If you think the widening chasm between the rich and the
rest spells trouble for American democracy, have a look at the growing gulf
between the information-rich and-poor.
Earlier this year, a Harvard economist’s jaw-dropping study
of American’s beliefs about the distribution of American wealth became a viral video. Now a new Pew study
of the distribution of American news consumption is just as flabbergasting.
According to the Harvard study, most people believe that the
top 20 percent of the country owns about half the nation’s wealth, and that the
lower 60 percent combined, including the 20 percent in the middle, have only
about 20 percent of the wealth. A whopping 92 percent of Americans think this
is out of whack; in the ideal distribution, they said, the lower 60 percent
would have about half of the wealth, with the middle 20 percent of the people
owning 20 percent of the wealth.
What’s astonishing about this is how wrong Americans are
about reality. In fact, the bottom 80 percent owns only 7 percent of the
nation’s wealth, and the top 1 percent hold more of the country’s wealth – 40 percent
– than 9 out of 10 people think the top 20 percent should have. The top 10
percent of earners take home half the income
of the country; in 2012, the top 1 percent earned more than a fifth of U.S. income –
the highest share since the government began collecting the data a century ago.
But America ’s
information inequality is at least as shocking as its economic inequality.
Pew sliced the TV news audience into thirds: heavy, medium
and light. In my Jeffersonian fantasy, that distribution would look like a bell
curve; in fact, it looks like a cliff. Heavy viewers watch a little over two
hours of TV news a day, but medium viewers barely watch a quarter of an hour
and light viewers average only two minutes a day. The top third of the country
does 88 percent of the day’s TV news viewing; the middle third watches only 10
percent of the total time; the bottom third sees just 2 percent of the minutes
of news consumed. Two-thirds of Americans live in an information underclass as
journalistically impoverished as the minuscule bazillionaire class is
triumphant.
This month, the Pew Research Journalism Project reported how
Americans get their news at home. If you think it’s from the Internet, you’ll
be surprised that the 38 percent of us who access news at home on a desktop or
laptop spend an average of only 90 seconds a day getting news online. America ’s
dominant news source is television, and the disparity between heavy viewers of
TV news and everyone else is as startling as the gap between the plutocrats and
the people.
As for those heavy news viewers, says Pew, “There is no news
junkie like a cable junkie.” A heavy local news viewer watches about 22 minutes
of it a day at home, and a heavy network news viewer watches about 32 minutes a
day. But a heavy cable news consumer averages 72 minutes of it a day. The gap
between heavy, medium and light cable news viewers is especially stark. If
you’re reading this, you’re probably in that 72-minutes-of-cable-news-a-day
class. But medium cable news viewers see barely more than three minutes of it a
day, and light cable news viewers see about 12 seconds of it a day. In other
words, either you live in the country that watches more than an hour of
Blitzer, O’Reilly, Maddow, et al, a day – or in the country that watches
virtually none of them at all.
If you want to know where this is heading, consider another cheery
piece of Pew research. Americans 67 to 84 years old spend 84 minutes
a day watching, reading or listening to the news. Boomers (48 to 66) are close
behind, at 77 minutes a day. But Gen Xers (33 to 47) spend 66 minutes, and
Millennials (18 to 31) spend only 46 minutes a day. The kids are tuning out. I
love it that 43 percent of “The Colbert Report” audience, and 39 percent of
“The Daily Show” viewers, are 18 to 29
years old; the young audiences of those fake news shows get real
news from them. But fewer than a million and a half Americans under 50 are
watching them.
Much has been made of the ideological news bubbles we live
in, where we see the world exclusively through Fox-colored lenses, or filters
manufactured only by MSNBC or CNN. The Pew study upends this belief. It’s true
that about one-quarter of American adults watch only Fox News, another quarter
watch only CNN and 15 percent watch only MSNBC. But 28 percent of Fox News
viewers also watch MSNBC, and 34 percent of MSNBC viewers watch Fox. More than
half of MSNBC viewers, and nearly half of Fox viewers, watch CNN, and of CNN’s
viewers, about 4 out of 10 also watch Fox, and 4 out of 10 also watch MSNBC.
It’s encouraging that our self-segregation into polarized
news ghettos is a bit of a myth. But whatever joy there is in that finding is
blunted by the disparity between people who watch a lot of news and people who
watch almost none of it, and by the trend toward an even deeper division ahead.
The danger democracy faces isn’t so much that different segments of our country
inhabit alternative realities constructed from different data delivered by
different news sources. It’s that a minority of the country watches a fair
amount of news, and a majority may as well be living on the moon.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.