A place were I can write...

My simple blog of pictures of travel, friends, activities and the Universe we live in as we go slowly around the Sun.



September 30, 2025

It's like being in the hospital and having Charly Manson and Hitler be your doctor...

Trump Delivers Bonkers N-Word Ramble to Military Chiefs

Story by Sarah Ewall-Wice

President Donald Trump delivered what was a largely rambling and incoherent address before senior military leaders on Tuesday, where he bragged about ending wars, ranted about the Nobel Peace Prize, and even mentioned the “N-words.”

Trump, 79, traveled to Quantico, Virginia, where Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth had called hundreds of general and flag officers in an unprecedented move to give a speech about the “warrior ethos” and ending wokeness.

The president’s remarks sounded more like a low-energy campaign speech full of grievances and his usual musings than one to top military brass.

At one point during his speech, Trump brought up rebuilding the U.S. nuclear arsenal when he went off on a tangent about sending a nuclear submarine to the coast of Russia in response to a threat.

The president told top generals he could not say if he sent one or two submarines, as if they were not aware of the top secret military activity, and that he called nuclear the “N-word.”

“There are two N words, and you can’t use either of them,” Trump said as if thinking aloud to himself.

The president often appeared exhausted and changed subjects mid-sentence as he stood in front of a massive American flag.

At another point, the president brought up his claim that he ended seven wars and suggested he may have solved the biggest of them all with Israel’s war against Hamas in Gaza. He said if Hamas did not agree to the plan announced on Monday, it would be very tough on them.

He said if it were solved, he would give himself credit for solving “eight plus” wars and suggested he would give himself credit for solving “two or three” wars for the one in Gaza.

He noted many of the top generals had been to the Middle East, which he called a big part of the earth.

At another point in his address, the president praised himself for being the 45th, 46th, and 47th president.

Trump told top generals he did not want the credit for 46, which was when President Joe Biden had won the 2020 election, but Trump said, “I like having it,” as he repeatedly denies he ever lost.

Trump also argued that he deserves the Nobel Peace Prize again. He talked about how if he solved Russia’s war in Ukraine, he would have ended eight wars in eight months, noting, “That’s pretty good.”

Then he questioned, “Will you get the Nobel Prize?” as if he were speaking to himself. “Absolutely not,” he added. He said it would be a big insult to the country.

The president also complained about wanting “big, beautiful, firm paper” for signing military commissions and professed his love for its “real gold writing” at the top while signing commissions.

Trump discussed how, when military officials work their whole life to become a general or admiral, the president signs their commissions, and he gets to do that.

“Actually, I love my signature, I really do,” Trump declared.

The president then questioned the use of an autopen to sign commissions before circling back to more attacks on Biden, who he often criticizes for having used an autopen.

Overall, it was a tough audience for the president, who often feeds off energy from his many supporters. The military’s top brass was standing at attention when the president entered and thus did not applaud.

“I’ve never walked into a room so silent before,” Trump noted at the start and encouraged them, “If you want to applaud, you applaud.”

The president did receive a few laughs from the crowd at times, but his comment that they have to “loosen these guys up a little bit” did not do much to change the formal reception.

While much of the president’s speech was jumbled and darted from subject to subject, he did offer a few moments of clarity.

He told the group, who he described as “central casting,” that there was no greater honor than serving as their commander in chief.

He also said his message was “very simple,” that he was with them and has their backs 100 percent.

The president declared they were going to make the military tougher, faster, and more powerful than ever before.

But Trump’s direct on-script message was very short-lived.

He spoke about how popular it was that he had changed the name of the Department of Defense to the Department of War and noted that a couple of “fake news outlets” did not follow his plan to rename the Gulf of Mexico. He attacked the Associated Press for its stance and was quick to describe the judge in the lawsuit as “liberal.”

Trump said on renaming the Defense Department that they “really want no wars,” but sometimes “you have to do it.”

At another point, the president briefly mentioned that U.S. cities are a “big part” of war now, but quickly moved on.

Trump started to praise the U.S. strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities carried out by the military, but he quickly veered into repeating his attacks on CNN and its “scammer reporter” for its coverage of the strikes.

He claimed that CNN had “turned off the cameras” amid his criticisms, like the president used to claim they did when he spoke at campaign rallies.

With no transition, Trump suddenly declared the U.S. needed to “start thinking about battleships,” which got a laugh from some in the room.

Trump, who never served, went on to describe how he used to watch the black and white documentary series Victory at Sea about World War II.

“I love Victory at Sea,” Trump declared.

At what point do you pull the plug??? Just fucking INSANE!

Trump, Hegseth fat shame generals, test loyalties in manic military rant 

Bill Goodykoontz

This is not normal.

Yes, it's becoming more and more difficult to define "normal," but the speeches that President Donald Trump and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth delivered to the nation's top military brass on Tuesday, Sept. 30, were genuinely jaw-dropping, even by their standards. (Unless you're a guest on Fox News, apparently.)

The commander in chief telling his highest-ranking generals and admirals, "We should use some of these dangerous cities as training grounds for our military" certainly qualifies.

"There were just so many false claims," Daniel Dale, CNN's fact-checker, said after Trump's speech. "And I say that after essentially every speech, unfortunately, from President Donald Trump. But I think this is notable because of the audience. He was telling a lot of lies, saying a lot of other inaccurate things, regardless of his intentions, to the U.S.’ top military leaders."

Exactly.

Any media outlet that characterizes this as just another day at the office isn't doing its job. Simply put, this was nuts, often in a scary way. No matter how many bizarre lawsuits Trump files against media companies or what insane demands Hegseth makes of reporters, this has to be called out as what it was: crazy.

Hegseth's speech was crazy. Trump's was crazier

Hegseth strutted around talking about how tough the military would be under his leadership (and what good shape he was in).

Trump, meanwhile, basically delivered a head-spinning, unhinged campaign speech, only instead of the usual full-throated, MAGA-hat wearing worshipful followers, this was in front of an audience ordered to be there, the nation's highest-ranking military officers ― who, one supposes, must have better things to do. He railed against Joe Biden and Democrats; talked again about how "tariff" is his favorite word; said, "I love my signature, I really do"; and more.

Hegseth called the meeting on short notice, ordering the generals and admirals from around the world to Quantico, Virginia. Hegseth made it clear early on what kind of loyalty he expected from them.

"If the words I’m speaking today are making your heart sink, then you should do the honorable thing and resign," he said.

Hegseth went on to decry "wokeness" and "dudes in dresses" and, taking a page from his boss' book, praised himself. "It all starts with physical fitness and appearance," Hegseth said. "If the secretary of War can do regular hard PT, so can every member of our joint force. Frankly, it's tiring to look out at combat formations and see fat troops. Likewise, it's completely unacceptable to see fat generals and admirals."

Hegseth called rules of engagement 'stupid'

Worried about those pesky rules of engagement, which help prevent war crimes? Don't be!

"We unleash overwhelming and punishing violence on the enemy," Hegseth said. "We also don't fight with stupid rules of engagement. We untie the hands of our warfighters to intimidate, demoralize, hunt and kill the enemies of our country. No more politically correct and overbearing rules of engagement."

And in what has already become a meme, Hegseth also offered this: "Should our enemies choose foolishly to challenge us, they will be crushed by the violence, precision and ferocity of the War Department. In other words, to our enemies, FAFO."

Don't know what that means?

"If necessary, our troops can translate that for you."

Amazingly, Hegseth was just the warm-up act.

Trump tested the loyalty of top military officials

Next up was Trump, who rambled (there really is no other word for it, except maybe "raved") for more than an hour. He lied about the 2020 election results, again. He attacked the media, again. He trotted out this old chestnut: "We were a dead country a year ago, and now we’re the hottest country anywhere in the world. You must be proud of that.”

What must the generals and admirals have been thinking?

When Trump came out, there was no applause. He said he'd never "walked into a room so silent before." When the audience laughed, Trump said, "Don't laugh, you're not allowed to do that." He was joking, and then said, "Just have a good time. And if you want to applaud, you applaud. And if you want to do anything you want, you can do anything you want. And if you don’t like what I’m saying, you can leave the room. Of course, there goes your rank, there goes your future."

The remarks drew some laughter. There were worries that the purpose of the meeting would be a loyalty test among military leaders. It never got that explicit. But it was pretty close.

He said far more alarming things, but Trump really reached back into his greatest-hits repertoire when he trashed "fake-news CNN" and claimed, "Oh, they just turned their camera off," and that they do so every time he mentioned them.

Interestingly enough, I watched him tell this lie ... on CNN.

Veterans reacted on CNN, Fox News

At one point, Trump talked about battleships and how much he loves watching "Victory at Sea." He didn't ask anyone what their favorite war movie was, although in Hegseth's case, he didn't have to. The speeches took place in front of a giant American flag, identical to the backdrop of the opening of the movie "Patton." Trump mentioned more than once how important optics are to him.

MSNBC cut away from Trump's speech eventually. Later, CNN did. Fox News carried the full speech, then spoke with military veterans who mostly praised the speeches. The absolute insanity went either unnoticed or unremarked upon.

Not so on CNN, where Amy McGrath, a retired lieutenant colonel who flew combat missions, described Trump's speech perfectly.

"There was a lot of rambling, there was a ton of lies, a lot of politicization … and some of the craziness that you heard from this speech," she said. "But the scariest part was when the president talked about using the military and using our cities as a training ground for the United States military." 

"I’m very worried about this," she continued. "I think the whole part of bringing these generals and admirals back here was to discuss this type of thing. It should scare us all. This is something that we just don’t do in America."

It is now. If there were any doubt, Tuesday's speeches removed it. It's the job of the media to make clear how scary that is.

Palestinian people

Trump peace plan 'ignores interests of Palestinian people', Hamas official tells BBC

Rushdi Abualouf

A senior Hamas figure has told the BBC that the group is likely to reject Donald Trump's peace plan for Gaza, saying it "serves Israel's interests" and "ignores those of the Palestinian people".

The figure said that Hamas is unlikely to agree to disarming and handing over their weapons - a key condition of Trump's plan.

Hamas is also said to object to the deployment of an International Stabilisation Force (ISF) in Gaza, which it views as a new form of occupation.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu accepted Trump's plan during White House talks on Monday. Hamas has not yet given an official response.

Qatar's foreign ministry has said Hamas is studying the White House proposal "responsibly".

A senior Palestinian official with knowledge of Hamas talks told the BBC they involve the group's leadership both inside and outside of Gaza.

The group's military commander in the territory, Ez al-Din al-Haddad, is thought to be determined to keep fighting rather than accept the plan on offer. Hamas figures outside Gaza have recently found themselves sidelined in discussions as they do not have direct control over the hostages.

Hamas talks, which are expected to take several days, also include other Palestinian factions.

The armed group Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ), which took part in the 7 October attack and previously held some Israeli hostages, rejected the plan on Tuesday.

For Hamas, a key sticking point is thought to be that the plan requires them to hand over all of the hostages in one go - giving away their only bargaining chip.

Even with Donald Trump's backing for the plan, there is a lack of trust that Israel will not resume its military operations once it has received the hostages - particularly after it attempted to assassinate Hamas leadership in Doha earlier this month, in defiance of the US.

Additionally, a map of Gaza shared by the Trump administration shows what appears to be a planned buffer zone along Gaza's southern border with Egypt. It is unclear how this would be administered, but if Israel is involved it is also likely to be a point of contention.

Further, since agreeing to the plan on Monday evening, Netanyahu has appeared to push back on several of the terms it outlines.

In a video shared on X, he insists that the Israeli military would be able to remain in parts of Gaza and that Israel said it would "forcibly resist" a Palestinian state.

This goes against the terms of Trump's framework, which stipulates complete withdrawal of Israeli forces and says that once the plan is complete there may be a "credible pathway to Palestinian self-determination and statehood".

Within Gaza, Palestinians were broadly supportive of the plan, but only because it would lead to an end to the war.

Resident Khadar Abu Kweik told the BBC: "The American plan has bad clauses, but I support it because it will stop the war and get rid of Hamas. Even if the devil himself brought a plan to end this hell we are living in, I would support it."

Palestinian journalist Fathi Sabah said: "A Hamas rejection, god forbid, would mean giving Netanyahu a green light to continue the war with American and Western backing, to destroy what remains of Gaza and the central region."

"The people of Gaza cannot bear that. They are devastated, exhausted, desperate and hopeless," he said.

"They want a ceasefire now, not tomorrow, at any cost, even though they know the plan serves Netanyahu's interests, is full of pitfalls, and does not reflect their aspirations," he added.

The Israeli military launched a campaign in Gaza in response to the Hamas-led attack on southern Israel on 7 October 2023, in which about 1,200 people were killed and 251 others were taken hostage.

At least 66,097 people have been killed in Israeli attacks in Gaza since then, according to the territory's Hamas-run health ministry.

In August, a UN-backed body confirmed that famine was taking place in Gaza City. Earlier this month, a UN commission of inquiry concluded that Israel had committed genocide in Gaza - which Israel strongly rejects.

Driving while Black.. Can be anyone...

Boxer Terence Crawford held at gunpoint during traffic stop, police say

By George Ramsay

Renowned boxing champion Terence “Bud” Crawford was ordered out of his vehicle at gunpoint and given a citation for reckless driving, police said, just hours after a victory parade in his honor in his hometown of Omaha, Nebraska.

According to a press release from Omaha police, the incident occurred in the early hours of Sunday morning and has prompted an internal affairs investigation.

On Saturday, Crawford had attended a celebratory parade in Omaha to mark his victory over Canelo Álvarez earlier this month, which saw him crowned the undisputed world super middleweight champion.

Footage that has been widely circulated on social media apparently shows Crawford getting out of a car at gunpoint during a traffic stop.

“While speaking with the driver, an officer observed a firearm on the driver’s side floorboard,” said the police press release. “For safety, all four occupants were ordered out of the vehicle at gunpoint.

“The driver was later identified as Mr. Crawford upon verification of his driver’s license and was issued a citation for reckless driving. One passenger, a member of Mr. Crawford’s security team, was also found to be carrying a legal firearm.

“Police have confirmed that all occupants are legally permitted to carry firearms. A police supervisor and lieutenant responded to the scene at Mr. Crawford’s request.”

CNN Sports has contacted Crawford for comment. According to the Associated Press, he declined to comment via his spokeswoman.

On Sunday, Omaha mayor John Ewing said that he had spoken personally to Crawford about the traffic stop.

“I acknowledge the seriousness of what occurred and how trust between law enforcement and our community is important and shows the need to be continuously vigilant about building relationships,” Ewing added.

“Omaha Police Chief Todd Schmaderer has pledged an internal investigation, which I support and want to be full and thorough. We will gather all the facts and be transparent with the public about our findings.

“Understand that my heart dropped in learning of this end to an otherwise wonderful day and evening celebrating our city’s world boxing champion … Omaha needs to remember this important day as a good one while we seek answers to how it ended. Meanwhile, we must ensure that every resident, no matter who they are, feels safe and respected in Omaha.”

With his victory over Álvarez in Las Vegas, Crawford unified a weight division for the third time in his career. He has a 42-0 professional record with 31 knockouts and is considered to be one of the greatest pound-for-pound boxers of all time.

Got to be fucking kidding.. Orange turd needs to go to prison and get ass fucked every night...

Mitt Romney reveals he personally urged Biden administration to preemptively pardon Donald Trump

By Sarah Boxer

Former Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney revealed Monday night that he called the White House during the Biden administration when Special Counsel Jack Smith was investigating Donald Trump to urge President Joe Biden to preemptively pardon him.

“I called a member of the White House, one of the senior advisers to President Biden. And I said, if the Justice Department decides to indict President Trump, I hope President Biden will immediately eliminate that, and that he will provide a pardon immediately. Why? Number one, I don’t want the anger and the hate and the vitriol. But number two: We just can’t begin to be prosecuting political opponents,” Romney said during a conversation with CNN’s Dana Bash at an event hosted by Drew University in Morristown, New Jersey.

“Pardoning at that point would have been a way to make that very clear,” added Romney.

“What did they say back to you?” asked Bash.

“They didn’t do that,” Romney said, smiling.

That revelation came while discussing the Trump administration’s recent indictment of former FBI Director James Comey, which Romney said he disagrees with: “The idea that the system of justice is used to punish political opponents is a very dangerous path to go down.”

“I just don’t think that’s the right path to go down. I’d go down a different path,” he added.

Romney said last year that if he were Biden he would have “immediately pardoned” Trump once the Justice Department brought indictments.

Romney also offered up his opinion of why Trump is pursuing Comey: Humiliation.

“The most powerful negative emotion is humiliation. If you’ve been humiliated, the response is the most significant,” Romney said. “And I think President Trump, when he was not in office, was humiliated by these actions where he sat in a New York courtroom at the defendant table being chastised by a judge and being attacked by a prosecutor who in his campaign and said he was gonna bring Donald Trump an indictment and put him on trial.”

Now, Romney says Trump is doing exactly what he had promised during his reelection campaign.

“He said he was gonna have revenge and retribution, and he is. And he’s trying to have a stronger executive branch because he and the people around him believe that the executive branch is too weak and that it needs to have more power,” he said.

Bash asked if Romney feels that Trump’s aggressive use of the executive branch is constitutional.

“In some cases, yes, probably in some cases, no. We’ll see what the Supreme Court says,” he responded.

Romney also said he doesn’t want the court to allow Trump to remove Federal Reserve governor Lisa Cook. “I think that’s a huge mistake. The challenge is the Constitution doesn’t actually describe independent agencies.”

During his own run for president in 2012, Romney was famously mocked by President Barack Obama for saying that Russia posed America’s greatest geopolitical threat.

Today, Romney’s warnings are proving prescient.

Romney said he had a hard time watching Trump’s summit in Alaska with Russian President Vladimir Putin. “We talk about humiliation, but Vladimir Putin, come to Alaska and have a red carpet. Oh boy … This is unimaginable. And we just have to stand up for our friends in Ukraine,” he said.

‘I’m not a tariff guy’

Romney said “I’m not a tariff guy” and that he thinks the aggressive way President Trump is imposing tariffs is wrong.

“In the past, we’ve tried to build power by making friends around the world and, and bringing people here, legal immigrants and H1-B visa and so forth. We’ve been building power. He’s saying we’ve been building power too long. We want to exercise it,” said Romney, adding in disbelief, “Going after Canada, for Pete’s sake. Canada!”

Though he said China deserves high tariffs, it should be coordinated with allies to really put the squeeze on that regime.

The former senator called Trump’s tariffs inflationary and said he is now going to the grocery store and cooking meals a few days a week at home. Romney said he sees the high prices gripping US consumers first hand, which he considered a major problem for Republicans.

“I am shocked at the prices in the grocery store. I mean, everything is $5 or more,” Romney said. He admitted that he has a taste for a high-protein cereal that now costs $10. “It’s unbelievable to me the price of these things.

“And it only pours, like, four bowls!”

JD Vance 2028?

Romney told Jake Tapper in December that he thought JD Vance would be the next GOP presidential nominee and stands by that still.

He said Vance, whom Romney called “brilliant,” will not only be the Republican nominee in 2028, but also has a strong chance of becoming president.

“I’m not saying that’s my preference, but I’m saying we’ll see that the Democrats are able to put up,” Romney told the crowd and added, “I don’t have a home in either political party,”

It’s a unique position for the former bearer of the Republican party to be in. Romney traced his compass back to a lesson from his father, former Michigan Gov. George Romney, who taught him, “There is no pain like being indicted by your own conscience.”

Attack on a church is unimaginable

Romney harkened back to his Michigan roots when asked by Bash about the devastating shooting at the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Grand Blanc, Michigan, on Sunday.

”Whether it’s that church or any church, an attack on a religious institution where people are worshiping is unimaginable, unthinkable and inexcusable,” Romney stated.

Romney, who is Mormon, told Bash he has cousins who were worshipers at the congregation.

“My church has a heritage of having faced persecution in the past. And you wonder, well, are we in for another bout of this,” he said while also lamenting the recent shooting at a Catholic church and rise in antisemitism as well.

Violence has also taken a personal turn for Romney with the assassination of Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University.

He told Bash that two of his grandchildren attend the school. “It becomes associated with this terrible act of what presumably was a very troubled young man,” Romney said.

Utah Gov. Spencer Cox has steadfastly spoken out against the toxicity of social media and its role in the shooting. Romney says Cox has distinguished himself by drawing that line during this tragedy.

“There are dark impulses in the human psyche and it gets us angry, gets us to tune in again and again and again. And so our social media has taken over how people get information now, and it finds people to blame,” Romney said.

Romney shared that he wasn’t familiar with Kirk before his murder: “I’ve never listened to Charlie Kirk. So I don’t know him, but I certainly defend his right to express his point of view. And I expressed the right of people that vehemently disagree. That’s what democracy is.”

“What is freedom if we can’t speak freely?”

Handing out public land and millions of your dollars...

Trump is handing out public land and millions of dollars to revive big coal, sending advocates reeling

By Andrew Freedman

While the Trump administration wages war against clean energy, it is now vowing to lease millions of acres of public lands at a discount and spend hundreds of millions of dollars to prop up the most polluting source of electricity: coal.

This comes as the administration has restricted new solar and wind farms on federal lands, and decried subsidies provided to these two renewable energy sources.

The new policies announced Monday include giving $625 million to utilities to extend the life of aging, coal-fired power plants. Such facilities would likely otherwise close because of the availability of cheaper energy sources.

The coordinated actions from the departments of Interior, Energy and the Environmental Protection Agency would seek to open as much as 13.1 million acres of federal land to coal mining at reduced royalty rates. In addition, the EPA would ease regulations on water and air pollution to allow for the extension of coal power plants’ lifetimes.

Currently, coal provides about 16% of the United States’ electricity, a share that has fallen steeply in recent years as the cost of natural gas, wind and solar energy has come down, and anti-pollution regulations have helped to convince utilities to close coal power plants.

Coal mining has also fallen out of favor in recent decades as demand for the fuel has declined. Coal is the energy source that produces the most global warming pollution, and its decline in the US had been helping to reduce the nation’s emissions.

Environmental groups denounced the new moves as a waste of money, a threat to public health and a step backward in the fight against human-caused global warming.

“Expanding mining and spending taxpayer money on burning coal, while rolling back vital health protections, will only exacerbate the deadly pollution and rising electricity bills that communities are facing across the country,” said Jill Tauber of Earthjustice in a statement. “Clean energy and other climate solutions are driving significant growth in our economy, but this administration is choosing to throw its weight behind fossil fuel industries and stymie progress.”

“The Trump administration’s attempts to ban clean energy and prop up dirty and costly coal will not only cause costs to keep going up, but will also risk the health of our communities and threaten public lands that belong to all of us,” said Matthew Davis of the League of Conservation Voters, in a statement.

The Trump administration, however, sees coal as a reliable source of baseload power at a time when such energy sources are at a premium given rising electricity demands amid the artificial intelligence boom.

The White House is prioritizing such energy sources, be it coal or nuclear power plants, over the cheapest sources of electricity today, which are wind and solar.

“Beautiful, clean coal will be essential to powering America’s reindustrialization and winning the AI race,” Energy Secretary Chris Wright said in a statement. “These funds will help keep our nation’s coal plants operating and will be vital to keeping electricity prices low and the lights on without interruption.”

A sign of a BAD economy, Hotdog and canned beans sales are way up....

There may not be a jobs report at all this week — so economists are homing in on this data instead

By Alicia Wallace

In what could be the last piece of federal jobs data released this week if the government shuts down, a new report Tuesday showed that the number of available roles remains low for the year, a sign that opportunities continue to dwindle for Americans looking for work.

Tuesday’s Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey showed that the number of available jobs increased slightly to 7.23 million at the end of August from an upwardly revised 7.21 million. Job openings as a share of total employment remain at five-year lows, Bureau of Labor Statistics data shows.

Tuesday’s data further confirmed that the US job market has grown increasingly stagnant. Excluding the onset of the pandemic in early 2020, the rate of hiring fell in August to 3.2%, matching the lowest rate since 2013, BLS data shows.

“That’s the worst level since the Great Recession era, when unemployment was 7% or higher, with the exception of April 2020,” Heather Long, Navy Federal Credit Union’s chief economist, wrote in a note on Tuesday. “The job market has been frozen for close to a year now, and it appears to be getting worse for job seekers. Americans feel stuck in this economy without job opportunities or hopes of buying a home. This needs to change.”

Federal data at risk of going dark

The monthly report carries added weight this week and comes at a precarious time for the economy: If the federal government does shut down at midnight, the release of crucial labor market data such as Friday’s jobs report, could be delayed.

The BLS and other federal statistical agencies are expected to have a skeleton crew and delay the gathering, analysis and release of economic data if government funding lapses.

Key reports that could be postponed this week include the Labor Department’s weekly jobless claims and the September jobs report.

The already crucial monthly employment snapshot has become even more important. Recent months’ data has shown the “low-fire, low-hire” environment to be even more anemic than previously thought, stoking concerns that the labor market is cracking.

That spurred the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates earlier this month, and the September jobs report is “arguably the most important piece of information” for central bankers when they meet in October, Bank of America economists wrote earlier this week.

Still, if a shutdown were to occur for an extended period of time, it could have a cascading effect on crucial economic data that could waylay or gum up reports for months to come.

“There are very specific processes (by statistical agencies) that need to be adhered to, and when you throw a wrench into that process, it has a ripple effect across a whole suite of reported statistics,” Brett Ryan, senior US economist at Deutsche Bank, said in an interview with CNN on Tuesday.

Without the gold-standard economic data, economists, policymakers, investors and others will instead have to lean more heavily on “soft,” survey-drawn data on consumer sentiment, and private sector readouts such as those put out by payroll company ADP, which will be releasing its monthly jobs estimates on Wednesday.

Listless labor market

Demand for workers has been on a downward slope for much of this year. In addition to a high-uncertainty environment (driven in part by an unpredictable trade policy, sharp reductions in immigration, and a steep pullback in federal spending), the rise of AI and other technological advances are factoring in to businesses’ hiring plans.

In August, job openings plummeted by 115,000 positions to 188,000 in construction, which logged its second-largest monthly decrease of openings on record.

Hiring, however, picked up slightly, as did the number of workers who quit. Construction, which is closely watched as an indicator of economic activity, has been dogged by high interest rates, a persistent housing affordability crisis, deportations of workers and tariff-related uncertainty.

Hiring was listless across most sectors, especially white-collar industries where activity was flat in August, according to Tuesday’s report.

As opportunities dwindle, people are holding on to the jobs they have: The level and rate of voluntary quits dropped to an eight-month low.

One of the few bright spots has been that layoff activity isn’t escalating, and that was the case in August as well.

Still, the overall picture of the labor market remains dour for many Americans, especially the nearly 2 million people who have been searching for jobs for at least half a year.

“All else equal, lower churn can make it harder for new entrants to break into the labor market and can be a drag on average wage growth since finding a new job is often the best way to see better pay,” Elise Gould, senior economist at the Economic Policy Institute, wrote Tuesday.

Separate data released Tuesday showed that the slowing labor market is also taking a toll on Americans’ attitudes toward the economy.

Consumer confidence fell 3.6 points in September to a reading of 94.2, The Conference Board said Tuesday, the lowest level in five months.

Respondents’ “appraisal of current job availability fell for the ninth-straight month to reach a new multiyear low,” Stephanie Guichard, senior economist of global indicators at The Conference Board, said in a release, noting that is “consistent with the decline in job openings.”

In the September survey, 54% of respondents said that jobs were “not so plentiful.” Outside of the pandemic era, that’s the highest share since July 2016, The Conference Board historical data shows.

Shut it all down........

Congress has less than 24 hours to avert a shutdown. The odds don’t look good

By Sarah Ferris, Arlette Saenz, Manu Raju, Morgan Rimmer

With less than 24 hours until a possible government shutdown, Senate Republicans will give Democrats a final chance to support their plan to keep the lights on at midnight. But inside the Capitol, few believe that Democrats are ready to yield.

The bitter stalemate between Republicans and Democrats in recent weeks — largely centered around billions of dollars in enhanced Affordable Care Act subsidies — now appears likely to result in the first government funding lapse of President Donald Trump’s second administration.

Any hope for an eleventh-hour deal was lost Monday afternoon, after a high-stakes meeting in the Oval Office with President Donald Trump and top congressional leaders led to no progress in the funding talks. Now ahead of that midnight deadline, the Senate is scheduled to vote at least once more on a GOP funding plan that Democrats have already rejected.

The move by Senate Majority Leader John Thune is intended to maximize pressure on his counterpart, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, who has so far blocked a plan for a status-quo funding bill without commitments to extend the Obamacare subsidies. Schumer, for his part, said the outcome is up to Trump and his GOP leaders.

“It’s now in the president’s hands. He can avoid a shutdown if he gets the Republican leader to go along with what we want,” Schumer said Monday night, hours after Congress’ top four party leaders met with Trump for a last-ditch meeting at the White House.

But Republicans have accused Schumer of holding government funding hostage over their demands and insist any negotiations on those tax credits should not be tied to keeping the government open.

Even one of the Senate GOP’s biggest advocates for extending those credits, Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri, said he doesn’t think Democrats should force the government into a shutdown over the issue.

“I don’t understand what shutting down government has to do with that,” Hawley said. “My message to them is like, ‘Hey, I will work with you on all of those things. I think there’s a lot of common ground, but let’s leave the government funding out of it.’”

Thune and his GOP conference have long believed that Schumer will cave — especially as the White House’s own budget office has threatened mass firings if Congress allows a shutdown and cedes some of its spending authority to the executive branch. And if a shutdown does happen, the prevailing sense among congressional Republicans is that voters will blame Democrats for their demands, not the GOP for a no-strings-attached funding deal.

“If you want to have that debate, that’s a debate to have. You don’t hold government funding hostage for it,” said GOP Sen. Eric Schmitt of Missouri.

“Chuck Schumer is afraid of his own shadow, and he doesn’t want to be perceived as working with President Trump,” Schmitt said. “That’s a shame, because I think the American people are going to suffer because of it.”

Asked if there’s any room for negotiations on Obamacare subsidies by Tuesday’s midnight shutdown deadline, Republican Sen. John Kennedy said, “Not unless Chuck stops smoking wizard weed.”

“We can negotiate the Obamacare subsidies and reform thereof, but we can’t do it by midnight tomorrow night,” Kennedy added. “That’s what Senator Schumer demanded, and it’s a very unserious proposal. Chuck wants a shutdown.”

Democrats have made clear for weeks they wanted a health care concession from Trump in exchange for helping to keep the government open. In recent days, Schumer and Jeffries have argued that any agreement on health care — such as those subsidies — needs to go into law. They believe it’s the only way to make sure the president keeps his word.

“We’ve got to deal with the health care collapse. We’re going off a cliff, and we can’t leave Vermonters and Americans high and dry,” Democratic Sen. Peter Welch said. “We need the president to acknowledge that he has to abide by what Congress authorizes for spending.”

Welch expressed skepticism about the two sides reaching a deal before midnight Tuesday.

“I think the odds are against it right now, and I say that with a lot of regret,” Welch said of the possibility of reaching an agreement, adding: “My hope is we’ll keep the lights on, and if they go off, I want them to get back on as soon as possible.”

Sen. John Fetterman, the lone Democrat who voted for the GOP’s funding plan during a failed vote last week, said he’s worried for the millions of people whose lives could be disrupted by a shutdown.

“You’re running the risk of plunging our nation into chaos. Millions and millions of lives will be upended,” he said. “What kind of messages does that send to our country and to our allies and to our enemies?”

Senate GOP plan: Keep voting until Democrats relent

Republican leaders in the Senate are settling on a plan: Keep voting on a seven-week funding extension until Democrats eventually capitulate.

The belief among top Republicans is that Democrats will start to bend after hearing public outcry over a loss of critical government services and as federal employees get furloughed — or even fired.

The GOP bill, which passed the House earlier this month largely along party lines, would extend government funding until late November and does not include extraneous policy provisions. But along with the expiring Obamacare subsidies, Democrats have demanded a reverse to Medicaid cuts enacted under Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” — and to constrain his ability to cut federal spending without Capitol Hill’s consent.

Thune and House Speaker Mike Johnson, emerging from Monday afternoon’s closed-door meeting with Trump, said that they believe the Democratic position is unsustainable and they plan to pressure Democrats with repeated votes on the stopgap measure.

“Yes,” Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso, told CNN when asked if they would keep scheduling votes on the GOP plan. Barrasso said they would continue this approach “until the government is opened again as a result of ending the Schumer shutdown.”

Leaving the Senate Republican leadership meeting on Monday night, Sen. Markwayne Mullin agreed with the tactic. “We’re gonna put it back on the floor,” if the package fails to advance on Tuesday.

“There’s no other option,” Mullin said.

Sen. Kevin Cramer, a North Dakota Republican, predicted that even if there is a shutdown, Democrats won’t be able to hold out for long.

“I think my sense is, if there’s a shutdown, it’ll be short, because I don’t believe that 47 Democratic senators want to walk the plank on something that — I mean, let’s face it — funding the government for Democrats is like falling off a log,” he said.

“It’s what they do. It’s what they love. So, I just don’t see, I don’t see even Chuck Schumer holding it all together for very long.”

Enriches One Well-Connected US Billionaire.. Of course....

Trump’s Argentina Bailout Enriches One Well-Connected US Billionaire

A $20 billion US rescue package is a gift for a hedge fund manager with ties to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent.

Judd Legum

Last week, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced a $20 billion package to rescue the Argentinian economy. The risky taxpayer-financed deal, which involves trading US dollars for Argentine pesos, has little upside for ordinary Americans. Argentina is not a significant US trading partner, and its economy, long in turmoil, has little impact on the United States.

However, Bessent’s announcement had massive economic benefits for one American: billionaire hedge fund manager Rob Citrone, who has placed large bets on the future of the Argentine economy. Citrone, the co-founder of Discovery Capital Management, is also a friend and former colleague of Bessent—a fact that has not been previously reported in US media outlets. Citrone, by his own account, helped make Bessent very wealthy.

Since Javier Milei, a right-wing populist, became president of Argentina in December 2023, Citrone has invested heavily in Argentina. Citrone has bought Argentine debt and purchased equity in numerous Argentine companies that are closely tied to the performance of the overall economy. Due to Argentina’s massive debt load and chaotic economic history—in 2023, Argentina’s inflation rate was over 200 percent—Citrone purchased Argentine bonds with an interest rate of nearly 20 percent. (Citrone has declined to detail exactly “how much of the $2.8 billion he manages is invested” in Argentina.)

Citrone, who is also a minority owner of the Pittsburgh Steelers, is effectively betting on Milei’s right-wing economic program, which emphasizes deregulation and sharply reduced government spending. Citrone viewed “the probability of default as minuscule,” even though Argentina has defaulted on its debts many times in the past.

In the short term, this appeared to be a savvy investment. After taking office, Milei fired tens of thousands of government workers, cut spending on welfare and research, and achieved fiscal balance. Inflation was reduced to around 40 percent, which spurred economic growth and foreign investment. Argentina’s economic rebound contributed to Discovery Capital’s 52 percent return in 2024.

Then it all came crashing down.

The austerity measures slowed economic growth, and unemployment spiked to nearly 8 percent. Millions had a harder time making ends meet after Milei reduced or eliminated subsidies for transportation, medicine, and other necessities. Milei’s popularity slumped, leading to speculation that his party could be routed in the 2025 midterm elections, which would hamstring Milei’s ability to implement his agenda. This created an economic panic, with investors dumping the peso and liquidating other Argentine assets.

Milei has desperately attempted to keep inflation in check. Last week Argentina’s “central bank spent more than $1 billion to shore up the peso.” But Argentina was running out of foreign currency. That spelled trouble for Citrone.

Then Bessent and the Trump administration came to the rescue, floating a $20 billion economic package that helped stabilize the Argentine peso and functioned as a political lifeline for Milei.

In early September, days before Bessent’s announcement, Citrone purchased more Argentine bonds.

Bessent’s personal and professional relationship with Citrone has spanned decades. In a May 14 appearance on the “Goldman Sachs Exchanges” podcast, Citrone revealed how he delivered a financial windfall for Bessent. They were both working for investor George Soros in 2013 when Citrone convinced Bessent and Soros to bet on the US dollar against the Japanese yen.

I think there’s special times every five or ten years where there’s a really spectacular trade in investment that we then will concentrate in a meaningful way. 2013, the dollar-yen, where we made over a billion dollars long dollar-yen. And, in fact, you know, we discussed it quite a bit with George, and I kind of convinced George and Scott Bessent at the time to go big in that. And, you know, Scott says I’m responsible for 75 percent of his bonus at Soros, kind of jokingly, over that time.

CE Noticias Financieras, a leading Latin American economic publication, describes Citrone as “a friend of the Secretary of the Treasury.” El Cronista, citing government sources, reported that Citrone “has a personal relationship as well as a past working relationship” with Bessent.

Citrone has also reportedly leveraged his relationship with Bessent to gain access to Trump. According to CE Noticias Financieras, in November, “Citrone gave a case of four red wines to Javier Milei during his visit to Mar-A-Lago, in Palm Beach, in his first meeting with Trump.”

When Argentina’s economy began to falter in April, it was Citrone who “intervened before Scott Bessent…to advocate for an IMF agreement with Argentina,” CE Noticias Financieras reported. Bessent subsequently played a key role in convincing the IMF to extend a separate $20 billion currency stabilization package. (That package ultimately proved insufficient to stabilize the Argentine peso.)

Shortly after the IMF deal was secured, Bessent traveled to Argentina to meet with Milei and other top Argentine officials. It was an unusual choice for the Treasury Secretary’s first foreign trip. Citrone arrived in Argentina at the same time as Bessent, meeting with Milei just before Bessent. During those meetings, Bessent emphasized US support for Argentina’s economic agenda.

Bessent’s September 24 announcement, thus far, has had the desired impact, increasing the value of Argentine assets, including bonds, stocks, and the peso. “It has helped tremendously that the US has come in to support Milei, and it will pay dividends for the US strategically,” Citrone said in an interview with Bloomberg.

Whether the US improves the prospects over the long term is a separate question. Propping up the value of the Argentine currency beyond what the market will support with yet another influx of foreign currency gives wealthy Argentines an opportunity to cash out. The Argentine elite now have the ability to convert their peso assets into dollars and move them abroad. This phenomenon, known as “capital flight,” is why the previous IMF bailout package proved insufficient.

Discovery Capital did not immediately return a request for comment about Citrone’s role in securing the US assistance package for Argentina.

Another overlooked aspect of the rescue package is the role of the organizers of the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), an influential right-wing political group.

In November 2024, shortly after Trump’s election, key CPAC officials, including Matt Schlapp and Mercedes Schlapp, founded a new lobbying firm called Tactic Global. This is the same group that organized CPAC Argentina in December 2024, an event that featured Milei, Lara Trump, and other right-wing luminaries. CPAC has long played a key role in Trump’s political operation.

In February 2025, Tactic Global began representing the Argentine government as a foreign agent. According to the filing, “Tactic will serve as a liason [sic] between Presidencia de la Nacion de la Republica Argentina and its counterparts in the U.S. Tactic will coordinate meetings between officials of the two countries and offer strategic counsel to the Secretaria de Inteligencia de Estado.”

The contract specifies that Argentina pays Tactic $10,000 per month.

Tactic Global’s official name is Tactic COC because its parent company is COC Global Enterprise. Leonardo Scaturice, an Argentinian businessman and lobbyist who lives in the United States, is the chairman and CEO of COC Global Enterprise and a principal at Tactic Global.

In April 2025, Matt Schlapp traveled with Citrone to meet with Milei and other top Argentine officials, according to news reports. They arrived together in Scaturice’s private jet, a striking black Bombardier Global 5000. Also participating in the meetings was Soledad Cedro, the Managing Director of Tactic Global and the CEO of CPAC Latin America.

Scaturice once worked for Argentine intelligence, which may explain why Tactic Global’s contract was routed through the Argentine Secretariat of Intelligence. More recently, CE Noticias Financieras reported that Barry Bennett, a former Trump advisor and current Tactic Global principal, “became directly involved” in securing the US rescue package.

Although CPAC promotes itself as an “America First” organization, Tactic Global represents not only the government of Argentina but also Kyrgyzstan and Vietnam. After Bessent announced his rescue package for Argentina last week, CPAC promoted the deal on its social media accounts.

412 women faced criminal charge

When Miscarriages Become Crimes

412 women faced criminal charges for pregnancy outcomes. This is what fetal personhood looks like.

Abby Vesoulis

In early June, Sasha, who was around 16 weeks pregnant, started to bleed vaginally. She went to the emergency room, where doctors told her she was suffering from a “subchorionic hemorrhage,” diagnosed her with a “threatened miscarriage,” and sent her home.

A couple of weeks later, Sasha (whose name has been changed to protect her privacy) miscarried a tiny, non-viable, 18-week-old fetus in a South Carolina motel room. She later told a county coroner that she didn’t call for help at the time because she “was scared and did not know what to do.”

As it turned out, she was right to be fearful. The day after her miscarriage, Sasha continued to bleed and suffered from severe abdominal pain, so she returned to the hospital. There, her medical providers reported her to the state’s Department of Social Services, whose staff alerted the county sheriff’s office about a possible “child abuse” case, as they complied with South Carolina’s reporting mandates. According to the hospital, failure to report any suspicion of harm to a fetus, viable or not, can result in the provider being criminally liable. The sheriff’s office began an investigation and eventually found the pregnancy remains in a trash receptacle near the motel. 

The Mayo Clinic estimates that 10 to 20 percent of known pregnancies end in miscarriage. Nonetheless, Sasha was arrested and jailed for the improper disposal of hers. A local abortion fund that had heard about the arrest on the news provided Sasha’s $10,000 bail.

Sasha’s arrest was not an isolated incident. A report released today by Pregnancy Justice—a research, legal, and advocacy group—shows that between June 2022 and June 2024, at least 412 people across the country have been charged for crimes related to their pregnancies, pregnancy losses, or even live births. Sasha’s case is not included in the report because her arrest occurred a year after the researchers’ 2024 cut-off date, as were at least four criminalization cases Mother Jones has identified. But collectively, experts say, these types of arrests show a concerning pattern: Amid a conservative movement to enshrine rights to fetuses, being pregnant is not just a health status. Sometimes, it’s a criminal liability. 

“Four hundred and twelve women were charged with crimes that would not have been crimes if they were not pregnant,” says Dana Sussman, senior vice president at Pregnancy Justice. “That is exactly what happens when we give rights and status to embryos and fetuses.”

The pregnancy-related prosecutions tracked by Pregnancy Justice span 16 states, most having taken place where Republican state legislatures or courts have conferred legal rights to eggs, embryos, and fetuses: a conservative movement known as “fetal personhood.”

The 62 prosecutions that took place before Sasha’s in South Carolina followed a 1997 state supreme court decision that held child endangerment charges also applied to fetuses. In Oklahoma—where Pregnancy Justice identified 112 prosecutions—a state appeals court made a similar decision in 2020. 

Pregnancy Justice counted 192 pregnancy-related prosecutions in Alabama, which was the first state to enshrine rights to unborn children in its constitution via a 2018 ballot measure. The Alabama state supreme court used this ballot measure to support its 2024 decision that even frozen embryos are considered “extrauterine children” with inalienable rights. (This ruling had vast implications for Alabama fertility clinics, some of which paused IVF services out of fear they’d be held liable for the “wrongful death” of embryos on ice. Facing backlash, Republicans spoke out in support of IVF. Alabama subsequently passed a law shielding fertility providers from liability.)

Roughly 90 percent of the charges catalogued by Pregnancy Justice accuse pregnant women of abuse, neglect, or endangerment—accusations that are bolstered by the conservative perception of fetuses having the same rights as children that result from live births.

Many of the abuse, neglect, and endangerment cases involved allegations of substance use during pregnancy. Evidence of meth and cocaine use was noted in some of the charging documents, according to Pregnancy Justice. So was the presence of marijuana, nicotine, and alcohol. In 68 of the cases, the nonprofit says, the only substance use alleged was marijuana. 

Some defendants were charged for pregnancies they did not know existed. This was the case for Catherine, a 31-year-old woman in Alabama, who was arrested in 2023 for a pregnancy-related drug charge.

Catherine, who asked not to be identified by her last name, previously spoke to Mother Jones reporter Madison Pauly about her years-long ordeal. She said what began one day in 2021 as severe stomach pain quickly escalated to an intensity that led her to collapse in her bathroom, where she lay on the floor surrounded by blood and holding a stillborn baby. After calling 911 and being transported to a local hospital, law enforcement confiscated her phone, and the nurses asked for her password. They all were seeking evidence in order to charge her with “chemical endangerment” of her “unborn child.” 

For many reasons, Catherine said she was shocked. She never tried to hide that she had a controlled substance in her system. (She admitted to battling drug addiction.) Nor was she trying to hide a pregnancy. 

“I never knew that I was pregnant,” she told Mother Jones. “My body never showed signs. I never gained weight. I felt completely normal.”

Generally, most health experts would recommend that individuals battling substance abuse try to avoid becoming pregnant. But in real life, Sussman says, the scenarios are often far more nuanced. Some investigations have arisen from pregnant individuals using medications they had been prescribed; there have even been cases in which mothers who consumed poppy seed bagels were falsely charged with opioid abuse. In circumstances where pregnant women are actively battling addictions to substances like methamphetamines or fentanyl, Sussman argues that criminalization can be more harmful than helpful.

 “Criminalization does not improve health outcomes,” Sussman says. “Ensuring that people can access prenatal care and go to the hospital when they need to, without worrying that they will be charged with a crime—that is the best intervention possible.”

A law Tennessee passed in 2014 illustrates the risks of criminalization. The statute allowed prosecutors to bring aggravated assault charges against women for using illicit narcotic drugs while pregnant, with penalties of potentially up to 15 years in prison. 

While the law intended to reduce Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome and other complications, reproductive care advocates such as Pregnancy Justice say it discouraged pregnant people from seeking prenatal care or drug treatment, out of fear of prosecution.

According to a review by the Georgetown Law Journal, there was a “sharp decline in the receipt of prenatal care” around the time the fetal endangerment law was implemented, and fetal deaths increased. The law was also seen as being responsible for having a disproportionate impact on women in poverty and those with more limited access to treatment programs. As a result, the law was sunsetted in 2016. 

The Trump administration’s recent amplification of a narrow research study suggesting that acetaminophen use during pregnancy can cause autism gives Pregnancy Justice additional concerns about what else could make pregnant women vulnerable to prosecution in the future. “We are moving into a place, potentially, where pregnant people’s behavior and exposure of their pregnancy to any risk—whether perceived or actual, justified by science or not—can further diminish their rights,” Sussman says. 

As seen with both Sasha and Catherine, medical facilities and personnel potentially can play a significant role in the pregnancy criminalization surveillance system. In 264 of the 412 prosecutions Pregnancy Justice tracked between 2022 and 2024, health care providers contributed information to police that eventually was used as evidence against the defendants during their prosecutions. 

Brittany Watts is one example. In September 2023, she repeatedly went to her local hospital in Ohio after her water broke prematurely. Her 22-week-old fetus registered a heartbeat, but doctors determined it was nonviable. Despite physician concerns that Watts could contract sepsis, hemorrhage, or even die, staff at the hospital delayed inducing her as they awaited input from the hospital’s ethics board. (Ohio banned abortion at 22 weeks.) Over the course of two days, Watts waited 18 hours at the hospital for an induction that never came. Frustrated by the delays, she went home to be more comfortable.

Less than 48 hours later, she miscarried in the toilet, attempted to flush, and returned to the hospital, where she was treated for dehydration and blood loss. But hospital staff also took it upon themselves to report Watts to the police. 

“The nurse comes in and she’s rubbing my back and talking to me and saying, ‘Everything’s going to be OK. You’re going to be OK,'” Watts told CBS News last year in her first sit-down interview. “Little do I know, there’s a police officer who comes into the room a short time later. And I’m wondering, ‘Why is a police officer coming in here? I don’t recall doing anything wrong.’ And little do I know, the nurse comforting me and saying that everything was gonna be OK was the one who called the police.”

As Watts lay in a hospital bed, police searched her home, where they rummaged through her trash and disassembled her toilet to find evidence of the fetal remains, investigatory files obtained through public records requests show. 

Photos taken by police as a part of the investigation reveal what anyone who has endured the trauma of a pregnancy loss might expect: blood-stained pants, soiled rags, a drug store receipt for Tylenol, and a discarded hospital bracelet. For the purported crime of experiencing a pregnancy loss in her bathroom, Watts could have faced a year in prison. Instead, a grand jury declined to indict her, leading prosecutors to drop the charges against her.

Amari Marsh risked a much longer sentence for her 2023 home miscarriage. Prosecutors initially charged the South Carolina woman with homicide through child abuse. Police erroneously suspected she had tried to induce an abortion. They also claimed that a proximate cause of death was her not removing the fetus from the toilet fast enough. An autopsy later determined that an infection had caused the pregnancy loss, and a grand jury declined to indict Marsh. Had she been convicted, she could have faced 20 years to life in prison.

Fueling the issue, Sussman argues, is the public’s lack of knowledge around miscarriages: “How common it is, what it looks like, where it happens, how it happens.” Law enforcement might find something suspicious that is, in fact, “completely normal,” she says.

Pregnant women also can be in the dark, Sussman notes: “No one is given a pamphlet in their doctor’s office when they go for their first prenatal appointment that’s like, ‘By the way, if you miscarry, here’s the number to call, here’s the coroner’s office that you’re required to call.'”

Even when charges don’t result in convictions, pregnancy-related prosecutions can have enduring consequences for those accused. In a civil lawsuit Watts recently filed against the city that prosecuted her and the hospital that she went to for medical help, Watts claims to have suffered “deprivation of liberty, reputational harm, public humiliation, distress, pain, and suffering, for which she is entitled to compensatory damages, including damages for mental and emotional distress.”

And in the midst of dealing with legal issues, some women who have been prosecuted for pregnancy-related crimes are also mourning pregnancies they lost. According to her civil suit, Watts’ pregnancy was “very much wanted.” Catherine, who is in remission from drug addiction, says she misses her stillborn daughter every day. Sasha and her lawyer declined to be interviewed while her case is active, but in police records, she asserts that she was taking prenatal vitamins—another indication that she, too, was trying to have a healthy pregnancy.

Contained in these stories, experts say, is a painful irony. Pregnant women who fear becoming the next Watts, Catherine, or Sasha may choose to forgo medical help altogether, risking even worse outcomes for both them and their fetuses. “It’s not surprising,” Sussman says, “that the states that represent a lot of the arrests also have poor infant health outcomes.”

Wholesale Destruction

Trump and His Minions Are Eyeing “Wholesale Destruction” of Environmental Science

And they may seek to use a government shutdown as the pretext.

Jessica McKenzie

The United States is hurtling towards a potential government shutdown if Congress does not pass a budget or short-term funding bill by the end of the month, and the fate of the federal government’s Earth and climate science programs may hang in the balance.

President Donald Trump has proposed vast, devastating cuts to these agencies, many of which target programs dedicated to studying and preparing for climate change. In the event of a shutdown, the Office of Management and Budget, or OMB, has told agencies to consider layoffs or reductions in force for “all employees” in all “programs, projects, or activities” with lapsed funding that are “not consistent with the President’s priorities.”

As Sophia Cai notes in Politico, this is starkly different from how previous government shutdowns were handled, when federal workers were temporarily furloughed and returned to work when funding was restored. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer characterized the memo as an “attempt at intimidation.”

Bobby Kogan, a former OMB official with the Biden administration, said the direction may not be legal. “It doesn’t seem to me that they would really be able to legally do that additional work during a shutdown—and it doesn’t seem to me that they’d be able to get it all done beforehand,” Kogan told the Federal News Network. “So either this is something they were planning to do anyway, and they are just using this as a pretext, or it’s a threat to try to get what they want.”

Organizations that represent the interests of public workers have been more explicit: “The plan to exploit a shutdown to purge federal workers is illegal, unconstitutional, and deeply disturbing,” Tim Whitehouse, the executive director of Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, said in a statement. “A shutdown triggers furloughs, not firings. To weaponize it as a tool to destroy the civil service would mark a dangerous slide into lawlessness and further consolidate power in the Executive Branch.”

But illegality (or possible illegality) would not necessarily stop the Trump administration from choosing the layoff route if a budget deal is not reached. In any case, the memo obviously creates uncertainty and anxiety for the federal scientists whose work has been singled out for steep funding cuts or even elimination by the Trump administration.

“Either we all go home or it’s business as usual…nobody knows what’s going to happen,” one NASA scientist, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, told the Bulletin.

Earlier this year, the president submitted a budget request to Congress that would slash NASA’s overall 2026 budget by 24 percent. It is the clearest indication of what his priorities are going into a possible government shutdown. The steepest cuts were within science programs, which the president proposed reducing by more than 46 percent. Funding for Earth science programs specifically would be cut by more than half.

Proposed cuts to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) research are also severe, outright eliminating the entire budget for climate research, weather and air chemistry research, and the Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research (OAR). (In addition to cuts to Earth and climate science, the proposed budget recommends cutting all funding for habitat conservation and research, as well as ocean, coastal, and Great Lakes research.)

Although the White House recommended cutting NOAA’s budget by up to 30 percent, members of the House Appropriations Committee have recommended a much smaller cut of 6 percent. But by telling agencies to conduct layoffs based on the president’s priorities, the Trump administration could try to preempt Congress and reshape the federal government in line with their own vision and budget proposal during a shutdown.

Even without a government shutdown, a third of the US Geological Survey’s Climate Adaptation Science Centers could wind down or cease operations this week because the Interior Department is refusing to submit paperwork to release funding.

“This is a dismantling of efforts in the United States on climate science, and in fact, in large swaths of environmental science. And I don’t think that people know that,” Elisabeth Moyer, an atmospheric scientist at the University of Chicago, told the Bulletin. “This is wholesale destruction, what’s proposed.”

There are at least 14 NASA Earth science missions that the Trump administration has proposed terminating. These include an array of satellite-related research (see: NASA missions at risk under the Trump administration).

The worst-case scenario would be if the government shuts down and agencies begin to comply with the administration’s budget proposal, including the termination of missions. According to a NASA scientist, people have already been instructed to do the preparatory work for ending these satellite and instrument programs, so this is not an impossibility.

The list of projects and programs that the Trump administration has proposed terminating at NOAA is, frankly, shocking. It includes the National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, which conducts wide-ranging research on everything from aquaculture to corals to pollution; the National Coastal Resilience Fund; Habitat Conservation and Restoration; and OAR’s Regional Climate Data and Information program, which helps communities develop plans for dealing with climate crises like droughts and heat waves.

The budget also recommends terminating funding for OAR’s Climate Laboratories and Cooperative Institutes, which would result in the closure of the Atlantic Oceanographic & Meteorological Laboratory; the Air Resources Laboratory; the Chemical Sciences Laboratory; the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory; the Global Monitoring Laboratory; the Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory; and the Physical Sciences Laboratory.

NOAA has already been hard hit under the Trump administration this year. Rick Spinrad, a NOAA administrator under President Biden, said the agency has lost around 2,000 of its 12,000 employees to layoffs, buyouts, resignations, and retirement this year. (Exact figures are remarkably hard to find, but in March the New York Times reported that the agency was planning to fire another 1,000 workers in addition to the 1,300 workers that had already resigned or been laid off.) Some of the vacancies within the National Weather Service (which is part of NOAA) have resulted in reduced operations at some forecasting stations across the country.

Monica Medina, a principal deputy administrator of NOAA in the Obama administration, compared the work the National Weather Service does to issue weather forecasts to a mosaic. “When you cut holes in the mosaic…you’re losing pixels, and so the picture gets fuzzier,” she said. “It has an impact on people’s lives and their livelihoods. When key vacancies happen, when we cut holes, we are really hurting our civil defenses.”

The Trump administration has already withheld or rescinded several hundred million in funding for NOAA operations this year, Spinrad said. The Senate Appropriations Committee has been tracking federal funding that the Trump administration has frozen or cancelled (last updated September 8) totaling more than $400 million in NOAA funds, including those earmarked for disaster response and the procurement of weather radars and satellites.

“There are programs like the phased array radar program that have been pulled back—that was undoubtedly going to be one of the most important efforts in trying to improve observational capability for the National Weather Service,” Spinrad said. “So many of those kinds of programs are suffering, and that’s just what’s been done in [fiscal year] ‘25, I’m not even talking about the ‘26 budget.”

“We are not talking about trying to find water on Mars,” Medina said. “We are talking about understanding what’s happening on our planet, impacting people in their day to day lives today. We could be improving that in the face of these forces that are changing in our global environment. And instead, we’re taking away funding at the very moment when we need it most.”

Obviously has a small dick.....

Hegseth Uses Extraordinary Meeting to Fat-Shame Generals

The US military’s top brass were silent as the secretary ordered a return to the “highest male standard.”

Inae Oh

More than 800 members of the US military’s top brass, including hundreds of generals and admirals, gathered for an extraordinary meeting in Quantico, Virginia, on Tuesday, where they were greeted by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s order to return to “the highest male standard” in military fitness tests and training exercises.

In the same breath, Hegseth disparaged women serving in the military, claiming they were physically incapable of meeting the same physical standards.

“I don’t want my son serving alongside troops who are out of shape or in combat units with females who can’t meet the same combat arms physical standards as men,” Hegseth said as the crowd remained virtually silent throughout the meeting. The former Fox weekend host included references to “woke garbage” and fat-shaming—”It’s completely unacceptable to see fat generals and admirals”—before all but announcing an end to formal processes that allow military personnel to register complaints of abuse.

“We are overhauling an inspector general process that has been weaponized, putting complainers and poor performers in the driver’s seat,” he said. “We are doing the same with the equal opportunity policies. No more frivolous complaints, no more anonymous complaints.”

A similar silence greeted President Donald Trump as he aired a characteristically discursive speech that at turns featured self-praise for his decision to send the National Guard to Portland, Orgeon, suggesting that such cities be used as “training grounds” for the military, misguided claims that he ended eight world wars, love for his own signature, and comparisons of “nuclear” power to the “n-word.”

Together, the dual speeches appeared to confirm suspicions leading up to Tuesday’s meeting that the country’s top military commanders were being forced from their posts around the world in order to attend what essentially boiled down to a MAGA pep rally—absent the cheering crowds.

What can go wrong?

‘No driver, no hands, no clue’: Driverless car pulled over on Bay Area road

By Gillian Mohney

Police were left baffled last week after pulling over a car without anyone behind the wheel in San Bruno. Officers were taking part in DUI enforcement when they observed a Waymo car making an illegal U-turn right in front of them.

They pulled the car over, but since it had no human occupants, they were unable to issue a ticket. Driverless cars are unable to be cited for traffic violations unless there is a human safety driver in the vehicle.

San Bruno police wrote in a social media post Saturday they alerted Waymo to the “glitch” and that their citation books don’t have a box for “robot.” 

“Hopefully the reprogramming will keep it from making any more illegal moves,” police wrote in the post. 

In an emailed statement to SFGATE, Waymo said it was investigating the incident. 

“Waymo’s autonomous driving system, the Waymo Driver, is designed to respect the rules of the road. We are looking into this situation and are committed to improving road safety through our ongoing learnings and experience,” Waymo spokesperson Julia Ilina told SFGATE. 

Waymo has quickly expanded its footprint in the Bay Area after officially debuting in San Francisco in 2024. The company’s white Jaguars have become a ubiquitous sight on Bay Area streets in recent years and even an attraction for visiting tourists. Waymo was recently granted approval to operate at San Francisco Airport. 

Accused of mailing abortion pills

Louisiana issues a warrant to arrest California doctor accused of mailing abortion pills

By SARA CLINE and GEOFF MULVIHILL

Louisiana is pursuing a criminal case against another out-of-state doctor accused of mailing abortion pills to a patient in the state, court documents filed this month revealed.

A warrant for the arrest of a California doctor is a rare charge of violating one of the state abortion bans that has taken effect since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022 and allowed enforcement.

It represents an additional front in a growing legal battle between liberal and conservative states over prescribing abortion medications via telehealth and mailing them to patients.

Pills are the most common way abortions are accessed in the U.S., and are a major reason that, despite the bans, abortion numbers rose last year, according to a report.

A Louisiana woman says she was forced to take abortion drugs

Louisiana said in a court case filed Sept. 19 that it had issued a warrant for a California-based doctor who it says provided pills to a Louisiana woman in 2023.

Both the woman, Rosalie Markezich, and the state attorney's general, are seeking to be part of a lawsuit that seeks to order drug regulators to bar telehealth prescriptions to mifepristone, one of the two drugs usually used in combination for medication abortions.

In court filings, Markezich says her boyfriend at the time used her email address to order drugs from Dr. Remy Coeytaux, a California physician, and sent her $150, which she forwarded to Coeytaux. She said she had no other contact with the doctor.

She said she did not want to take the pills but felt forced to and said in the filing that “the trauma of my chemical abortion still haunts me” and that it would not have happened if telehealth prescriptions to the drug were off limits.

The accusation builds on a position taken by anti-abortion groups: That allowing abortion pills to be prescribed by phone or video call and filled by mail opens the door to women being coerced to take them.

“Rosalie is bravely representing many woman who are victimized by the illegal, immoral, and unethical conduct of these drug dealers,” Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill said in a statement.

The doctor also faces a lawsuit in Texas

Murrill's office did not immediately answer questions about what charges Coeytaux faces, or when the warrant was issued. But under the state's ban on abortions at all stages of pregnancy, physicians convicted of providing abortion face up to 15 years in prison and $200,000 in fines.

Coeytaux is also the target of a lawsuit filed in July in federal court by a Texas man who says the doctor illegally provided his girlfriend with abortion pills.

Email and a telephone message seeking comment were left for Coeytaux.

The combination of a Louisiana criminal case and a Texas civil case over abortion pills is also playing out surrounding a New York doctor, Margaret Carpenter. New York authorities are refusing to extradite Carpenter to Louisiana or to enforce for Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton the $100,000 civil judgment against her.

In the Louisiana case, officials said a pregnant minor’s mother requested the abortion medication online and directed her daughter to take them. The mother was arrested, pleaded not guilty and was released on bond.

New York officials cite a law there that seeks to protect medical providers who prescribe abortion medications to patients in states with abortion bans — or where such prescriptions by telehealth violate the law.

New York and California are among the eight states that have shield laws with such provisions, according to a tally by the Guttmacher Institute, a research organization that supports abortion rights.

The Abortion Coalition of Telemedicine said they “fully expect” California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, to uphold his state’s shield law in the new case.

Murrill told The Associated Press that she will sue governors whose shield laws “purport to protect these individuals from criminal conduct” in Louisiana.

The legal and political fight over abortion pills is expanding

The legal filings that revealed the Louisiana charge against Coeytaux are part of an effort for Louisiana, along with Florida and Texas, to join a lawsuit filed last year by the Republican attorneys general for Idaho, Kansas and Missouri to roll back federal approvals for mifepristone.

This year, both Louisiana and Texas have adopted laws to target out-of-state providers of abortion pills.

The Louisiana law lets patients who receive abortions sue providers and others. The Texas law goes further and allows anyone to sue those who prescribe such pills in the state.

Both Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Marty Makary have said they are conducting a full review of mifepristone’s safety and effectiveness.

Medication abortion has been available in the U.S. since 2000, when the Food and Drug Administration approved the use of mifepristone.

A group of 19 Democratic state attorneys general on Monday issued a statement saying that mifepristone is safe and expressing concern over an FDA review, which some Republican attorneys general had called for.

The Abortion Coalition of Telemedicine reiterated in a statement to The Associated Press that the medication is safe and an “essential part of women's healthcare.”

The nationwide organization, co-founded by Carpenter, described Louisiana's legal actions against Coeytaux as “extreme” and said it is an attempt to “intimidate healthcare providers."

Murrill described the “unlawful distribution” of the pills in Louisiana as “dangerous,” adding that she will use “any legal means available" to hold accountable those who violate the state's abortion laws.

They need to be burned, and the plants....

Illegal cannabis farm found surrounding protected California trees

By Lester Black

California’s world-famous Joshua trees face a long list of threats, from climate change to human development in the vast deserts east of Los Angeles. Scientists have predicted that, without help, this iconic tree of the American Southwest may become extinct by the end of the century. Recently, state officials found a new risk to this protected tree: illegal cannabis farming. 

In August, an eradication team with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife raided an illegal marijuana farm, where it found pot plants growing around the shaggy bark of Joshua trees in rural San Bernardino County, as well as illegally diverted water and a banned pesticide. 

Sarah Sol, a Fish and Wildlife spokesperson, said the cannabis growers were harming the trees by siphoning off their necessary water supply, clearing native shrubs and using harmful banned pesticides like methamidophos. That pesticide has been linked to killing wildlife around cannabis farms, according to the Department of Justice.

“Western Joshua trees are ecologically and culturally important in California, and we are really working to conserve them,” Sol said in an email to SFGATE. “Joshua trees are sensitive, and they’re being affected by a lot of things already, such as climate change, larger and more intense wildfires, invasive plants and droughts.”

Joshua trees are the largest plants in the yucca genus, which includes many desert-dwelling plants like the Mojave yucca. Joshua trees are not yet officially endangered, but they are protected by a 2023 state law that limits how they can be destroyed and forbids anyone from taking the plants without prior authorization from Fish and Wildlife.

Illicit cannabis farms still dot California’s millions of acres of wild lands, even after California voters legalized cannabis in 2016. The illegal cannabis grow near the Joshua trees was found during a multi-agency project that raided six illegal sites in July and August, which resulted in the eradication of 21,000 plants and the removal of more than 2,300 pounds of trash. The majority of the sites were connected to organized crime, according to Fish and Wildlife. 

The pussy and the pussy play "Big Man"... They are fucking insane....

Trump and Hegseth declare an end to 'politically correct' leadership in the US military

By BEN FINLEY, KONSTANTIN TOROPIN and EVAN VUCCI

President Donald Trump revealed that he wants to use American cities as training grounds for the armed forces and joined Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Tuesday in declaring an end to “woke” culture before an unusual gathering of hundreds of top U.S. military officials who were abruptly summoned to Virginia from around the world.

Hegseth announced new directives for troops that include “gender-neutral” or “male-level” standards for physical fitness, while Trump bragged about U.S. nuclear capabilities and warned that “America is under invasion from within.”

“After spending trillions of dollars defending the borders of foreign countries, with your help we’re defending the borders of our country,” Trump said.

Hegseth had called military leaders to the Marine Corps base in Quantico, near Washington, without publicly revealing the reason until this morning. His address largely focused on his own long-used talking points that painted a picture of a military that has been hamstrung by “woke” policies, and he said military leaders should “do the honorable thing and resign” if they don’t like his new approach.

Meetings between top military brass and civilian leaders are nothing new, but the gathering had fueled intense speculation about the summit’s purpose given the haste with which it was called and the mystery surrounding it.

Admirals and generals from conflict zones in the Middle East and elsewhere were summoned for a lecture on race and gender in the military, underscoring the extent to which the country’s culture wars have emerged as a front-and-center agenda item for Hegseth’s Pentagon, even at a time of broad national security concerns across the globe.

‘We will not be politically correct’

Trump is used to boisterous crowds of supporters who laugh at his jokes and applaud his boasts during his speeches. But he wasn't getting that kind of soundtrack from the generals and admirals in attendance.

In keeping with the nonpartisan tradition of the armed services, the military leaders sat mostly stone-faced through Trump’s politicized remarks, a contrast from when rank-and-file soldiers cheered during Trump’s speech at Fort Bragg this summer.

During his nearly hour-long speech, Hegseth said the U.S. military has promoted too many leaders for the wrong reasons based on race, gender quotas and “historic firsts.”

“The era of politically correct, overly sensitive don’t-hurt-anyone’s-feelings leadership ends right now at every level,” Hegseth said.

That was echoed by Trump, who said “the purposes of America military is not to protect anyone’s feelings. It’s to protect our republic.″

″We will not be politically correct when it comes to defending American freedom,” Trump said. “And we will be a fighting and winning machine.”

Loosening disciplinary rules

Hegseth said he is loosening disciplinary rules and weakening hazing protections, putting a heavy focus on removing many of the guardrails the military had put in place after numerous scandals and investigations.

He said he was ordering a review of “the department’s definitions of so-called toxic leadership, bullying and hazing to empower leaders to enforce standards without fear of retribution or second guessing.”

The defense secretary called for “changes to the retention of adverse information on personnel records that will allow leaders with forgivable, earnest, or minor infractions to not be encumbered by those infractions in perpetuity.”

“People make honest mistakes, and our mistakes should not define an entire career,” Hegseth said. “Otherwise, we only try not to make mistakes.”

Bullying and toxic leadership has been the suspected and confirmed cause behind numerous military suicides over the past several years, including the very dramatic suicide of Brandon Caserta, a young sailor who was bullied into killing himself in 2018.

A Navy investigation found that Caserta’s supervisor’s “noted belligerence, vulgarity and brash leadership was likely a significant contributing factor in (the sailor)’s decision to end his own life.”

Gender-neutral physical standards

Hegseth used the platform to slam environmental policies and transgender troops while talking up his and Trump's focus on “the warrior ethos” and “peace through strength.”

Hegseth said the department has been told from previous administrations that “our diversity is our strength,” which he called an “insane fallacy.”

“They had to put out dizzying DEI and LGBTQE+ statements. They were told females and males are the same thing, or that males who think they’re females is totally normal,” he said, adding the use of electric tanks and the COVID vaccine requirements to the list as mistaken policies.

Hegseth said this is not about preventing women from serving.

“But when it comes to any job that requires physical power to perform in combat, those physical standards must be high and gender neutral,” he said. “If women can make it excellent, if not, it is what it is. If that means no women qualify for some combat jobs, so be it. That is not the intent, but it could be the result.”

Hegseth's speech came as the country faces a potential government shutdown this week and as Hegseth, who has hammered home a focus on lethality, has taken several unusual and unexplained actions, including ordering cuts to the number of general officers and firings of other top military leaders.

Hegseth has championed the military’s role in securing the U.S.-Mexico border, deploying to American cities as part of Trump’s law enforcement surges, and carrying out strikes on boats in the Caribbean that the administration says targeted drug traffickers.