making progress on enforcement and collections, but that’s over now. And taxpayer services? Forget about it. Trump killed the agency’s free filing program on behalf of some billionaire software moguls. And my colleague Stephanie Mencimer recently wrote about the scorched wasteland that IRS customer service has become under Trump.

Good luck getting through.

Our humanity: Musk’s unsanctioned HR strategy was notable for its cruelty, not only for the hundreds of thousands of US workers whose lives and livelihoods were upended, but for the people they served. His abrupt destruction of the US Agency for International Development—which he’d vowed to feed through “a wood chipper”—has sown death and misery all over the globe. That’s not a great look for a once-admired nation.

“The cuts were done not on a glide path, as one would do if one had conducted a reasonable review of programming, but it was a cliff,” former USAID Administrator Samantha Power told PBS one year later. By that time, at least 800,000 deaths had been chalked up to Musk’s thoughtlessness, and the British medical journal The Lancet estimated 14 million people would die by 2030 if the programs DOGE destroyed weren’t resumed. The mindless way the cuts were done, Power noted, ensured “the most human harm possible.”

The world can now thank Musk for, among other things, the out-of-control Ebola outbreak now wracking the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

A semblance of privacy: To be fair, we lost our privacy ages ago to corporations like Lexis, Equifax, and Cambridge Analytica, but at least our government could be trusted to protect the confidential information it collected on citizens and others living here. Enter Elon Musk. In April 2025, Wired reported that DOGE, without authorization, was rapidly consolidating data from agencies including the IRS and the Social Security Administration (SSA), as well as state voting records, into a massive Department of Homeland Security database. “The scale at which DOGE is seeking to interconnect data, including sensitive biometric data, has never been done before, raising alarms with experts who fear it may lead to disastrous privacy violations for citizens, certified foreign workers, and undocumented immigrants,” the article noted. And this “has nothing to do with finding fraud or wasteful spending,” a senior DHS official told Wired.

It also goes well beyond the administration’s efforts to track down and deport undocumented immigrants. As Wired reported separately in January, a Department of Justice court filing indicated DOGE may have shared SSA data with an outside group that seeks to “overturn election results in certain states.”

“What I want people to be scared of,” Jonathan Kamens, a former government cybersecurity expert, told NPR, is “that this data that the government has on them, which in some cases can be used to damage them, will be used to damage them.”

Leadership in science: A friend who runs a life-science lab at UC Berkeley told me that he’d recently lost a third of his grant money and now would have to lay someone off. He studies RNA-protein complexes, which have nothing to do with DEI. No matter. Musk and Trump’s freezing, slashing, and bottlenecking of National Institutes of Health and National Science Foundation funding for research labs all over America, and the gutting of federal staff responsible for ensuring grants are doled out smoothly, threatens to destroy one thing that really has made America great—our global leadership in science and innovation.

Who do you think built the foundation for all the big biomedical and tech innovations over the past three-quarters of a century? You and your loved ones likely owe your lives to the US government-funded development and distribution—now in jeopardy thanks to Trump and RFK Jr.—of vaccines for scourges like Covid, diphtheria, pertussis, polio, mumps, measles, rubella, and countless more. Our tax dollars have paid for the revolutionary development of CRISPR and mRNA vaccines; pioneering surgical treatments; and HIV and cancer therapies. Guess who sequenced the first human genome? Literally built the internet? Invented GPS? Funded the Google guys as they were developing their cute little search engine? Provided the fledgling EV industry with the subsidies and loans that Musk relied on for Tesla’s success?

And yet, after taxpayers helped him get rich, Musk set out to drive a stake through the heart of America’s innovation engine. Very classy, pal.

Educational opportunities: The funding delays and cancellations initiated by DOGE, and the ongoing attacks on higher education by the Trump administration and Congress, not to mention the immigration threats and denials of visas for international students, have resulted in painful cuts to undergraduate and graduate education across America. With grants throttled and funding uncertain, colleges have laid off faculty and staff; rescinded acceptances; and eliminated courses, graduate programs, and even entire departments. There’s “a whole generation of young scientists who see no pathway into the field for them,” a paleoecologist who’d stopped taking on new graduate students told the Guardian. 

Now Trump wants to hand oversight of federal grants to his political appointees at the Office of Management and Budget, the same office whose chief, Russell Vought, vowed to put federal workers in “trauma” (and succeeded). The new plan faces fierce public opposition, and rightly so. Not that Trump gives a damn.

Safe food: Got cyclospora? I’m sorry. The FDA’s food inspection regimen was never 100 percent reliable. Produce coming across the border is spot-checked for disease-causing organisms, but that’s not foolproof, so occasional outbreaks of food-borne illness are inevitable. It’s what happens next that matters.

The public health response to the cyclospora outbreaks have been “confusing,” Michael Osterholm, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota, told Minnesota Public Radio. Cyclospora is a tough parasite to track, Osterholm conceded, but “the cuts that have occurred in this administration, and some of it with DOGE itself, [have] really crippled us in terms of our ability to respond. I mean, the senior leadership in the laboratory science area at CDC and parasites were all let go, basically. We’ve had just a number of issues where there’s a shortage of public health workers, and so it has hindered this investigation. There’s absolutely no question about it.”

Another thing to pin on Musk: explosive diarrhea.

Consumer protection: The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau was a staunchly independent agency created by Congress and funded by the Federal Reserve to protect people against the kinds of deceptive corporate practices we saw from Wall Street in the lead-up to the Great Recession. The CFPB launched in 2011, and in its first 10 years secured about $14.4 billion in relief and $1.7 billion in civil penalties for millions of American families. It still would be protecting them were it not for DOGE. By June 2025, according to the public interest group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, Musk’s minions had ensured the loss of nearly 1,500 CFPB employees and “effectively shuttered an agency which returned over $26 billion to the American people…but only cost taxpayers a fraction of that amount to run.”

Some additional realms in which the DOGE cuts have cost us dearly:
  • Clean air and water protections
  • Government oversight
  • Upkeep and protection of national parks
  • Local public safety
  • Disaster preparedness and response
  • Health and pandemic response
  • Reliability of federal data
  • Veterans health care
  • A functional Social Security system
I’ll bet you can come up with 20 more.

The point is, talking about “savings” from DOGE is like talking about savings from not paying your mortgage, ignoring the part where the bank comes and takes your home. Such is the subterfuge we’re dealing with.

Breaking things is disastrously easy. Building them is hard. Elon Musk pushed Humpty Dumpty off the wall. Piecing him back together, if even possible, will take decades, concerted effort, and enormous sums of money—money that will now be in short supply thanks to Trump and his enablers.

Democrat escalates scrutiny

Top House Judiciary Democrat escalates scrutiny of Paramount merger in new letter

Jamie Raskin has invited CEO David Ellison to appear for a transcribed interview.

Riley Rogerson

House Democrats are ramping up their scrutiny of Paramount Skydance’s bid to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery — and previewing their plans to crack down on the merger if they win the majority next year.

In a new letter Wednesday, Rep. Jamie Raskin of Maryland — the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee — invited Paramount CEO David Ellison to appear for a transcribed interview “to tell Congress and America your story and answer the Committee’s questions about your Donald Trump-enabled shopping spree to consolidate news organizations, movie studios, cable channels and streaming services.”

As a member of the minority party, Raskin has no power to force Ellison’s cooperation. A spokesperson for committee Republicans did not immediately return a request for comment about whether they were also interested in hearing from Ellison.

But should Democrats win back control of the House in the midterms, Raskin is expected to become the committee chair, and he would at that time have the power to exercise subpoena authority to compel Ellison’s testimony.

Raskin previewed his plans to ramp up oversight of the Paramount merger earlier this week, telling POLITICO that the investigation is a “priority” and that “anyone involved should be prepared to answer under oath for their role in this brazen campaign to bend America’s free press to Donald Trump’s political, financial and personal will.”

A spokesperson for Paramount did not immediately respond to a request for comment, but Paramount Chief Legal Officer Makan Delrahim, during a California policy summit Tuesday hosted by POLITICO, said the company has been “transparent” and responsive to lawmaker’s concerns.

In his letter Wednesday, however, Raskin said that Ellison has not responded to four letters Judiciary Democrats have sent over the past year seeking clarity on the proposed $110 billion merger, which has sparked opposition from Democrats worried about antitrust violations, corruption and national security implications.

“The House Committee on the Judiciary is committed to scrutinizing how the antitrust laws are being enforced to promote the public interest; how market power abuses may be harming not only competition but consumers, workers, and the public generally; and whether the federal antitrust agencies are successfully promoting free competition and innovation — or whether they are using their governmental powers to distort the market and undermine freedom of speech and freedom of the press, in violation of the First Amendment,” Raskin wrote.