A place were I can write...

My simple blog of pictures of travel, friends, activities and the Universe we live in as we go slowly around the Sun.



August 06, 2026

Shipping attack

Two shipping attacks reported as experts warn of Red Sea escalation

By Billy Stockwell

At least two attacks have been reported near the Red Sea’s Bab al-Mandeb Strait in recent days amid growing concern over the Iran-backed Houthi group’s targeting of shipping in the region.

A vessel sank off the coast of the Yemeni city of Al Mukha after being attacked by an uncrewed surface vessel, according to the UK Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) center. The attack, which was first reported on Tuesday, sparked a fire onboard.

Indian authorities confirmed Tuesday that an Indian-flagged vessel had been struck and sunk by a “projectile” off the coast of Yemen, with 14 seafarers safely brought to Al Mukha port.

On Wednesday, a loud explosion was heard near a vessel 95 nautical miles (around 109 miles) southeast of Aden, Yemen. “All crew accounted for and safe. There is no environmental impact recorded. Authorities are investigating,” the UKMTO said.

The UK maritime agency, a Royal Navy-affiliated body that monitors shipping in the Red Sea, Persian Gulf and northern Indian Ocean, did not name the ships or state which party was responsible, but the Houthis have repeatedly threatened to disrupt shipping through the strait, a key chokepoint at the southern end of the Red Sea.

As some ships divert toward the northern Red Sea to avoid traversing the strait, the Houthis vowed on Wednesday to “continue and escalate” their targeting of Saudi vessels in the northern Red Sea “to close all access points and prevent their passage.”

Shipping intelligence group Marisks said the group’s decision represents “a significant escalation in both geographic scope and strategic intent.”

“By openly declaring the northern Red Sea as an operational area, the group is signalling that Saudi-affiliated shipping may now face a sustained threat throughout the entire Red Sea,” Marisks said.

Despite this risk, commercial traffic continues to “transit steadily” through the southern Red Sea and Bab al-Mandeb, according to UKMTO.

Drive up costs and threaten free navigation

Shipping groups warn Hormuz tolls could drive up costs and threaten free navigation

By Mustafa Qadri

Leading shipping associations have urged the United Nations to oppose tolls and service fees for vessels transiting the Strait of Hormuz, as Iran and Oman are close to finalizing a deal on the vital waterway, according to Iran’s deputy foreign minister.

Eight maritime groups signed a joint open letter to the UN and the International Maritime Organization (IMO) on Monday, warning that introducing tolls could drive up costs for consumers and undermine the principles of free navigation.

“Once such a precedent is established, it becomes increasingly difficult to resist similar measures elsewhere, creating uncertainty for international shipping and global commerce,” the letter said.

“These consequences extend beyond shipping costs, contributing to higher energy prices, higher inflation, and higher economic uncertainty. Ultimately, these impacts will carry a human cost, affecting livelihoods around the world.”

On Monday, Iran said it intended to collect “fees” for several maritime services offered alongside Oman in the Strait of Hormuz once the waterway is opened, according to state media. That would mark a major change from the pre-war state, when no country controlled shipping through the waterway. Control or supervision over the chokepoint has become just as much a red line for Tehran as the right to nuclear enrichment.

The prospect of such leverage is unacceptable in Washington, Abu Dhabi and Riyadh. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has repeatedly said any form of state control over international waters is against international law.

Iran had agreed to not imposing fees or tolls on the strait for 60 days, under the Memorandum of Understanding, before it collapsed as both Tehran and Washington failed to commit to the 14-point agreement.

Delusions.....

Trump says US has "massive amounts" of munitions following reports of depleted stockpile

By Todd Symons

President Donald Trump claimed in the early hours of Thursday morning the United States has “massive amounts” of munitions, following reports from various media, including CNN, on the Pentagon’s depleted stockpile.

“The U.S. has massive amounts of ‘munitions,’ especially of certain types. Additionally, large amounts are being manufactured and shipped to the U.S. as needed,” Trump posted on Truth Social overnight. He did not specify which munitions he was referring to.

“Defense companies are building the largest number of plants and factories in our country’s history,” he added.

On Tuesday, CNN reported that the US military had exhausted nearly 80% of its interceptors for its key THAAD missile defense system, and that senior US military commanders had warned that the Pentagon’s munitions stockpile is “dangerously low,” according to multiple sources.

Our Sun


What does the new sharpest image of our Sun show? Instability. To be clear, a certain kind of interactive process called the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability (KHI). This instability can create waves and swirls when two streams flow past each other -- in this case variable streams of solar magnetic plasma. Long hypothesized to occur on the Sun's surface, KHI streaks and swirls were confirmed in just-released dramatic high-resolution images taken recently by the Inouye Solar Telescope in Hawaii, USA.  The featured false-yellow image, actually taken in deep blue, is the highest resolution image yet of the Sun in visible light. It spans about the radius of the Earth, but its finest details are city sized. Visible are several smooth tops of changing solar granules, while the edges of the flower-like structures have been found to harbor multiple KHI swirls. Future research may investigate how the KHI helps move energy, magnetic fields, and may even heat the surrounding solar corona.

This is how bad it is for the maggot ass lickers....

Trump-Endorsed Candidate Loses Michigan Primary to a Man Who Suspended His Campaign

Thomas J. Smith discontinued his campaign in July, endorsed someone else, and still beat Amir Hassan by more than 10,000 votes.

Alex Nguyen

A candidate who suspended his campaign a month ago, spent no money, and endorsed his own rival won Michigan’s 8th Congressional District GOP primary on Tuesday, handily defeating Amir Hassan, the candidate President Donald Trump endorsed.

The victor, Thomas J. Smith, won 50 percent of the vote in the state’s 8th Congressional District, according to the New York Times, while Amir Hassan only had about 33 percent. That’s a difference of over 10,000 votes. Smith suspended his campaign in mid-July—too late to get his name off the ballot. In a July 16 video, he formally endorsed Al Lemmo, donning an “Al Lemmo for Congress” hat. Lemmo ended up with 16 percent of the vote on Tuesday.

Trump endorsed Hassan on Truth Social in June, but supporters opposed the move, some with significant anti-Islamic sentiment. Hassan’s campaign website says the congressional candidate “recently reaffirmed his commitment to Christ” and stated that “Jesus Christ is his Lord and Savior.” Hassan also received support from House Republicans’ campaign committee, which highlighted his service in the Navy and as a former federal law enforcement officer. 

According to FEC campaign filings, Hassan spent over $600,000, while Smith has no FEC filings. 

According to the Detroit News, Smith spoke for about 13 seconds at a Wednesday Republican event at a restaurant in Warren, Michigan: “I’m running for the 8th Congressional District to unseat communist comrade Rivet.”

In a statement to Politico earlier on Wednesday, Smith said: “I look forward to working with Speaker [Mike] Johnson and the entire Republican team to expand our House majority and advance President Trump’s America First agenda to lower costs for working families and make America affordable again.”

Smith is set to face Kristen McDonald Rivet, the Democratic incumbent who has served as the representative for the district since 2025.

The short dicks love this....

Hiroshima and Me

Tom Engelhardt

As another August 6th approaches, let me tell you a little story about Hiroshima and me:

As a young man, I was probably not completely atypical in having the Bomb (the 1950s was a great time for capitalizing what was important) on my brain, and not just while I was ducking under my school desk as sirens howled their nuclear warnings outside. Like many people my age, I dreamed about the bomb, too. I could, in those nightmares, feel its searing heat, watch a mushroom cloud rise on some distant horizon, or find myself in some devastated landscape I had never come close to experiencing (except perhaps in sci-fi novels).

Of course, my dreams were nothing compared to those of America’s top strategists who, in secret National Security Council documents of the early 1950s, descended into the charnel house of future history, imagining life on this planet as an eternal potential holocaust. They wrote in those documents of the possibility that 100 atomic bombs, landing on targets in the United States, might kill or injure 22 million Americans and of an American “blow” that might result in the “complete destruction” of the Soviet Union.

And they were pikers compared to the top military brass who, in 1960, found themselves arguing over the country’s first Single Integrated Operational Plan for nuclear strategy. In it, a scenario was laid out for delivering more than 3,200 nuclear weapons to 1,060 targets in the Communist world, including at least 130 cities which would, if all went well, cease to exist. Official, if classified, estimates of possible casualties from such an attack — and by then, nuclear weaponry and its delivery systems had grown far more powerful — ran to 285 million dead and 40 million injured (and this probably underestimated radiation effects).

From the National Security Council and the Pentagon to a teenager’s nightmares, an American obsession with global annihilation undoubtedly peaked when President Kennedy came on the air on October 22, 1962, to tell us that Soviet missile sites were just then being prepared on the island of Cuba with “a nuclear strike capability against the Western Hemisphere.” Listening to his address, Americans everywhere imagined a nuclear confrontation that could leave parts of the country in ruins. Nuclear fears, however, began to fade (even as the superpower arsenals grew) when the Cuban Missile Crisis was defused and, along with atomic tests, went underground after the Nuclear Test Ban Treaty was signed in 1963. Then, of course, the Vietnam War seemed to swallow the world.

In 1979, after the reactor core of a nuclear plant at Three Mile Island in Pennsylvania partially melted down, the bomb returned to me in an odd way. Then a book editor, I went out to lunch with a potential author who had been on one of the investigatory panels created by the President’s Commission on the Accident at Three Mile Island which Jimmy Carter had set up. She told me of a Japanese journalist who testified before her panel. He had interviewed the mothers of young children and pregnant women belatedly evacuated from the potential danger zone to an iceless ice rink in the state capital, Harrisburg. None of them had heard of Hiroshima or Nagasaki.

This so startled me that I decided to search for a book to publish on what had happened on those August days in 1945 when two Japanese cities were wiped out by a new weapon and the nuclear age began. With the help of a historian and friend, I finally came across a Japanese book of images drawn by Hiroshima survivors, few of them artists, sometimes with school materials borrowed from their own grandchildren. Each drawing caught a moment experienced on that terrible day when Hiroshima was wiped out and was accompanied by a little personal description. Many of images were in pastels, or even crayon, and looked invitingly sprightly until you read the horrific accounts that accompanied them. The book was called Unforgettable Fire and it played a small role in the massive anti-nuclear movement that arose in those years. Unfortunately — and this tells us something — it’s now long out of print.

A couple of years later, I was invited by Japanese publishers to visit their country. Only on arriving did I discover that the man who had shepherded Unforgettable Fire to publication — and who was surprised to discover that an American editor wanted to publish it in translation — planned to take me to Hiroshima.

As a former atomic dreamer, who now knew a good deal about the history of the dropping of the bomb, and was, above all, the editor of possibly the only mainstream visual record in the U.S. of what had happened under that mushroom cloud, I was touched by the gesture, but somewhat bored by the idea. After all, Japan was then dazzling. It was the era of “Japan as Number One” mania and there was so much to see in a few brief days — and I, of course, knew pretty much what there was to be known about the experience of the first A-bombing. That’s just how plain dumb I was.

The trip to the Hiroshima Peace Memorial Museum with its caramelized children’s lunchbox and permanently imprinted human shadows was, to say the least, unspeakably horrifying. In fact, it left me literally speechless, so much so that, although I returned to New York babbling about Japan, I found, for a long time, I couldn’t talk about what I had seen in Hiroshima.

And that, mind you, was only the museum, which means it was next to nothing compared to what actually happened that long ago day. When American strategists in the 1950s confidently began, in Herman Kahn’s famous phrase, “thinking the unthinkable,” they, too, undoubtedly had no idea what they were incapable of imagining. By and large, they still don’t. As TomDispatch regular Frida Berrigan points out, the weapons that devastated Hiroshima and Nagasaki are the equivalent of BBs compared to what’s now in the major nuclear arsenals on this planet. So sweet dreams this Hiroshima Day.

People need to remember...

‘Everywhere there were pitifully injured people’: how a newly unearthed memoir captures the devastation of Hiroshima

Kiyoshi Tanimoto

(Excerpt from book.)

Most of the people of Hiroshima had neither seen nor heard any plane. They heard no sound of explosion. They had seen only a strange flash in open daylight, or merely felt the reflection of the flash. However, there had been a tremendous explosion.

The parents of Mr Konda, one of our church members, had been waiting for a train at Yokogawa station, located 2km [one and a quarter miles] away from the centre of the bomb’s explosion. They saw a B-29 and a parachute dropping through the air. Before they had time to wonder at the sight, they fell unconscious. Afterward, they could not remember sensing any sound or light. When they regained consciousness, they found themselves lying on the ground, burned and without any clothing. The houses all around had been crushed to the ground. After getting to their feet, they ran toward the suburbs. Other people rushing along the Koi highway had the same experience.

After crossing the Koi and Fukushima bridges, I reached a place about a kilometre away from the explosion. From the suburbs to this spot, houses were heavily damaged but somehow were still standing. However, the houses from here to the centre of the explosion were all flat on the ground, as if they had been toy buildings crushed by a hammer. Painful cries of “Tasukete!” – “Help! – could be heard from under smashed houses.

People seemed to be buried in the ground. I knew full well how hard a job it would be to pull out even one log from a collapsed house, because I had helped with the clearing of houses. Nothing whatsoever could be done, with the strength of only one person, to help the people beneath those houses. Yet there were people buried here and there – everywhere.

After I had stopped to try to do something for these people, the thought that my wife and baby and neighbours must be in the same state flashed through my mind. I was the defence coordinator of my neighbourhood, and there were 120 lives entrusted to me. I had to hurry back to my post. I ran away in tears, saying, “Excuse me, I’m sorry, but excuse me!” I ran like a wild man. At Fukushima bridge, I saw Mr Matsuo, who had been with me when the atomic bomb exploded. He came running up, out of breath. “Mr Matsuo, please excuse me, for I have responsibilities,” I said, and ran on.

I followed the riverbank of the Fukushima river, looking to find a place where the fire was not so furious. Then I came to Nakahiromachi, a northern neighbourhood, where there were many farm fields and not so many houses.

Everywhere there were pitifully injured people. They could no longer keep moving, so they were lying in the streets. The further I moved into the city, the more wounded I saw. I grabbed my panama hat and threw it on the ground. In my heart I cried, “Forgive me!” because I felt no reason for why I had been left uninjured. I thought my wife and baby must be injured like these people and might be buried under our house. I asked their forgiveness for not being there to rescue them.

The usual way home was to take the Misasa Bridge across the Ota River toward central Hiroshima and go out to Hakushima, but the foot of the bridge and the Hakushima district were in flames. Fortunately, the Ushita district, which was on the other side of the river, seemed to be unscathed by fire. If I could get past Ushita, my own neighbourhood of Noboricho would be within a stone’s throw.

In a determined manner, I plunged into the river. It was not that I had confidence in my swimming ability, but there were no other means of reaching my goal. The Ota River varies in water level according to the tides. There was not much water, but the stream was swift. Naturally, I lost control of my limbs. I had already run continuously for about an hour and was dead tired.

I began to swallow water, which ran into my nose and mouth. My body was heavy, and my head started to sink into the water. My gaiters became loose and dangled about my legs. One of my shoes came off. I thought I was drowning. I would not have resented being killed by American bombs, but it seemed regrettable to be drowned. I prayed while sinking, “Oh God, do help me. Protect my body until I can save my wife and child and my neighbours.” Then I calmed myself and became lighter by taking off my gaiters, coat and the other shoe. With all my remaining energy I swam through the water.

Soon I reached shallow water about my height and was saved. When I got to the opposite bank, I could not move any longer and rested for some time with my head on the ground. After I regained some strength, I got on my feet and started walking toward Ushita. I was completely undressed and only differed from others by having no scars from burns.

As the treasurer of my church lived nearby, I went to his house and saw that it was also crushed and deserted. Praying for his safety, I passed through Ushita. I saw no other residents and thought that everybody must have escaped by now.

Mrs Tada’s house, where my wife often stayed overnight, was nearby, and I thought of dropping in. Although she usually was back home by half past six or seven o’clock in the morning, I wondered if she might have stayed until nine or 10 that morning at Mrs Tada’s place and thus would have been saved. Praying, I took a few steps toward the house, and, to my surprise, I found my wife carrying Koko in her arms, in a line of refugees. She was wearing a blood-stained chemise, her hair was hanging about her shoulders, and she had a ghostlike appearance.

I called to her. She turned around, looked at me, and stood quietly with tears in her eyes. I looked away and asked, “What happened to you?”

She said, “Just as I reached home, Mrs Takaki came for a visit. We were both talking at the door when we were buried.”

“And what happened to Mrs Takaki?”

With a miserable expression, she said, “I don’t know.”

I had not experienced the slightest pleasure seeing my wife and child safe. Rather, I was filled with indignation. It was unpardonable that a church member who was paying a visit to the parsonage should be killed during an air raid and the family of the pastor still be saved. Should not the wife of the pastor have died together with the church member? I was filled with accusatory feelings toward my wife.

Afterward, I learned that my wife had been buried under the house in an instant and nearly crushed under the pressure of heavy wood. She could not breathe for a while and began to fall unconscious. However, she was brought to by the screams of Koko, who was still in her arms. She struggled with all her strength to save her baby. Calming herself, she noticed a small hole in the attic. Both of her arms were strongly pinned in the ruins, but she could move a bit and finally managed to stretch out one arm.

She gradually made the small hole wider. Every time she struggled to move, broken pieces of roofing fell on her head. Koko continued to cry loudly. Struggling with all her strength, she enlarged the hole and was finally able to push out Koko. Then she did everything she could to free herself and managed to get out.

By then, the house next door was on fire, and smoke was rising from it. She staggered along the alley with Koko in her arms. She thought of getting someone to help Mrs Takaki, but every house in sight was smashed and already deserted. The fire was spreading, and the smoke was getting thick. With the baby in her arms, she could not return to our house. Finally, she reached the Sentei gardens, after being pursued by the fire and smoke. However, her thoughts were with her neighbour.

No sound, bright flash.................

The Lost Hiroshima Memoir

How I came to edit a harrowing and gripping account of the first act of nuclear warfare.

David Corn

At 8:15 on the morning of August 6, 1945, Kiyoshi Tanimoto, a minister who presided over a Methodist church in Hiroshima, was two miles outside the city, when a tremendous flash occurred in the sky. Uninjured by the blast, he rushed toward his home and his family, passing hordes of the dead and the gravely wounded—people severely burnt, some holding their eyeballs in their hands—and scenes of horrific devastation, as an immense conflagration consumed his city. He didn’t know what had happened. No one did. This level of destruction was incomprehensible. Tanimoto also couldn’t know at that moment, as he feared for his wife, young daughter, and his parishioners, that he would become one of the best-known survivors of this first act of nuclear warfare and devote the rest of his life to preventing a recurrence of such a hellish catastrophe.

Though I never met Tanimoto, I feel as if I know him. That’s because about two years ago, I was asked to edit his poignant and gripping memoir of that horrible day and the weeks and months that followed, an account that had been lost for decades. Today, the book is being published by Random House’s Modern Library under the title Hiroshima, 8:15: The Lost Memoir.  It’s a harrowing tale of the atomic bombing from ground zero and details the heroic action—though Tanimoto never called it that—he took to ferry the wounded across a river, using a small boat he found and only a pole to push it along, so these victims might find medical attention. As the city burned and he tended to survivors who had lost much of their flesh—many would not live long—he kept repeating to himself, “These are human beings.” The horror was numbing. An eyewitness later called Tanimoto a “rescuing angel.”

Kai Bird, a co-author of American Prometheus, the biography that inspired Christopher Nolan’s film Oppenheimer, praises Tanimoto’s work as a “stunning historical discovery and a heartrending testimony of human suffering.” Tanimoto bore witness to one of the most significant days in human history, and his remembrances—as gruesome and disturbing as they are—ought to be read by all.

My involvement in bringing his memoir to the public began with a trip I took to Japan two years ago. Early in my journalism career, I focused on arms control and nuclear proliferation issues—and then moved on to other topics after a year or two of having nightmares about nuclear attacks. In Japan, I felt compelled to visit Hiroshima, where I was moved by how the city had rebuilt, creating a Peace Park at its center, and dedicating itself to the abolition of nuclear weapons. The memorials to the estimated 140,000 killed by the atomic bomb were inspiring because they were free of bitterness and promoted a never-again message.

Upon my return to the United States, I wrote an essay for this newsletter, in which I observed, “Hiroshima is certainly a reminder that we live in a world imperiled by nuclear arsenals and that we have yet to fully address that danger—and that human cruelty can be excessive and that the total annihilation of human civilization remains a possibility. But the city’s commemoration of the tragedy has a beautiful side.”

A few months later, I was contacted by Donald Rosenfeld, a veteran film producer who as a young man was president of Merchant Ivory Productions (Howards End, A Room with a View, Jefferson in Paris, The Remains of the Day). He informed me he was currently developing a feature film dramatizing one of the greatest journalistic feats of the 20th century: John Hersey’s article on Hiroshima published by the New Yorker a year after the bomb was dropped.

This 30,000-word account—written after Hersey visited the devastated city—consumed a full issue of the magazine and was the first comprehensive depiction in Western media of what happened to the residents of Hiroshima that day, as well as how they were affected by radiation poisoning in the months afterward. For a year, the media had generally shied away from fully describing what had befallen the people of Hiroshima, and the military had downplayed—even dismissed—the injuries and deaths resulting from the bomb’s radiation. The American public had mostly been exposed to images of rubble, not photographs or accounts that showed the pain and suffering of the civilian victims.

The coverage was incomplete—or sanitized—for a variety of reasons. The US military, then occupying Japan, controlled access to the city and was not keen to have reports on the gruesome effects of the bomb, and anti-Japanese racism and antipathy toward a WWII enemy inhibited sympathy for those vaporized, crushed, or wounded in the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Hersey changed all this. His article, which would soon be a bestselling book, told the separate stories of six Hiroshima residents who had survived. The piece recreated the day from each of their vantages—a just-the-facts recounting of the horror, no adjectives. His intent was to let readers envision what would happen to them and their loved ones if their city or town were hit by an atomic bomb. One of the six witnesses was Tanimoto.

Hersey’s work was an instant phenomenon. The issue sold out. His article prompted stories in newspapers and magazines around the globe. It was serialized on the radio. Albert Einstein asked the New Yorker for a thousand copies that he could distribute. But no copies were left. Hersey made the world see—and understand—what an atomic blast truly did. It was one of the most consequential acts of journalism in modern history. Already a Pulitzer Prize-winning novelist and much-acclaimed war correspondent—he was only 32—Hersey went on to a long and illustrious career as a journalist and writer. He died in 1993.

Rosenfeld was looking to make a movie covering Hersey’s pursuit of the Hiroshima story—there are twists and turns to the tale—and he asked if I wanted to be part of the project. Of course, I did. While we were figuring out my role in this endeavor—I read an early script and gave notes—he informed me that among Hersey’s papers stored at Yale University was a 221-page manuscript in English that Tanimoto had written in 1947 chronicling his experiences in Hiroshima. It was a more detailed accounting than what had appeared in Hersey’s article, told from the Japanese minister’s distinct perspective. At some point, Tanimoto, who passed away in 1986, had sent the typewritten manuscript to Hersey, and for years it had sat in a folder in a box. Tanimoto’s own family did not know it existed. Only a few researchers and scholars had come across it, and then Hersey’s grandson, Cannon Hersey, spotted the manuscript in late 2022.

As a side project to the Hersey film, Rosenfeld hoped to publish Tanimoto’s memoir. He asked if I would edit it and compose an introduction. I immediately said yes. What an honor it would be to help bring Tanimoto’s story to the public. Rosenfeld’s aim was to try to find a publisher for the memoir, but if that failed, he had a small publishing company of his own that could publish the work. I didn’t foresee huge market potential for the memoir but believed it would be a good deed to turn this forgotten manuscript into a book, no matter what happened after that.

So as the second Trump administration began, I found an escape from that chaos in editing Tanimoto’s terrifying reminiscences of August 6, 1945, and the months afterward, during which he contended with severe health problems, strove to rebuild his church, and headed toward what would be a decades-long career as an international peace activist.

Tanimoto had studied at the Candler School of Theology at Emory University in Atlanta prior to World War II and knew English. But passages in the memoir were written in a stiff English, some tough to understand. The manuscript included loads of details about routine church affairs. My goal was to make his memoir readable so this act of witnessing would have a chance to reach a wide audience. I dug up old maps of Hiroshima to check the names of streets, neighborhoods, rivers, and other geographic features. (In the memoir, Tanimoto notes his spelling skills were lacking.) I had to make sense of sections with confusing chronologies.

I did what editors do—and preserved Tanimoto’s straightforward recounting of the apocalyptic scenes he experienced, his rescue efforts, the many tragedies he saw, and the hardships he and other Hiroshima residents endured long after the bombing. In his memoir, he contemplated the morality of the nuclear attack—without bearing any ill will against the Americans—and its impact on human society. He described how he came to see his duty to spread the Christian faith as intertwined with his mission to prevent any more atomic bombings. As I note in an introduction to the book—which serves as a biography of Tanimoto and covers his long-lasting relationship with Hersey—Tanimoto encountered many travails as an antinuclear campaigner. His projects did not always pan out. But he stayed true to this cause until his last days.

Tanimoto’s memoir is more than a historical document. It’s a warning that the existential threat posed by the nuclear arsenals held by nine nations remains. We all live in peril, and human extinction—and global destruction—is only a few bad decisions away. That prospect is hard to grasp and absorb into our daily lives. As did Hersey, Tanimoto shows us the ghastly and inescapable reality of nuclear war—an alert that cannot be sounded often enough. The editors at Modern Library agreed. They acquired the memoir and are now enthusiastically promoting it widely.

As for the Hersey movie, the project is moving forward. Director Phil Joanou has written a script, and Rosenfeld is lining up financing. Tanimoto is a main character in the film, which, if it comes to be made, will further spread his crucial testimony. Until then, this book will share the simple but profound message to which he devoted his life: Do not forget.

In a moving foreword, his 81-year-old daughter, Koko Tanimoto Kondo, who as an infant survived the bombing because her mother managed to push her through an opening in the burning wreckage of their home that had collapsed on them, writes, “Human memory is fragile. It’s so convenient to forget unpleasant things, much easier than facing them. But if nuclear weapons are never used again, it will only be because of the memory of what happened to the people of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. My father was one of the first to understand this clearly.” Tanimoto spent decades prodding people and governments throughout the world to not permit the memory of Hiroshima to fade. With this book, he is still reminding us.

This is insane. Yet no one talks about it.....

Pete Hegseth's Pentagon Purge: List Of 20 Senior Army Generals Ousted, Ft. CD Donahue, Randy George

Authored by: Naman Trivedi

The departure of Gen. Chris "CD" Donahue has added another high-profile name to the growing list of senior military leaders who have exited the Pentagon during Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's tenure. Donahue, the commander of US Army Europe and Africa and head of NATO land forces in Europe, recently submitted paperwork to retire after just 18 months in the role. A US military official confirmed that he will relinquish command on July 2.

Widely recognized as the last American service member to leave Afghanistan during the 2021 US withdrawal, Donahue was regarded as one of the Army's most respected officers and was frequently mentioned as a potential future Army chief of staff. According to reports, however, he had allegedly fallen out of favor with Hegseth, making him the latest senior military figure to depart amid what critics have described as a broader purge of the Pentagon's top ranks.

Donahue's exit comes as Hegseth has overseen a series of removals and forced departures involving some of the military's most senior leaders across multiple branches.

List Of Senior Military Leaders Removed During Hegseth's Tenure

Among the notable officials who have been fired, forced out, or retired during Hegseth's time as defense secretary are:

Gen. Chris Donahue – Commander of US Army Europe and Africa.
Gen. Randy George – Army chief of staff and the Army's top officer.
Gen. David Hodne – Head of Army Transformation and Training Command.
Maj. Gen. William Green Jr. – Chief of Chaplains.
Col. Dave Butler – Senior officer who worked closely with Gen. George.
Lt. Gen. Joe McGee – Three-star Army officer.
Adm. Alvin Holsey – Head of US Southern Command.
Jon Harrison – Navy chief of staff.
Lt. Gen. Jeffrey Kruse – Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency.
Rear Adm. Milton Sands – Navy SEAL officer and head of Naval Special Warfare Command.
Gen. David Allvin – Chief of Staff of the Air Force.
Gen. Timothy Haugh – Head of US Cyber Command and director of the National Security Agency.
Gen. Charles Q. Brown Jr. – Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
Gen. James Slife – Former vice chief of staff of the Air Force.
Adm. Linda Fagan – Commandant of the US Coast Guard.
Adm. Lisa Franchetti
Lt. Gen. Jennifer Short
Lt. Gen. Joseph B. Berger III – The Army's top military lawyer.
Lt. Gen. Charles Plummer – The Air Force's top military lawyer.
Vice Adm. Shoshana Chatfield – The only woman on NATO's military committee.

The list also includes former Navy Secretary John Phelan, who was forced out earlier this year.

Why Donahue's Departure Stands Out

Among the recent departures, Donahue's exit has attracted particular attention because of his prominence within both the US military and NATO. Popular among American and allied troops, he had become one of the most recognizable generals of his generation following the Afghanistan withdrawal.

His resignation also comes at a critical time for US military operations in Europe and could open the door to significant changes in America's military posture on the continent.

They don't do this. Ever.

US Reveals Nuclear Submarine Location at Gibraltar After Bypassing Spain Over Iran Dispute

SOFX Staff Writer

The U.S. Sixth Fleet announced Monday that an Ohio-class ballistic missile submarine (SSBN) arrived in Gibraltar on May 10, 2026, in a rare public disclosure of an operational strategic nuclear asset’s location.

Gibraltar Broadcasting Corporation and local reports identified the vessel as USS Alaska (SSBN-732), a Trident II D5-capable submarine homeported at Naval Submarine Base Kings Bay, Georgia. The 6th Fleet’s statement did not name the submarine. “The port visit demonstrates U.S. capability, flexibility and continuing commitment to its NATO allies,” the fleet said. “Ohio-class ballistic missile submarines are undetectable launch platforms for submarine-launched ballistic missiles, providing the U.S. with its most survivable leg of the nuclear triad.”

The disclosure came one day after President Donald Trump rejected Iran’s ceasefire counterproposal on Truth Social, calling it “TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE,” and on Monday declared the ceasefire “on life support.”

Iranian Army spokesperson Brig. Gen. Mohammad Akraminia warned of “surprising options” if adversaries made another “miscalculation,” according to Iranian state media.

USS Alaska arrived under close escort from Gibraltar Squadron patrol craft, Gibraltar Defence Police units, and Royal Marines fleet protection detachments that had pre-positioned on the Rock via RAF transport aircraft. Two tugboats maneuvered the 170.7-meter vessel into its berth at South Mole, where a 200-meter maritime exclusion zone was enforced.

The choice of port carries distinct diplomatic weight. USS Alaska bypassed Naval Station Rota, Spain, just nearly 88 miles away, and docked at British-controlled Gibraltar instead. Spain has refused to allow U.S. forces to use its Rota and Morón bases for operations against Iran, a decision that prompted Trump to threaten trade restrictions and troop withdrawals. Spain formally protested a 2022 U.S. submarine stop at Gibraltar over that same base-access dispute.

Trump declared Monday that the U.S.-Iran ceasefire was “unbelievably weak.”