A place were I can write...

My simple blog of pictures of travel, friends, activities and the Universe we live in as we go slowly around the Sun.



May 27, 2026

Tent for his fat ass...

What the Hell Is That Thing

Check out these photos of Trump’s birthday cage fight setup.

Sophie Hurwitz

At first, when I saw these photos of curling scaffolding outside the White House, I thought construction was beginning on the Trump Arch. That assumption, however, shows my limited fluency in Donald Trump’s vanity projects.

This is actually something else entirely: a tarantula-like stage being built for the president’s birthday cage fight extravaganza, called UFC Freedom 250. The fights, which will be part of Trump’s America 250 celebration, will reportedly cost $60 million. Trump announced the event last year during a visit to the Iowa State Fair. This summer, it’s happening for real, featuring boxers Ilia Tupuria and Justin Gaethje.

Oh, you didn’t realize a cage fight was happening at the White House soon? Neither did many of us. Here is a list of things that people at the Center for Investigative Reporting’s New York office think the arena, at least in its current iteration, resembles instead:
  • Alien egg
  • Elon Musk’s first installation on Mars
  • Mall bungee jumping setup, near the food court, right around the corner from Claire’s, probably smelling faintly of cheese.
  • Rollercoaster, but little
  • Church carnival in a parking lot
  • The millionth Transformers film
  • The launch celebration for a new and improved NuvaRing. This one is sort of high-concept, and I don’t really understand it, but I believe my colleagues and here’s a link where you can judge for yourself.
  • St. Louis Arch (a.k.a The Gateway Arch, but a Lego Technic version.)
  • McDonald’s Arches.
  • Installation purpose-built for a mid-sized city’s bid to host the Olympics
I’m no architecture critic, so there’s not much else for me to add here. If tickets to the fight didn’t (reportedly) cost $1.5 million, I’d check it out. I think the Transformers movies are pretty neat, and I think that there are many worse things the president could be wasting his time on than a UFC fight.

A scandal-plagued hack.....

They’re All Ken Paxton Now

Texas Republicans chose a candidate who embodies something essential about the party under Trump.

Tim Murphy

When President Donald Trump endorsed Texas attorney general Ken Paxton earlier this month in his race to unseat four-term GOP Sen. John Cornyn, it fell to Lindsey Graham—as it so often does—to say the loud part loudest. 

Sure, Cornyn is Graham’s colleague. And Paxton is a scandal-plagued hack lawyer who has been impeached by members of his own party; forced to take remedial ethics classes; admitted to breaking securities law; reported to the FBI by his employees; investigated by own his state bar association; and whose wife has filed for divorce on “Biblical grounds.” But what Graham actually feared about the prospect of Paxton winning their primary was telling. “I think we’ll win Texas no matter what,” the South Carolina senator told reporters. “The truth of the matter is, Paxton will cost more money.”

For now, it’s Cornyn and his national Republican allies who have just lit giant bags of cash on fire, spending at least $92 million to produce the single worst primary performance for an incumbent Senator in almost fifty years. Next up for Republican funders after Paxton’s victory on Tuesday is an expensive general-election against Democratic state Rep. James Talarico that could help decide control of the chamber. 

Paxton’s win was not surprising, with Trump’s late endorsement perhaps more a reflection of the underlying realities than a determinative factor itself. But the margin was nonetheless stunning. Paxton won Republican voters by nearly two-to-one. Of the state’s 254 counties, all but one went for the AG. The exception was tiny Kennedy County—Cornyn carried it 6 votes to 2.

Incumbents almost never lose like this. But it’s not even the only time it’s happened this month. Louisiana Sen. Bill Cassidy, who angered Trump by voting for conviction at the second impeachment trial, recently became the first incumbent senator to finish outside the top two in a primary since the 1940s, according to the Downballot. Last week, Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie lost by nine points after bucking Trump on the Epstein files and the Iran war. Before that, the president helped take out six Republican legislators in Indiana who had blocked his push to redraw the state’s voting maps. Trump is more unpopular than he’s ever been in the general electorate. But among Republican primary voters, the bond has never been tighter.

Trump has always hovered over the Texas race in instructive ways. Cornyn and his supporters spent most of last year running a series of extremely blunt and ultimately kind of amusing attack ads with the goal of tanking Paxton’s numbers and scaring the president away. After the first round of the primary, when Cornyn unexpectedly came out on top in a three-person field, Trump said he was going to endorse one candidate soon and ask the other candidate to drop out, so the party could unite against Talarico. Paxton was quick to say that he would consider dropping out if the Senate would pass the SAVE Act, an omnibus voter suppression and election-malfeasance bill that’s somehow also anti-trans. The SAVE Act didn’t pass and Paxton’s bluff was safe—and in the end, Trump took another month to endorse.

Cornyn’s trajectory is instructive, although there are vanishingly few pre-MAGA Republicans left to take note of it. He was a less partisan attorney general than Paxton, in his previous life in Austin. In his current one in Washington, Cornyn passed a modest, bipartisan gun control law after the massacre in Uvalde, and called Trump “reckless” after January 6th. A lot of people in the chamber seemed to respect him. There is not even a billow of smoke about a messy personal life. But there has also probably never been a point in the last two years of Trump’s rule where anyone has thought, Well, John Cornyn will put a stop to this. He, too, told a story about what MAGA does to Republican officeholders, about how people who might know better simply find a different version of themselves. When Democrats in the state escaped to Illinois last summer to deny quorum, it was Cornyn who suggested the FBI be used to track them down. This was the fallacy of his campaign—that in order to stop Paxton, he must essentially become him. But there was no substitute for the real thing. 

As I explained in a profile of Paxton several years ago, the newly minted Republican nominee embodies something essential about the GOP in the age of Trump. He is remarkable not for his smarts or charisma, but for his willingness to do what is asked regardless of what might be proper. Shame can only hold you back. Under Paxton, the AG’s office has been a fully weaponized agency, that has launched frivolous but harassing investigations of voting rights groups and immigrant aid organizations; targeted Trump critics and Democrats; and built the legal foundation for overturning a presidential election. He has been elected over and over again by running against the enemies of Donald Trump and Christian nationalists—a Jewish Republican speaker; business-minded Republicans in the state legislature; a Bush scion; and now a white-haired elder statesmen who looked like someone who might broker a grand bargain even if he never really did.

It’s fitting that when Paxton was impeached in 2023, it was for allegedly using his office to benefit the interests of a single donor. While he was acquitted by the state senate and has denied wrongdoing, that kind of concierge service is the secret to his staying power. Increasingly, it’s just how you get ahead in Republican politics—not by blocking and tackling, or constituent services, or quietly building a reputation, but doing what is asked by the big guy.

Trump is who they want to be—saying and doing what he wants, making deals, getting rich. But Ken Paxton is all that most of them are: A bad lawyer looking to get ahead, background music in someone else’s story. After all, the Senate Republican caucus already includes two other former state attorneys general who signed the Texas AG’s shoddy brief seeking to throw out the results of the 2020 election. Graham and the rest will welcome him, even if it costs $100 million to get him there, because whoever was left of the old guard has retired or been forced out. There’s no more delusion about what a Republican senator is or needs to be in Trump’s second term: They’re all Ken Paxton now.

The fat pill dream is here......

Everyone’s on GLP-1s. But at What Cost?

As compounded versions proliferate, reports of eating disorders and adolescent use are on the rise.

Inae Oh

When Layla Taylor, the 25-year-old Utah influencer and member of MomTok, went public with her use of the GLP-1 drug Tirzepatide in the latest season of The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives, her pain was palpable. “I’m so exhausted all the time because I don’t eat,” Taylor shares with two cast-mates during a spa day. “My body hurts every night when I go to bed. When I lie down, if my knees are touching, it hurts because I don’t have enough fat on my body.”

Here was a young woman on reality television, clearly struggling with her mental health as she admits, “I don’t know how to stop.”

Were the producers unimpressed? Because, aside from a quick follow-up of Taylor seeking treatment for her eating disorder, her story mostly fades, cast aside as a minor detail amid the show’s on-again, off-again torture of other cast members. Perhaps even more unsettling were the ads for Ro, the telehealth company, that played throughout the season, specifically highlighting its “weight loss expertise”—even as one of the show’s central figures opened up about her issues with GLP-1s.

The result, for viewers, could feel sensationally callous; Taylor herself has said that she was disappointed by how little airtime her admission received. But the show’s treatment of Taylor reflects a culture where GLP-1s are ubiquitous and normalized, even when their use sometimes leads to extreme and troubling results.

Hulu did not respond to my questions about how it handled Taylor’s GLP-1 story. But Sabrina Strings, a professor and author of Fearing the Black Body: The Racial Origins of Fat Phobia, who had not seen the show, imagined that for its executives, “You can see the importance of not spending too much time lingering on the issue.” By welcoming the advertisements, the overall message became: “Yes, [Layla] may have a mental health concern, but that’s separate from the excellent quality of these drugs—and you need to take them too.”

Backing up a little: How was a reality television star with open body image struggles able to get Tirzepatide in the first place? Taylor, who, since the season finale, says that she has stopped using the drug, revealed that it was a plastic surgeon in Utah who wrote the prescription. “They just handed it to me without ever having an appointment with me,” Taylor told Allure. “They got me a prescription, and it was at my house the next day.” 

Most Americans might not have plastic surgeons to hit up for weight-loss concerns. But they do enjoy unfettered access to telehealth companies and medspas that offer GLP-1s in abundance. These companies share a slickness in marketing, often employing the language of empowerment to drill into our minds that the body we want is within reach.

“I’m on Ro,” Serena Williams says in the ad that aired throughout Mormon Wives. As thumping music plays in the background, Williams rattles off the benefits she reaped: “34 pounds down on GLP-1s. Healthier on Ro. Supported on Ro. FDA-approved GLP-1 options.”

The ad never discloses that Williams’ husband, Reddit co-founder Alexis Ohanian, is a Ro investor and board member. More importantly, Williams doesn’t mention that telehealth providers like Ro are not under the jurisdiction of the Food and Drug Administration, and the online health assessments they use to determine eligibility can be shaky.

Consider the experience of my colleague, Schuyler Mitchell. Schuyler has a history of previous eating disorders and recently attempted to see if she could become eligible to microdose the medications through two telehealth companies, Noom and Hers. “I lied about past eating disorder history by checking a box,” she said, echoing similar reports of how easy it is to be untruthful in these assessments—whether about age, past eating disorders, or current BMI—to obtain a prescription, even when companies insist that licensed physicians evaluate each application.

Here’s what unfolded after Schuyler submitted their online quizzes:

Hers—a women’s telehealth company that launched in 2018 with a focus on sexual wellness and skincare and has since become better known for offering weight loss drugs—warned me that my prescription would not be “evaluated for safety, effectiveness, or quality by the FDA.” It asked me harrowing questions such as, “How disruptive would vomiting, constipation, and diarrhea be to your daily life?” And then, thank God, Hers told me I didn’t qualify.

Noom let me right in. After it thanked me for taking the “important (and hard) first step” of sharing my current weight, it prompted me to buy my “personalized plan” for shedding 10 pounds in seven weeks.

Schuyler had specifically been attempting to get a compounded GLP-1. These versions are generally cheaper and more easily accessible than brand-name medications like Ozempic and Zepbound, and have been critical to the rise in popularity of GLP-1s. To distinguish themselves and not get sued, these copycat drugs include additional enhancements, such as Vitamin B12, to accompany the broader promise of weight loss. And perhaps most critically, compounded GLP-1s are not approved by the FDA. Instead, they were originally developed as a temporary solution in response to a 2022 national shortage of their brand-name precursors.

Even though the shortage resolved in late 2024, Alka Menon, a sociologist at Yale, said that compounded GLP-1s continue to proliferate, with little oversight over the drugs themselves and the popular pathways for accessing them, like telehealth companies. And for wide swaths of the user population, conditions appear rosy; a recent New York Times poll that surveyed over 2,000 GLP-1 users found that most of them were “enthusiastic” about their experience on the medications, with 63 percent saying that the drugs had relieved the conditions they were treating for. Though hard numbers on how many people are using compounded versions of brand-name medications are notoriously hard to find, Menon told me that pharmaceutical companies believe the market for these copycat drugs is “fairly significant in size.”

“Some of the really big telehealth companies have partnered directly with pharmaceutical companies to get branded versions of the drugs,” Menon said. “But they started by offering compounded versions. Most of the telehealth companies we see are doing something compounded.”

The public appears to know little about compounded GLP-1s. Even talking to people in my own social circles about their use of the drugs, no one could tell me if the medications they were taking were compounded or brand-name. The very word itself, “compounded,” appeared alien to them; the cascade of issues attached to the drugs was also similarly unknown. What they did know, however, was exactly how much the GLP-1s were costing them.

They aren’t the only ones with blinders on. A recent puff piece in the New York Times featuring Medvi, an AI-powered telehealth start-up, failed to mention a litany of legal problems facing the company, including a February warning from the FDA against Medvi’s use of “false or misleading” claims about compounded GLP-1s. After reader uproar, an editor’s note quickly accompanied the article, acknowledging that the reporting should have included the FDA’s warning. The fact that a major paper missed this crucial context seemed to reflect society’s willingness to overlook the dangers of GLP-1s due to our insatiable appetite for the promise of thinness.

Meanwhile, telehealth companies that market these medications receive little scrutiny as they race toward a $100 billion industry evaluation by the end of the decade. As the drugs and their copycat versions become easier and easier to obtain, it’s hard not to wonder if an emerging public health crisis is coming into view, especially as the use of the drugs increases among young people, some as young as 12.

Dr. Rebecca Boswell, a clinical psychologist and director at the Princeton Center for Eating Disorders, said that she had seen a “substantial uptick” in patients abusing GLP-1s, as well as severe cases of malnutrition. Boswell has been struck by how aware kids seem to be of the medications.

While speaking at a recent elementary school event about body image, she was astounded by how many kids brought up Ozempic. “They sang the jingle to me and the chorus,” Boswell said. “It was terrifying.”

“This was a turn I had never seen before,” she added, “kids really understanding the drive for thinness at such a young age.”

The relationship between GLP-1s and eating disorders is complicated; there is some evidence that the medications can help people struggling with binge eating because they suppress appetite. But Boswell called that strategy a “Band-Aid over a bullet hole.” While the urge to binge may be “less strong,” she said that the strategy was not addressing the deeper underlying factors that were causing individuals to binge eat in the first place.

Physicians also reported seeing similar health risks crop up for people on GLP-1s as they do for people with eating disorders. “We know that individuals with eating disorders have a high risk of bone fragility due to malnutrition and bone loss, and we’re beginning to see individuals prescribed GLP-1s with bone loss,” Dr. Elizabeth Wassenaar of The Eating Recovery Center in Denver, Colorado, said.

Though Wassenaar did not specify which age, she confirmed that the center has seen “pre-pubescent children on GLP-1s seeking treatment for eating disorders.”

“I’d like for there to be better oversight for the prescription of these medications,” Wassenaar said, “and better support for the real possibility of disordered eating after taking these medications.” She emphasized that a focus on cosmetic changes from GLP-1s was especially dangerous for children and young adults.

Even for adults curious about the medications, Menon, the Yale sociologist, cautions consumers to tread carefully when using medications procured online. “Even if you’re getting the branded product through a telehealth service and your insurance is reimbursing you, are you being seen by a doctor who’s making sure that the side effects are okay?” Menon said. “Are you ramping up the dose appropriately? Do you meet the diagnostic criteria that you report in the form? Are you taking the right dosage? Is it mixed properly? These are all big safety concerns, no matter what the product itself is.”

Got to be fucking high!!!!!!!

Join the Abraham Accords? US allies scoff at Trump’s demand.

Some say Trump is just appeasing domestic political players.

By Nahal Toosi

President Donald Trump’s demand that more Muslim-majority countries join the Abraham Accords and recognize Israel as part of efforts to end the Iran war is being met by officials in such countries with laughter, dismissal and, often, silence.

Trump’s idea, should he stick to it, could endanger a U.S.-Iran peace deal — governments may walk away from mediating talks rather than risk angering their publics by establishing ties with Israel. But some Middle Eastern officials aren’t taking Trump’s demand too seriously, saying they view it as merely the U.S. president trying to appease hawkish Republicans who worry he will give away too much in talks with Iran.

“It is a smart tactic to calm down the angry base,” a Gulf Arab diplomat said, having been granted anonymity, like others, to discuss sensitive diplomacy. “He will keep bringing it up again and again. But it will not be part of the deal.”

Trump’s assertion, nonetheless, injected uncertainty into an already volatile situation. A spate of new U.S. military strikes on Iranian missile sites and boats suspected of placing mines as well as Israel’s escalating offensive in Lebanon are adding to concerns that a tenuous U.S.-Israel-Iran ceasefire could collapse and plunge the region into even more fighting. The war has already had economic fallout globally.

Upon hearing of Trump’s demands, one former U.S. official sent mock notes to Arab officials congratulating them on joining the Abraham Accords — and received laughter emojis in response.

The former U.S. official said some of their Arab official contacts view the Trump demand as a “poison pill,” adding that “it creates new conditions for peace that neither Iran nor the states in question will accept.”

A second former U.S. official described the reaction from their Middle East government contacts as “disbelief and frustration.”

White House spokesperson Anna Kelly noted that Trump has wanted to expand the Abraham Accords, which established diplomatic, economic and other ties between Israel and several Arab states, since he launched them in his first term.

“The Abraham Accords have provided massive economic benefits to all countries involved and enabled historic cooperation, so this would be a natural complement to a peace deal between the United States and Iran,” Kelly said.

Trump wrote on Truth Social on Monday that he was “mandatorily requesting” that countries such as Pakistan, Egypt, Turkey, Qatar and Saudi Arabia sign on to the accords. He noted that he’d raised the idea in a Saturday call about Iran peace talks with leaders of many of the same countries. In his post, Trump suggested even Iran could join the accords, despite the Islamist regime’s decades of hostility toward Israel.

Some of the countries Trump mentioned, such as Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates, already are part of the Abraham Accords. Others, such as Egypt and Jordan, have peace treaties or other agreements with Israel.

For others, joining the accords anytime soon could be risky. In the wake of the Gaza war, Saudi Arabia has said it will not establish ties with Israel unless its leaders agree to a serious pathway to creating a Palestinian state. (At the same time, Saudi Arabia, like several other Arab countries, sees Iran’s Islamist regime as a destabilizing force in the region).

A Gulf Arab official said the Saudi position had not changed on either the Iran crisis or the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, despite Trump’s entreaties regarding the Abraham Accords.

“The Kingdom is supportive of all diplomatic efforts to resolve conflict, not military solutions,” the official said in a statement. “The kingdom also opposes all forms of aggression. Its position on the two-state solution being the only sensible way forward has not changed.” The statement did not directly mention the accords.

Pakistan, which is among the lead mediators of the U.S.-Iran talks, is also unlikely to join the Abraham Accords. As in many Muslim-majority nations, there is widespread sympathy for the Palestinians in Pakistan, and a government ignores that domestic opinion at its peril.

Pakistani Defense Minister Khawaja Asif, in an interview on Samaa TV, ruled out joining the accords, though he framed it as his opinion.

“In my personal view, I don’t think we’ll be part of any accords like this,” said Asif, whose social media posts are highly critical of Israel. “It would clash with our fundamental views. And I think no initiative like this has been taken from our side, nor as anyone approached us.”

A spokesperson for the Pakistani Foreign Ministry did not respond to a request for comment.

Diplomats and officials from several other countries did not respond to requests for comment or issue public statements at all — a sign of the sensitivity of the topic.

Few, after all, have incentives to risk Trump’s ire by openly defying or questioning him.

“Gulf states all seem to be trying to navigate a highly imperfect end to the war without antagonizing Trump and without Trump caving on their core interests,” said Michael Ratney, a former U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia.

Truth


 

They will gut themselves while drinking poison Koolaid...

The Texas GOP finally turned on Cornyn

The senator was a towering figure in Texas and national politics. His loss signals the end of an era for the Republican establishment.

By Liz Crampton

The storied career of Sen. John Cornyn came to a swift and decisive end at the hands of the GOP voters who once propelled him to power.

The senator was a towering figure in both national and Texas politics, known for his sober temperament, ability to cut deals and role in shaping the Senate GOP conference during the last four presidencies. Then, just about an hour after polls closed Tuesday, Cornyn lost his primary to Ken Paxton, a scandal-plagued MAGA darling who was boosted by President Donald Trump’s last-minute endorsement.

Cornyn’s defeat is rattling the establishment wing of the GOP, who viewed the brutal primary as a battle for the soul of the party. His supporters mourn his approaching absence in the Senate as another example of an institutionalist who fell victim to the rise of the populist right, what they see as the end of an era of compassionate conservatism.

“It just blows my mind that anybody could look at John Cornyn and somehow call him a secret liberal RINO,” said Josh Schroeder, mayor of Georgetown, Texas, and a Cornyn supporter. “If that guy can’t pass a conservative litmus test, who can?”

Cornyn’s loss stands to further deplete the corps of senators willing to work across the aisle on thorny policy issues, from immigration reform to gun safety — potentially contributing further to increasing polarization on Capitol Hill.

While Cornyn was not a frequent bipartisan operator in the mold of former Sens. Joe Manchin (I-W.Va.) or Rob Portman (R-Ohio), he occasionally dug in to try and find compromise. His loss comes just ten days after fellow Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) lost his own primary to a Trump-backed challenger. Before that, it had been 14 years since the last elected senator lost a primary.

“He’s always been about delivering results for Texas rather than chasing headlines,” said Brian Walsh, Cornyn’s former communications director. “He respects the Senate as his institution and believes deeply in doing the work the right way, even when it’s difficult, or I would say politically inconvenient.”

His participation was often crucial as a member of the GOP leadership team and a key Republican fundraiser who operated with the tacit approval of Kentucky Sen. Mitch McConnell, who served as GOP leader for nearly all of Cornyn’s tenure.

Even though his supporters were long skeptical of his odds in the primary, Cornyn chose to go down swinging. He continued to run negative ads against Paxton throughout Texas until the last minute, harping on Paxton’s indiscretions. And he warned during an appearance on Fox News on Tuesday that the attorney general would be an “albatross” on the rest of the Republican ticket “likely to have a negative drag on the down ballot races in Texas, judges, local officials, House of Representatives, you name it.”

But those moral arguments did not sway a majority of primary voters — or Trump, who chose to endorse the attorney general and cited Cornyn’s decision to wait to endorse his third presidential run as proof he was insufficiently loyal.

Paxton’s supporters have long shrugged off his long trail of criminal and ethics investigations, impeachment by the state legislature and ongoing divorce, complete with accusations of infidelity, believing that his commitment to carrying the MAGA torch was more important than corruption allegations or a messy personal life. Paxton, for his part, has tried to focus the campaign on his qualifications for the Senate — and allegiance to Trump.

Paxton also benefitted from a strong anti-incumbency sentiment rippling throughout Texas. The GOP base was ripe for his argument that Cornyn was too enmeshed in the D.C. swamp to justify sending back to Washington even as those attacks bewildered Cornyn’s supporters, who pointed to his long record of voting for Trump’s agenda.

As majority whip during Trump’s first term, Cornyn helped shepherd the president’s signature tax bill across the finish line. In 2024, he fell just a few votes short of becoming majority leader against Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.). And few Republicans have demonstrated fundraising prowess like Cornyn, the former chair of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, who has brought in more than $400 million throughout the course of his political career.

“Senate Republicans were very eager to see their friend and colleague continue, and Cornyn is one of those guys that would’ve raised money for his fellow incumbents. That’s unlikely to continue,” said a GOP Senate strategist, granted anonymity to speak candidly.

Trump, after weeks of standing on the sidelines, swooped in at the start of early voting to back Paxton, a reward for the attorney general supporting his efforts to overturn the 2020 election. Cornyn, on the other hand, voted to certify the results.

Throughout the bitter campaign, Cornyn shifted to the right on some issues, adopting the fiery language of the MAGA base, which was seen as an effort to endear himself to Trump in a bid for his endorsement. Most prominently, he ran an ad declaring that “radical Islam is a bloodthirsty ideology.”

When Paxton cleverly declared that he would drop out of the primary if the Senate GOP killed the filibuster to pass the SAVE America Act, Trump’s priority election bill, that staved off the president’s planned endorsement of Cornyn. The Texas senator belatedly announced a reversal of his longheld support of the filibuster. And Cornyn introduced a bill two weeks ago to rename a major U.S. highway Interstate 47 to honor Trump. But it came far too late to save him.

But in a hyper-partisan environment, Cornyn’s decisions to occasionally work with Democrats doomed his standing among the rabidly conservative base in Texas.

Cornyn kept to the outskirts of high-stakes bipartisan immigration talks, such as the “Gang of Eight” that sought a comprehensive overhaul in 2013. But he later partnered with Sen. Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona in exploring a narrower, border-security-focused bill.

He also found success reaching across the aisle in 2022 on gun safety legislation in the aftermath of the Uvalde school shooting. The Bipartisan Safer Communities Act was modest relative to Democratic demands for stricter gun control. But it was still the most significant federal gun legislation in a generation — and it provoked intense backlash among hard-right voters in Texas.

“We both know that when we’re doing what’s right, it doesn’t matter what other people think,” Cornyn texted Sinema at the time.

Four years later, Paxton made the legislation a centerpiece of his campaign, accusing Cornyn of shepherding “the worst gun control bill in decades.”

Texas will now be swept up in an expensive and competitive Senate race, with Democrats amped to compete against Paxton, who they view as more vulnerable than Cornyn in a midterm environment favorable to their party. Many believe Democratic nominee and state Rep. James Talarico is their best shot in a generation at flipping a statewide seat.

Schroeder, who represents a small town in Talarico’s former district, said the Democrat is capable of pulling off a strong campaign: “He appears to be campaigning from the high road while the Democratic party is just slicing Paxton to shreds because they got a whole lot of ammunition.”

In the aftermath of the brutal primary, some Republicans fear that the state of the GOP is dire – and potentially unable to unify ahead of November with the possibility that some Cornyn supporters will sit out the race entirely or vote for Talarico. After the race was quickly called on Tuesday, Talarico posted on X: “To Senator Cornyn’s supporters: you have a place in our campaign.”

In his concession speech, Cornyn said he will support the GOP ticket: “I’ve fought the good fight, I’ve finished the race, and I’ve kept the faith.”

“I’ll have more to say later.”

Well of course they do....

At posh, private club, Schlossberg shifts view on Israel

Congressional candidate and Kennedy scion Jack Schlossberg struck a more sympathetic tone toward Israel while speaking with members of an elite private social club.

By Jason Beeferman

Jack Schlossberg is positioning himself as the candidate most critical of Israel in NY-12, the seat held by retiring Rep. Jerry Nadler.

The Kennedy scion has declared on Instagram that he supports “no weapons to Israel.” His team says he’s the “only candidate” seeking to block “bombs and bulldozers” to the country. And Schlossberg has harshly criticized two of his opponents for purportedly believing in “NO CONDITIONS” when it comes to military support for Israel.

But behind closed doors — and speaking with members of one of New York City’s most exclusive private clubs — his tone on the fraught issue shifts.

“I probably would have continued funding Israel’s offensive weaponry within the years following October 7th,” Schlossberg told members of the swanky Harmonie Club at a private May 11 “meet and greet,” according to a recording of the event obtained by POLITICO.

The club, located on the Upper East Side, steps away from Central Park, was founded by Jewish German immigrants and is the second-oldest private social club in the city, according to The New York Times.

“I have been a stronger supporter of Israel than I ever thought I would be standing here today with you, because of educating myself on the issue,” Schlossberg also said at the event. “That is ultimately I think a sign of leadership and what a congressperson should do.”

Schlossberg’s remarks on Israel come as he squares off in the June 23 Democratic primary against state Assemblymembers Alex Bores and Micah Lasher, anti-Trump commentator George Conway and public health expert Nina Schwalbe in a district that has one of the largest Jewish populations in the country.

Schlossberg has sought to distinguish himself as the only major candidate willing to condition — or even halt — military aid to Israel in recent social media posts that were fired off as part of a shift in his social media strategy. Ever since the Times published a bruising piece painting Schlossberg as an “erratic” and sometimes-absent candidate, he has taken on a more furious — and idiosyncratic — tone online.

“Alex Bores and Micah Lasher are wholly-owned subsidiaries of billionaires,” Schlossberg wrote in one post on X.

“I’m the only Democrat in the NY12 primary,” he said in another, referencing their policies on aid to Israel.

In a statement from an unnamed spokesperson, Schlossberg’s team appeared to acknowledge his shift over the last two weeks from voicing support for “funding Israel’s offensive weaponry” to billing himself as the “no weapons to Israel” candidate — and is challenging his opponents to change their stances as well.

“Jack’s views have evolved as the situation has,” the spokespersons said. “The question is why haven’t his opponents updated their positions?”

The spokesperson said Schlossberg supports withholding offensive weapons for Israel, backs funding for the anti-missile defense system known as the Iron Dome and supports a recent resolution from Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders which seeks to stop the U.S. from selling $658.8 million worth of military weapons to Israel.

A January candidate questionnaire for the Working Families Party obtained by POLITICO also highlights how Schlossberg’s stance on Israel has shifted. At the time, Schlossberg said he was “unsure” about whether he would back legislation known as the “Block the Bombs Act,” which would prohibit the sale or transfer of military equipment to Israel until the country guarantees compliance with international law.

“This bill does not provide any discretion between current and unforeseen future scenarios,” Schlossberg wrote in the questionnaire. “Additionally, much of the violence and oppression taking place in Palestine has been accomplished without these weapons. The legislation would not provide an avenue to peace and stability.”

Ebola detection

Europe beefs up Ebola detection as Congo epidemic surges

The bloc isn’t taking any risks as the virus spreads faster than health workers can contain it.

By Helen Collis

Europe is increasing surveillance of potential Ebola symptoms among airline passengers arriving from the Democratic Republic of Congo as the deadly virus spreads faster than health workers can contain it.

As of Monday more than 900 suspected cases of Ebola had been reported in Congo, with at least 223 deaths, but the actual number of cases was expected to be far higher. Uganda, which borders Congo, has reported seven cases.

The European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control is modeling the likelihood of cases being imported into Europe and is working with the aviation sector “to strengthen the safety of all passengers on board,” the agency said in a statement Wednesday.

Earlier this week Italy reported two suspected cases among passengers who had arrived from Uganda, but they later tested negative for Ebola, the disease prevention agency said.

Meanwhile, Belgium has direct daily flights to and from Congo. Brussels Airlines said Wednesday it is making changes to its crew schedules given that the United States has banned entry to the country from the region, but added: “These changes are being implemented without affecting the current flight schedule.”

“In times like these, flights are more vital than ever to keep the region connected and to allow vital medication and medically trained personnel to reach the affected areas,” the airline said in a statement. The airline, which is part of the Lufthansa Group, added that it remains “committed to maintaining its flight schedule whenever possible.”

This deadly outbreak is caused by the Bundibugyo virus, for which there are no treatments or vaccines. The World Health Organization said talks were ongoing with developers of two experimental vaccines, while German diagnostic firm Altona said it aimed to provide a test for the specific Ebola strain in the “coming weeks.”

Ongoing conflict in the region and the rare viral type are making it almost impossible for health workers to stop the spread of the infection, the WHO told reporters.

Health facilities have come under attack by local people on occasion because relatives wanted to take the bodies of their loved ones for burial — a practice that can lead to further infections.

Meanwhile, Europe’s disease agency is pooling more resources from a network of experts to send more help. This larger presence will help it “gather more detailed information on exit screening, which ... is crucial to reduce risk by identifying travellers who are symptomatic,” the agency said.

It will also help ensure that the agency’s risk assessments and recommendations for European countries and their citizens are prompt and up to date.

Ukraine wants more missile defense

Zelenskyy pleads with Trump for Patriots to fight Russian bombardment

Ukraine wants more missile defense, but the war in the Middle East has driven up demand.

By Veronika Melkozerova and Jonas Loesel

Ukraine is pleading for the U.S.'s help to defend against escalating Russian ballistic missile attacks, which killed several people and injured more than 90 over the weekend.

In a letter sent to U.S. President Trump and Congress on Tuesday, seen by POLITICO, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy asked the U.S. for further shipments of its PAC-3 interceptor missiles. This latest request comes just a few days after Kyiv was pummeled by Russian ballistic missiles, with Moscow eyeing more attacks soon.

"For us — for a nation fighting for its survival — there is hardly anything more painful to see than Patriot batteries with no missiles loaded," Zelenskyy wrote. "I ask for your help in protecting Ukraine's skies from Russian missiles."

U.S.-made PAC-3 interceptor missiles used in the American Patriot system are currently the country’s best defense against Russian ballistic missiles, although it hopes to develop its own ballistic missile defenses. The second Trump administration has dragged its feet on providing Kyiv with Patriot missiles, leaving Kyiv in a bind as its supplies dwindle. The U.S.-Israeli war in Iran has further threatened Ukraine’s supply, as the two countries and other U.S. allies in the region burn through hundreds of PAC-3 interceptors.

In Monday’s letter, the Ukrainian leader acknowledged the “high demand” for Patriot missiles in other regions, and accedes to the longtime Trump position that Europe must “take on a greater role” in its own security.

He praised U.S. weapons systems and jets in glowing terms and expressed gratitude for their delivery to Ukraine.

Over the weekend, more than 90 missiles were launched at Ukraine, and on Monday, the Kremlin warned foreign diplomats that it would continue bombing Kyiv. Russian ballistic missiles are Putin’s “last major advantage on the battlefield,” Zelenskyy wrote.

"They can be intercepted. With Patriots. With your help. And you have the power to help," he wrote.

PK 164 +31.1


What is a pair of headphones doing in the sky? Today’s image features the Headphone Nebula, also known as PK 164 +31.1 or Jones-Emberson 1. This planetary nebula, the remnant of a dying Sun-like star, faintly occupies an angular region of the Lynx constellation about 1/5th the diameter of the full moon. The red and blue-ish green colors trace hydrogen and oxygen atoms, respectively, that have been excited and ionized by the nebula's central white dwarf. The headphone shape, where two lobes of hydrogen puncture the inner region of oxygen, adds this object to a long list of oddly shaped nebulae. The morphology of such strange nebulae hint at the presence of a stellar or planetary companion, which can stir the material flowing out from the dying star. You can listen to Hubble and JWST sonifications of planetary nebulae through your very own headphones!