A place were I can write...

My simple blog of pictures of travel, friends, activities and the Universe we live in as we go slowly around the Sun.



January 27, 2025

Enhanced voter identification

Trump wants California to institute restrictive voter law before receiving fire aid

The president suggested California shouldn't receive fire aid unless it institutes enhanced voter identification measures.

By Ja'han Jones

With wildfires ravaging Los Angeles County since the start of the year, Republicans have openly discussed withholding crucial disaster aid for California unless the state makes right-wing policy changes.

Earlier this month, I wrote about some of these Republicans, including far-right influencer Charlie Kirk, who said the funds should be contingent on California firing Kristin Crowley, Los Angeles’ first female and openly gay fire chief. And President Donald Trump has blamed the fires on California’s water distribution policy, though experts have pushed back on such claims. That hasn’t stopped him from demanding that California officials change their water policy.

Over the weekend, Trump added to his apparent list of conditions for California to receive federal fire aid, telling reporters on Friday that the state should impose a voting law that many legal experts say is voter suppression.

“In California, I have a condition,” he said during a news conference while visiting hurricane-affected areas of North Carolina. “In California, we want them to have voter ID so the people have a voice, because right now the people don’t have a voice, because you don’t know who’s voting and it’s very corrupt.”

There’s no evidence California’s voting system is corrupt or rife with voter fraud. As Gov. Gavin Newsom’s office posted to X on Friday: “Under current CA law you must be a CA resident and US citizen (and attest to being one under penalty of perjury) AND provide a form of ID such as driver’s license or passport that has been approved by the Secretary of State in order to register to vote.”

Trump’s proposed remedy to fix this nonexistent problem of widespread voter fraud, enhanced “voter ID,” is conservative parlance for policies that experts and activists often warn disproportionately harm nonwhite voters and other marginalized groups for various reasons. Trump’s ultimatum is all the more disturbing when you consider that the town of Altadena, which has a significant Black population, was severely hurt by the wildfires in California. Now he’s suggesting making their recovery contingent on California accepting policies that could make it harder for some of those people to vote.

So here, we have a scenario that feels similar to what led to Trump’s first impeachment for requesting a political favor in exchange for congressionally authorized aid to Ukraine. (The GOP-controlled Senate ultimately voted to acquit him.) In California’s case, Trump is being more explicit in demanding political concessions in exchange for vital aid. And he’s not threatening to withhold aid Congress has already authorized. He’s getting out in front of the negotiations entirely.

On that note, shoutout to U.S. Rep. Brad Sherman, D-Calif., who looked Trump in the eye during a meeting last Friday and warned that his cruel ultimatum could easily come back to hurt Republicans if a Democrat regains the White House and decides to use similar tactics against conservative-led states.

Oh fuck him....

Trump wants California to institute restrictive voter law before receiving fire aid

The president suggested California shouldn't receive fire aid unless it institutes enhanced voter identification measures.

By Ja'han Jones

With wildfires ravaging Los Angeles County since the start of the year, Republicans have openly discussed withholding crucial disaster aid for California unless the state makes right-wing policy changes.

Earlier this month, I wrote about some of these Republicans, including far-right influencer Charlie Kirk, who said the funds should be contingent on California firing Kristin Crowley, Los Angeles’ first female and openly gay fire chief. And President Donald Trump has blamed the fires on California’s water distribution policy, though experts have pushed back on such claims. That hasn’t stopped him from demanding that California officials change their water policy.

Over the weekend, Trump added to his apparent list of conditions for California to receive federal fire aid, telling reporters on Friday that the state should impose a voting law that many legal experts say is voter suppression.

“In California, I have a condition,” he said during a news conference while visiting hurricane-affected areas of North Carolina. “In California, we want them to have voter ID so the people have a voice, because right now the people don’t have a voice, because you don’t know who’s voting and it’s very corrupt.”

There’s no evidence California’s voting system is corrupt or rife with voter fraud. As Gov. Gavin Newsom’s office posted to X on Friday: “Under current CA law you must be a CA resident and US citizen (and attest to being one under penalty of perjury) AND provide a form of ID such as driver’s license or passport that has been approved by the Secretary of State in order to register to vote.”

Trump’s proposed remedy to fix this nonexistent problem of widespread voter fraud, enhanced “voter ID,” is conservative parlance for policies that experts and activists often warn disproportionately harm nonwhite voters and other marginalized groups for various reasons. Trump’s ultimatum is all the more disturbing when you consider that the town of Altadena, which has a significant Black population, was severely hurt by the wildfires in California. Now he’s suggesting making their recovery contingent on California accepting policies that could make it harder for some of those people to vote.

So here, we have a scenario that feels similar to what led to Trump’s first impeachment for requesting a political favor in exchange for congressionally authorized aid to Ukraine. (The GOP-controlled Senate ultimately voted to acquit him.) In California’s case, Trump is being more explicit in demanding political concessions in exchange for vital aid. And he’s not threatening to withhold aid Congress has already authorized. He’s getting out in front of the negotiations entirely.

On that note, shoutout to U.S. Rep. Brad Sherman, D-Calif., who looked Trump in the eye during a meeting last Friday and warned that his cruel ultimatum could easily come back to hurt Republicans if a Democrat regains the White House and decides to use similar tactics against conservative-led states.

Indigenous people being questioned

Navajo Nation leaders raise alarm over reports of Indigenous people being questioned and detained during immigration sweeps

By Alaa Elassar

At least 15 Indigenous people in Arizona and New Mexico have reported being stopped at their homes and workplaces, questioned or detained by federal law enforcement and asked to produce proof of citizenship during immigration raids since Wednesday, according to Navajo Nation officials.

The reports, which have caused panic amongst tribal communities in both states, come amid the Trump administration’s attempt to ramp up undocumented immigrant arrests nationwide and amass a larger force to carry out the president’s deportation pledge. CNN has reached out to the White House for comment.

The reported raids and the exact number of Diné/Navajo and other Indigenous tribal citizens who were apprehended are still under investigation, Navajo Nation Council Speaker Crystalyne Curley told CNN. It is unclear if Immigration and Customs Enforcement or other law enforcement entities were conducting the apprehensions. ICE has not responded to CNN’s request for comment.

Navajo Nation officials have contacted the Department of Homeland Security, the governors of Arizona and New Mexico, and ICE to address the reports, the Office of Navajo President Buu Nygren said in a news release Friday.

“My office has received multiple reports from Navajo citizens that they have had negative, and sometimes traumatizing, experiences with federal agents targeting undocumented immigrants in the Southwest,” Nygren said in the release.

Justin Ahasteen, executive director of the Navajo Nation Washington Office, said his office has not confirmed any reports of ICE action against Navajo citizens.

According to Ahasteen, one tribal member was involved in a raid in Phoenix. Ahasteen told CNN the incident was a “wrong place, wrong time” situation and the tribal member, who presented their tribal identification and was questioned while in custody, was not the intended target.

The person was released, Ahasteen said.

CNN has also contacted New Mexico State Police, the Navajo County Sheriff’s Office and the Navajo Nation Police Department for comment.

Arizona state Sen. Theresa Hatathlie, who is Diné/Navajo, told CNN she received a report from the family of a Navajo woman who said she was questioned by ICE and asked to show proof that she was Native after her workplace was raided Wednesday morning.

The woman says she was at her work site in Scottsdale, Arizona, when she and seven other Indigenous citizens were lined up behind white vans and questioned for two hours without their cell phones or a way to contact their families, according to Hatathlie.

“Now is it ICE or some other entity, I don’t know,” said Hatathlie, who represents Legislative District 6, which encompasses the Navajo Nation. “I did work with some individuals to confirm whether or not ICE did do that work site raid, but the communication back to me was that it’s not a normal practice for ICE to confirm a raid or not.”

The woman says she was eventually permitted to use her cell phone and text family members, who sent her a photo of her Certificate of Degree of Indian Blood (CDIB), and she was then allowed to leave, Hatathlie said. It is unclear what happened to the seven other Indigenous people who were questioned.

The Navajo Nation Council received the reports through social media and calls to council delegates from families who said they were visited by ICE at their apartments and place of work, Curley said.

“There’s a lot of fear, and I know they’re probably feeling frustrated knowing that they don’t feel safe in the country where they were born or where their ancestors come from and there’s a lot of frustration of them being stereotyped,” Curley told CNN.

“I think there’s a confusion with other races, maybe just because having a brown skin, automatically being profiled or stereotyped to be in a certain group of race.”

Hatathlie pointed to the double standard of Indigenous people welcoming settlers who later colonized their lands, forced Native children into violent boarding schools and banned displays of Native cultural practices, only to be victims of practices such as immigration raids – when the law enforcement officials’ ancestors were immigrants themselves, she said.

”If you can’t say, ‘we’ve been here for time immemorial,’ then you’re an immigrant. You’re not from here, so who are you to classify our Indigenous people? These lands have been a melting pot for many ethnicities,” Hatathlie said.

“It’s too kind to say it’s racism or discrimination. It’s disrespect for humanity.”

Indigenous people urged to carry their documentation

Operation Rainbow Bridge, a nonprofit that supports Navajo citizens who are victims of Medicaid fraud in Arizona, has launched the Immigration Crisis Initiative to assist Indigenous people impacted by federal law enforcement raids.

Diné, which means “The People” and is how Navajo people refer to themselves, and other Indigenous tribal members are being advised to carry state-issued identification along with their Certificate of Degree of Indian Blood in preparation of possible run ins with federal immigration officials and other law enforcement.

The initiative has a hotline for people to call so Diné and other Indigenous citizens who are being questioned or detained can call for immediate assistance, and to help government officials identify the documents they are being presented with.

Although a person might be carrying their certificates and tribal identification cards, many of the reports said the agents who detained or questioned them didn’t acknowledge the documents as valid proof of citizenship, Hatathlie said.

“With the way things are going right now and these types of situations, we have to put measures in place in order to help our constituents and government entities so that they can be a resource,” Hatathlie said.

“Tribes should communicate to Homeland Security and say, ‘This is a sample of our travel enrollment card. This is the sample of our Certificate of Indian Blood. If you have any questions to verify, here is a hotline. Here is a website,’” Hatathlie added.

The Navajo Nation Office of the President released a tip guide for Diné who are confronted by immigration agents. The guide advises them to request to see the agents’ identification to confirm their legitimacy, exercise their right to remain silent and speak to an attorney if they are arrested or detained, and to document the interaction if possible so they can later report the encounter.

Navajo Nation officials urged Diné and other Indigenous tribal citizens to apply for tribal ID cards, such as the Navajo Nation Identification card, if they don’t have one. Families are also being urged to educate their children on the ongoing incidents.

The guidance also advises against opening their doors if immigration agents show up at their homes without showing a valid warrant signed by a judge.

“Some public sites, organizations, and restaurants are being raided by ICE,” Operation Rainbow Bridge states on its website. “As a precaution, your children should memorize your phone number and their (Social Security Number), and everyone should have current, valid documentation on them” including Social Security cards, Navajo Nation Identification cards, Certificate of Degree of Indian Blood or passports, according to the statement.

‘No one is illegal on stolen land’

For Indigenous peoples who inhabited the Americas for thousands of years before the colonization of their lands and the brutal treatment of their people, the recent sweeps have reopened old wounds.

Diné elder James Jackson, an honored activist in the Navajo community, told CNN the recent immigration raids and their impact on his community are “shameful.”

“It’s making people hyperaware of their surroundings, limiting their travel in their daily lives because they worry they will get stopped,” said Jackson, who lives in Tuba City between the four Sacred Mountains of Navajo 90 miles north of Flagstaff, Arizona.

Although he worries for his community, Jackson says he also feels anger on behalf of immigrants from other countries who came to the US to escape violence and economic hardship for the sole sake of their families’s survival.

“No one is illegal on stolen land,” Jackson said. “It really goes back to the Indigenous way of life, that everything is made for the people. People have to understand that this is not the way to live or to be honorable and neighborly with each other.”

Anti-immigration tactics like the recent raids, Hatathlie and Jackson said, go against Indigenous values and their ways of life which allowed Native people to prosper and live in harmony with the land for thousands of years before American colonization.

“We always talk about the environment and how we belong to the earth,” Hatathlie said. “That sets the groundwork for having respect for what’s around us, especially for our children and our great grandchildren, and they’re the future.”

There are concerns for the safety of multiple Native tribes who live in areas near the border, including Tohono O’odham, who have been in the Sonoran Desert for thousands of years and live on both sides, regularly traveling back and forth, Jackson said.

The reported raids have triggered panic and anger stemming from generational trauma endured by Native people whose ancestors and elders like Jackson had to fight to take back mere fragments of their land and reclaim their language and culture, which they had so long been forbidden from practicing, according to Hatathlie.

“We’ve come a long way building relations, but these initiatives of the current administration are a huge step backwards,” Hatathlie said. “These are the attitudes and the mindset of privileged individuals.”

“The settlers showed up sick, they were hungry, they were lost, and then all of a sudden, they were given a place to eat and sleep, and they ended up taking more than than they were provided,” she said. “They wore out the welcome mat at this point.” 

Fascistic bullshit.

(All you dumb, racist, ignorant, and/or greedy motherfuckers who voted for this Anti-Environment pile of shit must be so proud. Here in Cali, however, we, along with our Pro-Environment Governor, raise both middle fingers to this fascistic bullshit.)

Trump Withdraws All Federal Waters From Future Offshore Wind Leasing

The Maritime Executive

In an executive order signed on the first day of his new term, President Donald Trump used the Offshore Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA) to withdraw all federal waters from future offshore wind leasing. The ban does not apply to existing leases, but it prohibits any further auctions, ending the Biden administration's plans for new lease sales off southern Oregon and the U.S. Gulf Coast. 

In the order, Trump said that his decision stemmed from a desire to keep energy costs for consumers low and maintain a robust fishing industry - factors that have driven criticism of the offshore wind industry on the East and West Coast.

In response, offshore wind proponents warned that a shutdown of wind leasing could endanger thousands of U.S. jobs, put at risk $1.8 billion in Jones Act shipbuilding orders, and slow down a supply chain that brings economic benefitis to 40 states. 

"Today’s actions threaten to strand $25 billion already flowing into new ports, vessels, and manufacturing centers, and curtail future investments across our country. We urge the administration to reverse this sweeping action and keep America working in offshore energy as part of its commitment to an “all-of-the-above” energy strategy," said Liz Burdock, head of the Oceantic Network (formerly Business Network for Offshore Wind). 

Some offshore wind industry players expressed support for a temporary withdrawal. In a statement, the Offshore Marine Service Association (OMSA) said that the order is "a critical opportunity to reassess the industry’s direction." The trade group said that it welcomed a chance to address concerns about "over-reliance on foreign renewable energy companies, foreign vessels, and foreign mariners to build American offshore wind farms."

"We view this pause in offshore wind development as a critical moment to reset the industry’s priorities," said Aaron Smith, President of OMSA. "By addressing these systemic issues, we have an opportunity to ensure that offshore wind is delivering on its promise by creating jobs for American mariners, supporting U.S. shipyards, and reinvesting in the American economy."

While the White House called the order a temporary measure, an OCSLA lease withdrawal may be reversible only by an act of Congress (or a Supreme Court decision). When Congress wrote OCSLA in 1953, it included text to give the president broad authority to withdraw areas from future leasing, but it did not include language to let the president take back a withdrawal. The United States District Court for the District of Alaska ruled in 2019 that Congress kept that authority for itself. 

In a separate executive order, Trump ordered the revocation of former President Joe Biden's OCSLA withdrawal order for offshore oil and gas leasing on the West Coast and East Coast. He also declared a national energy emergency, directing the use of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' emergency port and waterway permitting powers to expedite energy projects, with particular attention to projects on the West Coast and in the Northeast. 

Confront billionaire....

Native Hawaiians confront billionaire's megayacht in Hawaii

By Christine Hitt

Hawaii residents confronted a $250 million megayacht after it moored off the island of Molokai earlier this month. As the yacht’s passengers took a dinghy to Kaunakakai Wharf, a handful of Molokai residents were waiting for them, blocking access to shore.

The 387-foot yacht, known as “Liva O,” is owned by German American billionaire Stephen Orenstein, a commercial real estate businessman. The vessel made stops off Maui and Hawaii Island before it arrived at Molokai, heightening residents’ concerns.

They gathered at the wharf to find out what the passengers’ intentions were on Molokai. 

“We told them that we’re very concerned about who’s coming to Molokai, especially when they come on a $250 million boat,” Walter Ritte, a longtime Native Hawaiian activist and Molokai resident, told SFGATE. He was part of the group “Kahoolawe Nine,” which in 1976 landed on Kahoolawe to protest the military bombing of the island.

A crew member told Ritte that the passengers were there for a one-day excursion. Aware that the megayacht was making stops at different ports around Hawaii, Ritte talked with the captain through a walkie-talkie, asking if they were creating a tour or if this was a one-time deal. 

“People are very nervous about ships leading tours to Molokai. That’s why we all gathered at the wharf,” Ritte said. One of the concerns is overtourism, as large ships can bring a lot of people to the island at one time. Another major worry is how a ship’s anchor can damage the coral reef.

The captain promised Ritte that they were not there to start a business. The passengers then proceeded on their day-long excursion, and later, the yacht left the island.

“I’m assuming they hang out with other guys with big yachts. We’re hoping that the message goes out that Molokai is very touchy about bringing tourists to Molokai,” Ritte said.

Some Hawaii residents have expressed increasing concern with billionaires, such as Mark Zuckerberg and Marc Benioff, who own land on the Islands. Investment firm Guoco Group, which is part of a conglomerate founded by billionaire businessmen, owns Molokai Ranch, which encompasses one-third of Molokai. The landowner has been absent for over a decade, leaving its buildings, golf course and lodge abandoned like a ghost town.

The encounter with “Liva O” is not the first time Molokai residents have confronted a megayacht. In 2017, a group of Molokai residents, including Walter Ritte, blocked a luxury yacht’s access to Molokai, turning them away. “We want to keep Molokai, Molokai,” Loretta Ritte, Walter’s wife, said at the time.

The Hawaii Division of Boating and Ocean Recreation told SFGATE that yachts planning to moor off the Islands must let the relevant counties know ahead of time. They are allowed to anchor up to 72 hours as long as it’s in a designated Ocean Recreation Management Area. “Passengers can come ashore on any island that is under the State of Hawaii,” the division said.

Ritte, however, is worried about tourism numbers. “We’ve seen what happened to the other Islands. Tourism is out of control. There’s no control,” he continued. “So we want to make sure that we start trying to control [it].” He, however, is not as concerned about visitors flying over from other Islands since there’s only one small airline flying there, which inadvertently caps the number of people arriving to Molokai by plane.

“Right now, I think we have tourism under control,” he said. “We’re going to make sure that they don’t expand the airport, that they don’t [increase traffic] to our harbor. All those kinds of things helps keep Molokai the way it is.”

Palestinians return to northern Gaza

Middle East latest: Israel lets displaced Palestinians return to northern Gaza

By The Associated Press

Israel began allowing hundreds of thousands of Palestinians to return on Monday to the heavily destroyed northern Gaza Strip for the first time since the early weeks of the 15-month war with Hamas.

The U.N. said over 200,000 people were observed moving north in Gaza on Monday morning alone, in accordance with a fragile ceasefire.

“It’s the joy of return,” said Ismail Abu Matter, a father of four. He said people were singing, praying and crying as they reunited with relatives.

The ceasefire is aimed at winding down the deadliest and most destructive war ever fought between Israel and Hamas and securing the release of dozens of hostages captured in the militants’ Oct. 7, 2023, attack, which triggered the fighting. Hundreds of Palestinian prisoners are also set to be freed in the exchange.

Israel said Monday that a Hamas list shows eight of the 33 hostages to be released in the ceasefire's first phase are dead. Israel has said the next release of hostages will take place on Thursday, followed by another on Saturday.

Hamas officials are in Cairo to discuss ceasefire

A high-ranking Hamas delegation arrived in Cairo on Monday evening, aiming to discuss the implementation of the ceasefire deal.

The Hamas statement said the delegation includes senior leader Mohammed Darwish and other prominent members of its leadership council and negotiating team.

Hamas said meetings with Egyptian officials will focus on ensuring progress in the ceasefire’s implementation and addressing any challenges in the ongoing exchange of hostages and Palestinian prisoners. The Hamas delegation also will meet with Palestinian prisoners released under the ceasefire’s six-week first phase that began just over a week ago.

Egypt is a key mediator in ceasefire talks and part of the joint committee implementing the deal.

An Egyptian official said Egyptian contractors, along with a U.S. company, run checkpoints in Gaza that inspect vehicles heading north via Salahuddin road. The contractors are part of an Egyptian-Qatari committee implementing the ceasefire, according to the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak to the media.

Egypt's parliament speaker rejects proposals for taking in Palestinians from Gaza

Egypt’s parliament speaker on Monday strongly rejected proposals to move Palestinians out of the Gaza Strip and the occupied West Bank, saying this could spread conflict to other parts of the Middle East.

The comments by Hanfy el-Gebaly, speaker of the Egyptian House of Representatives, came a day after U.S. President Donald Trump urged Egypt and Jordan to take in Palestinians from war-ravaged Gaza.

El-Gebaly, who didn’t address Trump’s comments directly, told a parliament session Monday that such proposals "are not only a threat to the Palestinians but also they also represent a severe threat to regional security and stability.”

“The Egyptian House of Representatives completely rejects any arrangements or attempts to change the geographical and political reality for the Palestinian cause,” he said.

On Sunday, the Egyptian Foreign Ministry issued a carefully crafted statement rejecting any “temporary or long-term” transfer of Palestinians out of their territories.

The ministry warned that such a move “threatens stability, risks expanding the conflict in the region and undermines prospects of peace and coexistence among its people.”

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s far-right governing partners have long advocated what they describe as the voluntary emigration of large numbers of Palestinians and the reestablishment of Jewish settlements in Gaza.

Human rights groups have already accused Israel of ethnic cleansing, which United Nations experts have defined as a policy designed by one ethnic or religious group to remove the civilian population of another group from certain areas “by violent and terror-inspiring means.”

Israel says Hamas list shows 8 of 33 hostages who were to be freed in first phase of Gaza ceasefire are dead

Israel says a Hamas list shows that eight of the 33 hostages to be released in the first phase of the Gaza ceasefire are dead.

Government spokesman David Mencer told journalists Monday that Hamas said the other 25 are alive. Israel overnight said it had received a list of information on the status of the hostages from Hamas.

Israel has said the next release of hostages will take place on Thursday, followed by another on Saturday.

Whether hostages are alive or dead inside Gaza has been a heartbreaking question for waiting families who have pushed Israel’s government to reach a deal to free them, fearing that time was running out.

Approximately 90 hostages are still in captivity. Prior to this announcement, Israel believed at least 35 of them were dead.

Stocks tumble

Tech stocks tumble as a Chinese competitor threatens to upend the AI industry; Nvidia down 17%

By STAN CHOE

Wall Street’s superstars are tumbling Monday as a competitor from China threatens to upend the artificial-intelligence frenzy they've been feasting on.

The S&P 500 was down 1.9% in midday trading and heading for its worst day in more than a month. Big Tech stocks took some of the heaviest losses, with Nvidia down 17.6%, and they dragged the Nasdaq composite down 3.3%.

Stocks outside of AI-related industries held up much better, though, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average was down just 58 points, or 0.1%, as of 11:40 a.m. Eastern time. The Dow, which has much less of an emphasis on tech than the S&P 500 and Nasdaq, had briefly been on track for a small gain earlier in the morning.

The shock to financial markets came from China, where a company called DeepSeek said it had developed a large language model that can compete with U.S. giants but at a fraction of the cost. DeepSeek’s app had already hit the top of Apple’s App Store chart by Monday morning, and analysts said such a feat would be particularly impressive given how the U.S. government has restricted Chinese access to top AI chips.

Skepticism, though, remains about how much DeepSeek’s announcement will ultimately shake the AI supply chain, from the chip makers making semiconductors to the utilities hoping to electrify vast data centers gobbling up computing power.

“It remains to be seen if DeepSeek found a way to work around these chip restrictions rules and what chips they ultimately used as there will be many skeptics around this issue given the information is coming from China,” according to Dan Ives, an analyst with Wedbush Securities.

DeepSeek’s disruption nevertheless rocked AI-related stocks worldwide.

In Amsterdam, Dutch chip supplier ASML slid 7.4%. In Tokyo, Japan’s Softbank Group Corp. lost 8.3% to pull closer to where it was before leaping on an announcement trumpeted by the White House that it was joining a partnership to invest up to $500 billion in AI infrastructure.

And on Wall Street, shares of Constellation Energy lost nearly a fifth of its value, 19.5%. The company has said it would restart the shuttered Three Mile Island nuclear power plant to supply power for data centers for Microsoft.

All the worries sent investors toward bonds, which can be safer investments than any stock. The rush pushed the yield of the 10-year Treasury down to 4.54% from 4.62% late Friday.

It’s a sharp turnaround for the AI winners, which had soared in recent years on hopes that all the investment pouring in would remake the global economy and deliver gargantuan profits along the way. Such stellar performances also raised criticism that their stock prices had gone too far, too fast.

Before Monday's drop, Nvidia’s stock had soared from less than $20 to more than $140 in less than two years, for example.

Other Big Tech companies had also joined in the frenzy, and their stock prices had benefited too. It was just on Friday that Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg was saying he expects his company to invest up to $65 billion this year and grow its AI teams significantly, while talking up a datacenter in Louisiana that will be so large it would cover a significant part of Manhattan.

A small group of such companies has become so dominant that they’ve come to be known as the “Magnificent Seven.” These companies — Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, Nvidia and Tesla — alone accounted for more than half the S&P 500’s total return last year, according to S&P Dow Jones Indices.

Their immense sizes in turn have also given them huge sway over the S&P 500 and other indexes that give more weight to bigger companies. It shows the risk of betting too much on just a few winning stocks, something that market experts call “concentration risk.”

That “can feel good when those few names or ideas are on the ascent, but it is even more dangerous when disruptions take place,” said Brian Jacobsen, chief economist at Annex Wealth Management.

Still, he suggested not overreacting to Monday’s sharp swings. “It is possible that the news out of China could be overstated and then we could see a reversal of the recent market moves,” Jacobsen said. “It is also possible that the news is true, but then that would present new investment opportunities.”

More big swings may be ahead. Apple, Meta Platforms, Microsoft and Tesla are all on the schedule this upcoming week to report how much profit they made at the end of 2024.

The pressure is on companies to keep delivering strong profits, particularly after a recent jump in Treasury yields, even with Monday's decline. When bonds are paying more in interest, they put downward pressure on stock prices.

So far, big U.S. companies have been reporting better results than analysts expected. AT&T became the latest on Monday, and its stock rose 6%.

In stock markets abroad, movements for broad indexes across Europe and Asia weren’t as forceful as for the big U.S. tech stocks. France’s CAC 40 fell 0.2%, and Germany’s DAX lost 0.5%.

In Asia, stocks edged 0.1% lower in Shanghai after a survey of manufacturers showed export orders in China dropping to a five-month low.

The Federal Reserve holds its latest policy meeting later this week. Traders don’t expect recent weak data to push the Fed to cut its main interest rate. They’re virtually certain the central bank will hold steady, according to data from CME Group.

NGC 1333


Clouds of stardust drift through this deep skyscape, across the Perseus molecular cloud some 850 light-years away. Dusty nebulae reflecting light from embedded young stars stand out in the nearly 4 degree wide field of view. With a characteristic bluish color reflection nebula NGC 1333 is prominent near center. Hints of contrasting red emission from Herbig-Haro objects, the jets and shocked glowing gas emanating from recently formed stars, are scattered across the dusty expanse. While many stars are forming in the molecular cloud, most are obscured at visible wavelengths by the pervasive dust. The chaotic environment surrounding NGC 1333 may be similar to one in which our own Sun formed over 4.5 billion years ago. At the estimated distance of the Perseus molecular cloud, this cosmic scene would span about 80 light-years.

So many tails


Why does this comet have so many tails? C/2024 G3 (ATLAS) has developed several long and intricate tails visible from Earth's southern hemisphere over the past two weeks. Many observers reported seeing the impressive comet without any optical aid above the western horizon just after sunset. At least six different tails appear in the featured image captured five days ago from the dark skies above Paranal Observatory in Chile. One possible cause for the multiple tails is dust and gas being expelled from the comet's rotating nucleus. The outward push of the Sun's complex solar wind may also play a role. The huge iceberg-like nucleus of Comet ATLAS appears to have broken up near its closest approach to the Sun two weeks ago. Unfortunately, Comet ATLAS and its tails are expected to fade significantly over the coming weeks.

Big Brother

What the Hell Is Going on at NIH?

Scientists sound the alarm about Trump’s unprecedented “Big Brother” research crackdown.

Jackie Flynn Mogensen

Chrystal Starbird, a cancer researcher at the University of North Carolina School of Medicine, had been preparing to serve on her first National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant review panel at the end of January. On Wednesday, to her surprise, that meeting was abruptly canceled.

These NIH panels, or “study sections,” typically involve a group of about 20 to 30 scientists who meet to assess research grant proposals within their areas of expertise. Most of the grants, Starbird says, range from about $2 million to $10 million. Once the group reviews and scores the projects, a separate NIH “advisory council” decides which ones to fund.

The email Starbird received was vague. It came from her study section contact at NIH, within the Trump administration, and it said the multiday meeting, set for January 30 and 31, would not take place as planned. The message instructed her to save her files about the projects for the time being and thanked her for her service to the NIH. “I’ve never seen a complete pause like this as part of a transition,” she told me.

The “pause” goes beyond grant reviews. It appears to be part of a larger blackout on research at NIH and across the federal government. On Tuesday, as the Washington Post first reported, the Trump administration paused all external communications—”health advisories, weekly scientific reports, updates to websites and social media posts” at the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), which includes the NIH, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

HHS also reportedly instructed staff to pause any travel plans, including to conferences and workshops. (The department hasn’t publicly commented on the freeze, and didn’t respond to a request for comment from Mother Jones.) Employees also received a memo instructing them to report any colleagues who’ve used “coded or imprecise language” to “disguise” diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts—or face “adverse consequences.”

“It sounds like Big Brother,” one NIH researcher told me.

The disruptions to the grant process, some researchers say, is already affecting science. The NIH is the country’s largest public biomedical research funder, providing some $40 billion to outside scientists every year to pursue the type of basic research that over the decades has contributed to countless important discoveries, and the development of lifesaving drugs and treatments. To ensure the agency supports the most rigorous, promising studies, it relies on panelists like Starbird to review them. But now those meetings, which typically take months to schedule, can’t happen.

On top of that, according to reporting by Science and email memos reviewed by Mother Jones, upcoming advisory council meetings where studies are officially greenlit were suspended too. That puts new funding for all sorts of research, from cancer to the opioid crisis, on hold until further notice. “It just feels like everything is in limbo,” says Amanda Gillespie, a professor and speech-language pathologist at the Emory School of Medicine whose 5-year, approximately $2.5 million funding proposal was up for approval at an abruptly canceled council meeting that had been set for this week. She’d scored high marks from her reviewers, so was optimistic about getting selected. “It was, to put it mildly, quite a letdown.” Without knowing when the meetings will start up again, she says, “it’s really frustrating because it’s very hard to plan.”

If the pause is lifted, returning to the normal process will likely take months, experts say. “It’s quite an endeavor to organize this thing,” says Esther Choo, a professor of emergency medicine who studies policy and substance abuse at Oregon Health and Science University. Her study section on addressing the opioid crisis, was also scheduled for this week and then canceled. These meetings, she explains, typically last one to two full days and can require 40 to 60 hours of preparation. They often involve top researchers in a given field.

“If you go to somebody who’s a Nobel Laureate and say, ‘Okay, I need to schedule a meeting again next month,’ chances are it’s not going to happen,” Starbird points out.

The delays could have a direct impact on patients, experts say. As Choo explains, it’s a little bit like the Olympics: When a country can’t participate, or there’s a major disruption, “there are always those athletes that missed a window.” In the case of the NIH funding, people’s lives are on the line.

Starbird’s mother-in-law, for example, has late-stage lung cancer. She recently added to her chemo regimen a new drug that was discovered by one of Starbird’s former collaborators and approved just months ago. “Imagine if that drug pipeline had been delayed for a few months. You wouldn’t be giving her that drug today, right?”

The full consequences of the pause—and when (or whether) it will end—remain unclear. Theoretically, says Greg Ducker, a cancer and diet researcher at the University of Utah, whose study section next week was also canceled, it may be possible to catch up if the delay is short. But if it drags on, and grants and clinical trials go unfunded, that could present real problems. “Without communication from the head of HHS,” he says, it’s difficult to say what might happen.

Beyond any logistical disruptions, as I’ve previously reported, researchers fear their studies related to climate science, equity, and diversity initiatives may be vulnerable to funding cuts under the Trump administration, which has threatened to root out DEI programs. Outside scientists worry they’ll lose access to federal data—for example, the vital metrics provided by the Energy Information Agency—and that scientists may be forced out of frowned-upon specialties or never pursue them at all. “As Trump wages a war of intimidation and fear against scientists,” predicted Jennifer Jones, the director for the Center for Science and Democracy at the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS), a nonprofit science advocacy group, “you’re going to have a lot fewer people raising their hand to serve the public good through science into the future.”

The chill is already setting in. “Morale is very low,” the NIH researcher told me, and it’s possible the agency will soon start losing “good people.”

“It really concerns all of us that science is going to be rewritten. We’re all just very demoralized and concerned,” they added, and then hedged, in typical scientist fashion: “I hope I’m not being alarmist. But we just don’t know yet.”